Posted on

Technocratic control schemes of the parasite class

November 28, 2022 | Technocratic control schemes of the parasite class |

Technocracy can be defined as a scientific dictatorship.

The method of control is through a centrally organized, linked, and monitored monetary and economic system.

The 1938 Technocrat Magazine described technocracy as “The science  of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population.”

The UN is the vehicle attempting to install technocratic world governance. In lockstep with Agenda 21/2030, 193 nations have collaborated to replace individual liberty, national sovereignty, and free enterprise, with collectivism, control and slavery.

One way to begin rejecting the technocrat control scheme is by turning off the “smart” phone, which functions as a globalist weapon for monitoring and enslavement.

Another way to unplug from the globalist agenda is by organizing locally, working with State and Local legislators to enforce the Constitution and protect individual and State sovereignty. -JD

 


 

By Iain Davis |  November 25, 2022  |  off-guardian.org  |

Totalitarianism is a form of government that attempts to assert total control over the lives of its citizens. It is characterized by strong central rule that attempts to control and direct all aspects of individual life through coercion and repression. It does not permit individual freedom. Traditional social institutions and organizations are discouraged and suppressed, making people more willing to be merged into a single unified movement. Totalitarian states typically pursue a special goal to the exclusion of all others, with all resources directed toward its attainment, regardless of the cost.

That “special” goal is sustainable development and no cost, either financial or humanitarian, is too great to tackle the alleged “climate crisis.” In reality, climate change is simply the excuse for sustainable development and it is through the global policy commitment to “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs) that technocracy is being installed.

A technocratic society is called a Technate and the world’s first Technate has emerged in China. In this two part exploration we will look at how this system was constructed, who was behind it and why technocracy is now being foisted upon all of us.

These articles are drawn largely from my 2021 publication Pseudopandemic. It is free to subscribers to my blog.

GLOBAL TECHNOCRATIC GOVERNANCE

In order for global technocracy to be rolled-out, authority needs to be centrally controlled at the global level. Governments, intergovernmental organisations and multinational corporations have collaborated to form a global public-private partnership  (G3P) for this purpose.

Throughout the 20th and 21st century the G3P network has sought to construct global governance. In turn, global governance enables the worldwide distribution of the technocracy that governments then convert into national policy commitments. Many components of global technocratic governance have already been established.

The World Heath Organisation (WHO) delivers global governance of public health; global access to technological development is meted out through the World Intellectual Property Organization; the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) works to coordinate economic policies between nation-states and global trade is monitored and controlled through the trade agreements overseen by the World Trade Organisation.

The Bank For International Settlements (BIS) coordinates global monetary policy and the flow of capital; the direction of education, academia, the sciences and cultural development is steered through the U.N Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and the seizure of the global commons and the “financialisation” of nature—through natural asset companies and other mechanisms—is nearing completion.

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are centrally controlled through global governance, primarily by the U.N Development and Environmental programs (UNDP & UNEP). The necessary global scientific consensus on climate change is centrally administered and the appropriate research funding streams allocated, by the U.N’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The powerful individuals, pushing the G3P project forward, are a collective of mass polluters, robber barons, land grabbers and the world’s leading exponents of worker exploitation, market manipulation, monetary extortion (usury) and oppression. They form what would otherwise be considered a criminal cartel but have greenwashed their reputations through their commitment to so-called “sustainable development.”

Often referred to as the elite, a more fitting description is “the parasite class.”

The G3P has managed to convince billions that it is committed to sustainable, net zero, environmentalism and wants to “save the planet.” It is actually determined to empower global governance and enforce technocracy upon humanity through SDGs and the associated policy Agendas. Regardless of what you think about the causes of climate change or the level of risk it presents, SDGs do nothing to address itand are designed to serve no-one and nothing other than the G3P and its interests.

In order to requisition, commodify, audit and ultimately divide up the Earth’s resources among themselves, the stakeholder capitalists, at the heart of the G3P, also need technocratic control. Once humanity figures out what has happened, technocracy will enable the G3P to shutdown resistance through literal population control.

Every human being will be individually monitored by Artificial Intelligence (AI) networks which will punish or reward them, depending upon their behaviour. Biosecurity and environmental concerns are set to provide the justification for this enslavement.

Much like the quack pseudo-science of eugenics, which many G3P “thought leaders” seem to believe, Technocracy was the social sciencecertainty of its day. Like eugenics, while it has subsequently faded from public consciousness, it is still avidly pursued by the G3P’s compartmentalised hierarchy.

TECHNOCRACY

In 1911, arguably the worlds first management consultant, Frederick Winslow Taylor, published The Principles of Scientific Management. His publication came at the culmination of the Progressive Era in the United States.

This was a period marked by the political activism of the US middle class who mainly sought to address the underlying social problems, as they saw them, of excessive industrialisation, immigration and political corruption. So-called “Taylorism,” fixated with the imminent exhaustion of natural resources and advocating efficient “scientific management systems,” was in the spirit of the age.

Taylor wrote:

In the past the man has been first; in the future the system must be first. [. . .] The best management is a true science, resting upon clearly defined laws, rules, and principles. [. . . ] The fundamental principles of scientific management are applicable to all kinds of human activities, from our simplest individual acts to the work of our great corporations.

 

Link To Full Article HERE


 

 

Image Source

Posted on

The Microwave Radiation Invasion

Image: 5G tower at Mulberry Street and Bayard Street, New York City.   Photo credit: AD

November 11, 2022 | Zero5G.comThe Microwave Radiation Invasion | Who is monitoring and measuring MICROWAVE RADIATION?

A recent article in the New York Times citing “mysterious towers looming over New York’s sidewalks” has drawn much needed attention to the problem of reckless deployment of polluting wireless irradiating antennas, being marketed as “5G”.  

What is unknown to most cell phone users, is that in addition to the advertised “faster downloads,” other purposes of “4G-5G-6G” may include, unwarranted biometric surveillance and data collection, track and trace, vaxx surveillance with interactive capabilities, digital currency, digital ID, weather modification, weaponry aspects, and other globalist, technocratic intrusions.

