Posted on

Is NVIDIA the real reason behind Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan?

Is NVIDIA the real reason behind Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan?

August 2, 2022 | Disclosure Report | NVIDIA AI CHIPS

More scrutiny is needed to understand the real motivation for Ms. Pelosi’s trip to Taiwan. What is clear is that Americans will be spending millions of dollars on her travel expenses and security for a trip that is serving to unnecessarily increase tensions with China.

Behind the claim that Ms. Pelosi is showing support for Taiwan, the real reason may be in regard to her husband’s financial ties with NVIDIA,  a world leader in Artificial Intelligence computing.

Two days prior to the passage of the CHIPs Act, Ms. Pelosi disclosed selling 25,000 shares of NVIDIA, at a value between $1,000,00 and $5,000,000.

Far from representing American interests, Pelosi’s trip to Taiwan appears as though it may be related to activities following insider trading.

Source: https://www.instagram.com/explore/locations/502103801/nvidia-taiwan/

 

NVIDIA Taiwan

Additionally, investments in AI serve to further undermine Americans’ sovereignty and national security because the foundation for AI is built upon hazardous & vulnerable wireless networks (4G-5G-6G+satellites) that are contaminating the environment with microwave radiation, that is operating at about the same frequency as  a microwave oven, around 2.45 GHz.

From ‘virus’ activation to extreme violence, could the dramatic rise of neurological and physiological damage to human beings be the result of exponential increases in exposure to microwave radiation (MWR)?

Tragically, no agencies are measuring or protecting populations and our environment from exposure to MWR. This inconvenient truth facing human beings worldwide presents our “Roman moment”, an opportunity to change direction away from a dangerous path, not only for humankind, but for all life on Earth. Link

The technocratic goal of constant biometric surveillance and tracking every living being with nanochips via wireless sensor networks, is anti-human and anti-American. -JD

 


 

 

US National Security in a New Era of Intense Global Competition

LINK

 


 

Posted on

Researchers Engineer Graphene To Detect CV-19

Researchers Engineer Graphene To Detect CV-19

Researchers and patents describe graphene oxide as a component of the CV-19 injections. Beyond the Internet of Nanothings (IoNT) this system comprises a technocratic prison called the Internet of Bodies (IoB).   -JD

 


June 16, 2021 | By Jacqueline Carey | University of Illinois at Chicago | Phys.org  |  https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.1c02549

Researchers at the University of Illinois Chicago have successfully used graphene—one of the strongest, thinnest known materials—to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus in laboratory experiments. The researchers say the discovery could be a breakthrough in coronavirus detection, with potential applications in the fight against COVID-19 and its variants.

In experiments, researchers combined sheets of graphene, which are more than 1,000 times thinner than a postage stamp, with an antibody designed to target the infamous spike protein on the coronavirus. They then measured the atomic-level vibrations of these graphene sheets when exposed to COVID-positive and COVID-negative samples in artificial saliva. These sheets were also tested in the presence of other coronaviruses, like Middle East respiratory syndrome, or MERS-CoV.

Their findings are published today in the journal ACS Nano.

“We have been developing graphene sensors for many years. In the past, we have built detectors for cancer cells and ALS. It is hard to imagine a more pressing application than to help stem the spread of the current pandemic,” said Vikas Berry, professor and head of chemical engineering at the UIC College of Engineering and senior author of the paper. “There is a clear need in society for better ways to quickly and accurately detect COVID and its variants, and this research has the potential to make a real difference. The modified sensor is highly sensitive and selective for COVID, and it is fast and inexpensive.”

“This project has been an amazingly novel response to the need and demand for detection of viruses, quickly and accurately,” said study co-author Garrett Lindemann, a researcher with Carbon Advanced Materials and Products, or CAMP. “The development of this technology as a clinical testing device has many advantages over the currently deployed and used tests.”

Berry says that graphene has unique properties that make it highly versatile, making this type of sensor possible.

Graphene is a single-atom-thick material made up of carbon. Carbon atoms are bound by whose elasticity and movement can produce resonant vibrations, also known as phonons, which can be very accurately measured. When a molecule like a SARS-CoV-2 molecule interacts with graphene, it changes these resonant vibrations in a very specific and quantifiable way.

