Posted on

VORTEX Tornadoes and other Federal Weather Experiments

May 4, 2024 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | How’s the weather? | Image Source: H.R. 6093, the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Reauthorization Act | As nearly a dozen States have started taking legislative action to prohibit weather manipulation, the federal government and other U.S. states are continuing decades of weather experiments. Colorado HB 1435 provides millions of dollars for weather modification programs. 29 states and Washington, D.C. have policies which allow for weather modification experimentation.

It is notable that western states that have long standing artificial “weather” experimentation programs have experienced the worst drought, flooding, and catastrophic fires. 

 

Keep in mind that in 1961 JFK promoted United Nations world government, weather control (geoengineering), and the use of satellites, which function now as overarching architecture of a globalist digital prison (AI/5G). Weather engineering systems, branded as “weather research” utilize networks of interoperable ground-based, airborne, and space-based facilities.   

System for facilitating cloud formation and cloud precipitation 

 

 

 

The use of weather as a weapon of war has long been discussed in military and academic literature. The 1975 DARPA report entitled “Soviet Developments in Weather Modification, Climate Modification, and Climatology,” includes a section about the threat of covert environmental warfare:  

“…the particular danger of environmental warfare lies in the possibility that the aggressor nation may be secretly, over the course of many years, employing any of a whole arsenal of hostile geophysical techniques against another nation which would be unaware of the origin of the “natural” disasters afflicting her and thus incapable of initiating any counteraction.”   p.92                                      

How to “Build Back Better?” First, destruction.

 

Link To video HERE

 

Lack of public consent, oversight, and accountability for potential damage and harm.

 

H.R. 6093, the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Reauthorization Act

Source

The “Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment (VORTEX)” has a budget appropriations of $20,000,000 in H.R. 6093.  Other areas of focus for federal experimental weather schemes include appropriations for atmospheric research, water management, hurricane, tsunami, flooding, and storms. Satellites and data collection are an integral part of weather management, compartmentalized under NESDIS. Partnerships and data transfers are also mentioned without providing specific entities.   

 

H.R. 6093 is the reauthorization of The Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Act of 2017, H.R. 353, enacted by the Trump administration to improve coordination of the U.S. weather enterprise.

H.R.353 – Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Act of 2017

STRATEGIC PLAN FOR FEDERAL WEATHER ENTERPRISE

 

H.R. 6093, the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Reauthorization Act is rooted upon H.R. 2130, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Authorization Act of 1992, authorizing “appropriations to the Secretary of Commerce for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for: (1) National Weather Service operations and research; (2) certain public warning and weather forecast systems and programs; (3) climate and air quality research, including climate and global changes; (4) atmospheric research; and (5) satellite observing systems.”

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, H.R. 6093 was passed in the House, then referred to the Senate, read twice and referred to the: Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

H.R. 6093 Summary : “To improve the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s weather research, support improvements in weather forecasting and prediction, expand commercial opportunities for the provision of weather data, and for other purposes.”

Link To Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Reauthorization Act of 2023

The Interagency Council for Advancing Meteorological Services listed in H.R. 6093 is also mentioned with regard to SRM coordination in the Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Modification.

Why was ICAMS created?

“In April of 2017, the President signed into law the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Act (Public Law No. 115-25, Title IV, sec. 402, 15 U.S.C. § 8542 – link takes you to a non-icams-portal.gov website). The Act required the Director of The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) to establish an Interagency Committee for Advancing Weather Services – ICAMS meets this requirement. As indicated in the Act, ICAMS will serve “to improve coordination of relevant weather research and forecast innovation activities across the Federal Government.””  Link to ICAMS HERE

Readers may notice the lack of funding or coordination for “geoengineering” programs.

Sophisticated branding such as “weather research” allows a never-ending revenue stream to continue flowing for atmospheric experiments or “other purposes,” avoiding public opposition to weather control and legislative measures to prohibit environmental manipulation at  State and National levels.

Find contact info to call Committee Senators HERE and urge Members to OPPOSE the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Reauthorization Act of 2023.

 

Related:  FAA Reauthorization of 2024  /  H. R. 3935

 


 

More Context 

WEATHER WARFARE: HURRICANE AND TORNADO CONTROL DEVICE

 

The Need For A Climate Control Study Program    CIA 1960 Report:

Technological developments of the past two decades have provided the understanding, the techniques, and the means necessary for an assault on the problems of climate control. Control of any kind requires capabilities in all these areas. Meteorology is just now beginning to acquire such capabilities.” LINK

The Need For A Climate Control Study Program – November 1960 – CIA

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

5Z 2005 OSTP Letter RE: S. 517 Rebranding Weather Modification

First Comprehensive Weather Policy Update Since 1992 Now Law / H.R. 353

The Federal Weather Enterprise: Fiscal Year 2021 Budget and Coordination Report

Meteorology, Climate Control, and Rebranding The Federal Weather Enterprise

FY 2024 Congressional Record – NOAA Appropriations

S.3888 Artificial Intelligence, Surveillance, & Weather

California Blizzard, Texas Wildfires, & the UN Climate Agenda

NATO’s Unexpected Role in Shaping Air Quality Policies

Freedom or Agenda 21? 

 


 

For information on advocacy for legislation to prohibit environmental manipulation, and other atmospheric pollution hazards in your state or nation email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

Send a message to your State legislators HERE

Americans4ACleanAtmosphere

 


 

Posted on

Earthquakes & Unraveling Illusions

April 7, 2024 |  Image source screenshot youtube video  | A 4.8 magnitude earthquake shook the northeastern U.S. on Friday morning April 5th, 2024. Earthquake activity In New York and New Jersey is a rare occurrence. Researcher Dutchsinse had predicted the quakes several days before.

Weather Warfare

In 1997 DOD Secretary William S. Cohen stated, “Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.” Link

 

2024 Federal Funding for Weather Activities – Lead Agency NOAA Receives nearly $5 BILLION:

FY 2024 Congressional Record – NOAA Appropriations

Soviet Weather Engineering Over North America – Presentation by -Lt. Col. Tom Bearden 1985

 

The lecture includes information on electromagnetic weapon systems.  In the final analysis Bearden stated, “In my opinion the Soviet Union has been waging a certain kind of undeclared war on the United States for  a period of over two decades.”

Link To Video HERE

Lt. Col. Tom Bearden Research Archive

In 2005 Lt. Col Bearden wrote a book called “Oblivion: America at the Brink,” in which he describes warfare capabilities of electromagnetic (EM) weapons. More info here:

How electromagnetic weapons induce disease and mentally disable entire populations

 


 

The media presents a competitive dynamic between the U.S. and Russia (and China) when in fact, the nations may be more accurately characterized as partners as per UN Agenda 2030.

US-Russian Merger

The Amazing Deception

 

SOVIET AND U.S. PLAN EMERGES

In 1975, DARPA published a report called, “Soviet Developments in Weather Modification, Climate Modification, and Climatology.” Described are applications of weather and climate modification  with capabilities for environmental warfare. Noted on page 84 of the report:

“…the U.S. has seven environmental warfare centers (not identified in the article) which are engaged in research on potential tactical measures such as the triggering of major earthquakes by the deep injection of “lubricants”  into vulnerable geologic faults or the generation of destructive seismic tidal waves by underwater explosions. In the same vein, the Soviet commentator alludes to the potential specter of “guided” tornadoes….

…potential geophysical warfare techniques: the creation of ‘windows” in the atmospheric ozone layer; the hostile deployment of       ultra- and infra-acoustic fields; the manipulation of atmospheric electricity to depress the mental activity of large groups of people; the tactical deployment of “guided” lightening;”

 

Page 85:

“University of California is cited as engaged in research on the debilitating effect of weak vibrational fields on human behavior…

 “…the particular danger of environmental warfare lies in the possibility that the aggressor nation may be secretly, over the course of many years, employing any of a whole arsenal of hostile geophysical techniques against another nation which would be unaware of the origin of the “natural” disasters afflicting her and thus incapable of initiating any  counteraction.”

