COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective
“Supportive data comparisons suggest the existing COVID-19 fatality data, which has been so influential upon public policy, may be substantially compromised regarding accuracy and integrity, and illegal under existing federal laws.”
October 2020 | Authors: Henry Ealy, Michael McEvoy, Daniel Chong, John Nowicki, Monica Sava, Sandeep Gupta, David White, James Jordan, Daniel Simon, Paul Anderson | ResearchGate | Source |
Abstract
“This historical retrospective will provide a timeline summary of events to help the reader orient themselves to many aspects of the crisis previously unknown and will discuss the significance of the March 24, 2020 COVID- 19 Alert No. 2 that had a dramatic impact upon cause of death reporting numbers. Supportive data comparisons suggest the existing COVID-19 fatality data, which has been so influential upon public policy, may be substantially compromised regarding accuracy and integrity, and illegal under existing federal laws. If the fatality data being presented by the CDC is illegally inflated, then all public health policies based upon them would be immediately null and void.”
Conclusion
“Arguing over what the most accurate COVID fatality count may be is an exercise in futility without intimate knowledge of case history and accompanying certificates of death, and it is the exact reason we entrust these determinations to the skill of our licensed professionals. With the inclusion of probable fatalities and significant changes made to how certificates of death are recorded exclusively for COVID-19 , scientific objectivity demands that we acknowledge the data presented is inaccurate.
Federal agencies have a legal obligation to provide the most accurate data to the public, fellow agencies, and policy makers they are advising, and they have a responsibility to abide by every federal law. This responsibility to collect, analyze, and publish data accurately, transparently, and with unquestionable integrity increases exponentially during a national crisis.
It is concerning that the CDC may have willfully failed to collect, analyze, and publish accurate data used by elected officials to develop public health policy for a nation in crisis.
Further federal investigation is justified by the magnitude of the crisis and the collateral damage generated by policies based upon projection data that was unproven and never peer reviewed. If the data being reported was indeed compromised by the CDC’s perplexing decision to abandon proven data collection and reporting practices in favor of untested methods, then all public health policies based upon these inaccurate data must be reexamined.”
COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective.pdf
Link To Article_”Before COVID, Gates Planned Social Media Censorship of Vaccine Safety Advocates With Pharma, CDC, Media, China and CIA” – Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
“CDC has supported China CDC’s national influenza laboratory for more than 20 years.” Link
“The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the government of China have collaborated for the past 30 years addressing public health priorities affecting the U.S., China, and the world. Through the decades, the CDC China office has evolved the focus of its technical assistance towards strengthening global health security. As the country improved it’s ability to prevent, detect and respond to disease outbreaks, the government of China has been able to provide global health security support to other countries.”
Link To Source_china_fact-sheet
How the CDC is manipulating data to prop-up “vaccine effectiveness”
Attorney sues CDC and HHS over Covid-19 tyranny, urges Americans to resist
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Link
Link To Full Document_spars-pandemic-scenario
October 18, 2019 |
An event hosted by The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