The NYT must have missed the story in 2021, when the proposed deployment of such hazardous “5G” infrastructure (Link5G) was strongly opposed by New Yorkers. Residents were ignored and dismissed by the office of Mayor Adams, NYC Council Members and NY state officials.  

 

Source     Jumbo “small cells”-  Link5G

 

The Link5G cell towers shown above and other microwave towers and antennas are designed to transmit and receive pulsed, data-modulated Radiofrequency/MICROWAVE RADIATION(RF/MWR).     12-13-2021_Link5G-PDF

 


“MICROWAVE RADIATION” is a term that the telecommunications industry does not want the public to talk about or understand.

 

 

“5G” is Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation (RF/MWR), a hazardous, xenobiotic (foreign-to-life) physical agent, that is also used by the military and police as a weapon. The idea that the adverse bio-effects and harms of MICROWAVE RADIATION are not known, is false.

Well documented in tens of thousands of scientific studies are significant adverse bio-effects including neurological disorders, blood clotting, cardiomyopathy, DNA damage, diabetes, increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, sleep disruption, sperm damage, even at very low levels of RF/MWR exposure.

Additionally, acute radiation sickness “is just exactly like a terrible flu,” according to Colonel L. Andrew Huff, Director Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute National Naval Medical Center.

 

Link to What is 5G?

Link To Congress is moving forward on classified 6G wireless

Link To MICROWAVE RADIATION Primer       

Link To Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Microwave Radiation Exposures

 

 

 


5G is likely to prove to be an ecological disaster without essential local public oversight and safety regulations to immediately reduce and eliminate harmful RF/MWR pollution.

 

The map below provides an unverified estimate of how many microwave towers and antennas are located within a 3 mile radius of the recently deployed “5G” jumbo tower located at Bayard Street and Mulberry Street in New York City.

Source: Antennasearch.com

According to antennasearch.com, there are 680 microwave towers and 9,688 microwave antennas within a 3 mile radius of this location.

 

 

RF Readings taken at Mulberry Street and Bayard Street, New York City on November 10, 2022

Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation (RF/MWR) detected at Mulberry Street and Bayard Street in NYC.   Photo credit: AD

 

Peak RF: 27,960 µW/m²  > 1,000 = Extreme Hazard

Peak Volts per Meter  37 V/m  >10 = Extreme Hazard  

Peak Magnetic Field 49.4 Milligauss mG  >5 = Extreme Hazard

 

Question: Is the jumbo 5G tower on?

Answer: RF/MWR levels at this location are in the extreme hazard range, so if the tower is not operating now, the addition of the jumbo 5G tower will be far more hazardous.

 

Link To Biologically-Based RF Microwave Radiation Exposure Guidelines

 

 


 

Complaints?

Contact the Mayor HERE

Contact NYC Council Members HERE

 

Reference:

Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G

https://icbe-emf.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/ICBE-EMF-paper-12940_2022_900_OnlinePDF_Patched-1.pdf

 

Building biology, an empirical science, and tens of thousands of peer-reviewed studies have positively established adverse bio-effects of  RF/MWR.

 

There is no “safe” level of exposure to MICROWAVE RADIATION.

 

 

MICROWAVE RADIATION bio-effects increase synergistically, not merely additively.          Chart of Microwavelengths for 5G here

Harvard School of Pubic Health Researcher Susan Clark on Microwave Radiation Hazards

 

 


 

 

Evidence for a connection between coronavirus disease-19 and exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless communications including 5G.LINK

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34778597/

 

 

 


 

It’s crucial to recognize that the FCC is following the international standard set by the United Nations ITU.

 

United Nations ITU – The most important agency you have never heard of:

 


 

 

The UN ITU role of globally standardizing “5G” underscores a key governance flaw: Rather than following the Constitution by protecting the rights (and safety) of individuals, many public officials have been led to believe that the FCC, UN ITU, and industry guidelines trump local oversight and control.

 

This error was addressed by a Federal Judge in New York on July 29, 2022 in the case of Extenet Systems Inc. v. The Village of Flower Hill. In a far reaching decision, the Court reaffirmed the power preserved to State and local governments by the United States Congress (47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(A)) entitled “general authority,” to regulate placement, construction, siting, and maintenance of cell towers and wireless facilities within their respective jurisdictions.

https://casetext.com/case/extenet-sys-v-vill-of-flower-hill

 

 


 

Now is the time for individuals in their local and state jurisdictions to step up together and prioritize public health and safety by controlling and regulating operations of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (WTFs).

 

 


 

 

Examples of USA communities and jurisdictions that have stopped 5G, prevented cell towers or addressed the RF/MWR crisis:

Ithaca, New York ( Strengthened Ordinance ) 2020
Letter from Mayor — Scarsdale, New York  2020
Woodstock, New York 2021
Idaho, Dalton Gardens 2022
Easton, Connecticut 2020
Ocean City, Maryland 2021
Lewis County Tennessee 2022

 

 

Montclair, New Jersey 2020

https://zero5g.com/2020/montclair-new-jersey-victory/

 

Governor of Wyoming FCC Letter to immediately address RF Radiation Levels 2022

https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Governor-Gordon-Letter-to-FCC-.pdf

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 


 

 

Industry RF/MW Radiation Guideline Is NOT A Safety Standard

LINK

 

 


 

Posted on

Have You Heard About 5G & The Internet of Things?

Have You Heard About 5G & The Internet of Things? |  Zero5G.com

“5G” marketing is so skillful, that many people are under the false impression that this “product” is mainly about improving their cell phone “services.” What is not mentioned in slick advertising campaigns, is that “5G,” and ALL THE “G’s,” are actually MICROWAVE RADIATION pollution, that is transmitted by antenna systems 24/7/365.

MICROWAVE RADIATION is a hazardous physical agent that is harmful to human beings, our environment, and all life on Earth. Even devout environmentalists may not have considered the consequences of contaminating our environment with MICROWAVE RADIATION and continuous exposure to this hazardous agent.

Advertising is powerful and clever so as to emphasize certain “positive” aspects and hide negatives. So it is with the Internet of Things, or the IoT, made up of a combination of “5G” and other antenna and satellite systems to connect EVERYTHING to the internet. Those that have been paying attention understand this as total surveillance and potential control via biometrics,  blockchain, and monitoring under the skin.  Even beyond the IoT, is the Internet of Bodies or the IoB.

