Posted on

IRENA & the MULTI-TRILLION dollar climate hoaxers

November 29, 2022 | IRENA & the MULTI-TRILLION dollar climate hoaxers |

The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) plays a key role in siphoning trillions of dollars from the world’s economy and driving government policies with regard to the UN’s climate narrative. Unfortunately their climate scheme is not intended to actually stop, prevent, or clean up harmful pollution, but instead, IRENA’s goal is to help facilitate the elite’s global economic transformation.

It’s time to start tackling real pollution, stop funding the climate scam and remove immunities and privileges of organizations such as IRENA. These alphabet agencies are attempting to implement a New World Order by undermining USA sovereignty and stealing our national wealth. -JD

 


 

By The Sharp Edge  |  Corey’s Digs  |  Source |  Laundering With Immunity: The Control Framework – Part 1.

As a driving force placing pressure on public and private sectors to comply, the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) plays a key role in funneling trillions from the global economy while influencing government policies and propping up the climate hoax narrative.  While IRENA is pivotal in the “no-regrets” initiative to transform the global economy, the international organization enjoys immunities and privileges which allow them to operate without transparency or accountability.

History & Mission

The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) was officially founded on January 26, 2009 in Bonn, Germany.  UN planning meetings which took place in the years prior, plus a U.S. House bill to establish IRENA introduced in March of 2008 by Democrat Ed Markey, who is the Senate author of the Green New Deal, suggest that the United Nations and the United States were the major driving forces behind the founding of this agency.  At the time of its founding, 75 countries signed the IRENA statute, while Canada and Russia were the only G8 countries that initially declined.  It was determined in June of 2009 that Abu Dhabi, UAE would be the headquarters of the international organization and a few years later in April of 2011 IRENA held their first assembly.

While only UN member states are permitted to join, IRENA has grown from 85 members in 2011 to 168 members in 2022.  IRENA has become a leading agency to oversee the implementation of the Paris Agreement and the UN 2030 Agenda and is regarded as a “global hub” for facilitating the flow of investments and driving climate policies that transform the global governance and economy into their dystopian vision of full control.  IRENA acts as a “global platform” to synthesize partnerships between international, intergovernmental, non-governmental and private sector parties to act in complete lock-step as they usher in their plan for “A New World.”  The UN considers IRENA to be “the lead intergovernmental agency” for their “global energy transformation.”

Privileges & Immunities

IRENA is one part of a global web of international organizations which have been granted immunities and privileges allowing them to operate without transparency or accountability, as outlined in Corey’s Digs report Laundering With Immunity: The Control Framework – Part 1.

Their headquarters agreement with the UAE offers privileges and immunities for their members and assets, while their official documents are inviolable.  Under their statute, IRENA is afforded additional immunities and privileges by way of agreements signed with each of their 168 member nations.

In the United States, for example, Barack Obama issued an executive order in September of 2015 to designate IRENA as “a public international organization entitled to enjoy the privileges, exemptions, and immunities provided by the International Organizations Immunities Act.”  Furthermore, IRENA is protected under immunities and privileges of the UN headquarters, as the international organization maintains a permanent office there.

Though IRENA does periodically publish financial and investment reports, tracking the massive transfer of the world’s wealth between international organizations, facilitated by this agency in the name of climate change, becomes an almost insurmountable task due to layers of immunities and inviolability of documents.

Globalist Co-Conspirators Protected by Privileges & Immunities

IRENA has signed partnerships, contracts, and compacts with numerous organizations to transition the global economy, drive government policies, and prop up the climate hoax narrative.  The goals and commitments vary among agreements, but a common thread among many of the organizations involved in this massive transfer of wealth are their privileges and immunities which allow them to operate outside of the law.

To name a few, the United Nations and their specialized agencies operate under the privileges and immunities afforded to them by the ‘Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations,’ which among other things, shields members from legal process and renders their official documents inviolable.  USAID is afforded privileges and immunities that provide employees with “full criminal and civil immunity for both personal and official acts.”  The European Commission is granted privileges and immunities protecting members and assets from legal process while rendering official documents inviolable.  Similarly, the World Bank is shielded from accountability through their immunities and privileges clauses.