“Graphene is just one atom thick, so a molecule on its surface is relatively enormous and can produce a specific change in its electronic energy,” Berry said. “In this experiment, we modified graphene with an antibody and, in essence, calibrated it to react only with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Using this method, graphene could similarly be used to detect COVID-19 variants.”

The researchers say the potential applications for a atomic-level sensor—from detecting COVID to ALS to cancer—continue to expand.

Link To Read Full Article Here

 


 

 

Graphene Oxide Toxicity

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31549672/

 

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11426-012-4620-z

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xcfp8arvikjgi21/2-%20GRAPHENE%20OXIDE%20TOXICITY%20REPORT.pdf?dl=0

 


 

 

Design of Wireless Nanosensor Networks for Intrabody Application

LINK

 


 

3D Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles for Cloud Seeding Patent US 2022/0002159 A1

LINK

 

 


 

 

 

 

Posted on

Former Google CEO Issues Warning: Negotiations Urgently Needed To Address AI Dangers

Image Source_Video

Former Google CEO Issues Warning: Negotiations Urgently Needed To Address  AI Dangers

Eric Schmidt discusses some of the major challenges of Artificial Intelligence( AI ), from the lack of understanding and naiveté about the potential impact of AI twenty years ago, to the need for governments and other institutions to put more pressure on tech now, to get the technology consistent with our values (as a free society).

Schmidt urges negotiations to solve national security issues surrounding AI and to prevent a conundrum resulting from lack of preparedness and diplomacy.

The participants in this forum are many of the same technocratic entities and organizations linked with the political ruling class, big tech, private corporations, the military-industrial- intelligence-pharmaceutical-complex, with the Rockefeller Foundation as a partner.

 

 

As usual, the American people have absolutely zero input, and no role whatsoever in the decisions being made by this elite group.  -JD

 


 

July 22, 2022 | Aspen Security Forum |

A New Frontier: National Security, Artificial Intelligence, and Misinformation

 

Eric Schmidt, Chairman, National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence

Brad Smith, President and Vice Chair, Microsoft

Senator Mark Warner, Chairman, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence

Moderator: Anja Manuel, Executive Director, Aspen Strategy Group and Aspen Security Forum

 

Link To_Full Discussion

 


 

Posted on

What Is a 6G Network and How Will It Affect Us?

What Is a 6G Network and How Will It Affect Us?

“How far is humanity willing to go for the sake of technological progress? And does progress always have to mean trading off our health and safety?”

January 31,2022 | By Jane Knight | Omnia

“The power to question is the basis of all human progress”
 – Indira Gandhi

We would understand if you saw the title of this article and thought, “5G isn’t even rolled out around the world yet, why are you warning us about 6G?”

But make no mistake – the race for 6G technology is on.

Despite the potential health impacts of 5G causing its rollout to be stalled and mired in controversy, big tech firms and nations across the world are already working on its successor!

But what exactly is a 6G network, and how is it different from 5G? Moreover, what does this technology mean for humanity’s future and well-being? If you find yourself wondering about these relevant questions, then read on. We’re taking you through the basics of 6G today.

What is a 6G Network?

6G technology is the sixth generation cellular technology that is slated to succeed 5G. It’s already under development as a collaboration between policymakers and technological firms globally, and is predicted to be significantly faster than its predecessor.

Some of the biggest names in tech have come together for this purpose – in August 2021, the Center for Technology at Purdue University launched their lab named ‘Lab to Life’ which is dedicated to researching and developing 6G technology and its uses across industries. This initiative is supported by firms like Dell, Cisco, Eriksson, Qualcomm, Intel, and Nokia, among many others. This 400-acre research area is slated to be the USA’s very first 6G deployment zone.

And that’s just scratching the surface – in the past year, several 6G symposiums have been organized across Europe, the USA, and Asia to discuss the road ahead for 6G and its real-world applications. In fact, China launched a 6G test satellite in November 2020.

How Does 6G Work?

