Posted on

MANDAMUS TO THE COUNTY SHERIFFS — STEWARDS OF THE CONSTITUTION

MANDAMUS TO THE COUNTY SHERIFFS — STEWARDS OF THE CONSTITUTION

Did you know?

“The Sheriff being the Chief Law Enforcement Officer and highest Peace Officer of the entire County in which he was elected is to secure the peace and answers to the People alone.”

This document filed in 2015 outlines a judicial remedy  to restore the rule of law in our Constitutional Republic.

“ONLY THE PEOPLE CAN SAVE AMERICA

And it is the Sheriffs duty to lawfully protect and serve the People”


May 20, 2015 | Unified United States Common Law Grand Jury | NationalLibertyAlliance.org | Source

“The County Sheriff is a Constitutional Officer, elected by the People, bound by oath as guardian of the Peoples’ unalienable rights secured by the Constitution. ” P.3

 

Link To Source__mandamus_to_sheriff

 


 

 

These Sheriffs Are the Difference Between Freedom and Tyranny

Link

 

 

 


 

 

 

Nevada: SHERIFF REFUSES TO ENFORCE SISOLAK CV19 “ORDERS”; “In a free society, such as America was meant to be, masks cannot be forced upon the citizens”-Sheriff Mack

LINK

 

 


 

 

 

Declaration of Independence, Original Constitution for the united States of America, The Buck Act

Link

 

 

 


 

 

YUSEF EL INTERVIEW- WHAT IS A US CITIZEN?

LINK TO VIDEO

 

 

 

 


 

 

Posted on

Mindless lockdowns destroy lives — and our Constitution

Mindless lockdowns destroy lives — and our Constitution

 

February 8, 2021 | By John Yoo and Scott Atlas | NEW YORK POST | Source

“The US Supreme Court on Friday made clear to Team Biden and state governors that the fight against the pandemic doesn’t give them a blank check against individual liberties.

In South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. Newsom, the high court struck down a California emergency regulation that prohibited all indoor religious services. Six justices held that Gov. Gavin Newsom had violated the First Amendment by subjecting religious groups to a complete ban, even while groceries, public transit and retail shops remain open.

Americans accepted a broad — but temporary — lockdown of society to slow the pandemic a year ago. Yet many still live under unprecedented restrictions: business and school closures, travel bans, curfews, quarantines, limits on groups and mask mandates.

Whatever the health benefits of these diktats (and many are questionable), they have been handed down with shocking disregard for the costs: strokes uncared for, cancers left undetected, psychological anguish (especially among young adults), skyrocketing domestic abuse and harm to children from lack of in-person schooling. Unemployment from lockdowns, meanwhile, will cause 890,000 additional US deaths over the next 15 years, according to a recent study.

Lockdowns also inflict great harm upon liberty. Governments overrode the rights to meet, work, speak, worship or organize. Bureaucracies decided which businesses could open and which should die.”

 

Link To Full Article @ Source

 

 


 

 

 

Posted on

Was The Texas Power Grid Hacked?

Was The Texas Power Grid Hacked?

 

Is it possible, in addition to miscalculations of man-made artificial weather (weather modification_WM), that the Texas smart grid could have been hacked?

It’s a well known fact that not-so “smart” grids are extremely vulnerable to hacking.  Fiber-optic cable to the premises (FTTP), for which consumers have already paid, could well replace failed, vulnerable wireless networks, with safe, fast, reliable, energy-efficient, cyber-secure and resilient network systems. -JD

 

Link To_Texas Issues & Weather Modification

 

Link To_A smart grid for water utilities? | Smart Energy International

 

Link To SG_Demo_Project_List_11.24.09

 

SMART Wind Power Plant

 

Link To _Wind Energy A Big Scam

 

 


 

 

Former CIA director James Woolsey warning 2011

‘The “smart” grid is a really stupid grid’   Video

 

 


 

The Danger From The Smart Grid That No One Is Talking About

May 27, 2020 | By Off The Grid News Staff | Source

smart grid

Nobody knows if the smart grid will actually work because it is a totally new technology that no one has ever tried before

Big government’s plans to modernize electricity by creating a smart grid appear to be a recipe for disaster. Consequently, a grid such as this would be more vulnerable to hacking and sabotage.