These organizations move billions, if not trillions, between them seamlessly as their immunities and privileges allow them to operate outside of the confines of the law and without fear of reprisal.

IRENA & the Clinton Climate Initiative – IRENA has joined with the Clinton Climate Initiative and many others, including UNDP and the World Bank, on the SIDS Lighthouses Initiative to facilitate the flow of hundreds of millions of dollars to small island developing states under the guise of converting their power systems to renewable energy.

IRENA & the European Commission – With the ‘Global Europe’ budget of 79.5 billion euros from 2021-2027, IRENA has partnered with the European Commission “to accelerate the global green deal,” by providing a framework for the transition of the global economy, and guiding economic policy towards transition at the country and regional levels.

IRENA & the Rockefeller Foundation – IRENA has partnered with the Rockefeller Foundation and others, including USAID, to exploit multiple manufactured crises in order to facilitate the massive transfer of wealth.  The Rockefeller Foundation report states, “Even amid an era of unprecedented crises—including the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic which has caused incalculable damage around the world in just months —we have a remarkable opportunity to empower the world’s most vulnerable people… By working together across countries, continents, and sectors, we the undersigned believe we can not only recover from this devastating pandemic but also make the world better, more sustainable, and more equitable than it was before Covid-19.”

IRENA & the United Nations – IRENA has partnered with the United Nations and several UN agencies including UNICEF, UNDP, UN Climate Change (UNFCCC), and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) to accelerate the UN 2030 Agenda, facilitate the flow of money to transform the world’s economy, indoctrinate the next generation into their climate religion, and to restructure global agriculture.  IRENA plays a vital role, in partnership with multiple intergovernmental organizations, in the UN’s energy policy to funnel trillions away from oil, coal and natural gas under the guise of energy transformation.

IRENA & the World Bank – IRENA has joined forces with the World Bank, the WHO, the UN Statistics Division (UNSD), and the International Energy Agency (IEA) to produce status reports on renewable energy investments and the need to dramatically scale-up those investments, in part by exploiting Covid and inflation related economic stimulus packages.

Many other IRENA partnerships can be found here and here.

Mission Control

One of the main functions of IRENA is to produce reports which overhype the imminent threat of climate change and praise the imagined achievements of renewables, all-the-while demanding for pouring trillions more from an endless spigot into numerous climate slush funds. The reports IRENA creates are echoed ad nauseum by the UN and others to perpetuate the climate hoax narrative and coerce nations to accelerate their mission to kill the oil, coal and natural gas industries while pilfering trillions from the global economy.

In a prescient 2019 report entitled “A New World,” published in the months leading up to the release of the Covid-19 bioweapon that launched the Great Reset into motion, IRENA predicted the geopolitical fallout that we are watching unfold today, as a result of their plans to radically transform the global energy supply and economy.  The report foresaw that, “The accelerating deployment of renewables has set in motion a global energy transformation that will have profound geopolitical consequences. Just as fossil fuels have shaped the geopolitical map over the last two centuries, the energy transformation will alter the global distribution of power, relations between states, the risk of conflict, and the social, economic and environmental drivers of geopolitical instability.”  IRENA forecasted “social unrest, political infighting and even violence” as well as supply chain disruptions, armed conflicts, currency and fuel price instability, and debt crises as a result of their energy transformation initiative.  IRENA admits in this report that their plans for transforming global energy will “lead to fundamental structural changes in economies and society,” adding that, “The world that will emerge from the renewable energy transition will be very different from the one that was built on a foundation of fossil fuels.”  Did this report serve as a warning or a blueprint for geopolitical and economic transformation?

In their 2021 report entitled “World Energy Transitions Outlook: 1.5°C  Pathway,” IRENA calls for channeling trillions from oil, coal and natural gas, while bilking the global economy out of at least 4.4 trillion each year until 2050, for a grand total of 131 trillion dollars.  Proponents of this massive wealth transfer speak casually of taxing the energy sector, businesses, and consumers to death in order to reach their astronomical $131 trillion goal.