 

Congress moving forward on classified 6G wireless

 

 


Is the U.S. Military Operating Under NATO Command?

 

What are the implications of the Israel – NATO alliance? Congress prioritizes the funding of Israel and NATO over Americans’ best interests. For example, see NDAA FY 2024 Funding:

S. 2226 National Defense Authorization Act FY 2024  |  RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • NATO Defense Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic (DIANA) Initiative
  • Cooperative programs with Israel on military directed energy capabilities
  • DOD 5G
  • DOD CIA Intelligence Collection Activities

S. 2226

 

Is NATO with US or Against US?

 

NATO’s Unexpected Role in Shaping Air Quality Policies

 

 


 

The Biden Administration and Congress has approved the transfer of more weapons to Israel for their war crimes. Note that the cost is not mentioned, since US “blank check” without conditions is apparently the official policy.

Related   

 American Congressman Pastor Timothy Walberg Calls for Nuclear Bombing of Gaza Like we Did in Japan

 

Biden, Congress, Kennedy, and Trump Agree

 

Open Secrets

 

Shahid Bolsen: Message to the Israeli people   Link

Link To Video HERE |        Now IS the Time for Peace Negotiations

 

Information regarding which members of Congress are dual citizens is not disclosed to the public, but the spending habits of DC politicians are not a secret.

Dual Citizens in Congress? Americans Need to Know. The Problem of Dual Citizenship

 

Investment in Americans’ interests are not a priority for Congress:

 

Providing more weapons for Israel’s  genocide of Palestinians follows calculated attacks on humanitarian workers which have drawn condemnation from around the world.

Source

 

In addition, more questions are being raised around the events of October 7: Forensic analysis shows Hamas abuses, many false Israeli claims

Israel’s Pearl Harbor? Reports Emerge of Ignored Warnings

 

 


 

Microwave Weapons

California Blizzard, Texas Wildfires, & the UN Climate Agenda

More Evidence Suggests Directed Energy Weapons Caused Fires in Maui

Did Directed Energy Weapons Cause Colorado Fires?

Fire Starters

U.S. Weather Enterprise + Artificial Intelligence

Freedom or Agenda 21? 

 

Posted on

Bill Gates Is Going Nuclear in Wyoming

April 1, 2024 | Image source | Depopulation expert Bill Gates is helping nuclear make a comeback.

Gates is Chairman of the Board of TerraPower LLC, the company building a commercial nuclear reactor in Kemmerer, Wyoming. This is the first nuclear reactor to be built in the U.S. in over a dozen years.

This has given the public plenty of  time to forget about one of the worst  nuclear disasters in U.S. history at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania, in 1979.

Link To Full Article HERE

 

The Problem of Cleaning Up the Remains of Nuclear Facilities      June 16, 1977   GAO Report

According to the above 1977 GAO Report,

“Cleaning up the remains of nuclear activities, however, presents special problems because of radioactivity and contamination which can endanger public health and safety. Some radioactivity remains hazardous for thousands of years making final and absolute disposal at best a difficult and expensive task.”

 

The report outlines the built-in problems with nuclear plants including lack of planning for decommissioning  the remains of nuclear facilities. At the very least the owners should be charged with providing  for decommissioning, or else the expense is left to the States or federal government.

 

In addition to being an environmental hazard that would burden future generations with extremely hazardous pollution, nuclear reactors present an ideal military target for direct energy weapons (DEWs) which could cause catastrophic harm.

 

Nuclear energy has not proven to be safe or green.

 


 

Related

UN & Bill Gates Launch “50in5” Global Digital Infrastructure Plans 

Partnership with WHO and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation -Catastrophic Contagion

The Cover-Up Continues: The Truth About Bill Gates, Microsoft, and Jeffrey Epstein

Bill Gates Helps Push for Build Back Batter

Bill & Melinda Gates Agenda in Africa

Bill Gates India

Bill Gates Vaxx Development and Surveillance

Bill Gates CDC

Bill & Melinda Gates Marburg

Bill Gates Vaxx Investment Return

Bill Gates 5G

Bill Gates Geoengineering

Bill Gates GMO’s

Bill Gates Farmland

Bill Gates Eugenics_Agenda

Bill Gates DNA Mining

Bill Gates Cryptocurrency_MICROSOFT_Patent_WO2020060606A1

Bill Gates / Henry Kissinger Call For Mass Vaxx

Bill Gates_Injectable Controlled Release Fluid Delivery System_US9067047

Bill Gates Partners with CCP on Infectious Disease Research

 


 

Posted on

Researchers Study Link Between RF Radiation Exposure and CV19

March 26, 2024 | Image source | An interesting  2021 study explores links between Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) exposure, CV19 and other diseases.

“Effect of Coronavirus Worldwide through Misusing of Wireless Sensor Networks,” was published in the American Journal of Bioinformatics Research. Authors studied impacts of exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless devices, networks and sensors concluding, “Corona is a sensory technical virus to spread as a non-communicable disease in animals and human beings. This virus is not biological, it is spread by technological programming and remote sensing.”

The abstract states: “…The study aims to evaluate the maltreating of wireless sensor networks that affect individuals within the body boundary area. Wireless sensor data were collected from individual’s profile, diagnosis and sensor node records at laboratory experiments. The study shows the effect of processed sensor nodes among individual’s body organs to compare with the existing environments. The study illustrates all individuals suffer from sensor disease due to reflecting of wavered sensors at open eyes sights with high speed electromagnetic-radio tracking systems…”

Link To Source HERE

 

 

There have been other studies linking virus activation and CV19 with increased exposure to RFR:

Evidence for a connection between coronavirus disease-19 and exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless communications including 5G

Microwave Emissions and the Problem of Modern Viral Diseases

 

The inducing and triggering of diseases by means of increasing RFR exposure warrants consideration.

How electromagnetic weapons induce disease and mentally disable entire populations

 

RFR has crept up on humanity. If we follow the marketing for new devices and services there’s no mention of the harms of RFR exposure. If we follow military weapons research and development, it’s clear that RFR is a weapon.

 

1975 DARPA report, “Soviet Developments in Weather Modification, Climate Modification, and Climatology:”  Potential geophysical warfare techniques: “the creation of ‘windows” in the atmospheric ozone layer; the hostile deployment of ultra- and infra-acoustic fields; the manipulation of atmospheric electricity to depress the mental activity of large groups of people…”

Source   

 

The installation of a sophisticated surveillance system built with RFR-transmitting infrastructure inclusive of satellite networks and interoperable ground based instruments that are continuously polluting the environment with RFR has been termed the “digital prison.”

 

Amazon’s Satellites Strengthen Digital Prison

 

Source

These systems such as “5G”, “6G”, FutureG and interactive components comprise the internet of everything, the internet of bodies, as well as the foundation of global weather engineering and weather monitoring networks built inside of an overarching globalist designed Artificial Intelligence.

 

Nanobots, Construction process of Microchips in C19 injectables, new insights on Shedding

The Whole Truth About Covid-19 Vaccines — Professor Jean-Bernard Fourtillan

Artificial Intelligence, ‘SMART DUST,’ and the IoT Challenge

Is the purpose of AI to enslave humans?

 

State and local safety regulations are a cure for the plague of RFR pollution assaulting our civilization.

 

How do we know for sure that RFR is pollution?   AT&T and Verizon offer us the definition:

 

 

Alphabet agencies that are in partnership with the United Nations such as the FCC are not capable of proper regulatory oversight.

 

Source

The EPA has known for decades about the hazards of RFR exposure and failed to protect the public.

1978 EPA Report: Efforts to Protect the Public from Radiation

 

The federal government in partnership with the UN is not capable of reigning in the problem because the federal government is funding these activities.

