PCR Swab Analysis / ABRASIVE “PORCUPINE” SWABS: DR. ANTONIETTA GATTI’S RESEARCH ON COVID SWAB ELEMENTAL COMPOSITION
August 24, 2021 | Tim Truth | Link To Video | Photo Image Source |
“The irritating result: the PCR test swabs are made of hard materials and contain a variety of (nano) particles made of silver, aluminium, titanium, glass fibres ect, many of which are undeclared in the package leaflet. When they enter the mucous membrane, they can cause wounds and inflammation, the scientist said.” Link
About Antonietta Gatti Bio
What is in the PCR Tests? | Evolve To Ecology | Link
“The experimental physicist and biomaterial researcher Dr Antonietta Gatti examined various PCR test rods under the microscope and analysed their ingredients. Antonietta M. Gatti, Ph.D. is also the coordinator of the Italian Institute of Technology’s Project of Nanoecotoxicology, called INESE.
The irritating result: the PCR test swabs are made of hard materials and contain a variety of (nano) particles made of silver, aluminium, titanium, glass fibres ect, many of which are undeclared in the package leaflet. When they enter the mucous membrane, they can cause wounds and inflammation, the scientist said. ENT doctors told 2020News that they are finding more hardened mucous membranes in people who are often tested for SARS-CoV-2. No longer intact mucous membranes can no longer fulfil their task of repelling viruses, bacteria and fungi before they reach the airways, as the pediatrician Eugen Janzen also reports. The germs thus penetrate into the airways without any immune filter. Particularly problematic in this context: the warm breath moisture under the masks is the ideal breeding ground for germs of all kinds.
Prof. Gatti has analyzed in the laboratory various types of smear swabs used for the collection of human organic material for PCR diagnostics using electron microscopy (ESEM and EDS) to check the morphology and chemical composition.
For Prof. Gatti, a “cotton” stick from Biocomma in Shenzhen, China, could not determine whether it was made of carbon or cotton. The dirt in the product consisted of calcium corbonate, stainless steel or silicates.
A brush-like test stick from Manta, China, had a variety of broken fibers. Carbon, oxygen, silicone, zirconium, sulfur, aluminum, titanium and sodium were found as components of the sample.
Another swab from Biocomma seemed to consist of fiberglass or at least a coating of fiberglass. Components were carbon, oxygen, aluminum, silicone and titanium. It could not be ruled out that an additional coating consisted of organic materials.
The tip of the applicator of another test stick – FLOQSwabs® – was coated with short nylon® fibers arranged vertically. FLOQSwabs® have no inner core to enclose the sample.
Prof. Gatti writes: “The company explains that the fiber core is made of nylon with a coating of a patented material that turns out to be silicate-zirconium titanium in the analysis. This coating makes the fiber harder so that it is able to tear the mucous membrane. There is a possibility that the pressure applied to the smear maneuvers may break some fibers that remain in situ. If this is the case, they can cause a foreign body reaction that can damage the mucous membrane in such a way that breathing and speech are hindered.”
According to Prof. Gatti’s analysis, the small white dots on the image of the swab neck are silver nanoparticles: “Silver is a material that is not declared in the manufacturer’s data sheet.”
Prof. Gatti comes to the following conclusions:
“The “porcupine” swabs are made of hard fibers. If they scrape on the nasal mucosa, they can damage it, causing a bleeding lesion or, in any case, tissue trauma.
During the healing process of the mucous membrane, the broken fibers can penetrate the tissue without any possibility of removing them, thus causing the formation of a granuloma or fibrotic tissue, as happens with any foreign body.
The medical devices examined are not fully biocompatible and therefore do not meet the requirements of ISO 10993 and the tests required to obtain the CE mark.
Summarized:
- Some swabs are dangerous for the nasal-throat mucosa. The glass-like fibers, hard and brittle, can scratch the mucous membrane and produce lesions. Bleeding is an expression of the invasiveness of the test.
- Repeated tests with smears can cause chronic lesions. The release of fragments of brittle glass-like fibers can cause biological reactions such as granulomas and/or fibrosis of the tissue.
- These reductions pose a risk to the health of infants and children. If the tests are necessary, Prof. Gatti says, small and mild smears must be carried out in children.
Results from another independent test on PCR swabs in Slovakia.
In Slovakia, in an unnamed hospital laboratory from Bratislava, another independent lab test was done to determine the material on the PCR swab which determined Darpa patented hydrogel, lithium and nylon.
”After spawning a mixture of nylon fiber fragments, Darpa Hydrogel remains on the nasal mucosa under the pituitary and pineal gland along with lithium. This mixture immediately reacts with living structures to form crystals that are directionally oriented to the pineal gland, which has its own electromagnetic field. The shape of the crystals determines the type of hydrogel used. The crystals are conductive due to the lithium contained in it. The crystals can receive the signal from the transmitter to the cell and transmit signals from the cell to the transmitter. These are actually nano-antennas.” LINK
Link To Read Full Article_ What is in the PCR Tests?