Posted on

STOP Human Genetic Modification

March 7, 2023 | Zero-GMO.com | STOP Human Genetic Modification

Opposition is growing to the attempt to legalize Human Genetic Modification (HGM).

According to a white paper by The Alliance for Humane Biotechnology, “International scientific organizations are making significant strides towards approving the creation of genetically modified humans (GM Humans) or “designer babies,i.e., embryos whose genomes are genetically altered in laboratories before being implanted in their birth mothers resulting in a birth, nine months later, to a genetically modified infant. These are developments about which all sectors of society should be made aware and given the opportunity to challenge.” LINK

 


 

International Coalition to Stop Designer Babies 

Link To Source HERE

 


 

 

 

GMO SCIENCE – a public platform where genetically engineered (GE) crop and food impacts are openly discussed and thoughtfully analyzed.


 

Posted on

Montana Bill Would Prohibit mRNA Vaxxed from Donating Blood

March 6, 2023 | If passed, Montana Bill Would Prohibit mRNA Vaxxed from Donating Blood | Image source

Montana House Bill 645 states: “A person may not knowingly donate whole blood, plasma, blood products, blood derivatives, human tissue, organs, or bones containing gene-altering proteins, nanoparticles, high-count spike proteins from long covid-19, or other isolates introduced by mRNA or DNA vaccines, mRNA or DNA chemotherapies, or other novel mRNA or DNA pharmaceutical biotechnologies.”

Assuring that the blood supply is free from vaxx ingredients from now on will be challenging.

The legislation also prohibits discrimination based on vaxx status or possession of immunity passport.

Additionally, “An individual may not be required to receive any vaccine whose use is allowed under an emergency use authorization or any vaccine undergoing safety trials.”

State legislation such as HB 645 is important to protect individual health, freedom, state sovereignty, and counteract federal and international overreach.

 


 

 

Link To Full Montana House Bill 645 HERE

 


 

Posted on

Addressing The Threat of Human Engineering

February 25, 2023 |  Addressing The Threat of Human Engineering  | Image Source

We were warned about the rise of unwarranted influence both sought and unsought by the military-industrial [intelligence-pharmaceutical-media] complex by President Eisenhower in 1961.

The military industry and billionaire “philanthropists” have partnered to control every aspect of the natural world including engineering of the food, medicine, and even the weather.  Human beings are another target of engineering.  The following article by Spartacus explores the globalist effort to re-engineer humanity.

We have seen how Schwab and other anti-human organizers of C19 are obsessed with controlling (and reducing) the world’s population.  The plan to enslave humanity through bio surveillance under the skin, a digital ID, vaxx passport, social credit system, QR codes, and central bank digital currency (CBDC), has not been a secret.

However, many people choose freedom and understand their ability to derail this scheme. There are many things we can all do to buck the system: using cash whenever we shop, powering off the cell phones and wi-fi, consciously unplugging from social media, reigning in the ‘smart’ grid with safety regulations, and connecting with others who share our values to work together at the local level to help enact better policies. Most important is the urgent need for public oversight and bioethics in technology.

 


 

 

By Spartacus

Link To Video HERE

Here’s the problem: he’s not wrong. People get pissed off when they hear statements like master of the world because they think it’s an empty threat; little more than the idle bluster of a megalomaniac. It most certainly isn’t. The reason why people don’t see what this technology is capable of is because, for one thing, they aren’t cursed with an overactive imagination, and for another, they aren’t used to holistic systems thinking, and lastly, there has been next to no mainstream media coverage of synthetic biologybecause if there was, people would rightly be having a conniption fit.

I’m going to ask you something that may strike you as a little bit strange. What is an internal organ? The textbook answer is something along the lines of specialized tissue in the body that performs a specific function. But what if I told you that an internal organ can be whatever the heck we want it to be?

RSC – A morphospace for synthetic organs and organoids: the possible and the actual

Efforts in evolutionary developmental biology have shed light on how organs are developed and why evolution has selected some structures instead of others. These advances in the understanding of organogenesis along with the most recent techniques of organotypic cultures, tissue bioprinting and synthetic biology provide the tools to hack the physical and genetic constraints in organ development, thus opening new avenues for research in the form of completely designed or merely altered settings. Here we propose a unifying framework that connects the concept of morphospace (i.e. the space of possible structures) with synthetic biology and tissue engineering. We aim for a synthesis that incorporates our understanding of both evolutionary and architectural constraints and can be used as a guide for exploring alternative design principles to build artificial organs and organoids. We present a three-dimensional morphospace incorporating three key features associated to organ and organoid complexity. The axes of this space include the degree of complexity introduced by developmental mechanisms required to build the structure, its potential to store and react to information and the underlying physical state. We suggest that a large fraction of this space is empty, and that the void might offer clues for alternative ways of designing and even inventing new organs.

What if the organs found in humans and animals – kidneys, spleen, liver, heart, brain, et cetera – do not represent all possible configurations of cells, but only the narrowly defined ones selected by evolution? What if there is a giant unexamined blank spot where you can have things like thinking muscle tissue chock-full of neurons, or an all-in-one liver and kidney (lidney?) right under your skin that makes you sweat filtered toxins out? What if we could manufacture entirely new organs from scratch that never existed in nature before and have completely novel functions? What if a guy could have little brains implanted in every joint in his body and give his arms and legs a mind of their own, like an octopus?

This is something that has been explored in science fiction numerous times, in the past. In Warhammer 40,000, the highly augmented and superhuman Space Marines are implanted with numerous scratch-built organs, and if you’ve ever read Bacigalupi’s The Windup Girl or the late Greg Bear’s Blood Music, then you know exactly how bizarre this sort of thing can get. There’s just one problem, here, and it’s that this stuff is getting alarmingly close to not being science fiction anymore, and there are basically no ethical frameworks in place to make sure it isn’t horribly abused.

This is just one example of what you can do with synthetic biology. Another thing you can do is design completely new enzymes from scratch, insert the genes coding for them into bacteria, and use them as reagents to produce entirely new compounds.

Still not convinced? If you go on the Government of Canada’s website, right now, this is one of the articles they have up. I recommend archiving it.

Policy Horizons Canada – Exploring Biodigital Convergence

I wake up to the sunlight and salty coastal air of the Adriatic sea. I don’t live anywhere near the Mediterranean, but my AI, which is also my health advisor, has prescribed a specific air quality, scent, and solar intensity to manage my energy levels in the morning, and has programmed my bedroom to mimic this climate.

The fresh bed sheets grown in my building from regenerating fungi are better than I imagined; I feel rested and ready for the day. I need to check a few things before I get up. I send a brain message to open the app that controls my insulin levels and make sure my pancreas is optimally supported. I can’t imagine having to inject myself with needles like my mother did when she was a child. Now it’s a microbe transplant that auto adjusts and reports on my levels.

Everything looks all right, so I check my brain’s digital interface to read the dream data that was recorded and processed in real time last night. My therapy app analyzes the emotional responses I expressed while I slept. It suggests I take time to be in nature this week to reflect on my recurring trapped-in-a-box dream and enhance helpful subconscious neural activity. My AI recommends a “forest day”. I think “okay”, and my AI and neural implant do the rest.

I touched on this in the last Spartacast, but I don’t think I really got the point across. Biotech and information technology are completely intertwined, and they have been for decades, now. Anyone remember Folding@home, where people used their PlayStations to contribute processor power to a distributed supercomputer network?

That was back in 2007, and the actual software client itself has existed since 2000. They do everything on a computer, now. The whole idea behind mRNA vaccines is basically to digitize vaccines by reducing them to synthetic gene sequences and using human cells as bioreactors to make the actual protein, skipping over a bunch of manufacturing steps.

Okay, so you have CRISPR. You have DREADDs. You have nanotransducers. You have the ability to create engineered amyloids, like Ehud Gazit’s amyloid semiconductors. You have even more than that, too. A friend of mine on Twitter, C.M. (who currently goes by @CRISPR_Cas69), alerted me to a paper on implementing an entire von Neumann architecture in nothing but lipid nanoparticles:

Science Advances – Nanoparticle-based computing architecture for nanoparticle neural networks

The lack of a scalable nanoparticle-based computing architecture severely limits the potential and use of nanoparticles for manipulating and processing information with molecular computing schemes. Inspired by the von Neumann architecture (VNA), in which multiple programs can be operated without restructuring the computer, we realized the nanoparticle-based VNA (NVNA) on a lipid chip for multiple executions of arbitrary molecular logic operations in the single chip without refabrication. In this system, nanoparticles on a lipid chip function as the hardware that features memory, processors, and output units, and DNA strands are used as the software to provide molecular instructions for the facile programming of logic circuits. NVNA enables a group of nanoparticles to form a feed-forward neural network, a perceptron, which implements functionally complete Boolean logic operations, and provides a programmable, resettable, scalable computing architecture and circuit board to form nanoparticle neural networks and make logical decisions.

What happens if we integrate all of these disparate ideas together into a single platform? What could we create? Could we inject someone with a substance that generates wirelessly manipulated smart tissues in someone’s body? Think about it. Let’s say we use mRNA to produce Yamanaka factors in someone’s cells to turn them into stem cells in vivo, and then, let’s say we spliced new genes into those cells to generate an entirely new, synthetic cell line with entirely novel functionality. Then, let’s say these collections of cells were coaxed into performing specific tasks by manipulating their membrane potential with nanotransducers, or by using chemogenetics. What if these cells migrated throughout the body, divided, and formed colonies, like a symbiotic organism, all while evading the immune system by giving off signals identical to human cells? What if these cells could be made to secrete neurotransmitters or hormones into the extracellular space to manipulate the functions of the subject’s normal cells? What if they could be used to construct tissue scaffolds around the subject’s existing organs and manipulate or monitor their function, through extracellular matrix remodeling?

These are just a couple hypothetical examples. There are many more possible implementations, here, including using tissue engineering to make entirely new, 3D-printed “cybernetic” organs. Soldiers in the future might not wear gas masks at all. Why bother, when they’ve all been implanted with an organ that instantly secretes atropine the moment they get a whiff of VX, or when their acetylcholine receptors have been completely altered to resist binding by organophosphates? What if intelligence officers all had 200 IQ and perfect recall because their neural lace links their brains together into a hive mind with a bunch of printed brains in vats?

These sorts of questions, and many more, are being asked in top military think tanks in the US, Russia, and China. Nobody wants to lose strategic surprise by being the one country that didn’t make supermen in time for World War III. DARPA know that China’s track record for ethics is extremely poor, and that it’s likely that they’re engaging in human experimentation behind the scenes. That tempts our own leaders to do the same (and, indeed, they are).

That’s not all you can do with synthetic biology. Assassinations without the possibility for attribution, debilitating specific people by inducing chronic health issues, destroying enemy agriculture with novel plant pathogens, engineering scratch-made viruses and bacteria to produce hyper-lethal bioweapons, engineering obedience and docility into people by altering the balance of androgens and neurotransmitters in their bodies to blunt aggression and drive for reward, the list goes on and on.

When Klaus Schwab says that those who master these technologies will master the world, if anything, he is underselling it. With these technologies, you could re-engineer an entire species – including humans – into something completely different.

I cannot stress this enough. There needs to be a public conversation about synthetic biology and neurotechnology, right now, and there need to be policies enacted that strictly define international and binding limits for its use. If not, then the human beings of the future will inevitably be reduced to engineered products.

The people behind all of this are anti-personalists. They see no value in the person per se, the person itself. Only the collective good matters to them.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy – Personalism

Personalists regard personhood (or “personality”) as the fundamental notion, as that which gives meaning to all of reality and constitutes its supreme value. Personhood carries with it an inviolable dignity that merits unconditional respect. Personalism has for the most part not been primarily a theoretical philosophy of the person. Although it does defend a unique theoretical understanding of the person, this understanding is in itself such as to support the prioritization of practical or moral philosophy, while at the same time the moral experience of the person is such as to decisively determine the theoretical understanding. For personalists, a person combines subjectivity and objectivity, causal activity and receptivity, unicity and relation, identity and creativity. Stressing the moral nature of the person, or the person as the subject and object of free activity, personalism tends to focus on practical, moral action and ethical questions.

Human beings are regarded by the agents of the NWO as resource-hungry, tribalistic, and aggressive. Basically, an invasive nuisance species. All it would take is for one panel of bioethicists to decide, “Gee, civilization sure would be better if we engineered the capacity for crime, aggressive behavior, bigotry, and fanaticism out of humans.”

Then, before you know it, one day, people line up for their “vaccines”, and years later, they start having kids that are more carpenter ant than human, utterly incapable of personhood, of the intrinsically valuable experience of becoming a man or woman.

People still think this is just about a virus or a vaccine. It’s not. Much, much more than that is at stake, here. More than most can even fathom.

-Spartacus

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

Posted on

Discussion About Military Countermeasures

February 24, 2023 | Discussion About Military Countermeasures | Law researcher Katherine Watt and former pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova in conversation with Sean Morgan regarding the organizing of C19 and military countermeasures.

Topics include key players, legal constructs, propaganda, financing and architecture of the vaxx war on humanity. Solutions and suggestions on ways to take action moving forward are also discussed.

 


 

Link To Video

https://sashalatypova.substack.com

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/

Notice of War Crimes To Health Care Providers and Health Insurance Providers 

 


 

Related

 

How Public Health Has Been Militarized – JDfor2024

Operation Warp Speed: The Role of the US DoD and Partners in the CV19 War on Humanity – JDfor2024

Money Laundering with Immunity: The Control Framework – JDfor2024

IRENA & the MULTI-TRILLION-dollar climate hoaxers – JDfor2024

Psychological control grid funding – JDfor2024

 

 


Image Source

Posted on

Analysis of a single drop of the Pfizer V@xx

January 8, 2023 | Analysis of a single drop of the Pfizer V@xx | Image Source

Research team La Quinta Columna from Spain present analysis of a single drop of the Pfizer v@xx from December 26, 2022.

Using optical microscopy, these findings show self-assembling, technological material, not biological or genetic. Graphene-based carbon nanotubes, graphene microfilaments, and graphene sheets, were observed. -JD

 


 

Analysis of a single drop of the Pfizer «vaccine», as of December 26, 2022

 

Link To Video Here

 


 

Full video:

https://www.laquintacolumna.info/videos-de-interes/nuevas-imagenes-de-la-vacuna-comirnaty-pfizer-26-diciembre-2022/

 

 


 

Related:

Chinese Patent CN112220919A CV Vaxx contains graphene oxide  • Vaccine toxicity, laws, actions to take – ZEROMANDATORYVAXX.com

 

2019: Fauci Testimony on Self-assembling Nanoparticle V@xx • Vaccine toxicity, laws, actions to take – ZEROMANDATORYVAXX.com

 

Nanobots, Construction process of Microchips in C19 injectables, new insights on Shedding • Vaccine toxicity, laws, actions to take – ZEROMANDATORYVAXX.com

 


 

 


 

Posted on

Operation Warp Speed: The Role of the US DoD and Partners in the CV19 War on Humanity

December 28, 2022 | Operation Warp Speed: The Role of the US DoD and Partners in the CV19 War on Humanity |

In her illuminating article below, pharma insider Sasha Latypova provides documentation and well-sourced research to examine the role of the US DoD in CV19 countermeasures. According to the documents, DoD partners in the orchestrated CV19 war against humanity include The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), the US Government, The Israeli Minister of Health, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Fosun Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer and BioNTech, and of course, Bill & Melinda Gates. A variety of international investors include actors from Europe, US, UK, Singapore, China and others.

Ms Latypova points out that while Russia does not seem to be in this particular alliance, the Russian government is running their own version of the “covid script,” in the bioweapon war against humanity. -JD

 


 

The role of the US DoD (and their co-investors) in “covid countermeasures” enterprise.

 

By Sasha Latypova | SubstackPDFDiscussion with Sam Dube and Lara Logan on DoD Vax Ownership and FDA Theatrics_Link

“The current war is the war of the global governments (plural), that only pretend to be at odds with each other, marketing themselves as “left”, “right”, “communists”, “green”, “capitalists”, “socialists”, “populists”, “conservatives”, etc. etc. in a never ending clown show of the political theater. Behind the scenes, the “official enemies” are partners and co-investors into “joint ventures” against us, people of the world. They use taxpayers’ money to fund, develop, then “approve”, purchase and deploy prohibited biowarfare agents for killing and injuring their own civilian population, their own armed forces, first responders, healthcare workers, pregnant women and children. To stop this every one of us must start using correct precise language, start calling things what they really are.” -Sasha Latypova

 

 

While the DOD/BARDA countermeasure contracts refer to safety and efficacy requirements for vaccines and mention current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) compliance, these items are explicitly carved out as not being paid for nor ordered by the US Government.

 

 

This gets even more interesting when we examine some of the redactions in contracts:

 

 

I know what is in the redacted part of the above paragraph and it was not hard to figure out. The first redaction under 1.1.1 BACKGROUND is “Fosun Pharmaceuticals”, so the sentence reads “Fosun Pharmaceuticals”, Pfizer and BioNTech entered into an agreement for the co-development…”

Note: the only journalist I am aware of in either “mainstream” or “resistance” who mentioned Fosun was Naomi Wolf, kudos to her. I was in touch with The Epoch Times to try to publish this information, and even they decided to bury the story (but they published my other materials). I did discuss this on Dr. Jane Ruby’s show, and kudos to her as well for not being afraid to cover the truth.

 

Pfizer-BioNTech is really a 3-party R&D alliance: Fosun-Pfizer-BioNTech, and by “party” I mean that one of the three is the Chinese Communist Party. Fosun is a huge Chinese conglomerate that owns a large number of global companies, and its chairman Guo Guangchang is a very high ranking member of the CCP. It is curious that the US DoD awarded $10 billion (Pfizer’s Operation Warp Speed/DoD/BARDA contract) to a venture whose substantial equity (and IP) holder is the the Chinese Communist Party. For avoidance of doubt:

Below is the timeline of some of the key investments and R&D deals I was able to identify from public SEC shareholder disclosures, immediately preceding and following the “pandemic”:

 

Just to make sure, we are talking about the exact technology in the mRNA shots. Here is the definition from March 17, 2020 agreement between Pfizer and BioNTech (p. 4):

The same document describes a data sharing agreement, “pharmacovigilance” globally among the 3 parties. They will count the bodies and share the data with each other:

On the “pharmacovigilance” aspect, there is a 4th participant in this arrangement – the Israeli Ministry of Health, which entered into a data sharing agreement with Pfizer on January 6, 2021 and gave Pfizer (and by extension, US DoD and anyone who controls it, BioNTech and anyone who controls it, Fosun and anyone who controls it, i.e. CCP) access to all their citizens’ centralized electronic health records. But don’t worry, Benjamin Netanyahu promised to keep the data de-identified. Right.

 

 

Side note – Israeli government recently “misplaced” the Manufacturing and Supply Agreement with Pfizer mentioned in the data sharing agreement above (so we know for sure it exists). The government sadly cannot find it for some reason…

 

Link To Read the Full Article HERE

 


 

 

Link To_Intent to Harm: Pharma Insider Reveals Irrefutable Evidence of Conspiracy to Commit Mass Murder by C-19 Injections HERE

 


 

Posted on

CV-19 mRNA Injections Are Deadly Bioweapons

December 6, 2022 |  Zero Mandatory Vaxx  |  Sarasota For Vaccination Choice |  CV-19 mRNA Injections Are Deadly Bioweapons |

According to current statistics tens of thousands have been severely injured or killed from the experimental CV-19 mRNA injections. It’s critical to bring a FULL STOP to the shots NOW to prevent genocide and protect humanity.

Under 18 U.S.Code § 176 Seizure, forfeiture, and destruction, every American State Attorney General has the authority to seize and destroy any biological agent without a warrant. Karen Kingston provides evidence in the form of historical documentation, patents, and law in the articles below, demonstrating clearly why CV19 shots must be criminalized and banned.

Accountability and immediate prosecutions are essential for those responsible for funding, promoting, profiting and mandating CV-19 mRNA injections. -JD

 

 


 

 

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

December 4, 2022 | By

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

 

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

 

December 7, 2022 | By Karen Kingston | substack

Link To Full Article HERE


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted on

CV19 V@xx Shedding to Unv@xxed?

December 5, 2022 | ZeroMandatoryVaxx.com | CV19 V@xx Shedding to Unv@xxed? | Image Source |

New research examines possible mechanisms of shedding from v@xxed to unv@axxed.

The study, titled, Current state of knowledge on the excretion of mRNA and spike produced by anti-COVID-19 mRNA vaccines; possibility of contamination of the entourage of those vaccinated by these products, in the journal Infectious Diseases Research by Helene Banoun states, “There are numerous reports of symptoms and pathologies identical to the adverse effects of mRNA vaccines in unvaccinated persons in contact with freshly vaccinated persons”.

-JD

 


 

“It Looks Like the mRNA is Transferring from the Vaccinated to the Unvaccinated”

Link To Video

 


 

Link To Article HERE

Link To Study:Current state of knowledge on the excretion of mRNA and spike produced by anti-COVID-19 mRNA vaccines; possibility of contamination of the entourage of those vaccinated by these products


 

Posted on

Technocratic control schemes of the parasite class

November 28, 2022 | Technocratic control schemes of the parasite class |

Technocracy can be defined as a scientific dictatorship.

The method of control is through a centrally organized, linked, and monitored monetary and economic system.

The 1938 Technocrat Magazine described technocracy as “The science  of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population.”

The UN is the vehicle attempting to install technocratic world governance. In lockstep with Agenda 21/2030, 193 nations have collaborated to replace individual liberty, national sovereignty, and free enterprise, with collectivism, control and slavery.

One way to begin rejecting the technocrat control scheme is by turning off the “smart” phone, which functions as a globalist weapon for monitoring and enslavement.

Another way to unplug from the globalist agenda is by organizing locally, working with State and Local legislators to enforce the Constitution and protect individual and State sovereignty. -JD

 


 

By Iain Davis |  November 25, 2022  |  off-guardian.org  |

Totalitarianism is a form of government that attempts to assert total control over the lives of its citizens. It is characterized by strong central rule that attempts to control and direct all aspects of individual life through coercion and repression. It does not permit individual freedom. Traditional social institutions and organizations are discouraged and suppressed, making people more willing to be merged into a single unified movement. Totalitarian states typically pursue a special goal to the exclusion of all others, with all resources directed toward its attainment, regardless of the cost.

That “special” goal is sustainable development and no cost, either financial or humanitarian, is too great to tackle the alleged “climate crisis.” In reality, climate change is simply the excuse for sustainable development and it is through the global policy commitment to “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs) that technocracy is being installed.

A technocratic society is called a Technate and the world’s first Technate has emerged in China. In this two part exploration we will look at how this system was constructed, who was behind it and why technocracy is now being foisted upon all of us.

These articles are drawn largely from my 2021 publication Pseudopandemic. It is free to subscribers to my blog.

GLOBAL TECHNOCRATIC GOVERNANCE

In order for global technocracy to be rolled-out, authority needs to be centrally controlled at the global level. Governments, intergovernmental organisations and multinational corporations have collaborated to form a global public-private partnership  (G3P) for this purpose.

Throughout the 20th and 21st century the G3P network has sought to construct global governance. In turn, global governance enables the worldwide distribution of the technocracy that governments then convert into national policy commitments. Many components of global technocratic governance have already been established.

The World Heath Organisation (WHO) delivers global governance of public health; global access to technological development is meted out through the World Intellectual Property Organization; the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) works to coordinate economic policies between nation-states and global trade is monitored and controlled through the trade agreements overseen by the World Trade Organisation.

The Bank For International Settlements (BIS) coordinates global monetary policy and the flow of capital; the direction of education, academia, the sciences and cultural development is steered through the U.N Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and the seizure of the global commons and the “financialisation” of nature—through natural asset companies and other mechanisms—is nearing completion.

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are centrally controlled through global governance, primarily by the U.N Development and Environmental programs (UNDP & UNEP). The necessary global scientific consensus on climate change is centrally administered and the appropriate research funding streams allocated, by the U.N’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The powerful individuals, pushing the G3P project forward, are a collective of mass polluters, robber barons, land grabbers and the world’s leading exponents of worker exploitation, market manipulation, monetary extortion (usury) and oppression. They form what would otherwise be considered a criminal cartel but have greenwashed their reputations through their commitment to so-called “sustainable development.”

Often referred to as the elite, a more fitting description is “the parasite class.”

The G3P has managed to convince billions that it is committed to sustainable, net zero, environmentalism and wants to “save the planet.” It is actually determined to empower global governance and enforce technocracy upon humanity through SDGs and the associated policy Agendas. Regardless of what you think about the causes of climate change or the level of risk it presents, SDGs do nothing to address itand are designed to serve no-one and nothing other than the G3P and its interests.

In order to requisition, commodify, audit and ultimately divide up the Earth’s resources among themselves, the stakeholder capitalists, at the heart of the G3P, also need technocratic control. Once humanity figures out what has happened, technocracy will enable the G3P to shutdown resistance through literal population control.

Every human being will be individually monitored by Artificial Intelligence (AI) networks which will punish or reward them, depending upon their behaviour. Biosecurity and environmental concerns are set to provide the justification for this enslavement.

Much like the quack pseudo-science of eugenics, which many G3P “thought leaders” seem to believe, Technocracy was the social sciencecertainty of its day. Like eugenics, while it has subsequently faded from public consciousness, it is still avidly pursued by the G3P’s compartmentalised hierarchy.

TECHNOCRACY

In 1911, arguably the worlds first management consultant, Frederick Winslow Taylor, published The Principles of Scientific Management. His publication came at the culmination of the Progressive Era in the United States.

This was a period marked by the political activism of the US middle class who mainly sought to address the underlying social problems, as they saw them, of excessive industrialisation, immigration and political corruption. So-called “Taylorism,” fixated with the imminent exhaustion of natural resources and advocating efficient “scientific management systems,” was in the spirit of the age.

Taylor wrote:

In the past the man has been first; in the future the system must be first. [. . .] The best management is a true science, resting upon clearly defined laws, rules, and principles. [. . . ] The fundamental principles of scientific management are applicable to all kinds of human activities, from our simplest individual acts to the work of our great corporations.

 

Link To Full Article HERE


 

 

Image Source

Posted on

2019: Fauci Testimony on Self-assembling Nanoparticle V@xx

November 27, 2022 | ZeroMandatoryVaxx.com  | 2019: Fauci Testimony on Self-assembling Nanoparticle V@xx | Image Source

Investigation into harmful v@xx ingredients has revealed a wide range of hazardous contaminants including components that self assemble. Pandemic Timeline has provided documentation in substantiation, with 2019 testimony from Fauci and an Executive Order 13887, signed by Trump on September 19, 2019.

It’s notable that Fauci was in a leadership role at National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, serving in 7 presidential administrations.  -JD

 


 

By Pandemic Timeline | Source

Link To_Testimony – Fauci (NIH) 12.04.2019

Link To_Executive Order 13887_Trump 09.19.2019

See also, on this site:

 

Link To Article @ Source_HERE

 


 

 

“Teslaphoresis” is self-assembly at a distance.

 

 

April 14, 2016 | Mike Williams | Rice University |  Source |Link To Video

 


 

Design of Wireless Nanosensor Networks for Intrabody Application

LINK

 


 

NEUROWeapons: 5G + VAXX = WMD

LINK

 


 

Art of War: US-China-CDC Partnership

LINK