 

Source     p.179

 

Source  p.180

 

White House Report: Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Modification (SRM)

 

Congress moving forward on classified 6G wireless

 

 

Many states have introduced legislation to tackle RFR and SRM pollution, pursuant to the Tenth Amendment.

 

To learn more and get involved visit Americans4aCleanAtmosphere

 

 


 

Related

Microwave Radiation Is A Bigger Problem Than Tiktok

1981: Pandemic Genocide Predicted by Globalist Banker

Fast Tracking the Quiet War: White House Update

Microwave Weapons

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

NATO’s Unexpected Role in Shaping Air Quality Policies

Freedom or Agenda 21? 

 

 


 

Posted on

Aerosols & Recent Events

March 13, 2024 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | Image Source | With a “major measles outbreak” being recently reported and malaria in the news last summer, researchers may remember a 2015 article, Atmospheric dispersion modelling of bioaerosols that are pathogenic to humans and livestock, which examines the generation and transport of pathogenic bioaerosols.

The report states:

“In this review we discuss studies that applied atmospheric dispersion models (ADM) to bioaerosols that are pathogenic to humans and livestock in the context of risk assessment studies…The studies included human, livestock, and industrial sources. Important factors for dispersion included wind speed, atmospheric stability, topographic effects, and deposition.”

Notably, malaria and measles, are included in Appendix B.

 

Link To Report HERE

 

Readers may also recall US Patent 8,967,029 B1 Toxic mosquito aerial release system, which describes an invention “capable of delivering lethal and non-lethal toxins, including any agent that can be carried and administered by a mosquito”.

Toxic mosquito aerial release system

Acknowledged in the background information provided is the fact that well known methods of toxin delivery include dispersion using an aerosol spray.

 

2003 Medscape article,  Potential for Aerosol Dissemination of Biological Weapons: Lessons From Biological Control of Insects,” discusses technological feasibility of disseminating biological weapons from aircraft.

 

 

Aerosol injection and other atmospheric polluting are widely recognized as being unacceptable. People around the world are calling for immediate prohibition and criminalization of such environmental hazards.

 


 

Related

Multiscale Airborne Infectious Disease Transmission

Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute “OMICS Malarial on the Move” 2024 World Malaria Day Symposium

Beyond Borders: NATO’s Unexpected Role In Shaping Air Quality Policies Worldwide

Towards a High-Resolution, Implantable Neural Interface (darpa.mil)

 

Ray Kurzweil describes taking “some kind of medication that would have nanobots go through our bloodstream and they would find the end of the neocortex and attach themselves there and communicate outside so you could have a computer on your body but more likely you’re really in the cloud…”

 

 


 

More Context

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025] 

 

Aerosolized Nanobot Described in 2012 Geoengineering Business Model 

 

Oblivion: Weather Engineering Warfare

 

Atmospheric dispersion modelling of bioaerosols that are pathogenic to humans and livestock

 

 


 

 

To learn more about how to get involved in advocacy for legislation to prohibit weather engineering and other atmospheric / environmental hazards in your state or nation email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 

Send a message to your legislators HERE

 

Americans4ACleanAtmosphere

 

 

 


 

Posted on

NATO’s Unexpected Role in Shaping Air Quality Policies

March 6, 2024 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | Image Source

NATO’s Unexpected Role in Shaping Air Quality Policies 

 Key Points: 

  • NATO’s Influence on U.S. and Global Pollution Policy
  • Environmental Protection as a Racket
  • Evolution into Solar Radiation Modification (SRM)
  • EPA’s Historical Failures

IT ALL STARTS HERE…

NATO is a military force closely aligned with the United Nations (UN). 

Is NATO with US or Against US?

Related: Environmental Protection within NATO

This foreign military is not an elected organization or in any way qualified to lead environmental protection efforts or establish public safety policies. The idea that this agency may have played a key role in influencing the creation of worldwide air quality policy and standards warrants wider public scrutiny.

According to the book AIR POLLUTION MODELING AND ITS APPLICATION XV, in 1969 NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organization) established the Committee on Challenges of Modern Society (CCMS) and developed a framework to study pollution modeling and its applications. This 2004 book is a compilation of scientific and technical reports from the 25th year of international conferences held during 2001.

MODELING DEFINED… 

Modeling may involve the use of computer simulations and may also involve “in-situ” observations of experimentation using actual pollutants.

“In-situ” refers to measurements or observations taken directly at the location where a phenomenon is occurring: Ultrafine aerosol particles in aircraft plumes In situ observations

Both approaches, in-situ observation and modeling, complement each other. Observations provide real-world data for validation and refinement of models.

The book, AIR POLLUTION MODELING AND ITS APPLICATION XV, covers topics such as: Regional Air Pollution and Climate; Global and Long-Range Transport; Integrated Regional Modelling; Role of Atmospheric Models in Air Pollution Policy and Abatement Strategies; New Developments; and Model Assessment and Verification are documented in the book. *Note the spelling difference between UK “modelling” and US “modeling” terms.

Obviously a lot of time, money, and coordination went into these decades-long studies, but why? Why was NATO, a foreign military, leading this effort?

Countries worldwide followed NATO’s lead and replicated similar modeling protocols and air quality standards were adopted.  In the United States the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) became the leading agency charged with developing and enforcing pollution standards. All 50 States adopted air dispersion or modeling protocols. Scroll down to find your state’s modeling protocols at the end of this article.

EPA WROTE THE RULES?

The assumption that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is actively working to eliminate pollution is not accurate. In the US we take air quality standards for granted without considering the foreign military, NATO, which helped create and develop the standards. 

These protocols involve the use of models and averages to determine “acceptable” levels of exposure to various pollutants. Given that there is a distinct difference between engineering statistical models and real world impacts on biological life, pollution dispersion protocols are inadequate in protecting and honoring the sanctity of life. 

If the goal was genuinely to protect life and the environment, then protocols would be implemented to effectively prohibit the release of pollution, not to allow further releases.

IT’S ACTUALLY A RACKET

Since the U.S. government is a corporation, the EPA functions within the business plan to keep the wheels of commerce rolling.

The EPA was established in 1970 under Richard Nixon’s notoriously corrupt administration. Henry Kissinger, Nixon’s National Security advisor and Secretary of State was linked to the Rockefeller-created UN, the KGB (Soviet intelligence) and promoted policies of worldwide depopulation, known also as activities to accelerate fertility decline.

Infiltration by Soviet agents such as Kissinger into positions of influence and power in American government is an important fact to better understanding recent history and current events. For more information on this see the 2003 article by Charlotte Iserbyt, United States Russian Merger: A Done Deal?

The intention to “comfortably” merge the Soviet Union with the United States was the goal of the UN and major Tax-Exempt Foundations.

US-Russian Merger

 

Notably, the Nixon administration, under Kissinger’s direction, was involved in advancing international weather modification efforts:

Source

Related:

Weather Modification in North Vietnam and Laos (Project Popeye)

 

SOVIET AND U.S. PLAN EMERGES

In 1975, DARPA published a report called, “Soviet Developments in Weather Modification, Climate Modification, and Climatology.” The report describes applications of weather and climate modification as well as methods of moderating hypothetical warming trends by increasing the concentration of sulfate aerosol in the lower stratosphere.

Currently, this Soviet sulfate aerosol injection strategy is called Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), and is being funded by the US Congress, in partnership with federal agencies, the UN World Meteorological Organization (WMO), private partners, and academia relative to Solar Radiation Modification (SRM).

Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Modification

Weather and climate modification is now being promoted as Solar Radiation Modification (SRM), Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), Marine Cloud Brightening (MCB), and other terms, as research, or more accurately, experimentation. Presenting Solar Radiation Modification (SRM) as legitimate “research,” when the potential adverse consequences of this dual purposed military weaponry have been known for decades, is how these activities have been able to proceed without being challenged.

The EU is also proposing a similar global governance framework for SRM research.