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

 

Why the “Green New Deal” Is NOT A Good Deal At All; Biden: “How I learned to love the New World Order”; 2020 U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations recommends $15,000,000 for cloud-aerosol research

LINK

 


 

 

Rockefeller’s War On Humanity: UN Agenda 21/2030 & The New World Order

LINK

 

 


 

Posted on

South Dakota Governor Bans TikTok

November 29, 2022 | South Dakota Governor Bans TikTok |  South Dakota State News

Governor Kristi Noem of South Dakota, signed Executive Order 2022-10 banning the social media platform TikTok for contractors, employees, and state agencies using state devices.

The Order is in response to the national security threat of TikTok with regard to personal data gathering operations potentially exploited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Gov. Noem stated,“Because of our serious duty to protect the private data of South Dakota citizens, we must take this action immediately. I hope other states will follow South Dakota’s lead, and Congress should take broader action, as well”.

-JD

 


 

Link To Source HERE

 


 

Link To Executive Order 2022-10

 


 

Posted on

Technocratic control schemes of the parasite class

November 28, 2022 | Technocratic control schemes of the parasite class |

Technocracy can be defined as a scientific dictatorship.

The method of control is through a centrally organized, linked, and monitored monetary and economic system.

The 1938 Technocrat Magazine described technocracy as “The science  of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population.”

The UN is the vehicle attempting to install technocratic world governance. In lockstep with Agenda 21/2030, 193 nations have collaborated to replace individual liberty, national sovereignty, and free enterprise, with collectivism, control and slavery.

One way to begin rejecting the technocrat control scheme is by turning off the “smart” phone, which functions as a globalist weapon for monitoring and enslavement.

Another way to unplug from the globalist agenda is by organizing locally, working with State and Local legislators to enforce the Constitution and protect individual and State sovereignty. -JD

 


 

By Iain Davis |  November 25, 2022  |  off-guardian.org  |

Totalitarianism is a form of government that attempts to assert total control over the lives of its citizens. It is characterized by strong central rule that attempts to control and direct all aspects of individual life through coercion and repression. It does not permit individual freedom. Traditional social institutions and organizations are discouraged and suppressed, making people more willing to be merged into a single unified movement. Totalitarian states typically pursue a special goal to the exclusion of all others, with all resources directed toward its attainment, regardless of the cost.

That “special” goal is sustainable development and no cost, either financial or humanitarian, is too great to tackle the alleged “climate crisis.” In reality, climate change is simply the excuse for sustainable development and it is through the global policy commitment to “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs) that technocracy is being installed.

A technocratic society is called a Technate and the world’s first Technate has emerged in China. In this two part exploration we will look at how this system was constructed, who was behind it and why technocracy is now being foisted upon all of us.

These articles are drawn largely from my 2021 publication Pseudopandemic. It is free to subscribers to my blog.

GLOBAL TECHNOCRATIC GOVERNANCE

In order for global technocracy to be rolled-out, authority needs to be centrally controlled at the global level. Governments, intergovernmental organisations and multinational corporations have collaborated to form a global public-private partnership  (G3P) for this purpose.

Throughout the 20th and 21st century the G3P network has sought to construct global governance. In turn, global governance enables the worldwide distribution of the technocracy that governments then convert into national policy commitments. Many components of global technocratic governance have already been established.

The World Heath Organisation (WHO) delivers global governance of public health; global access to technological development is meted out through the World Intellectual Property Organization; the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) works to coordinate economic policies between nation-states and global trade is monitored and controlled through the trade agreements overseen by the World Trade Organisation.

The Bank For International Settlements (BIS) coordinates global monetary policy and the flow of capital; the direction of education, academia, the sciences and cultural development is steered through the U.N Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and the seizure of the global commons and the “financialisation” of nature—through natural asset companies and other mechanisms—is nearing completion.

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are centrally controlled through global governance, primarily by the U.N Development and Environmental programs (UNDP & UNEP). The necessary global scientific consensus on climate change is centrally administered and the appropriate research funding streams allocated, by the U.N’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The powerful individuals, pushing the G3P project forward, are a collective of mass polluters, robber barons, land grabbers and the world’s leading exponents of worker exploitation, market manipulation, monetary extortion (usury) and oppression. They form what would otherwise be considered a criminal cartel but have greenwashed their reputations through their commitment to so-called “sustainable development.”

Often referred to as the elite, a more fitting description is “the parasite class.”