A smart grid will be more prone to failure because it relies on the cloud – a fragile and complex network of data centers. Therefore, it would be more likely to suffer blackouts than the traditional system.

A traditional electric power grid distributes electricity from power plants to homes and businesses directly through a simple system. In addition, human operators control the traditional grid at a few central locations. The traditional power grid is less vulnerable to sabotage because it is low-tech.

What Is The Smart Grid?

A smart grid [1] is a computerized system in which artificial intelligence (AI) would make the decisions. People call such a system the smart grid because it deploys so-called “smart technology.”

The control systems for this type of grid will be located on the cloud. As a result, they will be more vulnerable to hacking and software glitches. Humans might not be able to access or repair cloud-based systems quickly.

The hope is to optimize the grid’s performance and maximize profits. A smart grid is supposed to maximize performance by having AI send electricity to where it is needed most, or by selling power for the highest price.

The most noteworthy advantage to the smart grid is that it can harness electricity from a wide variety of sources. Those sources can include traditional nuclear or coal-fired power plants, roof-top solar panels, and micro-generators.

That means the smart grid is theoretically more robust than the existing grid. Unfortunately, the AI and cloud-based control systems add another layer of complexity that makes failure likely.

Dependable, Portable, Backup Emergency Power Supply [2]

 

The Smart Grid Nightmare Scenarios

A smart grid can give rise to a number of frightening nightmare scenarios. Grid nightmares your family might face in the near future include:

  • Sky-high electric bills that appear out of nowhere. Under an unregulated smart grid, an AI or algorithm might have the power to increase or decrease your electric bill at any time.
  • Utility companies can program the smart grid to change rates suddenly and without warning. The cost of electricity might be $10 a day on Monday and $100 a day on Friday if demand increases.
  • A grid utility would have the ability to shut your power off at any time. A smart grid AI might call you and tell you to pay your bill right now or it will turn off the lights.
  • A far greater potential for sudden electricity shortages. The AI that runs a smart grid might automatically shift electricity supplies away from homes. The electricity would be sent to more profitable customers such as big corporations instead. Homes might be in the dark while the lights and registers stay on at Walmart.
  • Hackers have already proven [3] it is possible to take down the existing grid. The cloud-based grid would be far more vulnerable to cyber attacks because it operates through the web. A grave danger would be targeted attacks aimed at specific customers or certain kinds of users. Attackers might try to sow panic by shutting off power to certain businesses such as filling stations or supermarkets.

 

More Vulnerable To Sabotage

  • A smart grid will make traditional low-tech sabotage easier and more effective. This kind of grid will be highly vulnerable to low-tech, traditional sabotage methods. Those methods include smashing computers, cutting wires, or bombing infrastructure.
  • A major threat would be the destruction of internet infrastructure, which might cause a system crash. Attacks on the data centers that operate the cloud might bring down the smart grid.
  • Another way to knock out the smart grid would be to attack the power sources for the data centers. In this case, cutting off power to the data centers would shut down the cloud and the power grid.
  • Increased possibility of catastrophic failure because of more complexity. The smart grid will be a highly complex system. That means that there is a lot more that can go wrong with it.
  • Equipment failures, software glitches, and human errors can be magnified throughout the whole system. A software glitch might shut off power to several states or provinces.
  • There would be no backup available because there are no humans are on duty. The worst case scenario is that there would be no human operators available to switch power around and keep the system operating in an emergency.
  • If the smart grid fails, it might take hours, days, or even weeks for human operators to take back control.
  • Governments or utilities can use a smart grid to ration power. A grid like this can be used to divert electricity from low-population rural areas to cities where most of the voters live, for example.
  • Nobody knows if the smart grid will actually work because it is a totally new technology that has never been tried before.

 

Conclusion

The bottom line is that the smart grid will probably be very unstable and unreliable. Fortunately, there is a portion of the power grid plan that can keep the lights on even if the whole system fails. Households and businesses can hook up their own off-grid sources of electricity and backup power systems.

Such systems will keep the lights on and technology working even if the smart grid itself is a failure.