European Commission Report on Geoengineering Governance

Horizon Europe Report: SRM Governance of Research

Pakistan is also discussing a global governance framework for SRM research.

Pakistan Policy Brief: Governance of Solar Radiation Modification

The Vatican has been discussing global governance framework for SRM research for years.

C2G2: Vatican Seminar on the Governance of Geoengineering

More Information:  SRM Governance 

Notably missing from these discussions and proposals for global SRM governance is public consent. Legitimate governance requires the consent of the governed.

 

EPA HISTORY OF FAILURE TO PROTECT

A prime example of EPA failure to protect public health from harmful pollution may be found in the 1978 report: Efforts by the Environmental Protection Agency To Protect the Public from Environmental Nonionizing Radiation Exposures. According to the 15-page report, symptoms attributed to low-level exposure to radiation include, “headache, weariness, dizziness, irritability, emotional instability, partial loss of memory, loss of appetite, cardiovascular effects, electroencephalogram changes, blood chemistry changes, changes in respiration, and possible genetic effects.”

No action was taken based on the report. Why?

ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS

It’s worth reiterating: The assumption that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is actively working to eliminate pollution is not accurate.

Since the 1970’s, awareness of pollution, driven by professional marketing campaigns, has become a modern economic phenomenon.

Billions and billions of dollars are now hinged on investment schemes such as carbon credits, ESG bond ratings, and the latest, NAC’s (Natural Asset Companies). Anything that is linked to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) or the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC), and claims to be helping anyone besides investors is suspect. For such entities, the primary goal is profit.

Consider UN “climate action” plans implemented in your state or nation based on the carbon dioxide (CO2) hypothesis that was proposed in the 1975 DARPA-Soviet report mentioned above.

Between 1975 and now, sophisticated marketing campaigns have driven consumers and entire nations toward “virtuous cycles of investment.”

source

UN AGENDA 21 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS

In 1992 Untied Nations (UN) codified virtuous investment branded as Sustainable Development or Agenda 21, which has since evolved into more precise planning for Agenda 2030 and Agenda 2050. This was made possible by the UN in concert with The World Bank and a host of financial giants.

Under UN Agenda 21, international observation and “research” programs in global atmospheric chemistry were adopted by participating nations via the World Meteorological Organization (WMO),which is also part of the UN.

The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) is a primary driver of atmospheric experimentation and weather modification. The WMO Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) Implementation Plan 2016-2023, states:

“GAW also supports the enhancement of aviation meteorological services through research of atmospheric aerosol dispersion.” 

Outside and beyond the context of legitimate governance, weather modification programs have been operating without safety regulations, public oversight, or public consent, since the 1950’s.

At the 2017 GLOBAL WEATHER ENTERPRISE SEMINAR it was no secret that the public might have better ideas regarding pollution abatement: 

“There is a huge risk in not acting globally now, because local solutions will be developed and
possibly interfere with broader ones” -p.8

Link

The U.S. Federal Weather Enterprise was linked to the above mentioned Global Weather Enterprise.

STRATEGIC PLAN FOR FEDERAL WEATHER ENTERPRISE

Link to 2018-2022 Strategic Plan For Federal Weather Enterprise Coordination

“4.1 Exercise leadership in coordinating U.S. efforts in international weather research priorities including the current World Meteorological Organization Grand Challenges.” -Quote from Federal Weather Enterprise Budget and Coordination Reports in 2019, 2020, and p.3 of the 2021 Federal Weather Enterprise (FWE).

The funding of more than 30 U.S. agencies is outlined on page 30 of the 2021 Federal Weather Enterprise. NOAA, DOC, EPA, FAA, DOE, DOD, NASA, and others are listed as participants in a system of meteorology for climate control within an international NGO (non-government agency) called the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), which is also part of the UN.

Notably, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is consistently listed as a top funded agency in partnership with the Department of Commerce (DOC).

 

CIA INTEREST IN METEOROLOGY FOR CLIMATE CONTROL: 1960

“Technological developments of the past two decades have provided the understanding, the techniques, and the means necessary for an assault on the problems of climate control. Control of any kind requires capabilities in all these areas. Meteorology is just now beginning to acquire such capabilities.”   November 22, 1960,  p.5 of 17

 

In 1961 JFK delivered a speech to the United Nations promoting globalism, cooperation in global weather control, satellite communications to link the whole world, and international disarmament, whereby the UN would become the world’s military police force.

Who is the UN’s military partner?  NATO.  

This is problematic for numerous reasons including the fact that Russia is on the UN security council and China is a leading funder of the UN, with both being members of the UN’s World Meteorological Organization along with the U.S.. This may explain why Chinese weather balloons have been allowed to travel freely over the United States.

The Amazing Deception

 

The five permanent members of the UN Security Council are: ChinaFranceRussian Federationthe United Kingdom, and the United States.

“We shall propose further cooperative efforts between all nations in weather prediction and eventually in weather control.”  President John F. Kennedy,  25 September 1961   Link To Full Speech Quote @ 22:02

In 1962 Lyndon Johnson described the development of a weather satellite to permit man to determine the world’s cloud layer and ultimately to control the weather. Johnson stated: “he who controls the weather will control the world.”

NATO 2030

An important revelation written in the Foreign Policy Institute/Henry A. Kissinger Center for Global Affairs,
Johns Hopkins University SAIS 2021 white paper, NATO 2030 states: 

“Notably, it is no longer a given that the United States will play a significant leadership role in the Alliance.”   Intro p. 13

Link To NATO 2030 Towards a New Strategic Concept and Beyond HERE

Is the U.S. Military Operating Under NATO Command?

 

Additionally, NATO collaborates with the International Civil Aviation Organization.

This international group is partnered with the UN as well as the UN’s global weather apparatus, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), and plays a central role in facilitating global air traffic.

Published in separate English, French, Russian and Spanish editions by the INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION 999 University Street, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H3C 5H7         International Civil Aviation Organization 2011 330

 

MERGING OF CIVIL AND MILITARY AVIATION

“There is now a clearly defined need to establish procedures that support the efficient integration of military and civil aviation in day-to-day operations.”  Chapter 6  p. 22

With reference to the list of acronyms on page (x) of this 2011 document, note the multiple mentions of remotely piloted aircraft systems, unmanned aircraft, and satellite systems.

“Historically, offshore airspace is regarded as optimal for conducting hazardous air activity due to its natural separation from both people and property and from other air activity. As a result, much of the offshore airspace around the U.S. has been designated as SUA (Special use airspace).” – p.28

 

EXACTLY WHOSE MILITARY?

As stated in the NATO 2030 document, there has been a diminishing U.S. leadership role in NATO.

This is consistent with the overarching establishment of UN global governance plans that have been in the works for at least a century.

The UN-linked International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) merger of global civil and military aviation operations has undermined legitimate USA Constitutional authority as well as national jurisdictions and sovereignty.

Remember, there is a difference between civil aviation operations such as flying to a destination and military operations involving warfare-related activities. 

The global merging of military and civil aviation operations prevents essential public oversight of potentially catastrophic and hazardous atmospheric experimentation.

In the USA, the FAA, along with the EPA, as revealed in the source documents above, are not able to function in the best interests of the people because of the merging with a foreign military.

Air quality standards adopted by the EPA, spawned by NATO aka UN-linked military, allow regulatory cover for continual atmospheric dispersion modelling.

In conclusion, what’s being marketed as “climate change” is the result of over 70 years of weather and climate modification undertaken without public consent. It is now called Solar Radiation Modification (SRM).

========

IT ALL ENDS HERE…

Legitimate Constitutional regulatory mechanisms to prohibit and penalize atmospheric experimentation involving the intentional release of polluting emissions is necessary to protect human health and our environment. 

Nations and States must step up to defend the rule of law.