If you thought the leap in data transfer speed from 4G to 5G was a big one, then here’s a shocker: 6G wireless network is rumored to be 100 times faster than 5G. While 5G technology relied on frequencies in the microwave range to transmit data, 6G will be using even smaller wavelengths that fall in the Terahertz (THz) band that falls between 100 GHz to 3 THz.

This will enable it to transmit data at shockingly fast speeds of approximately 95 Gbps (gigabits per second), which can hit a peak max speed of up to even 1 Tbps (terabit per second).

Another way to understand the data transmission speeds with 6G is to analyze its latency, which is usually measured in milliseconds. Simply put, latency is the time it takes for data to be transmitted from its originating source to its destination. The lower the latency, the faster your data transmission speed would be.

The latency for 4G networks is around 50 milliseconds and it falls to a mere 5 milliseconds with 5G technology. 6G networks are set to reduce that to only 1 millisecond – implying an almost instantaneous data transfer speed. The high-capacity, ultra-low latency features of 6G will expand the scope of wireless technology to encompass never-before-seen applications in AI (artificial intelligence), mobile edge computing, blockchain technology, and much more.

What Will 6G Be Like?

If you’re wondering how 6G will be different from its predecessors, then the name of Purdue University’s 6G laboratory (Lab to Life) should give you a clue – this technology will seek to not just enable faster communication, but embed our very lives into a global informational grid. Thanks to its faster-than-ever data speeds, 6G is said to become the foundation over which a plethora of industries will be built. By embedding the network in systems across residential, manufacturing, and other commercial purposes, 6G is being built to become the next ‘electricity’.

With its ultra-fast computing speeds, 6G is set to give a major push to ‘cognitive technology’ where computers are able to mimic human brain functions and decision-making abilities. By connecting our homes, cars, offices, phones, wireless devices, digital wearables, and much more to each other, this technology is capable of not just continuously monitoring our lives and activities, but also playing an active part in it.

By offering real-time recommendations and converting our daily activities into a series of millions of data points, our lives will be even more accessible online by corporations and/or governments, unless watertight data privacy protocols are put in place before the roll out.

With the announcement of the metaverse world and virtual reality becoming a real-world reality with each passing day, it’s not wrong to think that we will soon find ourselves dependent on 6G-enabled technology for functioning in our day-to-day lives. VR (Virtual reality) conferences, schools, and events may become a regular occurrence, with us spending more and more of our lives inside a 6G-enabled simulation in the brick-and-mortar world.

While AI-enabled technology has its applications and benefits, the question to ask ourselves is this – where is the line between us taking advantage of technology, and technology taking advantage of us? 

Will 6G Have An Impact On Human Health?

There is mounting evidence that EMF radiation as well as the short millimeter waves used in 5G wireless technology have significant and undeniable effects on our well-being and that of the environment. Considering that 6G is estimated to be 100 times faster and uses even shorter radiofrequency waves than 5G, it is likely that we will see these effects intensified manifold with this new technology. Although research has begun on the applications of 6G technology, we still have extremely limited information on the safe exposure limits of THz frequency.

A study looking into the biological effects of Terahertz radiation (used in 6G) waves on artificial human skin and mice have revealed that it caused “DNA double-strand breakage, cell death, cell membrane change, disturbance of nerve cell growth, suppression of cell-signaling pathways as well as acute inflammation.”

Another article published by the Journal of the Royal Society shares that Terahertz radiation is reported to interfere with DNA as well as cause genomic instabilities. While a lot more research is sorely needed to fully understand how Terahertz radiation affects living beings, the preliminary information is a cause for concern and warrants urgent intervention for public safety.

Final Thoughts

How far is humanity willing to go for the sake of technological progress? And does progress always have to mean trading off our health and safety? As more news of 6G technology and its potential health impacts come to light, we as a society have to ask ourselves these two urgent questions. This is not only for the sake of our own well-being, but to preserve and protect the health, freedom, and autonomy of future generations.

References and interesting reads:

 

 

Link To Full Article Here

 


 

 Is Humanity Being Poisoned By Microwave Radiation?