You may also enjoy reading an additional Off The Grid News article: 8 Simple Ways To Live Off Grid On Less Watts[4]

Or download our free 30-page report which discusses slashing your electric bill by up to 50%: How To Cut Your Electric Bills In Half [5]

 

Link To Read Full Article @ Source

 


 

“A cyber-attack on a smart grid would have devastating effects on reliability of widespread infrastructure given the potential cascade effects of shutting down the electricity grid since most of the devices in our homes, offices, hospitals and trains require electricity to run. Once a single device is compromised, then the whole grid becomes vulnerable to cyberattacks. Such attacks on electricity supply can grind entire cities to a halt thereby causing huge financial and economic losses. This makes security a critical factor to consider before large scale deployment of IoT based smart grid networks.” Link

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1874548217301622?via%3Dihub

Link To Article_Science Direct

 


 

 

2009_Security Expert Proves Hacking Smart Grid is a Snap BY ARIEL SCHWARTZ

“As with all wirelessly-connected electronic devices, smart meters–and in turn, the smart grid–are vulnerable to hackers. And if the smart grid is hacked, well, there goes the neighborhood’s (or the city’s) power.”

Link To Article_

 

 


 

 

Link To 2011 Article_Smart Grid in Texas

 

 

Link To 2014 Article_Utility Control System was Hacked Says DHS

 

 

Link To 2017 WIRED_Article_Hackers gain switch flipping access to US power systems 

 

 

Link To 2017 Article_WIRED_Hacking a Power Grid

 

 

Link To 2019 Article _First US Power Grid Attack Details

 

 

 


 

 

 

Was Weather Modification or Cyber Hacking Involved in Texas Storm Damage?

Link

 

 


 

Posted on

One-Third of Deaths Reported to CDC After COVID Vaccines Occurred Within 48 Hours of Vaccination

One-Third of Deaths Reported to CDC After COVID Vaccines Occurred Within 48 Hours of Vaccination

 

February 19, 2021 |By Children’s Health Defense Team| Source |

 

“The numbers reflect the latest data available as of Feb. 12 from the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System website. Of the 929 reported deaths, about one-third occurred within 48 hours.”

 

 

“According to new data released today, as of Feb. 12, 15,923 adverse reactions to COVID vaccines, including 929 deaths, have been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) since Dec. 14, 2020.

VAERS is the primary mechanism in the U.S. for reporting adverse vaccine reactions. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a determination can be made as to whether the reported adverse event was directly or indirectly caused by the vaccine.

Feb. 12 release VAERS data.The latest VAERS data show that 799 of the deaths were reported in the U.S., and that about one-third of those deaths occurred within 48 hours of the individual receiving the vaccination.

As is consistent with previous VAERS data reports, 192 of the reported deaths — or 21% — were cardiac-related. As The Defender reported earlier this month, Dr. J. Patrick Whelan, a pediatric rheumatologist, warned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in December that mRNA vaccineslike those developed by Pfizer and Moderna could cause heart attacks and other injuries in ways not assessed in safety trials.

Of the 929 deaths reported since Dec. 14, 2020, the average age of the deceased was 77.8 and the youngest was 23. Fifty-two percent of the reported deaths were among men, 45% were women and 3% are unknown. Fifty-eight percent of the deaths were reported in people who received the Pfizer vaccine, and 41% were related to the Moderna vaccine.

States with the highest reported number of deaths were: California (71); Florida (50); Ohio (38); New York (31); Kentucky (41); Michigan (31); and Texas (31).

CBS Detroit reported this week that a 68-year old news anchor died one day after being vaccinated for COVID of a suspected stroke.

Reports of deaths among elderly people after being vaccinated for COVID continue to surface, including the articlepublished this week by The Defender about 46 nursing home residents in Spain who died within one month of receiving the Pfizer vaccine.

According to the latest data, 3,126 “serious” adverse reactions have been reported. Adverse reaction reports from the latest CDC data also include:

So far, only Pfizer and Moderna vaccines — approved for emergency use, but not fully licensed — are being used in the U.S.