Kentucky SB217 states: “Pursuant to the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and the inherent right for Kentucky citizens to engage in thoughtful deliberation and determine public policy by voting, the citizens of the Commonwealth do not consent to any unconstitutional actions or efforts made by the federal government or international bodies that intentionally release polluting emissions into the Commonwealth’s atmosphere, through geoengineering, cloud seeding, weather modification, or any other means;”

Illinois Weather Modification Act Introduced

Tennessee HB2063 and SB2691 Introduced

Clean Air Bill Introduced in Connecticut

 

========

SUMMARY:

Economic Interests Driving Pollution Policy:

    • Pollution policy, driven by marketing campaigns, has become an economic phenomenon tied to investment schemes such as carbon credits and NACs.
    • Entities linked to financial markets prioritize profit, potentially overshadowing genuine efforts to combat pollution.

 

UN’s Role in Harmonizing Atmospheric Experimentation:

    • UN-NATO led initiatives prioritizing Agenda 21/2030 sustainable development goals (SDGs) have guided sovereign nations toward global atmospheric experimentation without public consent or legitimate governance.
    • Weather modification and climate control programs, now termed SRM, lack public consent and oversight.

 

Merging Civil and Military Aviation:

    • The merging of civil and military aviation, facilitated by organizations like NATO and the ICAO, excludes public oversight of hazardous atmospheric experimentation.
    • The diminishing U.S. leadership role in NATO aligns with broader UN global governance plans.

 

Call for Constitutional Regulation:

    • Constitutional regulatory mechanisms are crucial to prohibit and penalize atmospheric experimentation releasing pollutants intentionally.
    • Nations and states are urged to defend the rule of law, exemplified by Kentucky SB217, asserting citizens’ right to reject and prohibit unconstitutional actions related to atmospheric experimentation.

 

========

Collection of U.S. States’ Air Dispersion and Modeling Information Illustrating Compliance with EPA’s Adoption of NATO-directed NAAQS (National Ambient Air Quality Standards). 

 

Alabama

Alabama Department of Environmental Management

MODELING GUIDELINES – PSD AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS (alabama.gov)

 

========

 

Arizona

AQD | Air Dispersion Modeling | ADEQ (azdeq.gov)

Air Dispersion Modeling Guidelines (azdeq.gov)

 

========

 

Arkansas

air_permitting_introductory_guide_final-6-16-21.pdf (state.ar.us)

arkansas_source_characterization.pdf (epa.gov)

Chemical Hazards Research Center | Chemical Hazards Research Center | University of Arkansas (uark.edu)

 

 

========

 

Alaska

Air Quality Dispersion Modeling (alaska.gov)

acp-23-5641-2023.pdf (copernicus.org)

 

=========

 

California 

HARP AERMOD Meteorological Files | California Air Resources Board

California aerosols – their physical and chemical characteristics (Journal Article) | OSTI.GOV

METEOROLOGICAL AND AIR DISPERSION MODELING APPROACH

 

========

 

Colorado

Colorado (state.co.us)

Air Quality Modeling Guidance for Permits | Department of Public Health & Environment (colorado.gov)

1 (epa.gov)

Microsoft Word – 119656715_1.docx (coag.gov)

 

=========

 

Connecticut

Air Quality Dispersion Modeling (ct.gov)

SO2DataRequirementsEPALetterpdf.pdf (ct.gov)

 

========

 

Delaware 

Air Contaminant Equipment Registration – DNREC (delaware.gov)

Air Quality Dispersion Modeling – Screening Models | US EPA

Air Quality Pre-Application Review – DNREC (delaware.gov)

 

=========

 

Florida

Air Modeling for Air Permitting | Florida Department of Environmental Protection

PSD Air Quality Modeling Best Practices_2022_0.pdf (floridadep.gov)

 

========

 

Georgia

Air Quality Modeling | Environmental Protection Division (georgia.gov)

Georgia AERMET Meteorological Data | Environmental Protection Division

Interim Air Dispersion Modeling Guidance (providenceoris.com)

 

========

 

Hawaii

Meteorological and Air Quality Modeling for Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands – PMC (nih.gov)

Clean Air Branch | Air Emissions Reporting Requirements (AERR) + State & Local Emissions Inventory System (SLEIS) (hawaii.gov)

 

========

 

Idaho

State of Idaho Air Quality Modeling Guideline

Guideline for Performing Air Quality Impact Analyses_Revised Section 3 – 0721.docx (live.com)

 

========

 

Illinois

pcb.illinois.gov.doc (live.com)

Air-Quality-Impact-Evaluation-Interim-Guidance.pdf (chicago.gov)

Revised Emissions and Air Dispersion Modeling Study (chicago.gov)

 

========

 

Indiana

IDEM: Air Quality: Air Dispersion Meteorological Data (in.gov)

IDEM: Air Quality: Modeling

 

 

========

 

Iowa

Dispersion Modeling (iowadnr.gov)

modeling_guidelines.pdf (iowadnr.gov)

modeling_guidelines.pdf (iowa.gov)

Air Dispersion Modeling Evaluation (polkcountyiowa.gov)

 

========

 

Kansas

Modeling-Protocol-Guidance-Document-PDF (ks.gov)

Air Permit Modeling | KDHE, KS

2023 Regional, State, and Local Dispersion Modelers’ Workshop | US EPA

 

========

 

Kentucky

Modeling and Meteorology – Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet

Meteorological Data for Dispersion Modeling | LouisvilleKY.gov

Kentucky Annual Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan 2022

 

========

 

Louisiana

Air Modeling Resource | Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality

Microsoft Word – LA Modeling Guidelines62006.doc (louisiana.gov)

2015-4-4.pdf (la-awma.org)

PowerPoint Presentation (la-awma.org)

 

========

 

Maine

Modeling Protocols and Submittals, Air Quality,Maine DEP

Permit Air Quality Modeling Guidelines Maine DEP

Chapter 115: Emission License Regulations | EPA-Approved Maine Regulations | State Implementation Plans (SIPs)

 

========

 

Maryland

Air Quality Planning (maryland.gov)

York Mod InitialandSupplementDocket07-23.pdf (maryland.gov)

Dispersion Modeling, Air Miodeling, Air Dispersion | SCS Engineers

 

========

 

Massachusetts

Microsoft Word – modguid (mass.gov)

Air Quality Modeling Submittal (AQ MM) | Mass.gov

Federal Register :: Guideline on Air Quality Models; Enhancements to the AERMOD Dispersion Modeling System

 

========

 

Michigan

Modeling and Meteorology (michigan.gov)

Dispersion Modeling Info (michigan.gov)

MDEQ Air Quality Division Updates two key Policy and Procedure Documents (govdelivery.com)

 

========

 

Minnesota

Air quality modeling | Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (state.mn.us)

MPCA Air Quality Dispersion Modeling Practices Manual (state.mn.us)

MPCA Air Dispersion Modeling Practices Manaul (providenceoris.com)

 

========

 

Mississippi

NSR Air Quality Modeling – MDEQ (ms.gov)

Air Dispersion Modeling for Mississippi – High Level Overview for Managers & Decision Makers | Trinity Consultants

IJERPH | Free Full-Text | Some Observational and Modeling Studies of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer at Mississippi Gulf Coast for Air Pollution Dispersion Assessment (mdpi.com)

Air Quality Modeling for the Urban Jackson, Mississippi Region Using a High Resolution WRF/Chem Model – PMC (nih.gov)

 

========

 

Missouri

Air Permit Modeling | Missouri Department of Natural Resources

Minor Source Dispersion Modeling Protocol Template Minor Source Category | Missouri Department of Natural Resources

Atmosphere | Free Full-Text | Combining Dispersion Modeling and Monitoring Data for Community-Scale Air Quality Characterization (mdpi.com)

 

========

 

Montana

Air Quality Monitoring | Montana DEQ (mt.gov)

Montana Modeling Guideline for Air Quality Permits (providenceoris.com)