While the mainstream media continuously promotes distractions from matters of greatest urgency, recently the U.S. Department of Commerce “has appointed 16 experts for the new Internet of Things Advisory Board (IoTAB), to advise the Internet of Things Federal Working Group.” The announcement describes the board as stakeholders outside the federal government who are experts in the IoT. Additionally, the U.S. Congress is moving forward on classified 6G wireless.

One may wonder why all the secrecy if the genuine goal is simply for everyone to have faster speeds and more services for cell phones? Turns out that the IoT( and the IoB ) looks very much like Russia’s new “Safe Cities” and China’s surveillance state.  In the USA, the 4th Amendment of our Constitution guarantees the right to be free from unwarranted surveillance and unreasonable searches and seizures.  More and more towns and counties around the USA are preventing the reckless deployment of these de facto weapons systems.

5G and the IoT are not what they are being advertised to be.

 


 

October 27, 2022 | By Riley Waggaman | The Off-Guardian

Link To Article

 


 

 

1 February 2021 | By Will Serrano  |  Journal of Network and Computer Applications

 

Link To Article_BLOCKCHAIN SMARTCITIES-TWO COLUMNS

 


 

October 5, 2022 | The Intercept  | Source

Link To Full Article @ The Intercept HERE

 

 


 

Posted on

Congress moving forward on classified 6G wireless

October 27, 2022 |  Zero5G.com |  Congressional Record Source  |

Congress is moving forward on classified 6G wireless communications systems, even though microwave irradiating infrastructures (+4G-5G-6G+) are opposed by communities around the nation and worldwide, due to their hazardous pollution emissions continuously contaminating the environment, and the built-in, unwarranted surveillance capabilities.

According to microwave weapons expert Barrie Trower, 5G and wireless radiation constitutes weaponry. LINK

More and more communities are putting the brakes on these harmful antenna systems. LINK

A recent study by The International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF), entitled “Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G,” confirmed that FCC and ICNIRP guidelines, set in the 1990’s are not protective of human health or the environment and need to be updated.

The federal government 6G push is led by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). These agencies are in fact members of the UN International Telecommunications Union (UN ITU).

According to the NTIA, the UN ITU sets the global standard for 5G. The UN ITU is focused on implementation of Agenda 2030. LINK

RELATED: The International Telecommunication Union: The Most Important UN Agency You Have Never Heard Of_Link

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link To Congressional Record

 

 


 

 

 

U.S. Senate Seeks to Establish Classified Council for 6G Development and International Cooperation

LINK

 

 


 

“The federal government should continue to support private, robust networks built on consensus-based global standards driven by the private sector and aggressively remove local barriers to deployment.” p.9

AT&T 5G UN ITU Global Standards

LINK

 

 


 

Posted on

HAARP RF Radiation “Experiments” Underway

Image Source | October 21, 2022 | ZEROGeoEngineering.com | HAARP RF Radiation “Experiments” Underway  | UAF Geophysical Institute

The University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF), operating under an agreement with the Air Force, has started 13 new “experiments” radiating the upper atmosphere and ionosphere with up to 3.6 megawatts of power. The Air Force originally developed and owned HAARP (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program) but transferred the facility to UAF in August 2015. The program is made possible by a $9.3 million grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF), one of the original drivers of Weather and Climate Modification in 1965.

These experiments are another example of the lack of meaningful ethical and moral standards in technology. For example, what are the environmental and human health bio-effects of HAARP deploying massive amounts of (PULSED) Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation (RF/MW)? Questions such as this are absent from the “scientific” discussion regarding the pollution footprint created by these reckless “experiments”.

While HAARP may be new to many, research of this kind has been ongoing and explored by militaries as game-changing weaponry, especially since the brain is the battlefield of modern warfare.

A 1975 DARPA report titled, SOVIET DEVELOPMENTS IN WEATHER MODIFICATION, CLIMATE MODIFICATION AND CLIMATOLOGY stated:

“The Institute for the Study of the Brain (sic) of the University of California is cited as engaged in research on the debilitating effect of weak vibrational fields on human behavior.” -p.85

Bioethics in technology is urgently needed to reign in systems and programs which have the potential to harm and destroy life on Earth.  -JD

 


 

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ALTERING A REGION IN THE EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE, IONOSPHERE, AND/OR MAGNETOSPHERE __LINK 

2021_Geoengineering: NSF $9.3 Million Funds HAARP in Gakona, Alaska__LINK

HAARP Weather Control__LINK

Holes In Heaven__LINK

 

 


 

Neuroscientist Dr James Giordano. Neuro-Weapons. Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). Brain Implants.

Presenting developments in the field of ‘Neuro-Weapons’. ‘The Brain is the Battlefield of the Future’ on 09/25/18 at the Modern War Institute, United States Military Academy West Point.

Link To Video

 

The Brain Is The Battlefield For The Future_LINK

McCain Conference 2022: Brain Computer Interface__LINK


 

Link To  5G and the Realities of Neuroweapons

 

 

 


 

From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory__LINK

 

 


 

Microwave Emissions and the Problem of Modern Viral Diseases.__LINK

 

 


 

Evidence for a connection between coronavirus disease-19 and exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless communications including 5G.__LINK

 

 


 

 

Effects of microwave radiation on brain energy metabolism and related mechanisms.__LINK

 

 


 

Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G__LINK

 


 

Technology Convergence 2035:Humanity vs. AI__LINK

 


 

To learn more about advocating for a ban on atmospheric testing, please email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 


 

Posted on

New peer-reviewed paper presents scientific evidence challenging safety of current wireless exposure limits

October 18, 2022 | ZERO5G.com | Press Release | Report | Fact Sheet | Flawed Assumptions FCC & ICNRP| Environmental Health Trust | New peer-reviewed paper presents scientific evidence challenging safety of current wireless exposure limits |

The International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF), authors of a recent scientific study, have confirmed that the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the International Commission on Nonionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) wireless exposure guideline, based on science from the 1980’s, is wrong and needs to be revised.