AstraZeneca’s COVID vaccine, which does not use mRNA technology, was approved for emergency use this week by the World Health Organization, paving the way for some countries to start using it. However, as The Defender reportedthis week, some nations have said they won’t use it, citing safety and efficacy concerns.

FiercePharma reported today that the FDA may reject the AstraZeneca vaccine over concerns relating to efficacy, especially against new COVID variants, and manufacturing issues.

News reports indicate that a growing number of people, including nearly 30% of healthcare workers, now say they don’t want the COVID vaccine, citing safety concerns.

The Washington Post reported this week that nearly a third of military personnel are opting out of the vaccines, and ESPN reported that top NBA players are reluctant to promote the vaccine.

Meanwhile, the FDA has not yet implemented systems to monitor the safety of the experimentalCOVID vaccines. FDA officials told The New York Times they don’t expect the systems to be up and running before the Biden administration reaches its goal of vaccinating 100 million Americans — nearly one third of the U.S. population.

As of Feb. 19, about 56.3 million people in the U.S. had received one or both doses of a COVID vaccine.

While the VAERS database numbers may seem sobering, according to a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services study, the actual number of adverse events is likely significantly higher. VAERS is a passive surveillance system that relies on the willingness of individuals to submit reports voluntarily.”

 

Link To Read Full Article @ Source_ Children’s Health Defense

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

Posted on

(2014) Flashback: Fauci describes Ebola quarantines as ‘draconian,’ warns of ‘unintended consequences’

(2014) Flashback: Fauci describes Ebola quarantines as ‘draconian,’ warns of ‘unintended consequences’

“You don’t want to have policy that would have negative unintended consequences.”

February 19, 2021 |  By Jordan Schachtel  |  The Dossier | Source |

“When it came to a proposed mandatory quarantine for his colleagues, and not the American general public, Dr. Fauci was singing a very different tune on quarantines, which the government health bureaucrat has now been championing in the United States for the better part of an entire year.

In 2014, at the height of the Ebola outbreak in Africa, concerns were rising in America about the possibility of the disease spreading across the country. With a genuinely horrifying 40 percent case fatality rate (which is at least 40 times higher than the CFR of COVID-19), and a several week incubation period for infectees, state governors acted to pursue mandatory quarantines for healthcare workers returning to the U.S. from regions where the virus was spreading. 

At the peak of the epidemic, governors in several U.S. states initiated a very targeted quarantine that only applied to healthcare workers who were arriving back into the country from impacted areas.

Dr. Fauci wasn’t happy about the fact that his colleagues were being subject to quarantines. He went on a media blitz and hammered the quarantine policies that had been issued in New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Virginia, Maryland, Georgia and Florida, declaring them “unscientific” and “draconian.”

 

 

 

“The primary goal is to protect the American people, but there are ways to do that that may not necessarily have to go that far at all,” Fauci told NBC’s Chuck Todd.

 

 

“We have to be careful that there are [not] unintended consequences,” Fauci continued. “We need to treat them, returning people with respect,” he added, in describing the quarantine orders as unnecessarily “draconian.”

 

Link To Read Full Article @ Source _The Dossier

 

 


 

 

Posted on

Florida: Sarasota city commissioners eliminate mandatory mask ordinance

Florida: Sarasota city commissioners eliminate mandatory mask ordinance

 

February 18, 2021 | TIMOTHY FANNING | SARASOTA HERALD-TRIBUNE | Source |

“Against the urging of medical experts, city of Sarasota eliminates mask mandate”

“SARASOTA – Going against the urging of four medical doctors and other local health experts, the majority of Sarasota city commissioners have agreed to eliminate the city’s mandatory mask ordinance.

The mandate for face coverings in public, put in place last July, was largely rendered symbolic in September after Gov. Ron DeSantis cut local governments’ ability to enforce it.

Those in the majority on the City Commission felt that masks were too “burdensome” for residents and businesses, and because the city could not punish those who did not comply, what was the point in keeping the mandate in place? Besides, people are just going to do what they want, they contended.

“This was one of those ordinances that was done as a public spectacle,” said Vice Mayor Erik Arroyo. “People don’t really respect us as a commission for us trying to regulate every single little thing. It might make us feel good about passing it, but it just doesn’t work, and I think we need to stop this now.”