STATE OF MONTANA (mt.gov)

 

========

 

Nebraska

703_20231129-160531.pdf (nebraskalegislature.gov)

Microsoft Word – 06-188.doc (providenceoris.com)

nebraska_source_characterization.pdf (epa.gov)

 

========

 

Nevada

Microsoft Word – NBAPC_Model_Guide_Draft.doc (nv.gov)

Planning and Modeling | NDEP (nv.gov)

ARL Divisions: SORD – Air Resources Laboratory (noaa.gov)

 

========

 

New Hampshire

Modeling | NH Department of Environmental Services

Guidance and Procedure for Performing Air Quality Impact Modeling in New Hampshire (nh.gov)

New Hampshire Administrative Code | Part Env-A 606 – AIR POLLUTION DISPERSION MODELING IMPACT ANALYSIS | Casetext

Microsoft Word – NH_modeling_procedures_2006.doc (providenceoris.com)

 

========

 

New Jersey

NJDEP| Air Planning | Air Quality Evaluation and Planning

TECHNICAL MANUAL 1002 (nj.gov)

Section 7:27-22.8 – Air quality dispersion modeling and risk assessment, N.J. Admin. Code § 7:27-22.8 | Casetext Search + Citator

 

========

 

New Mexico

Air Quality Modeling (nm.gov)

Dispersion Modeling Guidelines & Data — City of Albuquerque (cabq.gov)

New Mexico Air Pollution Control Bureau (nm.gov)

feb2016-coa-dispersion-modeling-guidelines-1.pdf (cabq.gov)

 

========

 

New York

DAR-10: NYSDEC Guidelines on Dispersion Modeling Procedures for Air Quality Impact Analysis

Air Toxics Program – NYDEC

Air Quality Dispersion Modeling | US EPA

Expert Air Dispersion Modeling Services by C.T. Male Associates (ctmale.com)

 

========

 

North Carolina

Modeling & Meteorology | NC DEQ

Modeling | NC DEQ

Air Quality Modeling | Air Quality (mecknc.gov)

Atmospheric Dispersion and Pollution Transport – Air Quality Portal (ncsu.edu)

 

========

 

North Dakota 

Air Quality – North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality (nd.gov)

ND_Air_Dispersion_Modeling_Guide.pdf

Search Results < North Dakota State University (ndsu.edu)

EPA – Dispersion Modeling Analysis of PSD Class I Increment Consumption in North Dakota and Eastern Montana (ndhealth.gov)

 

========

 

Ohio

State Implementation Plan Section/Modeling | Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

EG69_11-14-18_final.pdf (ohio.gov)

Air Quality Modeling | Ohio University

Ohio-Modeling-guidance.pdf (providenceoris.com)

 

========

 

Oklahoma

1 Introduction (ok.gov)

6.4 The Oklahoma Dispersion Model: a Web-based management tool for near-surface releases of gases and small particulates (2002 – AFMAPUE_12airpoll) (confex.com)

A simple urban dispersion model tested with tracer data from Oklahoma City and Manhattan – ScienceDirect

 

========

 

Oregon

CAORP-AirQualityModeling.pdf (oregon.gov)

Department of Environmental Quality : Short-Term 1-Hour and 24-Hour NAAQS Requirements : Air Quality Permits : State of Oregon

nextCombMPrawp.pdf (state.or.us)

Recommended procedures for air quality dispersion modeling – September 2021 | Oregon State Library

 

========

 

Pennsylvania

Air Resource Management Division (pa.gov)

files.dep.state.pa.us/RegionalResources/SWRO/SWROPortalFiles/Community Info/Westmoreland_Sanitary_Landfill/Westmoreland_LF_Dispersion_Modeling_Protocol.pdf

BAQ Functions (pa.gov)

Air Dispersion Modeling (geosyntec.com)

Appendix A – Summary of Revised Air Dispersion Modeling for IRA.pdf (state.pa.us)

 

========

 

Rhode Island

RI DEM/Air Resources- Air Dispersion Modeling Guidelines for Stationary Sources

RIDEM, Office of Air Resources, GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSING HEALTH RISKS FROM PROPOSED AIR POLLUTION SOURCES

Rhode Island Air Pollution Control Regulation 9: Air Pollution Control Permits (epa.gov)

BEEST Suite – Air Quality Modeling, AERMOD | Providence-Oris (providenceoris.com)

 

========

 

South Carolina

Air Dispersion Modeling – Guidance and General Information | SCDHEC

Air Dispersion Modeling Overview | SCDHEC

 

========

 

South Dakota

Administrative Rule 74:36:21:04 | South Dakota Legislature (sdlegislature.gov)

sd-remarks-r2.pdf (epa.gov)

sd-rec-r2.pdf (epa.gov)

 

========

 

Tennessee

apc_ppo-TN-DAPC-PSD-Dispersion-Modeling-Protocol-Template-10132023final.pdf

Air Quality Modeling (tn.gov)

Microsoft Word – Georgia Air Dispersion Modeling Guidance.doc (tn.gov)

 

========

 

Texas

Guidance for Air Dispersion Modeling – Texas Commission on Environmental Quality – www.tceq.texas.gov

TCEQ Air Quality Modeling Guidelines (texas.gov)

https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=20011RKE.TXT 

 

========

 

Utah

Air Quality Modeling Program – Utah Department of Environmental Quality

Geographic Information Systems (GIS): Air Quality Modeling Program – Utah Department of Environmental Quality

Pardyjak Lab (utah.edu)

 

========

 

Vermont

Air Quality Modeling | Department of Environmental Conservation (vermont.gov)

Section 5-406 Required Air Modeling | Chapter 5 Air Pollution Control, Subchapter IV. Operations and Procedures (epa.gov)

Technical manual (vermont.gov)

 

========

 

Virginia

Air Assessments | Virginia DEQ

Virginia Modeling Guideline for Air Quality Permits

04616 RM849-20200424100447 (epa.gov)

References | Assessing Air Pollution Dispersion Models for Emissions Regulation | The National Academies Press

 

========

Washington

Air Dispersion Modeling Protocol (wa.gov)

PowerPoint Presentation (washington.edu)

Microsoft PowerPoint – CEE 357 air dispersion models.ppt [Compatibility Mode] (washington.edu)

Project Report Template (pscleanair.gov)

 

========

West Virginia

Air Modeling Group (wv.gov)

Microsoft Word – CMC Kent – PSD Modeling Protocol v0.7 – Post Comments (wv.gov)

Microsoft Word – Cover Sheet Attachment 1.docx (epa.gov)

 

========

Wisconsin

Air Dispersion Modeling | | Wisconsin DNR

Air Permits | Wisconsin DNR

“Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling of Pollutants in Milwaukee Using AERMO” by Otito Onwuzurike (marquette.edu)

Air dispersion modeling : foundations and applications – Catalog – UW-Madison Libraries (wisc.edu)

 

=========

Wyoming

[DRAFT] Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality/Air Quality Division (providenceoris.com)

An assessment of the air quality modeling efforts in southwest Wyoming (Technical Report) | OSTI.GOV

WDEQ-AQD Final Comment – PM2.5 Ozone Permit Modeling Guidance – 11.18.21.pdf (epa.gov)

 

=========

 

Relevant Related Documentation 

 

EPA

https://www.epa.gov/scram/air-quality-dispersion-modeling

https://www.epa.gov/scram/modeling-applications-and-tools

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_atmospheric_dispersion_models 

EPA Can Strengthen Its Process for Revising Air Quality Dispersion Models that Predict Impact of Pollutant Emissions

Federal Register :: Guideline on Air Quality Models; Enhancements to the AERMOD Dispersion Modeling System   Dec 2023

 

WMO

https://community.wmo.int/en/dispersion-models 

 

 

NATO Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application

https://vdocuments.net/5750a3021a28abcf0c9f7be7.html?page=6 

 

 