The G3P has managed to convince billions that it is committed to sustainable, net zero, environmentalism and wants to “save the planet.” It is actually determined to empower global governance and enforce technocracy upon humanity through SDGs and the associated policy Agendas. Regardless of what you think about the causes of climate change or the level of risk it presents, SDGs do nothing to address itand are designed to serve no-one and nothing other than the G3P and its interests.

In order to requisition, commodify, audit and ultimately divide up the Earth’s resources among themselves, the stakeholder capitalists, at the heart of the G3P, also need technocratic control. Once humanity figures out what has happened, technocracy will enable the G3P to shutdown resistance through literal population control.

Every human being will be individually monitored by Artificial Intelligence (AI) networks which will punish or reward them, depending upon their behaviour. Biosecurity and environmental concerns are set to provide the justification for this enslavement.

Much like the quack pseudo-science of eugenics, which many G3P “thought leaders” seem to believe, Technocracy was the social sciencecertainty of its day. Like eugenics, while it has subsequently faded from public consciousness, it is still avidly pursued by the G3P’s compartmentalised hierarchy.

TECHNOCRACY

In 1911, arguably the worlds first management consultant, Frederick Winslow Taylor, published The Principles of Scientific Management. His publication came at the culmination of the Progressive Era in the United States.

This was a period marked by the political activism of the US middle class who mainly sought to address the underlying social problems, as they saw them, of excessive industrialisation, immigration and political corruption. So-called “Taylorism,” fixated with the imminent exhaustion of natural resources and advocating efficient “scientific management systems,” was in the spirit of the age.

Taylor wrote:

In the past the man has been first; in the future the system must be first. [. . .] The best management is a true science, resting upon clearly defined laws, rules, and principles. [. . . ] The fundamental principles of scientific management are applicable to all kinds of human activities, from our simplest individual acts to the work of our great corporations.

 

Link To Full Article HERE


 

 

Image Source

Posted on

2019: Fauci Testimony on Self-assembling Nanoparticle V@xx

November 27, 2022 | ZeroMandatoryVaxx.com  | 2019: Fauci Testimony on Self-assembling Nanoparticle V@xx | Image Source

Investigation into harmful v@xx ingredients has revealed a wide range of hazardous contaminants including components that self assemble. Pandemic Timeline has provided documentation in substantiation, with 2019 testimony from Fauci and an Executive Order 13887, signed by Trump on September 19, 2019.

It’s notable that Fauci was in a leadership role at National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, serving in 7 presidential administrations.  -JD

 


 

By Pandemic Timeline | Source

Link To_Testimony – Fauci (NIH) 12.04.2019

Link To_Executive Order 13887_Trump 09.19.2019

See also, on this site:

 

Link To Article @ Source_HERE

 


 

 

“Teslaphoresis” is self-assembly at a distance.

 

 

April 14, 2016 | Mike Williams | Rice University |  Source |Link To Video

 


 

Design of Wireless Nanosensor Networks for Intrabody Application

LINK

 


 

NEUROWeapons: 5G + VAXX = WMD

LINK

 


 

Art of War: US-China-CDC Partnership

LINK

 


 

Posted on

Pentagon V@xx Mandate Must End Now

November 27, 2022 | Pentagon V@xx Mandate Must End Now  |  Overall Realignment of DoD Priorities Necessary To Restore Trust and Boost Readiness  |

The Pentagon’s mandatory v@xx policy is causing thousands of our best military service members to resign. According to the most recent statistics, the experimental mRNA injection is causing incalculable harm and death to the civilian and military population and therefore, must be halted immediately. In addition, accountability is needed for policymakers and leadership for decisions made with regard to the CV-19 operation. Finally, overall realignment of DoD priorities is necessary to restore trust and boost readiness.  -JD

 


 

When Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin issued the order mandating the mRNA “vaccine,” Miller issued a strong rebuttal.

He wrote:

“I believe the vaccines are both unnecessary and dangerous. I believe they represent far more of a risk to individual and collective readiness than the COVID-19 virus against which they ostensibly guard. Therefore, I believe the more responsible decision that I could make for the health of myself and those around me is to refuse to take the vaccines. I have never refused a vaccine required by the Army before, and have received many vaccines over the years.”

Despite being just months away from qualifying for a pension, Miller then resigned in protest of the Pentagon’s mRNA mandate.