Link To Full Article @ Source

 


 

Link

 


 

Posted on

America’s Frontline Doctors Unveil New ‘Vaccine Bill of Rights’

America’s Frontline Doctors Unveil New ‘Vaccine Bill of Rights’

January 14, 2021 | America’s Frontline Doctors | Source | Civil Liberties Human Rights Issues

Link To Vaccine Bill Of Rights     Link To Find Your Legislator

 

 


 

 

America’s Frontline Doctors Unveil New ‘Vaccine Bill of Rights’ 

Link To Full Document

 

“A MEMORIALIZING RESOLUTION for the State of [INSERT STATE] to protect its citizens against unconstitutional and medically irresponsible COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

Whereas the Founders designated that a Bill of Rights was necessary to guard individual liberty against encroachments from state and federal actors, public and private; and

Whereas the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution explicitly directs states not to “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”; and

Whereas no COVID vaccine is FDA-approved but some are authorized under a temporary Emergency Use Authorization as experimental (investigational) agents only; and

Whereas emergency use products are specifically prohibited by federal law 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3 from being mandated: “Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies … require …the option to accept or refuse administration of the product”; and

Whereas the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) affirmed in August 2020 that under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), experimental vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory”; and

Whereas decades-old universally accepted Codes of Medical Ethics, including the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki absolutely prohibits any form of coercion whatsoever to individuals participate in a medical experiment; and

Whereas 40 percent of respondents in at least one US poll reported that they would opt out of taking experimental COVID vaccines; and

Whereas it is neither feasible nor safe to mandate experimental vaccination given the large number of COVID-19 recovered patients in the general population and the FDA/Pfizer/ Moderna protocols which excluded COVID-19 recovered patients; and

Whereas it is neither feasible nor safe to administer experimental vaccines to many groups of patients, such as persons with post-natural infections, waning titers, allergic reactions, as well as childbearing women, etc.; and

Whereas public and private measures are nonetheless being considered to mandate experimental vaccinations in order to participate in certain public activities and functions of daily American life, including but not limited to: employment, in-person school attendance, public transportation, and concert performances; and

Whereas “vaccine passports,” “digital health IDs,” and other such required documentation pose substantial risks to personal privacy and equal treatment before the law for all citizens of [INSERT STATE] as well as the United States generally; and

Whereas administration of the experimental COVID-19 vaccines according to guidelines established by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices do not provide adequate protections for average Americans concerned about potential health hazards associated with the inoculations; and

Whereas the public is entitled to receive unbiased, transparent, easily accessible medical information related to all vaccines from their public health officials; and

Whereas the emergency powers assumed by the chief executives of certain states as well as municipal leaders violate certain unalienable rights guaranteed under the US Constitution and its and Bill of Rights and therefore deserve redress; and

Whereas while these legitimate grievances are pursued by the courts of various states, state lawmakers must enshrine certain rights against encroachment by decrees that are not medically or scientifically indicated, such as vaccine mandates, in order to ensure the continuity of these rights; and

Whereas that a COVID-19 Vaccine Bill of Rights memorialized by this resolution against COVID-19 vaccine mandates provides an example of adoption for other legislative bodies across the United States to be recognized and upheld by the attorneys general of those states; and

Whereas that the major principles of this Vaccine Bill of Rights will include a minimum of four

(4) of the following six (6) provisions:

●      No persons will be mandated, coerced, forced or pressured to take an experimental or “investigational” medication.

●      No physician or nurse shall be asked by an employer to promote a COVID-19 vaccine.

●      All persons reserve the right, at all times, to determine what is in their own best medical interest without threat to their livelihood or freedom of movement.

●      All persons must be given access to independent information to help them determine what is in their own best medical interest, including the risk of death based upon age/condition from contracting COVID-19 naturally. This must include information from sources that are independent of a conflict of interest. For example, pharmaceutical companies have an inherent conflict of interest, as do government or quasi-government institutions. Such information can be included but cannot be the sole source of information.

●      The frail elderly are additionally entitled to a knowledgeable, independent advocate with medical training to help them determine their own medical interest.