USA Air Modeling – State Modeling | US EPA

Atmospheric dispersion for impact assessment in France

Ultrafine aerosol particles in aircraft plumes In situ observations

Models, In situ, and Remote sensing of Aerosols (MIRA): Formation of an International Working Group

Atmospheric Dispersion Models for Environmental Pollution Applications

An Introduction to Atmospheric Pollutant Dispersion Modelling

Air Pollution Meteorology and Dispersion

DOE Two Column Aerosol Project Science Plan – DOE

Stratospheric Aircraft Exhaust Plume and Wake Chemistry – NASA

Method for Estimating Aircraft Black Carbon Mass and Particle Number Emissions USDA

DOD Management Issues Related to Chaff

EPA Dispersion Models AERMOD

New Evidence of Corruption at EPA Chemicals Division (theintercept.com)

Whistleblowers Expose Corruption in EPA Chemical Safety Office (theintercept.com)

 

==========

Posted on

Fast Tracking the Quiet War: White House Update

February 19, 2024 | Critical and Emerging TechnologiesSilent Weapons For Quiet Wars

Just in case you may have missed the quiet White House report on Critical and Emerging Technologies, below you’ll find the February 2024 update outlining research and development relative to “executive branch” policy goals.

Some of the listed technologies include:

Artificial Intelligence,

Directed Energy,

Human-Machine Interfaces,

Advanced modeling and simulation,

Payloads, sensors, and instruments,

Remote sensing of the Earth,

Detection and characterization of pathogens, and of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons and materials,

Health sector sensing,

Smart manufacturing, nanomanufacturing,

Novel synthetic biology including nucleic acid, genome, epigenome, and protein synthesis and
engineering, including design tools,

Multi-omics and other biometrology, bioinformatics, computational biology, predictive
modeling, and analytical tools for functional phenotypes,

Engineering of sub-cellular, multicellular, and multi-scale systems,

Cell-free systems and technologies,

Engineering of viral and viral delivery systems,

Grid integration technologies,

Distributed ledger technologies,

Digital assets,

Digital payment technologies,

Digital identity technologies, biometrics, and associated infrastructure…

The vast assortment of technical programs may raise a number of questions for readers, one of which may be, who exactly, is creating these policies and formulating the strategy?

 

According to the update, “The National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) is the principal means by which the Executive Branch coordinates science and technology policy across the diverse entities that make up the Federal research and development enterprise.”

 

The summary continues stating, “OSTP [Office of Science and Technology Policy] leads interagency science and technology policy coordination efforts, assists the Office of Management and Budget with an annual review and analysis of Federal research and development in budgets, and serves as a source of scientific and technological analysis and judgment for the President with respect to major policies, plans, and programs of the Federal Government.”

 

 

*The OSTP is also a leading agency coordinating Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Modification

*Keep in mind that past administrations spearheaded these programs and the current White House is simply continuing prior efforts:  

 

 

 


 Coordination of Critical and Emerging Technologies

 

 

 

 

Link To Full Document HERE

FY2024 Budget Biological / Environmental Research / Genomic Sciences

 


The skillful marketing of  “emerging technologies” conceals the quiet war of a permanent DIGITAL PRISON being built, purposed for constant biometric surveillance, data collection, CBDC infrastructure,  social credit score calculations, weather engineering, digital ID, “virus” activation, weaponry, and other unconstitutional endeavors to enslave the public via implementation of UN Agenda 2030.

 

 

Source

 

Undisclosed are the purposes of these technologies, specifically the impact of public and environmental exposure to ubiquitous, continuous RF / Microwave Radiation.

 

 Is Humanity Being Poisoned By Microwave Radiation?

Microwave Weapons

 

Radiation is defined as ((uninsurable)) pollution by AT&T and Verizon.

 

AT&T definition of Pollutants:

 

Submit an RF Radiation Reading HERE

World Radiation Tracker Map

How much RF RADIATION comes with cell phone “service?”

1978 EPA Report: Efforts to Protect the Public from Radiation

 

 

There are zero agencies in the US measuring or monitoring RF Radiation pollution in order to protect public health, the environment and wildlife.

Source

 

Emerging Technologies in Cell Towers: The Future of Connectivity  LINK

 

The map below shows AT&T wireless and “5G” “coverage” across the U.S.  Looks as though there are no significant gaps in coverage.

AT&T Wireless Coverage:

Link To Source HERE

AT&T 5G UN ITU Global Standards

 

Adding to the 24/7/365 RF Radiation pollution problem is the fact that AT&T is also collaborating with China on the Internet of Things (IoT). According to their website, AT&T has been in China for over 30 years.

 

 

White House Funds Secretive AT&T Surveillance Program

 

The Internet of Bodies ( IoB )

 

Audit finds government agencies violate laws with fake cell tower spying

 

How electromagnetic weapons induce disease and mentally disable entire populations / Oblivion

 

Fire Starters

 

Congress moving forward on classified 6G wireless

The White House and Congress are waging a silent war.

Wireless infrastructure is the foundation of a DIGITAL PRISON as well as weather engineering systems, which may be reigned in at the local and state level via the Tenth Amendment.

A number of states have taken legislative action to address RF Radiation and other hazardous pollution that threatens life and property.

 

Kentucky Senate Bill 217 Introduced to Prohibit Geoengineering

 

 

 

 


 

Related

 

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

 

Academic Research on Infectious Diseases / Eisenhower Warnings

 

The Brain is the Battlefield: The Realities of Neuroweapons

 

Is the purpose of AI to enslave humans?

 

Amazon’s Satellites Strengthen Digital Prison in Space

 

Reigning-in Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation (“5G”)

 

Cell Towers in Space Accelerate MindWar

 

Microwave Weapons

 

Novel Space Activities Framework 2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Modification

 

Election integrity compromised by voting systems linked to national cellular network

 

ZeroTrust #IoT #IoB #IoNT #IoBNT

 

 

Biodiversity Map | Agenda 21 Course

 

 

 


 

Is your city following the UN Agenda instead of following The Constitution? 

Protective environmental safety regulations, public oversight, and realignment with our Constitution / Bill of Rights are necessary steps to getting America back on track toward peace, sovereignty, and prosperity for all.

 

Freedom or Agenda 21? 

 

 


 

Posted on

Microwave Weapons

February 15, 2024 | Zero5G.com | Image sourceBlueHalo Electromagnetic Warfare and Cyber | The FCC claims electromagnetic radiation has no effects. The military claims  electromagnetic radiation is a weapon. Who is telling the truth?  

Link to video here

 

The 2006 report, “Interdisciplinary research project to explore the potential for developing non-lethal weapons based on radiofrequency/microwave bioeffects,” states:

“Our research is to lay the foundation for developing non-lethal stunning/immobilizing weaponry based on radiofrequency (RF)/microwave(MW) radiation. We are focusing specifically on identifying RF/MW parameters potentially capable of selectively altering exocytosis, the process underlying neurotransmitter release and hence nervous system functioning.
The overall objective of the research funded by this grant was to begin laying the foundation upon which RF/MW technology can be developed that would have an application for non-lethal weaponry purposes, such as stunning/immobilizing the enemy. To accomplish this goal, this proposal had as one of its objectives to assemble, characterize and optimize an exposure system that would allow us to undertake a carefully designed and controlled investigation of the MW exposure parameters in the 1 to 6 GHz frequency range that can alter exocytosis, the process underlying neurotransmitter release.”

According to an article by Nokia, “Mid-band spectrum (1 GHz – 6 GHz) is considered perfect for 5G…”

 

People in the USA and around the world are aware of the hazards of microwave radiation and the urgent need to reign-in military weapons in space and de facto ground based microwave antenna systems, including “5G”.

 

Radiation Is Defined As Pollution

 Is Humanity Being Poisoned By Microwave Radiation?