Link

 


 

Posted on

Is the U.S. Military Operating Under NATO Command?

Is the U.S. Military Operating Under NATO Command?

 

 

July 22, 2022 | Image source |  Link To Video

 

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul recently introduced an amendment to reaffirm that NATO cannot supersede Congress in declaring U.S. involvement in war, however it was rejected this week by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.[1]

Few Americans may realize that Virginia is home to the NATO Allied Joint Force Command in Norfolk.[2] The United States continues[3] to finance NATO as it has done for decades.[4][5][6]

 

Did you know?  

NATO is a close partner of the UN.[7]

NATO is interested in forming their own bank and deploying 5G.[8] / NATO-Financing-Gap

George Soros wrote Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO in 1993:

Link To_Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO

 

The calculated undermining of America’s military by vaxx mandates[9][10][11][12][13] and divisive political ideology[14][15][16] pushed by the Biden administration and top military leaders has for the most part, remained unchallenged.

In 1961 President Eisenhower issued a warning that only an alert and knowledgable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty many prosper together. [17]

 

WAKE UP CALL

 

As USA’s armed forces are facing a recruitment crisis[18], Congressional and military “leadership” are eagerly strengthening other militaries such as Ukraine and NATO.

Americans are needed RIGHT NOW to advocate for our military service members, challenge the treasonous actions of elected public servants and step up to protect and defend our Constitution since apparently those who took the Oath[19] of Office are failing to meet their obligation.[20]

Meanwhile, organizing with friends and family at the local level is something we can continue to do now, to get back to basics and forge a positive path forward toward a brighter future for everyone.

 


Link To Call: Representatives & Senators

Demand they meet their obligation to protect and defend American’s and our Constitution and stop dragging the USA into more NATO wars.

 

Link To Video

 


 

 

Link To Article_Has NATO Now Taken Over Command of the U.S. Navy?

 

Link To Article_U.S. Navy surrenders its command to NATO

 

 


 

 

Reference

[1]https://summit.news/2022/07/20/rand-paul-senate-just-rejected-my-attempt-to-reaffirm-the-constitution/

[2]https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_185870.htm

[3]https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2022/budget_justification/pdfs/11_NATO_Security_Investment_Program/FY22_NATO_Security_Investment_Program.pdf

[4]https://zerogeoengineering.com/2020/fiscal-year-fy-2020-budget-estimates/

[5]https://zerogeoengineering.com/2020/strategic-concept-of-employment-for-unmanned-aircraft-systems-in-nato/

[6]https://zerogeoengineering.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/1683358.pdf

[7]https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_50321.htm

[8]https://americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/NATO-Financing-Gap.pdf

[9]https://zeromandatoryvaxx.com/2022/army-lt-col-issues-urgent-warning-on-jab-mandates-and-catastrophic-vaxx-injuries/

[10]https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/dod-covid-vaccine-mandate-army-dr-samuel-sigoloff-exemptions/

[11]https://zeromandatoryvaxx.com/2022/dod-hides-cv-19-vxx-injuries-as-u-s-military-is-decimated-by-the-mandatory-shots/

[12]https://zeromandatoryvaxx.com/2022/defense-medical-epidemiology-database-dmed-shows-vaccine-induced-side-effects/

[13]https://degraw.substack.com/p/national-security-alert-act-of-war

[14]https://thefederalist.com/2021/07/29/how-woke-u-s-military-leaders-make-u-s-enemies-more-likely-to-start-a-war/

[15]https://nypost.com/2021/05/23/the-woke-takeover-of-the-us-military-endangers-us-all/

[16]https://www.foxnews.com/media/consequences-having-woke-nonsense-military-retired-army-colonel

[17]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyBNmecVtdU

[18]https://usmilitary.org/military-recruitment-crisis/

[19]https://oaths.us/senate-oath-of-office/

[20]https://jdfor2024.com/2022/05/should-dual-citizens-in-congress-and-other-public-offices-be-required-to-disclose-their-citizenship-status/

 


 

Posted on

US National Security in a New Era of Intense Global Competition

This article outlines challenges of USA relations with China, specifically related to political, economic and military domains.

With regard to 5G, the article states:

“The initial salvo for strategic industry leadership began with 5G wireless-telecommunications, as part of the “new information technology” sector. This is the entry point to the global digital and cyber-physical infrastructure with the opportunity to control the network infrastructure. This is also the path to position China as a “first mover” in training artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms on massive global data, driving AI to the network edge and accelerating digital transformation across many industries.”

U.S. leadership has enabled the installation of vulnerable (4G-5G+) wireless systems in the USA that have a built-in back door to China.  Correcting this critical problem with America’s electrical / “smart” grid is crucial to boosting national security, as these easily hackable (weapons) systems not only harvest personal data of Americans 24/7/365, but also engage in constant unwarranted surveillance, in violation of human rights and 4th Amendment Constitutional rights.  -JD

 

 


 

US National Security in a New Era of Intense Global Competition

05 April 2022 | Written by The Honorable Zachary J. Lemnios |  Science, Technology, Engineering, and Policy Studies | Original article published by Potomac Institute for Policy Studies |

A New Era

The United States and China are in a great power competition that will have profound impact on the national security and economic security of both countries for decades. 1,2 This competition aligns across interdependent economic, military, and political vectors. At the core, this is a competition of ideals and governance. But unlike the 20th century Cold War competition with the Soviet Union, the competition with China involves new challenges. The resulting tension between the US and China has opened a new era requiring a new national security framework.3,4

In the past, the United States has confronted the need for a complete transformation in the national security environment. For example, after World War II and the proliferation of nuclear weapons capabilities, the nation undertook Project Solarium and the Project Charles Air Defense Study to define a new national security operating model to contain the Soviet Union.5The competition with China poses an equally significant challenge now.

china

 

 

Economic Competition

The United States and China are in a fierce rivalry spanning a broad range of global markets and complex global supply chains. In 2020, US goods imports of $435 billion and exports of $125 billion reflect a trade imbalance with China. Persistent trade imbalances of this magnitude are unsustainable. This is caused by a complex competition in which the playing field is skewed and can lead to global market instability. Our companies and supply chains are interrelated. We depend upon each other’s markets and host each other’s companies.

The “Made in China 2025” plan, published in 2015, is China’s ten-year plan to reduce China’s dependence on foreign technology and to promote China’s technology position in the global marketplace. 6 China is focused on leading ten key high-tech industries (see the “Made in China 2025” figure above). Particular technology areas of competition with the US include information technology, robotics, new materials, and aerospace equipment. This plan is structured to raise the Chinese domestic content of core components and materials to 70% by 2025. The plan is the foundation of China’s economic competition.

The initial salvo for strategic industry leadership began with 5G wireless-telecommunications, as part of the “new information technology” sector. This is the entry point to the global digital and cyber-physical infrastructure with the opportunity to control the network infrastructure. This is also the path to position China as a “first mover” in training artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms on massive global data, driving AI to the network edge and accelerating digital transformation across many industries. 7

As a result, China is driving the development of technologies in the 5G telecommunications sector, led by its pri- vate sector companies Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent, Huawei, and ZTE (Zhongxing Telecommunications Company Ltd.). While there are over 200 Chinese companies listed on US stock exchanges with a total market capitalization in excess of $2.2 trillion, Huawei and ZTE have been the subject of special scrutiny.8 In late 2019, the Wall Street Journal reported that Huawei had access to as much as $75 billion in support from the China state government.9 In July 2020, the US government officially designated Huawei and ZTE as threats to US national security, because of their close ties to the Chinese Communist Party and China’s military apparatus and their legal obligation to cooperate with China’s intelligence services. More recently, White House Executive Order 13959 identified 59 Chinese entities for which US investments are banned by the Treasury Department.10

