photo image: pixabay
Pfizer Vaccine Was Not Approved By The FDA – A Legal And Medical Breakdown
“Games continue to be played with the “vaccine” as the deaths and injuries keep mounting. On Monday, August 23rd the FDA and the federal government announced that the FDA has officially approved the Pfizer mRNA shot. But after careful reading by many doctors and lawyers, the Pfizer “vaccine” has not been approved and the government is playing word games to fool the public.
Dr. Dave Janda stated:
To make matters worse, the FDA did not follow the standard process for vaccine approvals. Peter Doshi senior editor of the British Medical Journal states:
It’s not helping matters that FDA now says it won’t convene its advisory committee to discuss the data ahead of approving Pfizer’s vaccine. (Last August, to address vaccine hesitancy, the agency had “committed to use an advisory committee composed of independent experts to ensure deliberations about authorization or licensure are transparent for the public.”)
Unfortunately to really understand what the FDA, NIH, the federal government and big Pharma has concocted, you need to not only be a doctor, but also a lawyer. A group of legal and medical experts (including Doctor Malone) came together to analyze what has actually been approved and for what purpose. Here is part of their analysis:
According to the FDA: “The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness. (page 2, Pfizer letter)
- here FDA quietly admits that the licensed Pfizer vaccine and the authorized Pfizer vaccine are identical with regard to safety/efficacy, but they are “legally distinct.” That’s code for one has manufacturer liability, while the other doesn’t. It is also code for “we don’t want to impose a mandate on the EUA product cause it is illegal, but we can probably get away with a mandate on the licensed product.”
- page 12 AA (Conditions with Respect to Use of Licensed Product). This tells you that yes, we licensed the vaccine, but…there is a lot of the old vaccine out there, actually “a significant amount” and this amount will be considered an EUA and will continue to be used. o Now, why would they do that? Why specify that identical versions of the product will be legally different? Because they need the license to impose the mandates. But they need the EUA to evade liability.
- Along with the license comes liability for the manufacturer. (While all EUA products were given a liability shield.)
- Unfortunately, our federal governments would prefer us to be without recourse if we are injured, rather than have Pfizer defend its product in court. So, the feds want us to THINK the vaccine we are receiving is licensed, which will make people submit because they think it can now be mandated, but instead we are almost certain to receive the EUA vials instead, to save Pfizer’s behind. Yes, a stingy CICP injury program exists, but it has not paid out for a single COVID vaccine injury yet.
You can read their full analysis here”
Dr. Malone Sounds Alarm On Liability Coverage Of Pfizer Vaccine
Pfizer Seeking Full Indemnification