 

Cell Towers in Space Accelerate MindWar

 


 

China’s new microwave weapon made to zap Taiwan – Asia Times

Link To Full Article HERE

 


Is Russia putting an anti-satellite nuke in space? – Defense One

 

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

Is NATO with US or Against US?

Important Questions (IQ): 

Is the U.S. Military Operating Under NATO Command?

What are the implications of the NATO-Israel Alliance?

 

S.2226 

 

Sec. 212  authorizes DOD to provide funds to sustain U.S. participation in the NATO Defense Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic (DIANA) Initiative.

 

Sec.  1397 increases the amount authorized for RDT&E for cooperative programs with Israel on military directed energy capabilities

 

Subtitle H–Limitation on Withdrawal From NATO

 

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/2226

 


 

CNN Special Report 1985 | “Imagine the implications of a weapon with no visible trace…”

Link To Video Here

 


 

Was 5G Interference a Factor in F-35 Crash in South Carolina?

 

 

 

 


 

Related

High Power Microwave Generator Using Relativistic Electron Beam In Waveguide Drift Tube

Effects of microwave radiation on brain energy metabolism and related mechanisms

Actual or potential effects of ELF and RF/MW radiation on enhancing violence and homicide, and accelerating aging of human, animal or plant cells.

China, Russian Building Attack Satellites, Lasers: Pentagon Report

Pentagon Intelligence Chief: Russia And China Will Have Weapons in Space ‘In the Near Future’

High Powered Microwave Weapons

EMP Weapons

BIBLIOGPHY OF REPORTED BIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA (‘EFFECTS’) AND CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS ATTRIBUTED TO MICROWAVE AND RADIO-FREQUENCY RADIATION

Electromagnetic Field Interactions with the Human Body: Observed Effects and Theories

Bioelectromagnetic weapons

“Interdisciplinary research project to explore the potential for developing non-
lethal weapons based on radiofrequency/microwave bioeffects”

 

Soviet Directed Energy Weapons

 

Solar Powered Space Weapon

 

Targeted Justice

Behind NATO’s ‘cognitive warfare’: ‘Battle for your brain’ waged by Western militaries

 

Weaponizing Brain Science: Neuroweapons-  Part I   Part II

 

Research on High Power Microwave Weapons

 

Directed Energy Futures 2060

 

China, Russia Building Attack Satellites and Space Lasers

 

Is Russia putting an anti-satellite nuke in space?

 

There’s Darkness in the Distance: The Rising Threat of China’s EMP Weapons to U.S. Defenses and Critical Infrastructure

 

Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

 

Anti-Personnel ‘Soft Kill’ Em Weaponry

 

Future of Warfare: 5G/6G (and beyond) Weaponry

 

1978 EPA Report: Efforts to Protect the Public from Radiation

 

1988–MICROWAVE ANTENNA GUIDELINES FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES

 

The real purpose of 5G/6G is biometric surveillance, weaponry, and global governance 

 

Military Leading the Charge on 5G

 

5G and the Realities of Neuroweapons 

 

EARTH RISING The Revolution Toward a Thousand Years of Peace

Congress moving forward on classified 6G wireless

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted on

Is NATO with US or Against US?

February 5, 2024 | Image source | “Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.” – George Bush

NATO and Israel are recipients of endless free money as reflected in Congressional appropriations. The U.S. is funding NATO,  NATO is the UN’s military partner,  China is also funding the UN, and Russia is a permanent member of the UN.

 

The Amazing Deception

 

 

In 1961 JFK delivered a speech to the United Nations promoting globalism – cooperation in global weather control (geoengineering), satellite communications to link the whole world ( “5G”/AI ), and international disarmament, whereby the UN would become the world’s military police force.

 

An important revelation  written in the Johns Hopkins white paper, NATO 2030 states: “Notably, it is no longer a given that the United States will play a significant leadership role in the Alliance.” Intro p. 13

 

USA borders and airspace are not being defended and judging by Congressional appropriations, this might not be an accident.

 

 

NATO and the United Nations (UN) play a key role in the standardization of weaponizable technologies such as CV19, 5G, AI, and Air Pollution Modeling and it’s application ( weather engineering). The UN and NATO are also proponents of weaponized immigration.

 

 

UN Budgets Millions for U.S.-Bound Migrants in 2024 

 

At the end of last year Congress passed a bill that would prevent future presidents from withdrawing America from NATO without Congressional approval. Not widely acknowledged is the Israel-NATO alliance, which better explains the bipartisan Congressional measures. Note funding in S.2226 for DIANA, the NATO Defense Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic:

 

 

S.2226 – 118th Congress (2023-2024): National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

 

An important question: Is the U.S. Military Operating Under NATO Command?

Is the U.S. Military Operating Under NATO Command?

 

 

Furthermore, what are the implications of the Israel – NATO alliance?

 

 

Related

Dual Citizens in Congress? Americans Need to Know. The Problem of Dual Citizenship 

Freemasons in Congress? Americans Need To Know.

What are the implications of the NATO-Israel Alliance?

 


 

In 1961 President Eisenhower issued a warning to Americans:

“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-(intelligence)-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together…

Link To Transcript

Link to Video

 

 


 

When will policymakers and POTUS candidates denounce UN Agenda 21/2030?

 

Open Secrets

 

The Amazing Deception

 

Stop funding wars. Secure the borders NOW.

 

 


 

Posted on

North Dakota Law Review Article on Weather Modification Governance

January 22, 2024 | Image sourceCongressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Modification|

Zero Geoengineering.com |

North Dakota Law Review 2020 article, “IT’S RAINING, IT’S POURING, WEATHER MODIFICATION REGULATION IS SNORING: A PROPOSAL TO FILL THE GAP IN WEATHER MODIFICATION GOVERNANCE,” addresses the current state of weather modification governance in the United States. 

Absent from the review is the necessary requirement for informed public consent to weather experimentation and further, mechanisms to prohibit the intentional manipulation of weather and climate systems, inclusive of penalties for violation of such prohibition.

The thesis is based upon outdated assumptions that weather modification, typically involving the intentional release of polluting emissions, has legitimate environmental benefit. Additionally, in order to “make rain” in one area means that precipitation must be stolen from neighboring areas.

This may explain why states with longstanding weather modification programs such as Texas, California, New Mexico, Colorado and surrounding states have significant problems with drought. According to the article, Flood or Drought: How Do Aerosols Affect Precipitation?, “the radiative effects of aerosols on clouds mostly act to suppress precipitation.”

 


 

“In sum, federal and state governance over weather modification has failed to fill the gap left by the common law…

…While the federal government provides no substantive guidance, only twenty-nine states have statutes or regulations that mention weather modification.200 Of those states, few govern weather modification in a meaningful way. Importantly, no state has a framework under which those injured by weather modification may be compensated.” -p.52.

 

Link To Full Document HERE

NORTH DAKOTA LAW REVIEW – IT’S RAINING, IT’S POURING, WEATHER MODIFICATION .PDF

 


 

 

Over 70 years of weather and climate modification without meaningful safety regulations and environmental protection has resulted in weather and climate extremes often mischaracterized as “climate change.”

Many states are beginning to take legislative action to fill the gaps in weather modification governance with regulatory prohibition to protect life and property.

The Clean Atmosphere Preservation Act

The Atmosphere Protection Act

The Weather Modification Act

 

 


 

 

Related

Governance of Geoengineering 

Governance of Weather Modification Activities of the US 

Feasibility of Space-Based Monitoring for Governance of Solar Radiation Management Activities

National Weather Modification Policies and Programs 

Weather Control Policy in U.S. States 

Enhancing the Weather: Governance of Weather Modification Activities in Australia 

 

1967 Weather Modification Hearings

1980 NASA: Changing the Climate With Aerosol Modification

 


 

 

To learn more about how to get involved in advocacy for legislation to prohibit weather engineering and other atmospheric / environmental hazards in your state or nation email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com 

Americans4ACleanAtmosphere