●      Private businesses operating within the jurisdiction have no legal authority to require or mandate or coerce medication or experimental medication for any persons; and

Whereas technical guidance for employers released by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in December should not be understood to undermine employee constitutional rights laid out herein; and

Whereas state legislative bodies must practice oversight of such federal assistance consistent with their enumerated powers; and

Whereas out-of-state commercial vendors, including Ticketmaster, cannot require venue operators and organizers to mandate proof of vaccination from concertgoers and other paying customers before freely entering a venue on private or public property; and

Whereas K-12 vaccinations cannot be required without certain clear and consistent exemptions applied, among them medical and conscience clauses, or risk forfeiting a district’s or school board’s authority in the State of [INSERT STATE] to authorize such a mandate, nor can a vaccine mandate for these populations be a factor in state school-aid funding; and

Whereas interstate carriers such as airlines and all forms of public transit calling for so-called “vaccine passports” as a condition of entry cannot be allowed to operate with state licensure and waivers, and furthermore this resolution would call on federal entities such as the FAA to issue new rules prohibiting COVID-19 vaccine mandates for all carrier crews and customers; and

Therefore, be it resolved that the legislature of [INSERT STATE] memorializes a COVID-19 Vaccine Bill of Rights for the purposes of defending the constitutional liberties of its citizens, promoting sound science, and outlining a framework of best practices for state authorities and federal regulators to develop in this evolving phase of experimental vaccine administration and implementation.

Be it further resolved that copies of this resolution be sent to the President of the United States, the United States House of Representatives, the United States Senate, the Federal Aviation Administration, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the U.S. Department of Labor, and the U.S. Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division.”

 

Link To Source_The Vaccine Bill of Rights – America’s Frontline Doctors 

 

 

 


 

 

Dr. Simone Gold – The truth about the CV19 vaccine

Link

 

 

 

Posted on

Coronavirus Patent US 10,130,701 B2

Coronavirus Patent US 10,130,701 B2

Filed: July 23, 2015 | Application filed by Pirbright Institute | Source

Abstract

“The present invention provides a live, attenuated coronavirus comprising a variant replicase gene encoding polyproteins comprising a mutation in one or more of non-structural protein(s) (nsp)-10, nsp-14, nsp-15 or nsp-16. The coronavirus may be used as a vaccine for treating and/or preventing a disease, such as infectious bronchitis, in a subject.”

Link To Patent_US10130701-3

A61K39/215 Coronaviridae, e.g. avian infectious bronchitis virus

 

 


 

 

European Patent 3 172 319 B1  |

Date of Filing July 23, 2015

Source

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

“The present invention relates to an attenuated coronavirus comprising a variant replicase gene, which causes the virus to have reduced pathogenicity.”

 

Link To European Patent _EP3172319B1

C07K14/005 Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from viruses

 

 

 


 

 

 

April 2003

“This collaboration has brought together leading scientific expertise, and was established after WHO issued a global alert on SARS on 12 March 2003. The priority has been to find the cause and to develop diagnostic tests. Two laboratories in China recently joined this network of laboratories from Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China, Japan, the Netherlands, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America.”

https://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2003/pr31/en/
https://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2003/pr31/en/

 

Link To Source

 

 


 

WHO Draft Landscape of Covid 19 Candidate Vaccines

 

March 2020_novel-coronavirus-landscape-ncov

 

October 2020 novel-coronavirus-landscape-covid-19cc0232c16129498983a6a0e30ca94000

 

December 2020Novel-Coronavirus_Landscape_COVID-19

 

DISCLAIMER:

” WHO also disclaims any and all liability or responsibility whatsoever for any death, disability, injury, suffering, loss, damage or other prejudice of any kind that may arise from or in connection with the procurement, distribution or use of any product included in any of these landscape documents.”