The Department of Defense “vaccine” mandate, which is being enforced on extrajudicial grounds, has created a massive readiness and preparedness crisis within the U.S. military, as the mRNA injection has failed to live up to its safe and effective marketing.

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

Former Lieutenant Colonel Resigns Due to Pentagon Vaxx Mandate

Link To NTD Article

Link To Video

 


 

Art of War: US-China-CDC Partnership

LINK

 


 

Posted on

Pandemic Treaty Update

November 25, 2022

James Roguski delivers an update and analysis on the WHO CA+ Pandemic Treaty, described as a money making scheme and power grab. The recent push to impose vaccine passports for international travel is built into the Pandemic Treaty amendments which have been kept hidden from the public. Mr Roguski stresses the importance of greater awareness and vigilance in protecting our health freedom, our Constitution and derailing the Pandemic Treaty.  -JD

 


 

By James Roguski  |  Pandemic Treaty Update  |  The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body just released details regarding their upcoming meeting (December 5-7, 2022) regarding the World Health Organization’s proposed “Pandemic Treaty.”  |  Please watch the videos below…

 

James Roguski Outras Evidencias_WHO CA+.mp4.download

https://odysee.com/@MartaGB:2/JamesRoguski:6 (Please download and re-upload this video to your own platform and share it as widely as possible on social media.)

 

Link to Video

Link To James.Roguski.substack

 

The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) will be meeting for the third time on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, December 5-7, 2022.

At the moment, it is unclear as to whether or not they will be live-streaming their meetings.

As expected, the INB released this information at the most classic moment designed to hide information in plain sight. This morning, BLACK FRIDAY, November 25, 2022, the INB published the seven (7) documents listed below on their nearly invisible web page. I really did expect them to do exactly that on exactly this date. They know that everyone else in the United States is busy recovering from Thanksgiving and the biggest shopping day of the year. This came as no surprise to me.

  1. Provisional agenda
  2. Draft programme of work
  3. Conceptual zero draft for the consideration of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body at its third meeting [CLICK HERE TO READ ARTICLE]
  4. Proposal by the Bureau on an updated timeline and deliverables, development of the zero draft of the WHO CA+, and establishment of drafting group modalities
  5. Summaries of regional committee discussions on the working draft Report by the Secretariat
  6. Informal, focused consultations Report by the Bureau of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body
  7. Outcomes of the second round of public hearings Report by the Secretariat

Of the seven (7) documents, the most important is the official version of the “Conceptual Zero Draft” of the proposed “Pandemic Treaty.” However, I obtained and published an advance copy of that document, so most of my readers should already be aware of it. I believe that the official copy is the same as the advance copy. Please read this article , AND DEFINITELY READ THIS ARTICLE.

The next most important document is the updated timeline (schedule).

Documents 5, 6 and 7 are summaries of events that have already happened.

 

The above schedule is in regards to the proposed “Pandemic Treaty.”

 

The schedule below is in regards to the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.

November 28 – December 2, 2022: (IHRRC)

Face-to-face meeting (5 days, Geneva, Switzerland) for report drafting purposes, with, at least, one day meeting with Member States, United Nations and its specialized agencies and other relevant intergovernmental organizations or nongovernmental organizations in official relations with WHO, the Bureau of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), and the WGIHR;

December 15-16, 2022: (IHRRC)

Closed virtual working meeting;

January 9-13, 2023: (IHRRC)

Face-to-face meeting (5 days, Geneva, Switzerland) for finalization of the report, with, at least, one day meeting with Member States, United Nations and its specialized agencies and other relevant intergovernmental organizations or nongovernmental organizations in official relations with WHO, the Bureau of the INB, and the WGIHR.

January 15, 2023

WGIHR is scheduled to submit amendments to the Director General of the WHO.

May 2023

The WHO consistently claims that their goal is to consider these amendments at the 77th World Health Assembly in May 2024, but the amendments COULD be voted on by the 76th World Health Assembly in May 2023.