According to the researchers, the current RFR [radiofrequency radiation] exposure limits do not consider potential synergistic effects that reflect modern day exposures to multiple environmental agents. Current guidelines also do not consider duration of exposure to RFR.

Adverse health effects at exposures far below the threshold dose claimed by these agencies, are well documented in scientific studies that according to Dr. Ronald Melnick, “have demonstrated oxidative effects associated with exposure to low-intensity RFR [radiofrequency radiation], and significant adverse effects including cardiomyopathy, carcinogenicity, DNA damage, neurological disorders, increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, and sperm damage.”

View 15 minute slide presentation reviewing the paper HERE

-JD


 

Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G

 

Link To Document HERE

 

 


 

 

Link To Press Release HERE

 

 


 

Posted on

Lewis County Tennessee Resolution Passed Requesting Research Proving Safety of 5G

Lewis County Tennessee Resolution Passed Requesting Research Proving Safety of 5G

Image Source_Koppel, T., Hardell, L.”Measurements of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, including 5G, in the city of Columbia, SC, USA”. World Academy of Sciences Journal 4, no. 3 (2022): 22. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2022.157

October 12, 2022 | Zero5G.com | Environmental Health Trust

In April 2022, the Lewis County Board of Commissioners passed a resolution requesting more research on 5G wireless facilities to determine if the technology is safe for humans before allowing more deployment.

Note: “5G” is a marketing term.  The real agent is microwave radiation, a hazardous physical agent that is also used as a weapon. -JD

 


 

The Lewis County Board of Commissioners

RESOLUTION : Requesting our State & Federal Governments Conduct More Research on 5G Wireless Facilities to Determine if Such Technology is Safe for Humans Before Allowing More Deployment of 5G 

WHEREAS, according to the World Health Organization, there is limited research on the  frequencies used in 5G technology and its effect on humans; and

WHEREAS, as the result of such limited research, several local residents have repeatedly  expressed to the Lewis County Board of Commissioners that they would like to see our state and  federal governments, specifically the Federal Communications Commission, conduct an in-depth  independent study to re-evaluate the health effects of 5G wireless technology on humans;

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the legislative body of Lewis County meeting in  regular session this 18th day of April, 2022, that we hereby request our state and federal  governments, and especially the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), conduct more  research on 5G Wireless Facilities to determine if such technology is safe for humans, before  allowing more deployment of 5G;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon passage, a copy of this Resolution shall be mailed  to each of our elected state and federal representatives, including State Representative David  Byrd, State Senator Joey Hensley, U.S. Congressman Mark Green, U.S. Senator Marsha Blackburn, and U.S. Senator Bill Hagerty.

We, the undersigned County Commissioners, move the adoption of the above resolution.

 


 

 

Link To Read Full EHT Article HERE

 


 

1985 | CNN Special Investigation | “Imagine the implications of a weapon with no visible trace…”

Link To Video

 


 

Posted on

Technology Convergence 2035: Humanity vs. AI

 

October 9, 2022 | Zero5G.com | Technology Convergence 2035: Humanity vs. AI | Image Source

“Public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.” –President Eisenhower, 1961

Those working to reign in and shut down “5G” are recognizing that military-driven[1] wireless telecommunications[2] infrastructure[3] is out-of-control and being purposed for much more than the advertised capabilities.

                                                        “5G” is a marketing term.  The agent is microwave radiation.

“5G” is the foundation for “6G” [4], to enable “machine intelligence,” aka Artificial Intelligence or “AI”. This type of technology is being designed to function without human control and oversight, which is catastrophic since machines are incapable of applying ethics, morals, care, compassion, and other advanced human values, without being programmed to implement these attributes, by humans.

The skillful use of  “5G” advertising is designed to attract consumers to accept and buy the latest products claiming to offer greater convenience and entertainment. What isn’t advertised is the weaponized aspects of wireless telecommunications systems.

In addition to constantly contaminating the environment with harmful, xenobiotic (foreign-to-life), microwave radiation[5], and the potential[6] for interacting with, and/or activating components in mRNA injections, wireless telecommunications facilities(WTFs), distributed antenna systems(DAS), satellites, and the highly addictive ‘smart’ devices, may be used for surveillance.

[Related: NANOROUTERS FOUND IN THE VAXX__LINK]

The fact that wireless devices have the capability to be constantly monitoring[7], tracking, collecting, harvesting, exploiting, and selling the user’s personal information, has yet to be widely understood by the general public. Damaging data can even be secretly planted[8] on a device or network without the user’s knowledge or consent, destroying credibility, careers, and lives.

In a 2020 US military document[9] titled, “Estimation of Technology Convergence,” “The Mad Scientist Fellows” produced research and analysis regarding how artificial intelligence, biotechnology, quantum technology, nanotechnology, neurotechnology, autonomous technology, robotics and information technology might converge in the next 15 years. The vision is for a decentralized AI to remotely manage networks including weapons systems, without a human operator.

[Related: 5G and the Realities of Neuroweapons_LINK]

Link To_ Technology Convergence 2035

 

Referenced throughout the Estimation of Technology Convergence by 2035 report, is NVIDIA[10], a company of financial interest[11] to U.S. Congress member Pelosi. NVIDIA is a leader in AI chips and their integration with the IoT (Internet of Things).

 

[Related: The IoB (Internet of Bodies)_LINK]

[Related: U.S. Senate Seeks to Establish Classified Council for 6G Development and International Cooperation LINK]

 

Technology Convergence 2035 reads like a technocratic[12] dream, laying the foundation for permanent imprisonment of all human beings and total control of every aspect of life on Earth. The merging of humans with machines, digital twins, smart dust, manufacturing with graphene, human tissue engineering, ‘smart’ cities, and other AI system concepts are some of the topics discussed in this paper.

 

 

 

“once the smart dust is distributed, it is essentially impossible to recover. In turn, corporations would have access to a multitude of sensors capable of gathering audio and/or visual data without the consent of those being monitored.” – p.108

 

[Related: NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]_LINK]

 

The fact that Russia and China are not factoring in moral or ethical constraints on the use of AI technologies is mentioned as a problem and further justification for AI weapon systems development.

Link To_ Technology Convergence 2035

 

In another article[13] related to national security, 5G (and the competition for global AI dominance) is described as the “entry point to the global digital and cyber-physical infrastructure with the opportunity to control the network infrastructure.”

Source: https://www.potomacinstitute.org/steps/featured-articles/april-2022/us-national-security-in-a-new-era-of-intense-global-competition

 

 

Strong local safety regulations, civilian leadership, and ethics are urgently needed to begin reigning in out-of-control wireless communications systems. As microwave weapons expert Dr. Barrie Trower[14] stated[15] in conversation with Claire Edwards[16], wireless is not necessary for internet connection. Devices and computers can be wired responsibly to eliminate the grave threat of microwave radiation to human civilization and all life on Earth.

 

Link To Video

 

[Related: NanoTechnology Geoengineering_Link] 

 


 

 

Biodigital ConvergenceBombshell Document Reveals the True Agenda_Corbett Report_Link To Article

Image Source

“Are you getting a sense of where this is going yet? Do not gloss over this material and do not take it in stride. A government think tank is openly talking about the blurring of the lines between biological and digital systems, between living and nonliving organisms, and how this could lead to “new human bodies” and new senses of human identity. The transhumanist plan to effect the extinction of homo sapiens is being calmly discussed and dissected as if it’s just another technological breakthrough by the scientific boffins.”

– James Corbett

Link To Article

 


 

Reference

[1] https://zero5g.com/2019/dod-cio-brief-to-jhu-apl-5g-ieee-summit/

[2] https://zero5g.com/2019/the-5g-ecosystem-risks-and-opportunities-dor-dod/

[3] https://zero5g.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/2021-1-12_115445_national_strategy_to_secure_5g_implementation_plan_and_annexes_a_f_final.pdf

[4] https://zero5g.com/2021/6g-wireless-systems-ai-the-internet-of-bodies-iob-and-the-internet-of-everything-ioe/

[5] https://zero5g.com/2022/wi-fi-operates-around-the-same-frequency-as-the-microwave-oven-2-45-ghz/

[6] https://zero5g.com/2022/neuroweapons-5g-vaxx-wmd/

[7] https://www.vice.com/en/article/y3pnkw/us-military-bought-mass-monitoring-augury-team-cymru-browsing-email-data

[8] Source_twitter

[9] https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1115198.pdf

[10] https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/on-demand/session/gtcspring22-s41622/

[11] https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov/public_disc/ptr-pdfs/2022/20021438.pdf

[12] https://www.technocracy.news/military-looks-for-ai-to-replace-decision-making-on-battle-field/

[13] https://www.potomacinstitute.org/steps/featured-articles/april-2022/us-national-security-in-a-new-era-of-intense-global-competition

[14] http://geopathology-za.wikidot.com/barrie-trower#toc0

[15] https://zero5g.com/2022/5g-is-a-weapon/

[16] https://forlifeonearth.weebly.com

 


 

Posted on

NEUROWeapons: 5G + VAXX = WMD

NEUROWeapons: 5G + VAXX = WMD

October 4, 2022  |  Image Source  | In this conversation with Stew Peters, Karen Kingston provides more information regarding NEUROWeapons, including patents, military research, and 5G “Smart Robots,” that are a grave threat to human existence.

Removing microwave towers and antennas, ditching ‘smart’ phones, and stopping the shots is crucial to saving humanity and ALL Life On Earth. -JD

 


 

EVIDENCE- Mind Control Neuroweapon In The Vaxx: Hidden Document EXPOSES Jab Can React to 5G Towers

Link To Video

 


 

Reference

Battlescape Brain: Engaging Neuroscience in Defense Operations__LINK

PREFUSION CORONAVIRUS SPIKE PROTEINS AND THEIR USE__US20200061185A1__LINK

Carbon Nanotubes and Quantum Dots: Army Thinks VERY Small__LINK

Cloud AI Robots Family__LINK

From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory__LINK

Microwave Emissions and the Problem of Modern Viral Diseases.__LINK

Evidence for a connection between coronavirus disease-19 and exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless communications including 5G.__LINK

Effects of microwave radiation on brain energy metabolism and related mechanisms.__LINK

5G and the Realities of Neuroweapons__LINK

5G Is A Weapon__LINK

NANOROUTERS FOUND IN THE VAXX__LINK

Nano-technology in Covid Injections–It’s for Communications, It’s Technological Parasitism__LINK

Internet of Bodies__William & Mary Law Review__LINK

2016_Obama Connects to 5G with wireless initiative__LINK

2020__Trump_National Strategy To Secure 5G__LINK

2022_Biden_5G Agreement__LINK

 


 

Brain Science from Bench to Battlefield: The Realities – and Risks – of Neuroweapons__Dr. James Giordano

LINK

 


 

 

The Brain is the Battlefield: The Realities of Neuroweapons

LINK

 


 

 

“Teslaphoresis” is self-assembly at a distance.

April 14, 2016 | Mike Williams | Rice University |  Source

Link To Video

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

Posted on

Spawn Of DARPA: ARPA-H Is Fast Track To Digital Dictatorship

 

Spawn Of DARPA: ARPA-H Is Fast Track To Digital Dictatorship

The political ruling class is fast tracking a “digital dictatorship” over human beings through funding and weaponizing of rogue alphabet agencies. Wearables, smart phones, and other monitoring devices connecting to Artificial Intelligence via the United Nations ITU’s wireless grid, ( +4G-5G-6G+Satellites ) comprise the architecture of the Internet of Bodies (IoB). Humans are viewed as hackable animals by this parasitic billionaire ruling class.

Freedom of humanity involves active non-participation, consciously unplugging ourselves physically, spiritually, and financially from the ‘smart’ grid. -JD


 

This Biden Proposal Could Make the US a “Digital Dictatorship”

September 21, 2022 | By Whitney Webb | Unlimited Hangout | Technocracy News | PDF

Biden intends to appoint Dr. Reenee Wegrzyn, a former scientist with DARPA, as the inaugural director of the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H). Her specialties are synthetic biology, genetic engineering and data collection through biosurveillance. ARPA-H will be a swarming hive for Transhumanist scientists and projects. ⁃ TN Editor

Source: https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/05/investigative-reports/this-biden-proposal-could-make-the-us-a-digital-dictatorship/

Last Wednesday, President Biden was widely praised in mainstream and health-care–focused media for his call to create a “new biomedical research agency” modeled after the US military’s “high-risk, high-reward” Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA. As touted by the president, the agency would seek to develop “innovative” and “breakthrough” treatments for cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and diabetes, with a call to “end cancer as we know it.”

Far from “ending cancer” in the way most Americans might envision it, the proposed agency would merge “national security” with “health security” in such as way as to use both physical and mental health “warning signs” to prevent outbreaks of disease or violence before they occur. Such a system is a recipe for a technocratic “pre-crime” organization with the potential to criminalize both mental and physical illness as well as “wrongthink.”

The Biden administration has asked Congress for $6.5 billion to fund the agency, which would be largely guided by Biden’s recently confirmed top science adviser, Eric Lander. Lander, formerly the head of the Silicon Valley–dominated Broad Institute, has been controversial for his ties to eugenicist and child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and his relatively recent praise for James Watson, an overtly racist eugenicist. Despite that, Lander is set to be confirmed by the Senate and Congress and is reportedly significantly enthusiastic about the proposed new “health DARPA.”

This new agency, set to be called ARPA-H or HARPA, would be housed within the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and would raise the NIH budget to over $51 billion. Unlike other agencies at NIH, ARPA-H would differ in that the projects it funds would not be peer reviewed prior to approval; instead hand-picked program managers would make all funding decisions. Funding would also take the form of milestone-driven payments instead of the more traditional multiyear grants.

ARPA-H will likely heavily fund and promote mRNA vaccines as one of the “breakthroughs” that will cure cancer. Some of the mRNA vaccine manufacturers that have produced some of the most widely used COVID-19 vaccines, such as the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, stated just last month that “cancer is the next problem to tackle with mRNA tech” post-COVID. BioNTech has been developing mRNA gene therapies for cancer for years and is collaborating with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to create mRNA-based treatments for tuberculosis and HIV.

Other “innovative” technologies that will be a focus of this agency are less well known to the public and arguably more concerning.

 

The Long Road to ARPA-H

ARPA-H is not a new and exclusive Biden administration idea; there was a previous attempt to create a “health DARPA” during the Trump administration in late 2019. Biden began to promote the idea during his presidential campaign as early as June 2019, albeit using a very different justification for the agency than what had been pitched by its advocates to Trump. In 2019, the same foundation and individuals currently backing Biden’s ARPA-H had urged then president Trump to create “HARPA,” not for the main purpose of researching treatments for cancer and Alzheimer’s, but to stop mass shootings before they happen through the monitoring of Americans for “neuropsychiatric” warning signs.

Still from HARPA’s video “The Patients Are Waiting: How HARPA Will Change Lives Now”, Source: http://harpa.org

For the last few years, one man has been the driving force behind HARPA—former vice chair of General Electric and former president of NBCUniversal, Robert Wright. Through the Suzanne Wright Foundation (named for his late wife), Wright has spent years lobbying for an agency that “would develop biomedical capabilities—detection tools, treatments, medical devices, cures, etc.—for the millions of Americans who are not benefitting from the current system.” While he, like Biden, has cloaked the agency’s actual purpose by claiming it will be mainly focused on treating cancer, Wright’s 2019 proposal to his personal friend Donald Trump revealed its underlying ambitions.

As first proposed by Wright in 2019, the flagship program of HARPA would be SAFE HOME, short for Stopping Aberrant Fatal Events by Helping Overcome Mental Extremes. SAFE HOME would suck up masses of private data from “Apple Watches, Fitbits, Amazon Echo, and Google Home” and other consumer electronic devices, as well as information from health-care providers to determine if an individual might be likely to commit a crime. The data would be analyzed by artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms “for early diagnosis of neuropsychiatric violence.”

The Department of Justice’s pre-crime approach known as DEEP was activated just months before Trump left office; it was also justified as a way to “stop mass shootings before they happen.” Soon after Biden’s inauguration, the new administration began using information from social media to make pre-crime arrests as part of its approach toward combatting “domestic terror.” Given the history of Silicon Valley companies collaborating with the government on matters of warrantless surveillance, it appears that aspects of SAFE HOME may already be covertly active under Biden, only waiting for the formalization of ARPA-H/HARPA to be legitimized as public policy.

The national-security applications of Robert Wright’s HARPA are also illustrated by the man who was its lead scientific adviser—former head of DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office Geoffrey Ling. Not only is Ling the main scientific adviser of HARPA, but the original proposal by Wright would have Ling both personally design HARPA and lead it once it was established. Ling’s work at DARPA can be summarized by BTO’s stated mission, which is to work toward merging “biology, engineering, and computer science to harness the power of natural systems for national security.” BTO-favored technologies are also poised to be the mainstays of HARPA, which plans to specifically use “advancements in biotechnology, supercomputing, big data, and artificial intelligence” to accomplish its goals.

The direct DARPA connection to HARPA underscores that the agenda behind this coming agency dates back to the failed Bio-Surveillance project of DARPA’s Total Information Awareness program, which was launched after the events of September 11, 2001. TIA’s Bio-Surveillance project sought to develop the “necessary information technologies and resulting prototype capable of detecting the covert release of a biological pathogen automatically, and significantly earlier than traditional approaches,” accomplishing this “by monitoring non-traditional data sources” including “pre-diagnostic medical data” and “behavioral indicators.”

While nominally focused on “bioterrorist attacks,” TIA’s Bio-Surveillance project also sought to acquire early detection capabilities for “normal” disease outbreaks. Bio-Surveillance and related DARPA projects at the time, such as LifeLog, sought to harvest data through the mass use of some sort of wearable or handheld technology. These DARPA programs were ultimately shut down due to the controversy over claims they would be used to profile domestic dissidents and eliminate privacy for all Americans in the US.

That DARPA’s past total surveillance dragnet is coming back to life under a supposedly separate health-focused agency, and one that emulates its organizational model no less, confirms that many TIA-related programs were merely distanced from the Department of Defense when officially shut down. By separating the military from the public image of such technologies and programs, it made them more palatable to the masses, despite the military remaining heavily involved behind the scenes. As Unlimited Hangout has recently reported, major aspects of TIA were merely privatized, giving rise to companies such as Facebook and Palantir, which resulted in such DARPA projects being widely used and accepted. Now, under the guise of the proposed ARPA-H, DARPA’s original TIA would essentially be making a comeback for all intents and purposes as its own spin-off.

 

Silicon Valley, the Military and the Wearable “Revolution”

This most recent effort to create ARPA-H/HARPA combines well with the coordinated push of Silicon Valley companies into the field of health care, specifically Silicon Valley companies that double as contractors to US intelligence and/or the military (e.g., Microsoft, Google, and Amazon). During the COVID-19 crisis, this trend toward Silicon Valley dominance of the health-care sector has accelerated considerably due to a top-down push toward digitalization with telemedicine, remote monitoring, and the like.

One interesting example is Amazon, which launched a wearable last year that purports to not only use biometrics to monitor people’s physical health and fitness but to track their emotional state as well. The previous year, Amazon acquired the online pharmacy PillPack, and it is not hard to imagine a scenario in which data from Amazon’s Halo wellness band is used to offer treatment recommendations that are then supplied by Amazon-owned PillPack.

Companies such as Amazon, Palantir, and Google are set to be intimately involved in ARPA-H’s activities. In particular, Google, which launched numerous health-tech initiatives in 2020, is set to have a major role in this new agency due to its long-standing ties to the Obama administration when Biden was vice president and to President Biden’s top science adviser, Eric Lander.

As mentioned, Lander is poised to play a major role in ARPA-H/HARPA if and when it materializes. Before becoming the top scientist in the country, Lander was president and founding director of the Broad Institute. While advertised as a partnership between MIT and Harvard, the Broad Institute is heavily influenced by Silicon Valley, with two former Google executives on its board, a partner of Silicon Valley venture capital firm Greylock Partners, and the former CEO of IBM, as well as some of its top endowments coming from prominent tech executives.

The Broad Institute, Source: https://www.broadinstitute.org

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, who was intimately involved with Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign and who is close to the Democratic Party in general, chairs the Broad Institute as of this April. In March, Schmidt gave the institute $150 million to “connect biology and machine learning for understanding programs of life.” During his time on the Broad Institute board, Schmidt also chaired the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence, a group of mostly Silicon Valley, intelligence, and military operatives who have now charted the direction of the US government’s policies on emerging tech and AI. Schmidt was also pitched as potential head of a tech-industry task force by the Biden administration.

Earlier, in January, the Broad Institute announced that its health-research platform, Terra, which was built with Google subsidiary Verily, would partner with Microsoft. As a result, Terra now allows Google and Microsoft to access a vast trove of genomic data that is poured into the platform by academics and research institutions from around the world.

In addition, last September, Google teamed up with the Department of Defense as part of a new AI-driven “predictive health” program that also has links to the US intelligence community. While initially focused on predicting cancer cases, this initiative clearly plans to expand to predicting the onset of other diseases before symptoms appear, including COVID-19. As noted by Unlimited Hangout at the time, one of the ulterior motives for the program, from Google’s perspective, was for Google to gain access to “the largest repository of disease- and cancer-related medical data in the world,” which is held by the Defense Health Agency. Having exclusive access to this data is a huge boon for Google in its effort to develop and expand its growing suite of AI health-care products.

The military is currently being used to pilot COVID-19–related biometric wearables for “returning to work safely.” Last December, it was announced that Hill Air Force Base in Utah would make biometric wearables a mandatory part of the uniform for some squadrons. For example, the airmen of the Air Force’s 649th Munitions Squadron must now wear a smart watch made by Garmin and a smart ring made by Oura as part of their uniform.

According to the Air Force, these devices detect biometric indicators that are then analyzed for 165 different biomarkers by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency/Philips Healthcare AI algorithm that “attempts to recognize an infection or virus around 48 hours before the onset of symptoms.” The development of that algorithm began well before the COVID-19 crisis and is a recent iteration of a series of military research projects that appear to have begun under the 2007 DARPA Predicting Health and Disease (PHD) project.

While of interest to the military, these wearables are primarily intended for mass use—a big step toward the infrastructure needed for the resurrection of a bio-surveillance program to be run by the national-security state. Starting first with the military makes sense from the national-security apparatus’s perspective, as the ability to monitor biometric data, including emotions, has obvious appeal for those managing the recently expanded “insider threat” programs in the military and the Department of Homeland Security.

One indicator of the push for mass use is that the same Oura smart ring being used by the Air Force was also recently utilized by the NBA to prevent COVID-19 outbreaks among basketball players. Prior to COVID-19, it was promoted for consumer use by members of the British Royal family and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey for improving sleep. As recently as last Monday, Oura’s CEO, Harpeet Rai, said that the entire future of wearable health tech will soon be “proactive rather than reactive” because it will focus on predicting disease based on biometric data obtained from wearables in real time.

Another wearable tied to the military that is creeping into mass use is the BioButton and its predecessor the BioSticker. Produced by the company BioIntelliSense, the sleek new BioButton is advertised as a wearable system that is “a scalable and cost-effective solution for COVID-19 symptom monitoring at school, home and work.” BioIntelliSense received $2.8 million from the Pentagon last December to develop the BioButton and BioSticker wearables for COVID-19.

BioIntelliSense CEO James Mault poses with the company’s BioSticker wearable. Source: https://biointellisense.com

BioIntelliSense, cofounded and led by former Microsoft HealthVault developer James Mault, now has its wearable sensors being rolled out for widespread use on some college campuses and at some US hospitals. In some of those instances, the company’s wearables are being used to specifically monitor the side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine as opposed to symptoms of COVID-19 itself. BioIntelliSense is currently running a study, partnered with Philips Healthcare and the University of Colorado, on the use of its wearables for early COVID-19 detection, which is entirely funded by the US military.

While the use of these wearables is currently “encouraged but optional” at these pilot locations, could there come a time when they are mandated in a workplace or by a government? It would not be unheard of, as several countries have already required foreign arrivals to be monitored through use of a wearable during a mandatory quarantine period. Saint Lucia is currently using BioButton for this purpose. Singapore, which seeks to be among the first “smart nations” in the world, has given every single one of its residents a wearable called a “TraceTogether token” for its contact-tracing program. Either the wearable token or the TraceTogether smartphone app is mandatory for all workplaces, shopping malls, hotels, schools, health-care facilities, grocery stores, and hair salons. Those without access to a smartphone are expected to use the “free” government-issued wearable token.

 

The Era of Digital Dictatorships Is Nearly Here

Making mandatory wearables the new normal not just for COVID-19 prevention but for monitoring health in general would institutionalize quarantining people who have no symptoms of an illness but only an opaque algorithm’s determination that vital signs indicate “abnormal” activity.

Given that no AI is 100 percent accurate and that AI is only as good as the data it is trained on, such a system would be guaranteed to make regular errors: the question is how many. One AI algorithm being used to “predict COVID-19 outbreaks” in Israel and some US states is marketed by Diagnostic Robotics; the (likely inflated) accuracy rate the company provides for its product is only 73 percent. That means, by the company’s own admission, their AI is wrong 27 percent of the time. Probably, it is even less accurate, as the 73 percent figure has never been independently verified.

Adoption of these technologies has benefitted from the COVID-19 crisis, as supporters are seizing the opportunity to accelerate their introduction. As a result, their use will soon become ubiquitous if this advancing agenda continues unimpeded.

Though this push for wearables is obvious now, signs of this agenda were visible several years ago. In 2018, for instance, insurer John Hancock announced that it would replace its life insurance offerings with “interactive policies” that involve individuals having their health monitored by commercial health wearables. Prior to that announcement, John Hancock and other insurers such as Aetna, Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare offered various rewards for policyholders who wore a fitness wearable and shared that data with their insurance company.

In another pre-COVID example, the Journal of the American Medical Association published an article in August 2019 that claimed that wearables “encourage healthy behaviors and empower individuals to participate in their health.” The authors of the article, who are affiliated with Harvard, further claimed that “incentivizing use of these devices [wearables] by integrating them in insurance policies” may be an “attractive” policy approach. The use of wearables for policyholders has since been heavily promoted by the insurance industry, both prior to and after COVID-19, and some speculate that health insurers could soon mandate their use in certain cases or as a broader policy.

These biometric “fitness” devices—such as Amazon’s Halo—can monitor more than your physical vital signs, however, as they can also monitor your emotional state. ARPA-H/HARPA’s flagship SAFE HOME program reveals that the ability to monitor thoughts and feelings is an already existing goal of those seeking to establish this new agency.

According to World Economic Forum luminary and historian Yuval Noah Harari, the transition to “digital dictatorships” will have a “big watershed” moment once governments “start monitoring and surveying what is happening inside your body and inside your brain.” He says that the mass adoption of such technology would make human beings “hackable animals,” while those who abstain from having this technology on or in their bodies would become part of a new “useless” class. Harari has also asserted that biometric wearables will someday be used by governments to target individuals who have the “wrong” emotional reactions to government leaders.

Unsurprisingly, one of Harari’s biggest fans, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, has recently led his company into the development of a comprehensive biometric and “neural” wearable based on technology from a “neural interface” start-up that Facebook acquired in 2019. Per Facebook, the wearable “will integrate with AR [augmented reality], VR [virtual reality], and human neural signals” and is set to become commercially available soon. Facebook also notably owns the VR company Oculus Rift, whose founder, Palmer Luckey, now runs the US military AI contractor Anduril.

As recently reported, Facebook was shaped in its early days to be a private-sector replacement for DARPA’s controversial LifeLog program, which sought to both “humanize” AI and build profiles on domestic dissidents and terror suspects. LifeLog was also promoted by DARPA as “supporting medical research and the early detection of an emerging pandemic.”

It appears that current trends and events show that DARPA’s decades-long effort to merge “health security” and “national security” have now advanced further than ever before. This may partially be because Bill Gates, who has wielded significant influence over health policy globally in the last year, is a long-time advocate of fusing health security and national security to thwart both pandemics and “bioterrorists” before they can strike, as can be heard in his 2017 speech delivered at that year’s Munich Security Conference. That same year, Gates also publicly urged the US military to “focus more training on preparing to fight a global pandemic or bioterror attack.”

In the merging of “national security” and “health security,” any decision or mandate promulgated as a public health measure could be justified as necessary for “national security,” much in the same way that the mass abuses and war crimes that occurred during the post-9/11 “war on terror” were similarly justified by “national security” with little to no oversight. Yet, in this case, instead of only losing our civil liberties and control over our external lives, we stand to lose sovereignty over our individual bodies.

The NIH, which would house this new ARPA-H/HARPA, has spent hundreds of millions of dollars experimenting with the use of wearables since 2015, not only for detecting disease symptoms but also for monitoring individuals’ diets and illegal drug consumption. Biden played a key part in that project, known as the Precision Medicine initiative, and separately highlighted the use of wearables in cancer patients as part of the Obama administration’s related Cancer Moonshot program. The third Obama-era health-research project was the NIH’s BRAIN initiative, which was launched, among other things, to “develop tools to record, mark, and manipulate precisely defined neurons in the living brain” that are determined to be linked to an “abnormal” function or a neurological disease. These initiatives took place at a time when Eric Lander was the cochair of Obama’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology while still leading the Broad Institute. It is hardly a coincidence that Eric Lander is now Biden’s top science adviser, elevated to a new cabinet-level position and set to guide the course of ARPA-H/HARPA.

Thus, Biden’s newly announced agency, if approved by Congress, would integrate those past Obama-era initiatives with Orwellian applications under one roof, but with even less oversight than before. It would also seek to expand and mainstream the uses of these technologies and potentially move toward developing policies that would mandate their use.

If ARPA-H/HARPA is approved by Congress and ultimately established, it will be used to resurrect dangerous and long-standing agendas of the national-security state and its Silicon Valley contractors, creating a “digital dictatorship” that threatens human freedom, human society, and potentially the very definition of what it means to be human.

Link To Full Article HERE


 

Image Source