 

 

 


 

 

 

Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease

February  2020

Link To_who-china-joint-mission-on-covid-19—final-report-

 

 

 


 

 

Posted on

One-third of the military refusing COVID-19 vaccinations

One-third of the military refusing COVID-19 vaccinations

 

February 17, 2021 | The Washington Times | Source

 

In this Feb. 9, 2021, photo provided by the Department of Defense, Hickam 15th Medical Group host the first COVID-19 mass vaccination on Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam. By the thousands, U.S. service members are refusing or putting off the COVID-19 vaccine, as frustrated commanders scramble to knock down internet rumors and find the right pitch that will convince troops to take the shot. Some Army units are seeing as few as a third agree to the vaccine, others are higher. (U.S. Air Force Tech. Sgt. Anthony Nelson Jr./Department of Defense via AP)

 

 

“Thousands of U.S. soldiers and sailors are refusing to receive the COVID-19 vaccination and at this point there’s not much more frustrated military commanders can do about it.

About one-third of all those offered the shot to protect against the deadly pandemic have declined to roll up their sleeves, Pentagon officials told a hearing of the House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday.” 

 

Link To Full Article @ Source_Washington Times

 


 

 

 

Posted on

Data Disaster: A Call for an Investigation Into the CDC’s Conduct During COVID-19

Data Disaster: A Call for an Investigation Into the CDC’s Conduct During COVID-19

 

February 17, 2021 | Stand for Health Freedom | Link To Send Email To Investigate CDC |

Link To Video

Link To Send Letter Calling for Investigation into CDC’s Conduct During Covid-19

 

Panelists

Sayer Ji (Moderator) – Author; Founder of GreenMedInfo; Co-founder, Stand for Health Freedom

 

Dr. Peter Breggin – World-renowned psychiatrist and medical ethicist Mary Starrett – Chair, Board of Commissioners, Yamhill County, Oregon

 

Dr. David Martin – Founder and Chairman of M·CAM Inc.; Batten Fellow at the University of Virginia’s Darden Graduate School of Business Administration

 

Mark Thielman – Superintendent, Alsea School District (Oregon)

 

Ana Garner, Esq. – Attorney; Creator, Higher Path Solutions

 

Dennis Linthicum – Oregon State Senator

 

Dr. James Lyons-Weiler – Biomedical researcher; Scientific journal author; IPAK

 

Dr. Henry Ealy – Naturopath; Scientific journal author; Energetic Healing Institute

 

Link To_Stand For Health Freedom

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

October 12, 2020 |  Authors: Henry Ealy ∗, †, Michael McEvoy ‡§, Daniel Chong , John Nowicki , Monica Sava ¶, Sandeep Gupta ∥ ∗∗ †† ‡‡, David White , James Jordan , Daniel Simon , Paul Anderson |  Science, Public Health Policy, and The LawVolume 2:4-22 |  Source  |

 

Abstract

“This historical retrospective will provide a timeline summary of events to help the reader orient themselves to many aspects of the crisis previously unknown and will discuss the significance of the March 24, 2020 COVID- 19 Alert No. 2 that had a dramatic impact upon cause of death reporting numbers. Supportive data comparisons suggest the existing COVID-19 fatality data, which has been so influential upon public policy, may be substantially compromised regarding accuracy and integrity, and illegal under existing federal laws. If the fatality data being presented by the CDC is illegally inflated, then all public health policies based upon them would be immediately null and void.”

 

Conclusion

“Arguing over what the most accurate COVID fatality count may be is an exercise in futility without intimate knowledge of case history and accompanying certificates of death, and it is the exact reason we entrust these determinations to the skill of our licensed professionals. With the inclusion of probable fatalities and significant changes made to how certificates of death are recorded exclusively for COVID-19 , scientific objectivity demands that we acknowledge the data presented is inaccurate.

Federal agencies have a legal obligation to provide the most accurate data to the public, fellow agencies, and policy makers they are advising, and they have a responsibility to abide by every federal law. This responsibility to collect, analyze, and publish data accurately, transparently, and with unquestionable integrity increases exponentially during a national crisis.

It is concerning that the CDC may have willfully failed to collect, analyze, and publish accurate data used by elected officials to develop public health policy for a nation in crisis.

Further federal investigation is justified by the magnitude of the crisis and the collateral damage generated by policies based upon projection data that was unproven and never peer reviewed. If the data being reported was indeed compromised by the CDC’s perplexing decision to abandon proven data collection and reporting practices in favor of untested methods, then all public health policies based upon these inaccurate data must be reexamined.”

 

Link To Full Document_COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective