Posted on

Joe Biden’s Vaccine Mandate for Private Companies was Just a Press Release

 

Joe Biden’s Vaccine Mandate for Private Companies was Just a Press Release.

But Millions Took the Shots

Photo Image Source | October 12,2021 | The Federalist | NeedToKnowNews

“On September 9th, Joe Biden announced that he was implementing a Covid vaccine mandate for private companies with more than 100 employees, which has jeopardized the employment of tens of millions Americans and is causing a shortage of workers, especially in health care. Biden threatened to cut federal funding from businesses that refuse to comply. But there is no executive order to back this up. It was just an announcement to the press. Press statements have no legal authority.

Scientist and author James Lyons- Weiler tweeted about the OSHA final rule: Word to the wise: The OSHA Final Rule has not been entered in the Federal Register. If you are an employer and you are enforcing vaccine or test mandates, you’re wide open to lawsuits for damages, lost wages, and psychological distress. It’s a Guidance, meaning it’s non-binding.”-GEG

“Yes, we’ve heard all about Joe Biden’s alleged vaccine mandate for private companies employing 100 or more people. It was all over the news even before he announced it on September 9. His announcement has jeopardized the employment of millions of Americans and increased worker shortages in critical domains such as health care.

There’s only one problem. It’s all a mirage. Biden’s so-called vaccine mandate doesn’t exist — at least, not yet. So far, all we have is his press conference and other such made-for-media huff-puffing. No such rule even claiming to be legally binding has been issued yet.

That’s why nearly two dozen Republican attorneys general who have publicly voiced their opposition to the clearly unconstitutional and illegal mandate haven’t yet filed suit against it, the Office of the Indiana Attorney General confirmed for me. There is no mandate to haul into court. And that may be part of the plan.

According to several sources, so far it appears no such mandate has been sent to the White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs yet for approval. The White House, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Department of Labor haven’t released any official guidance for the alleged mandate. There is no executive order. There’s nothing but press statements.

Despite what you may have been falsely led to believe by the media fantasy projection machine, press statements have exactly zero legal authority.

“There is nothing there yet that gives employers any mandate,” Stephanie McFarland, spokeswoman for the Indiana Occupational Safety and Health Administration, told me Oct. 6. “The president made an announcement on this asking OSHA to do it, but we’ve not yet seen anything come from it yet,” she also said. When the state agency gets any further information, she said, they’ll review it.”

 

Link To Full Article

Posted on

Seattle PD Could Lose 40% Of Officers Over Vaxx Mandate

 

 

Seattle PD May Lose 40% Of Officers Over Covid-19 Vaccine Mandate

October 11, 2021 | By Tyler Durden | ZeroHedge

“It was inevitable – as vaccine mandates across the country approach their deadlines, vast swaths of American workers, service members and atheletes face termination or disciplinary action for refusing to take the Covid-19 jab.

In Los Angeles, nearly 1,000 firefighters are about to sue the city over the mandate. Southwest Airlines’ pilot union sued the company last week, before staffing shortages led to the cancellation of more than 2,000 flights over the weekend (and more on Monday). Meanwhile, doctors and nurses across the country have begun suing their employers.

Interestingly, after a group of officers from the Los Angeles Police Department sued over the mandate, Sheriff Alex Villanueva announced that he would not ‘force anyone‘ to take the jab.

But not Seattle – which stands to lose 40% of its 1,000 person force for failing to get vaccinated as an Oct. 18 deadline approaches.”

 

Link To Read Full Article

 


 

Posted on

Get America Out of the UN: American Sovereignty Restoration Act

 

 

Get America Out of the UN: American Sovereignty Restoration Act

 

In January 2019 H.R. 204 was introduced in Congress to end membership of the United States in the United Nations. The Bill called to “terminate all membership by the United States in the United Nations, and in any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations” by repealing The United Nations Participation Act of 1945 (Public Law 79–264; 22 U.S.C. 287 et seq.)

The goal of the UN is to crush the sovereignty of  America and other Nations in a world government, or New World Order, pushing socialist policies that completely contradict the USA Constitution and Declaration of Independence.

UN policies include vaccine passports and unwarranted surveillance, digital currency schemes with central banks and WEF to undermine American independence and commerce, totalitarian climate change schemes, indoctrinating children with anti-American ideology, extreme gun control, massive immigration without proper USA guidance and oversight, establishing a centralized global police force and other extremist policies.

Recent revelations have revealed that eugenicist Bill Gates funds the UN WHO.

The UN is behind Agenda 21 / Agenda 2030, promoting totalitarian control over the entire planet, including the USA, our infrastructure, economy, every aspect of our lives, and our children’s lives. The UN is behind the “Great Reset”, and “Build Back Better,” a central-planning scheme that world leaders including Mr. Biden have adopted.

Americans’ Freedom and Sovereignty is ESSENTIAL.  Urge your representatives to support reintroduction of the  American Sovereignty Restoration Act and urge them to take the appropriate actions to Get America Out of the United Nations.

LINK TO_BILLS-116 H.R. 204 

 


 

Note: The “Green New Deal” references the UN (climate gate) IPCC as “guidance” for American policy.

https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/sres166/BILLS-117sres166is.pdf

https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hres332/BILLS-117hres332ih.pdf

Their solution? NOT to actually halt pollution but instead:

“the United States must take a leading role in reducing emissions through economic transformation”

WHAT!?

Economics will not solve polluting emissions problems.

Additionally, the Green New Deal / UN IPCC 1.5 c global temperature reference target is actually cited in 1970’s Soviet military strategy.

Soviet_DARPA_1975 p.82,83:

 


 

 

Climate Gate Reference:

Link To_Monckton-Caught Green-Handed Climategate Scandal

 

Link To_Climategate-scandal

 

Link To_Climategate-emails

 

 

1997

http://21sci-tech.com/2006_articles/IceCoreSprg97.pdf



2010-2012 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2012/07/ipcc_admits_its_past_reports_were_junk.html


https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/03/01/fakegate-the-obnoxious-fabrication-of-global-warming/#3e317c976140



2013

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/climate-scientist-73-un-climate-models-wrong-no-global-warming-17



2014 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/03/31/the-ipccs-latest-report-deliberately-excludes-and-misrepresents-important-climate-science/#486bdfb428eb


https://www.climatedepot.com/2014/05/30/un-lead-author-michael-oppenheimer-admits-to-congress-climate-science-not-settled-the-question-of-exactly-how-warm-the-earth-will-become-as-a-result-of-rising-co2-thats-not-settle/



2015

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/11367272/Climategate-the-sequel-How-we-are-STILL-being-tricked-with-flawed-data-on-global-warming.html


2017 

https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-09-19-climate-change-science-implodes-as-ipcc-climate-models-found-to-be-totally-wrong-temperatures-arent-rising-as-predicted-hoax-unraveling.html


2018  https://dailycaller.com/2018/10/08/un-climate-report-global-warming/ https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/15/why-un-climate-report-cannot-be-trusted/

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Posted on

Hi-Rez & Jimmy Levy – This Is A War (Official Video)

 

 

Hi-Rez & Jimmy Levy – This Is A War (Official Video)

October 7, 2021 | Anti-Mandate anthem is a masterpiece | CitizenFreePress

 

“This is a war on religion
This is a war on the children
They give you the cure with the sickness
This is a war on tradition”

 

DOCUMENTED BY RACHEL KATZ & BRANDON MORIN EDITED BY NATHAN SHERIDAN

Jimmy Levy

https://www.twitter.com/Jimmylevymusic

https://www.instagram.com/Jimmylevy

 

Hi-Rez

https://www.facebook.com/HiRezFans

https://www.twitter.com/HiReztherapper

https://www.instagram.com/HiReztherapper

 

https://onlyforthefans.com

 

“This is a war that we living through

They won’t reveal to you that they all slowly been killing you,

They don’t tell you what the hell you agreeing to

Sheep in a herd and you don’t know who leading you

Keep on proceeding to follow

Your mind is hallow

While you being coddled

By government swallowing up everything that media tells you

without aa question or a problem all of these sheep being slaughtered

They poison the water, removing the father

Aint trusting these doctors, Ignoring blue collar,

Keep printing the dollar

Brainwashing your sons and your daughters

aint got any honor

If I’m being honest…I just aint picking a side

But im down to ride for my freedoms

And die for your freedoms

and question The government lies.

A lot on my Mind, and so little time.

GOD I think all of us needing a sign.

The devil he Hides in EGO and PRIDE.

They selling they soul but they paying the price

GOD won’t give you more than you can handle

Government should be dismantled

Every politician got a scandal

Prepare for this war, we going to battle

Id rather be red pilled and get killed

Then ignorant living, and meet death still.

Don’t stand up for something, u falling for nothing

Don’t wait till the world that we know Fall ill

This is the revelation of our generation

Losing civilization,

I’m determinated, just liberate us

With our dedication, fuck the terminator

Fuck your medication,

thee administration

cannot alienate us,

or exterminate us

Ill just keep on praying

For your salvation

U are outdated

Society becoming Outrageous

Keep your house painted for the first born

The angel of death in the worst form

we being scorned,

Look out for theirs Horns,

remember This isn’t their first war

They coming prepared,

so just be aware

They do not wanna hear none of our prayers

This is a war they aint playing fair

they feed off ya fear

They want you scared

Death and despair

its all in the air

So just beware, U think I care?

The more that you know

the more that its clear

This is a war its already here”

 

Link To Video


 

Posted on

New Documentary on WHO Exposes Widespread Corruption, Massive Funding by Bill Gates

 

 

New Documentary on WHO Exposes Widespread Corruption, Massive Funding by Bill Gates

“TrustWHO,” a documentary film produced by Lilian Franck, reveals the clandestine influences — including Bill Gates’s role as No. 1 funder — controlling the World Health Organization, to the peril of public health.

October 7, 2021 | Dr. Joseph Mercola | Children’s Health Defense |

“Story-at-a-glance:

  • “TrustWHO,” a documentary film produced by Lilian Franck, reveals the clandestine influences that are controlling the World Health Organization, to the peril of public health.
  • Bill Gates is WHO’s No. 1 funder, contributing more to WHO’s $4.84 billion biennial budget than any member-state government.
  • Pharmaceutical companies previously influenced WHO’s 2009 pandemic declaration —  experts later called swine flu a “false pandemic” that was driven by Big Pharma, which then cashed in on the health scare.
  • WHO has strong allegiance to China, and its investigation into COVID-19’s origin was a “fake” investigation from the start.
  • Even prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, WHO released a statement that it had been in discussions with Facebook to “ensure people can access authoritative information on vaccines and reduce the spread of inaccuracies.”
  • WHO’s history clearly illustrates its allegiance to Big Pharma and other industries, including downplaying the health effects caused by the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster and collaborating with opioid giant Purdue.
  • Given the strong and ongoing evidence that WHO is heavily conflicted and controlled by industry, its usefulness as a guardian of public health needs to be seriously reevaluated.

“TrustWHO,” a documentary film produced by Lilian Franck, reveals the clandestine influences that are controlling the World Health Organization (WHO) — and that have been since the very beginning. Founded in 1948 by 61 member states whose contributions initially financed the organization, WHO was quickly infiltrated by industry.

From Big Tobacco to the nuclear industry and pharmaceuticals, industry has historically dictated WHO’s global agenda and continues to do so in the present day, putting profits and power ahead of public health.

Bill Gates is WHO’s No. 1 funder

In April 2020, Donald Trump suspended U.S. funding to WHO while the administration conducted a review into its “role in severely mismanaging and covering up the spread of the coronavirus.” This clearly propelled the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation into the WHO’s No.1 funder slot. Upon election, President Joe Biden reversed the Trump administration decision, restoring U.S. funding to WHO.

However, Bill Gates is still the No. 1 funder, contributing more to WHO’s $4.84 billion biennial budget than any member-state government. As revealed in a preview copy I received of “Vax-Unvax,” Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s new book, which will be released in November 2021, “Gates has used his money strategically to infect the international aid agencies with his distorted self-serving priorities. The U.S. historically has been the largest direct donor to WHO.”

However, Bill Gates contributes to WHO via multiple avenues, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as well as GAVI, which was founded by the Gates Foundation in partnership with WHO, the World Bank and various vaccine manufacturers.

As of 2018, the cumulative contributions from the Gates Foundation and GAVI made Gates the unofficial top sponsor of the WHO, even before the Trump administration’s 2020 move to cut all his support to the organization. And in fact, Gates gives so much that Politico wrote a highly-critical article about his undue financial influence over the WHO’s operations in 2017, which Politico said was causing the agency to spend:

“… a disproportionate amount of its resources on projects with the measurable outcomes Gates prefers … His sway has NGOs and academics worried. Some health advocates fear that because the Gates Foundation’s money comes from investments in big business, it could serve as a Trojan horse for corporate interests to undermine WHO’s role in setting standards and shaping health policies.”

Plus, Gates “also routes funding to WHO through SAGE [Strategic Advisory Group of Experts] and UNICEF and Rotary International bringing his total contributions to over $1 billion,” Kennedy explains in the book, adding that these tax-deductible donations give Gates both leverage and control over international health policy, “which he largely directs to serve the profit interest of his pharma partners.”

As noted in the featured film, when it was founded, WHO could decide how to distribute its contributions. Now, 70% of its budget is tied to specific projects, countries or regions, which are dictated by the funders. As such, Gates’ priorities are the backbone of WHO, and it wasn’t a coincidence when he said of WHO, “Our priorities are your priorities.”

“Gates’ vaccine obsession has diverted WHO’s giving from poverty alleviation, nutrition, and clean water to make vaccine uptake its preeminent public health metric. And Gates is not afraid to throw his weight around,” according to Kennedy’s book. “… The sheer magnitude of his foundation’s financial contributions has made Bill Gates an unofficial — albeit unelected — leader of the WHO.”

Pharma & WHO cashing checks in previous pandemics

During the 2009 H1N1 (swine flu) pandemic, secret agreements were made between Germany, Great Britain, Italy and France with the pharmaceutical industry before the H1N1 pandemic began, which stated that they would purchase H1N1 flu vaccinations — but only if a pandemic level 6 was declared by WHO.

The “TrustWHO” documentary shows how, six weeks before the pandemic was declared, no one at WHO was worried about the virus, but the media was nonetheless exaggerating the dangers. Then, in the month leading up to the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, WHO changed the official definition of pandemic, removing the severity and high mortality criteria and leaving the definition of a pandemic as “a worldwide epidemic of a disease.”

This switch in definition allowed WHO to declare swine flu a pandemic after only 144 people had died from the infection worldwide. In 2010, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, then head of health at the Council of Europe, accused pharmaceutical companies of influencing WHO’s pandemic declaration, calling swine flu a “false pandemic” that was driven by Big Pharma, which cashed in on the health scare.

According to Wodarg, the swine flu pandemic was “one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century.” In the investigation into WHO and Big Pharma’s falsification of a pandemic, an inquiry stated:

“… in order to promote their patented drugs and vaccines against flu, pharmaceutical companies influenced scientists and official agencies responsible for public health standards to alarm governments worldwide and make them squander tight health resources for inefficient vaccines strategies, and needlessly expose millions of healthy people to the risk of an unknown amount of side effects of insufficiently tested vaccines.”

While governments ended up with stockpiles of vaccines they would never use, many of those who received the H1N1 swine flu vaccine suffered from adverse effects including Guillain-Barre syndrome, narcolepsy, cataplexy and other forms of brain damage.

The origins cover-up

WHO’s investigation into COVID-19’s origin was also a “fake” investigation from the start. China was allowed to hand pick the members of the WHO’s investigative team, which included Peter Daszak, Ph.D., who has close professional ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The inclusion of Dazsak on this team virtually guaranteed the dismissal of the lab-origin theory, and in February 2021, WHO cleared the institte and two other biosafety level 4 laboratories in Wuhan, China, of wrongdoing, saying these labs had nothing to do with the COVID-19 outbreak.

Only after backlash, including an open letter signed by 26 scientists demanding a full and unrestricted forensic investigation into the pandemic’s origins, did WHO enter damage control mode, with Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and 13 other world leaders joining the U.S. government in expressing “frustration with the level of access China granted an international mission to Wuhan.”

A couple of noteworthy points — Gates handpicked Ghebreyesus as WHO’s director general, not because of his qualifications — Tedros has no medical degree and a background that includes accusations of human rights violations — but due to his loyalty to Gates, again according to Kennedy’s book.

Further, WHO’s allegiance to China was secured years earlier, when China secured WHO votes to ensure its candidates would become director-general. A Sunday Times investigation also revealed that WHO’s independence was severely compromised and its close ties to China allowed COVID-19 to spread in the early days of the pandemic while obfuscating the investigation into its origins. According to the Sunday Times:

“The WHO leadership prioritized China’s economic interests over halting the spread of the virus when Covid-19 first emerged. China exerted ultimate control over the WHO investigation into the origins of Covid-19, appointing its chosen experts and negotiating a backroom deal to water down the mandate.”

WHO’s China ties played ‘decisive role’ in pandemic

On Jan. 28, 2020, four weeks after Taiwan had alerted WHO that a mysterious respiratory illness was spreading in China, WHO had not yet taken action and continued to praise China.

Tedros even praised China for their transparency and said the Chinese president had “shown ‘rare leadership’ and deserved ‘gratitude and respect’ for acting to contain the outbreak at the epicenter,” the Sunday Times reported. “These ‘extraordinary steps’ had prevented further spread of the virus, and this was why, he said, there were only ‘a few cases of human-to-human transmission outside China, which we are monitoring very closely.’”

Speaking with the Sunday Times, professor Richard Ebright of Rutgers University’s Waksman Institute of Microbiology in New Jersey, said it was this close connection that ultimately steered the course of the pandemic:

“Not only did it have a role; it has had a decisive role. It was the only motivation. There was no scientific or medical or policy justification for the stance that the WHO took in January and February 2020. That was entirely premised on maintaining satisfactory ties to the Chinese government.

“So at every step of the way, the WHO promoted the position that was sought by the Chinese government … the WHO actively resisted and obstructed efforts by other nations to implement effective border controls that could have limited the spread or even contained the spread of the outbreak.

“It is impossible for me to believe that the officials in Geneva, who were making those statements, believed those statements accorded with the facts that were available to them at the time the statements were made. It’s hard not to see that the direct origin of that is the support of the Chinese government for Tedros’s election as director-general …

“This was a remarkably high return on [China’s] investment with the relatively small sums that were invested in supporting his election. It paid off on a grand scale for the Chinese government.”

WHO corruption runs deep

Even prior to the pandemic, WHO had released a statement that it had been in discussions with Facebook to “ensure people can access authoritative information on vaccines and reduce the spread of inaccuracies.” At WHO’s first Global Vaccination Summit, held in Brussels in September 2019, Jason Hirsch, Facebook’s public policy manager, alluded to the censorship and media manipulation that was to come:

“The first thing that we are doing is reducing the distribution of misinformation about vaccinations and the second thing that we are doing is increasing exposure to credible, authoritative content on vaccinations.”

Rather than putting public health first, such as pushing for safety studies into vaccination, WHO’s history clearly illustrates its allegiance to Big Pharma and other industries. WHO, for instance, has downplayed the health effects caused by the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster, stating that only 50 deaths were directly caused by the incident and “a total of up to 4,000 people could eventually die of radiation exposure” from the disaster.

WHO signed an agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency, which is “promoting peaceful use of atomic energy,” in 1959, making it subordinate to the agency in relation to ionizing radiation.

WHO’s response to the Fukushima radiation disaster in 2011 was also criticized, with evidence of a high-level coverup. WHO once again downplayed the risks, stating “the predicted risks are low and no observable increases in cancer rates above baseline rates are anticipated.”

WHO also received more than $1.6 million from opioid giant Purdue from 1999 to 2010 and used industry-supported opioid data to incorporate into its official pro-opioid guidelines. According to the Alliance of Human Research Protection, WHO’s collaboration with Purdue led to expanded opioid use and global addiction.

Due to its acceptance of private money, a review in the Journal of Integrative Medicine & Therapy went so far as to say the corruption of WHO is the “biggest threat to the world’s public health of our time,” particularly as it relates to WHO’s drug recommendations — including its “list of essential medicines” — which it believes is biased and not reliable.

Given the strong and ongoing evidence that WHO is heavily conflicted and controlled by industry, its usefulness as a guardian of public health needs to be seriously reevaluated.”

Originally published by Mercola.

Link To Read Full Article 

 


 

Posted on

New Study: Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?

 

 

New Study: Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?

— Suggests there may already be over a million deaths from COVID-19 inoculations so far
from Appendix A:
“Thus, if the baseline of the host for coagulation/clotting, inflammation, hypoxia, neurodegeneration, etc., has been raised by the inoculations, translating into an increase in expected deaths and accelerated deaths, then it is entirely plausible that the VAERS death numbers reflect over a million deaths from COVID-19 inoculations so far. These are very short-term-effects only, and time will tell whether the large potential waves of ADE-driven deaths and autoimmune-driven deaths come to pass.”

 

October 7, 2021 | Authors: Ronald N.KostoffaDanielaCalinabDarjaKanduccMichael B.BriggsdPanayiotisVlachoyiannopouloseAndrey A.SvistunovfAristidisTsatsakisg | ScienceDirect |

Abstract
“This article examines issues related to COVID-19 inoculations for children. The bulk of the official COVID-19-attributed deaths per capita occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, and the COVID-19 attributed deaths per capita are negligible in children. The bulk of the normalized post-inoculation deaths also occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, while the normalized post-inoculation deaths are small, but not negligible, in children. Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term (a few months), had samples not representative of the total population, and for adolescents/children, had poor predictive power because of their small size. Further, the clinical trials did not address changes in biomarkers that could serve as early warning indicators of elevated predisposition to serious diseases. Most importantly, the clinical trials did not address long-term effects that, if serious, would be borne by children/adolescents for potentially decades.
A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic. The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects of the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially.”

 

Link To _Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19? – ScienceDirect

 


 

 

Posted on

16-Year-Old Wyoming Student Arrested for Not Wearing Mask, Entire School Placed on Lockdown

 

 

16-Year-Old Wyoming Student Arrested for Not Wearing Mask, Entire School Placed on Lockdown

October 10, 2021 | By Cassandra Fairbanks | Gateway Pundit |

“A 16-year-old student in Wyoming was arrested and the entire school was placed  on lockdown — all because she refused to wear a mask.

Grace Smith, 16, had already been suspended twice from Laramie High School in Wyoming for refusing to wear masks in class.

According to a report from RT, Grace will be expelled if she continues to collect suspensions — but the high school junior has no intention of backing down.

“I’m growing up in a country where I’m supposed to have my God-given rights to protect, and they’re being taken away,” she told the Laramie Boomerang“Everybody has the freedom to wear a mask if they choose, but I believe everybody also has the right to not wear a mask if they choose.”

The Smith family has hired an attorney to fight back. A GiveSendGo fundraiser to help them has already raised over $18,000.

“Grace is a high school junior. She is a beautiful young lady who is kind, caring, and compassionate. She loves dance and theater and is a good student. Grace has chosen to exercise her rights and attend school without wearing a mask. The local school board has voted to enforce a universal mask policy that we believe is unlawful and in violation of the constitution of the state of Wyoming,” the fundraising page explains.

“Grace has endured suspensions and was arrested for not wearing a mask. She has also been targeted by peers and school staff members for exercising her rights,” the fundraising description continues. “Grace is raising funds to help with the legal cost of defending her civil liberties and the civil liberties of other students in Wyoming who are enduring the same unlawful treatment. By supporting this fight for their liberties, you are helping ensure the rights of every citizen of the state of Wyoming.”

 

Link to Article

 


 

 

Posted on

CONTRADICTORY COMIRNATY CLAIMS

 

 

CONTRADICTORY COMIRNATY CLAIMS

COMIRNATY IS NOT BEING PRODUCED IN USA. SAME? OR IMPROVED SPIKE PRODUCTION? CONTRADICTORY CLAIMS

October 8, 2021 | By Tim Truth |

 

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/iis/COVID-19-related-codes.html

https://www.fda.gov/media/151733/download

https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/comirnaty-and-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine

 

Link To Video

 


 

Posted on

RECEIPTS: DoD Joint Artificial Intelligence Center Monitoring Vaxx Deaths!

 

RECEIPTS: DoD Joint Artificial Intelligence Center Monitoring Vaxx Deaths!

October 8,2021 | US20210082583A1 Bitchute

“Karen Kingston has done it, AGAIN. Kingston is a biotech analyst who joined Stew Peters with RECEIPTS, proving that the theory of Cyrus Parsa is NOT a “crazy conspiracy theory”, but the DoD is actually using their Joint AI Intel Center to monitor “vaccine” deaths! Why?”

Link To Video

Methods and systems of prioritizing treatments, vaccination, testing and/or activities while protecting the privacy of individuals
Publication date: March 18, 2021
Inventor: Gal EHRLICH, Maier Fenster
PDF here:
Same patent is here:
United States Application US20210082583
** EXCERPTS HIGHLIGHTED BY KAREN KINGSTON  IN  VIDEO SEGMENT WITH STEW PETERS:
Methods and systems of prioritizing treatments, vaccination, testing and/or activities while protecting the privacy of individuals
Abstract
An aspect of some embodiments of the invention relates to system and methods for anonymously selecting subjects for treatment against an infectious disease caused by a pathogen, comprising: 1. a plurality of electronic devices configured with instructions to generate an ID, when in proximity of another such electronic device, one or both of transmit said ID to said another electronic device and receive an ID from said another electronic device, generating a score based on a plurality of such received IDs, receiving information from a server, displaying relevant treatment instructions to said subjects based on received information; 2. at least one server comprising instructions for sending to said plurality of electronic devices information to display said relevant treatment instructions; where said at least one server or said electronic devices comprise instructions to generate a prediction of likelihood of a subject transmitting said pathogen, based on a score of the subject.
[277] Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may be utilized for some embodiments of the invention. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this document, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
[0278] A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may take any of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
[0279] Program code embodied on a computer readable medium and/or data used thereby may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
[0349] In some embodiments, the term vaccination means the administration of a vaccine to help the immune system develop protection from a disease. In some embodiments, vaccines contain a microorganism or virus in a weakened, live or killed state, or proteins or toxins from the organism. In some embodiments, in stimulating the body’s adaptive immunity, they help prevent sickness from an infectious disease. In some embodiments, as stated above, when a sufficiently large percentage of a population has been vaccinated, herd immunity results.
[350] In some embodiments, the term prophylactic treatment means a preventive measure taken to fend off a disease or another unwanted consequence.
[0351] In order to facilitate the explanation of the invention, the term “treatment” will be used. It should be understood that when the term “treatment” is used it refers to both vaccinations and prophylactic treatment.
[0352] In some embodiments, vaccines are all compounds as disclosed in in the website of the World Health Organization (https://www[dot]who[dot]int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-candidate-vaccines)
[https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-candidate-vaccines ], which are all incorporated herein by reference, and which are optionally provided (e.g., as a kit) with software such as described herein and/or provided with instructions for use targeting potential super spreaders detected, for example, using methods and apparatus as described herein, and include the following:
28 candidate vaccines in clinical evaluation
[NOTE, THE PATENT INCLUDES THE FULL LIST OF W.H.O. vaccines, as of the time of Patent application, including the ones from Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, etc.
COVID-19 vaccine tracker and landscape
[0478] Reference is now made to the following prophetic examples, which together with the above descriptions illustrate some embodiments of the invention in a non limiting fashion.
[0479] In the following example, three imaginary individuals (John Doe, Jane Smith and Mark Lite) will be scored according to one or more exemplary factors and/or components, as disclosed above. It should be understood that the following scenario is not limiting and it is only provided to enable a person having skills in the art to implement the invention.
Background Information
[0480]
John DoeJane SmithMark Lite
Age (relative weight 1%) 30 35 33
— END EXCERPT FROM PATENT —

 

=========================
Note: In the video segment above, Peters and Kingston are in part, referencing the comments made by Cyrus Parsa on the Stew Peters show broadcast on 10/7/21.
The AI Organization Founder [Cyrus Parsa]: “Nano-Tech Vaccines are Extinction Agenda”

 

===========================
Joint Artificial Intelligence Center [Dept of Defense]
JOINT ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CENTER
Vision: Transform the DoD Through Artificial Intelligence
===========================
FROM THE PATENT:

 

 


 

Vaxx Tracking / US Patent 11,107,588 B2

LINK

 

 


 

Posted on

Florida: Sarasota School Board repeals mask mandate

 

Photo Image: Source

Florida: Sarasota School Board repeals mask mandate

October 6, 2021 | Ryan McKinnon| Sarasota Herald-Tribune |

“The Sarasota County School Board voted to repeal its mask mandate on Tuesday evening.

In August, the board had imposed a policy making masks mandatory until the county’s single-day COVID-19 positivity rate fell below 8% for three consecutive days.

The district hit that metric last week, so masks have been optional since Sept. 27. But the policy remained in place that would make masks mandatory once more if the positivity rate ever surpassed 10% for a single day.

Superintendent Brennan Asplen urged the board to repeal the policy because he said it “has fulfilled its purpose,” and keeping the rule in place risked further ongoing legal battles with the state.”

 

Link To Article @ Source_ Sarasota Herald-Tribune