The “new information technology” sector of the “Made in China 2025” plan also depends on advanced semiconductor technology. State-of-the-art-microelectronics requires a complex supply chain with specialized technical talent and massive capital investments. Manufacturing facilities (fabs) are benchmarked by semiconductor wafer size (measured in millimeter in diameter), manufacturing volume (wafers/ month) and smallest printed geometric feature (nanometers). Today’s state-of-the-art products are manufactured on 300mm wafers at 5nm geometries. At the end of 2018 there were 112 production-class fabs globally utilizing 300mm wafers. 11 The global industry is projected to add at least 38 new 300mm fabs by 2024. Of these, Taiwan is expected to add 11 large-volume fabs, and China will add 8 to account for half of the global 300mm large-volume fabs by 2024. To support this, the China state government has established an investment fund of $150 billion to finance mergers and acquisitions for companies and technologies in the semiconductor industry.12

As a result, China is poised to successfully compete in the semiconductor sector. China is making significant investments and now has 13% of the global fabless market, up from 5% in 2010. 13 The Chinese semiconductor manufacturing sector has seen an average compound growth rate of nearly 25% since 2014.14 Design of semiconductors is also making significant progress in China. In 2019, China’s semiconductor design sector reached a level that surpassed Taiwan, making China the second-largest design industry cluster after the United States globally. China’s share of semiconductor design grew from 3.6% in 2004 to nearly 43% in 2019.15 Leadership in semiconductor design and manufacturing implies leadership in new information technology, which is but one sector of emphasis of the “Made in China 2025” plan for economic competition.

The US has begun to recognize the criticality of America’s supply chains and the economic security and national security challenge posed by foreign disruption. The recent White House review on this topic launched a comprehensive whole-of-government effort to strengthen domestic competitiveness and supply chain resilience across four critical sectors: (1) semiconductor manufacturing and advanced packaging, (2) large capacity batteries, (3) critical minerals and materials, and (4) pharmaceuticals and active pharmaceutical ingredients.16

To answer the challenge of economic competition, the US will need to greatly improve its ability to understand the national security implications of foreign economic developments and to provide better security for its own developments. New technologies can assist in addressing the national security implications of economic competition. Pursuit and integration of these directions into a comprehensive national defense apparatus might require new agencies and resources. Technology concepts, adapted from the commercial sector, could open new approaches to respond to economic challenges. These include the following.

  • Development and utilization of real-time national financial models to provide early warning indicators of critical supply chain disruptions, on both sides, thereby playing long-term offense and defense. Statistical models applied to open-source financial and industry data are being used today by companies to optimize global supply chain efficiencies and costs. With additional data, these could be used at a national level to preemptively forecast supply chain risks and economic impact and to make decisions to secure critical supplies for national needs.
  • Development and utilization of macroeconomic models to forecast foreign government involvements across global markets, and to provide early indicators of potential disruptive activities. For example, modeling mainland China’s potential economic futures with Taiwan would help to better understand and shape the region to thwart conflicts. Monte Carlo simulation techniques exist today to model thousands of scenarios and alert on early warnings and emerging scenarios, and to game threats and optimize responses. Analysts today monitor military threats; future analysts will use tools to analyze economic threats.
  • Utilization of blockchain, watermarking, design partitioning, and hardware obfuscation security approaches. Such approaches, emerging for use in commercial venues, can mitigate risks of counterfeiting, intellectual property theft, and tampering. A national approach is needed to integrate in-line data from millions of sensors across complex global supply chains with comprehensive analysis of the data to model and deploy strategies to defend the economic homeland.

 

Military Competition

Military strength and resiliency comprise a second element of competition. China’s strategy of “Military-Civil Fusion” poses significant challenges for the US and our allies. China’s Military-Civil Fusion development strategy has leveraged a whole-of-government approach to achieving parity with the United States in several military areas, including air defense systems, land-based conventional ballistic and cruise missiles, and shipbuilding.17 The prospect of China developing and fielding advanced military capabilities by integrating research across its commercial sector with its military and defense industrial sectors, is a key element of this great power competition.

The Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee has established the goal of building a “fully modern military” by 2027, with the capability to defend national sovereignty, safeguard against security threats in the western pacific region, and protect overseas development interests as China’s global economic presence grows.18 These plans include accelerating its integrated development in “mechanization,” “informatization,” and “intelligentization,” comprehensively strengthening military training and preparation. A recent report outlines the pace and impact of China’s military modernization, with a focus on the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA’s) strategy to use science and technology for military purposes.19

Over the past decade, China has made significant progress in key technical areas including radio frequency systems, electronic warfare, hypersonics, and more recently quantum computing. As an example, Chinese researchers recently published an approach to network hypersonic weapons into a smart swarm for coordinated attacks.20 The concept opens the alarming prospect of a saturation attack that would be difficult to counter, even with future air defense systems. Particularly alarming are the references that the Beijing Institute of Technology authors cited, including the Raytheon Tomahawk Cruise Missile (RGM/UGM-109) Technical Manual and System Description.

In the field of quantum technologies, the Intelligent Perception Technology Laboratory of the 14th Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation (CETC) announced China’s first quantum radar system in 2016 and displayed a mockup at the Zhuhai Airshow in 2018. 21,22 More recently, China opened the world’s largest quantum research center to push the frontier of quantum computing. The National Laboratory for Quantum Information Sciences, a $10 billion four-million square foot facility, has programs in quantum sensing, self-contained navigation, quantum computing, and quantum communications.

The United States has relied upon US technology leadership, unmatched engineering talent, and highly trained military personnel to build, deploy, and operate the world’s most technologically advanced military. With the development and availability of key advanced technologies from the commercial sector, nation state competitors and non-state actors now have equivalent access, eroding the technology overmatch to which our nation has grown accustomed. To recover and maintain technology superiority for military systems, new emphasis needs to be placed on defense technologies, involving new researchand development agencies and approaches. Some concepts that should be explored prior to establishing such centers include the following.

  • Faster movement toward reinvigorating US technology development demonstrating and fielding advanced technology in key areas . The Department of Defense can do so by expanding its Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) and Department Laboratories, or instituting new ones, in partnership with US industry. By using new partnership models to engage in a campaign of continuous development with field testing and integration, the US can match and exceed the efficiency of China’s Military-Civil Fusion model for military systems development.
  • Tools and techniques for persistent Gray Zone operations in competition with China. New approaches are needed to comprehend the long-term regional environment—economically, politically, and militarily. Long-duration campaign planning tools must employ tailorable and reversible effects at the most effective points in a regional campaign. Machine learning and dynamic planning could be adapted from the commercial sector and tailored with appropriate sensor data and modeling to preemptively plan for emerging scenarios. Emerging tools and techniques are beginning to provide military planners a “look ahead” into incipient scenarios and the opportunity to plan accordingly.23
  • A new deterrence strategy to address a combined Nuclear, Chemical, Biological, Cyber (NCBC) threat, expanding the range of highest priority threats requiring national capabilities . New deterrence, detection, and countermeasure techniques are needed considering that any combination of NCBC employment could present an existential threat to the United States. Natural or man-made, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in millions of deaths and crippled the world’s economy for many months. Fielding a global NCBC early warning capability is essential as engineered pathogens could have a similar impact. Deploying such a capability globally with allies and partner nations requires US global leadership.

 

Political Competition

Political strength is the third, and perhaps most challenging, element of the great power competition between the United States and China. China has harnessed its political and military strength in the South China Sea on a Gray Zone strategy. This has become an operational domain characterized by a long campaign of low threshold actions to achieve long-term strategic objectives without crossing the threshold of military confrontation. 24 It includes elements of Hybrid Warfare25 and Soft Power.26

China and Russia are increasingly using Gray Zone means to achieve their objectives without direct military engagement and below the level of war.27 The Gray Zone is growing rapidly in the South China Sea, where China is using coercion, intimidation, propaganda, and manipulation to expand its position in the region.28 China has built an artificial island chain, reclaimed disputed land, militarized islands, and is using legal arguments and diplomatic influence to expand its position.

In early 2020, China’s State Council established two new districts in Sansha City, a prefecture-level city headquartered on Woody Island which governs the bulk of China’s territorial claims in the South China Sea. This development will expand China’s control over the region and further complicate political and diplomatic dynamics.