 

 

 

 

Posted on

NSF Funding Sulfate Aerosol Injection 2023

November 25, 2022 | ZeroGeoengineering.com |  NSF Funding Sulfate Aerosol Injection 2023   |   National Science Foundation (NSF)

At a 2013 Geoengineering debate, Harvard professor David Keith admitted that sulfate aerosol injection is likely to kill tens of thousands of people when he stated,“So if I made a decision, or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision…”

Keith remarked that he and his colleague Alan Robock (who was also on the debate panel ) have different views relative to the moral hazard of making a decision to do “research” that directly kills people. Link to_Full Video

Regardless, Robock, Keith, and other grant-dependent academics receive MILLIONS of dollars in funding for sulfate aerosol injection “research” also known as geoengineering.

On October 13th of this year, the White House announced the plan to push ahead with sulfate aerosol injection, in spite of the moral hazard and harm to be caused to human health and the environment, potentially on a global scale.

It’s entirely possible that other biological hazards could be released and extreme weather events could be engineered. The announcement underscores the urgency for strong public opposition, demanding an immediate halt to aerosol injection activities. Criminalizing atmospheric testing, with provisions for enforcement to include severe penalties, has precedent and is essential NOW, in order to protect human health, nature, and our environment.

 

Every USA State could adapt The Clean Atmosphere Act model to outlaw Geoengineering:

 


 

Link To National Science Foundation Awards Stratospheric Aerosol Injection 

 

NSF Rutgers 2020-2023
Colorado 2018-2023
Columbia New York 2021-2023
University of Wyoming Continuing Grant 2010-2016
NSF Research in all 50 states

Link To Source

 

 


 

 

To learn more about advocating for a ban on Geoengineering, email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 

 


 

 

White House Promotes Environmental Warfare SO2 Aerosol Injection

LINK

 


 

Posted on

Electric cars are not Green

November 24, 2022 | Electric cars are not Green  | The claims of politicians about electric cars are built on magical thinking. Marketing for electric vehicles never mentions the fact that 500,000 lbs of minerals and rock has to be mined somewhere on Earth in order to make a single electric car vehicle battery. Mining is an extremely polluting and environmentally destructive activity that requires enormous amounts of fossil fuel.

Another inconvenient fact is that mining usually takes place in nations with the least environmental regulations and ingredients for batteries are often mined in places that enslave people and use child labor.

Our energy systems are being designed by bureaucrats instead of by engineers. This means more expensive and less reliable energy, with more harmful environmental impacts. -JD

 


 

Electric Cars: Inconvenient Facts |  By John Stossel  |

Link To Video

 

Link To Video


Image Source_Youtube screenshot

Posted on

Hundreds of Chinese-made drones detected over restricted DC airspace in recent months

November 23, 2022 | Hundreds of Chinese-made drones detected over restricted DC airspace in recent months

According to recent reports, hundreds of Chinese-manufactured drones have been detected flying over restricted airspace in DC over the past few months. While the drones may not be directly controlled by China, the devices have surveillance capability with the potential to be used  for cyber attacks, espionage, or to be weaponized.

Florida Senator Marco Rubio has introduced two bills to regulate drones: one banning drones from accessing U.S. telecommunications, and another banning the U.S. government from buying drones made in China. Neither bill has gained traction.

The vulnerability of drones being taken over and controlled remotely or weaponized, including the possible release of biological weapons, makes strong regulation of these popular off-the-shelf devices, urgent for national security. -JD

 


 

 

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

 

Link To Full Article HERE

 

 


 

Posted on

A sovereign state bank in Tennessee

November 22, 2022 | A sovereign state bank in Tennessee | The Solari Report |

Catherine Austin Fitts and Tennessee Senator Frank Niceley discuss the strengths and benefits of a Sovereign State Bank and bullion depository that could become a model for other USA States. The conversation examines strategic investment, precious metals, and how local banks and credit unions can counter the threat of Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). -JD

 

CAF states, “unless we have a sovereign state government, protecting sovereign individuals who are free to transact, including transact privately, you know, without invasive technology, we will have no sovereignty and then you’re talking about 100% central control by the bankers…we’re talking about a technology that in combined with other systems, can turn your home, your car and your community into a digital concentration camp. We’re talking about the end of human freedom and centrally controlled, through the financial system. So we must have states and citizens and with them community banks and other financial institutions that have the ability to protect free transactions.”

 

Link To Source

 


 

 

American States Can Reject the Fed’s Digital Dollar

LINK