While military deterrence is essential, the United States and our allies need a set of new technical and operational capabilities to operate in a persistent and multidomain Gray Zone.29,30

Prevailing in a prolonged political competition with China requires the United States to develop and implement a whole-of-government approach to integrate economic, political, and military signatures, indications, and warnings. The following technical approaches should be explored and deployed.

  • Intelligence, advanced forecasting, and decision support capabilities to detect, tailor, and preemptively plan economic, political, and military actions. Political actions can involve influence operations, marketing, competitive assistance, as well as tariffs and sanctions. Techniques can be adapted from the commercial sector to process live-stream data and alert on emergent behavior.
  • Whole-of-government synchronous strategic messaging and information operations using approaches from the commercial sector. Social media has opened a new strategic communication channel for enabling red teaming against a range of simulated actions and responses from China. The development of multi-domain models could open the prospects of predictive risk assessment to extend our economic, political, and military options.
  • New technical approaches to detect and protect government, enterprise, and private information that are increasingly entangled and increasingly vulnerable. Developing an effective layered information defense system is a daunting challenge. In addition to protecting critical infrastructure, effective capabilities would position the United States as a leader in information security, countering China’s cybersecurity laws that permit the government to obtain any information that they deem has an impact on Chinese security.

 

Link To Read the Full Article  Here_Potomac Institute for Policy Studies

 

Image Source

 


 

 

Understanding “Unrestricted Warfare”

Link

 

 


 

Posted on

UN Agency ITU sets global standard for 5G requirements

 

 

 

UN Agency ITU sets global standard for 5G requirements — NTIA is seeking public comments Re:(ITU) World Telecommunication Development Conference
May 24, 2021 | UN ITU | Link To Document_Department of Commerce_[Docket No. 210503-0097] |

For many it is not surprising that a specialized UN agency, the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), sets the global standard for 5G requirements.[1]  

This fact is important because the international UN Agenda 2030 coordination of regulations by ITU is effectively sidestepping local governance, public safety and national sovereignty, by sidelining essential public oversight and control of hazardous-pollution transmitting infrastructures (4G-5G+).

 

 

 



 


The US Department of Commerce and NTIA is requesting public comment prior to the International Telecommunication Union’s (ITU) World Telecommunication Development Conference November 8-19, 2021, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. [2

 


 


Local efforts to regulate and control wireless microwave radiation transmitting infrastructures (4G-5G+) are more important than ever!  You can send a letter now to your legislators to demand a halt to the deployment of microwave radiation transmitting towers and antennas (4G-5G+).  
Continue to educate your legislators on this matter of greatest urgency and keep organizing in your town to get copper wire or fiber optic cable all-the-way to the premises (FTTP). Wired internet connections are far superior to wireless, and customers have already paid for FTTP.[3]
Thank you for your efforts!  Together we are making a difference. 

 

 


https://mystreetmychoice.com
[1] https://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/5g_sc_report_august_1.pdf   p.6
[2] https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2021-09581.pdf
[3] https://kushnickbruce.medium.com/irregulator-treasure-map-billions-for-broadband-in-your-state-and-refunds-on-your-communications-ccd60561aefb

The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency for information and communication technologies – ICTs.

“Founded in 1865 to facilitate international connectivity in communications networks, we allocate global radio spectrum and satellite orbits, develop the technical standards that ensure networks and technologies seamlessly interconnect, and strive to improve access to ICTs to underserved communities worldwide.  Every time you make a phonecall via the mobile, access the Internet or send an email, you are benefitting from the work of ITU.”  LINK

 

 

 


“How is ITU Funded?

TU currently has a membership of 193 countries and more than 800 non-Member State entities, including private companies and academic institutions. ITU members provided approximately 123 million CHF or about 70 per cent of ITU’s total funding in 2016.

Member State contributions accounted for 61 percent of ITU’s total revenue in 2016. The top ten Member State donors were Japan, the United States, Germany, France, Italy, the Russian Federation, China, Australia, Canada, and Saudi Arabia. Together, they account for 34 per cent of ITU’s total funding.The remaining 183 countries, including 44 of the least developed countries in the world, provided 26 per cent.”


Link To Top Contributors