Posted on

Academic Research on Infectious Diseases / Eisenhower Warnings

October 26, 2023 | President Eisenhower warned in his 1961 Farewell Address: “…The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present-and is gravely to be regarded.”

In 2023, we are waking up in the world that Eisenhower warned about, where “public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”

Reports below show that the U.S. and China are collaborating on many areas of “research” including studies involving transmission of infectious diseases. (Readers will note also that China and Russia are currently engaged in collaborative scientific “research”).

Unfortunately, government funded university students are partnering with globalists toward the implementation of United Nations Agenda 21/2030, Sustainable Development Goals, aka, a one world totalitarian dictatorship.

As witnessed during the CV19 event, 193 UN nations including the U.S. are partnered in lockstep:

Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)Link To_WHO-China-Joint-Mission-on-covid-19

 

Art of War: US-China-CDC Partnership

 

The National Science Foundation is a lead agency helping to coordinate international efforts in a number of “research” endeavors including Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Diseases (EEID).

This partnership includes United Kingdom Research and Innovation, United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Institutes of Health, and National Institute of Food and Agriculture.

According to the Program Description:

The goal of the Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Diseases (EEID) program is to support important and innovative research on the ecological, evolutionary, behavioral, physiological, oceanographic, and socio-ecological principles that influence the transmission dynamics of infectious diseases. The program’s focus is on the discovery of general principles and processes and on building and testing models that elucidate these principles. Projects must address the quantitative, mathematical, or computational understanding of pathogen transmission dynamics. Research in EEID is expected to be an interdisciplinary effort that goes beyond the scope of typical studies funded by the standing programs of the partner agencies. Projects should bring together such areas as anthropology, behavior, bioinformatics, computational science, ecology, economics, epidemiology, evolution, food science, genomics, geography, global health, immunology, mathematics, medicine, microbiology, oceanography, plant science, population biology, sociology, physical environmental sciences, systems science, and veterinary medicine. Research within EEID is expected to generate rigorously characterized and tested models that are of value to the scientific community, and also may be useful in decision making. 

Link To Source HERE

 


 

In other U.S.-China “research”…

The NSF Engineering Directorate (ENG) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Department of Interdisciplinary Sciences are partnering to encourage joint research by U.S. – China teams collaborating on fundamental research on Sustainable Regional Systems (SRS).

NSF/NSFC Joint Research on Sustainable Regional Systems | NSF – National Science Foundation

 

 

Link To Source HERE

 

Organization(s)

 


 

NSF coordinated and funded research for 2024 involving deployment of microwave-irradiating antenna systems aka, “5G”:

 

2024 NSF Advanced Wireless Funding

Link To Full Document HERE

*2021-1-12_115445_national_strategy_to_secure_5g_implementation_plan_and_annexes_a_f_final.pdf (ntia.gov)

 


 

Russia and China also are collaborating on Scientific “Research”

 

RSF-NSFC Cooperation: 1st Call for Proposals (rscf.ru)

To facilitate the support of collaborative work between Russian and Chinese research groups, the Russian Science Foundation (RSF) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) jointly announce their first call for proposals for bilateral Joint Research Projects for the funding period 2021-2023 in all fields of science.

 

Link To Source HERE

 


 

“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-(intelligence)-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.”

–President Eisenhower    Farewell Address 1961

 


 

Examples below of how UN Agenda 21/2030 is being implemented via Academic Institutions and Science Foundations, sidestepping sovereignty and constitutions.
-UK-US-Israel-China
-US-China Research Partership
-Russia-China
-US NSF
-China
-Israel-China
-Pakistan-China

 


 

Related

Is your city following the UN Agenda instead of following The Constitution? 

Weather and Climate Modification 1965  National Science Foundation

Link To Document HERE

 

FY2024 DoE Congressional Funding Request for Biological and Environmental Research

 

Operation Warp Speed: The Role of the US DoD and Partners in the CV19 War on Humanity

 

The Amazing Deception

 

Austin and Houston Join UN C40 “SMART” Cities

 

White House Announces Plan to Block the Sun

 

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

 

Depopulation Club: The Story of the Committee of 300

 

Freedom or Agenda 21? 

 

Technology Convergence 2035: Humanity vs. AI

 

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

 

 


 

Posted on

Potential for Aerosol Dissemination of Biological Weapons

July 9, 2023 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | Image source |It’s critical to address the protection of our airspace, especially following the CV19 eventMosquitoGates, and fires.

2015 research paper titled, “Atmospheric dispersion modelling of bioaerosols that are pathogenic to humans and livestock – A review to inform risk assessment studies,” examines the generation and transport of pathogenic bioaerosols.

According to the authors, “Bioaerosols are small, airborne particles consisting of biological material (from bacteria, viruses, spores, fungi, algae, protozoa, and pollen) either attached to particulate matter or not (Bovallius and Roffey, 1987Després et al., 2012Dungan, 2010Gilbert and Duchaine, 2009Griffin, 2007Stärk, 1999Wéry, 2014).”

Potential for Aerosol Dissemination of Biological Weapons, a 2003 article, discusses technological feasibility of disseminating biological weapons from aircraft.

The paper states: “These findings should be understood by those with responsibility for preventing or responding to the consequences of bioterrorist attacks.”

 

In 1961 President Eisenhower warned:

“The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present-and is gravely to be regarded…

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”

 

Laws to prohibit the release of aerosols and other hazardous contaminants in Earth’s atmosphere and environment are urgently needed to protect all biological life. 

Take Action (USA) HERE 

 


 

J.P.G. Van Leuken, A.N. Swart, A.H. Havelaar, A. Van Pul, W. Van der Hoek, D. Heederik, Atmospheric dispersion modelling of bioaerosols that are pathogenic to humans and livestock – A review to inform risk assessment studies, Microbial Risk Analysis, Volume 1, 2016, Pages 19-39, ISSN 2352-3522, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mran.2015.07.002.

Abstract

In this review we discuss studies that applied atmospheric dispersion models (ADM) to bioaerosols that are pathogenic to humans and livestock in the context of risk assessment studies. Traditionally, ADMs have been developed to describe the atmospheric transport of chemical pollutants, radioactive matter, dust, and particulate matter. However, they have also enabled researchers to simulate bioaerosol dispersion.

To inform risk assessment, the aims of this review were fourfold, namely (1) to describe the most important physical processes related to ADMs and pathogen transport, (2) to discuss studies that focused on the application of ADMs to pathogenic bioaerosols, (3) to discuss emission and inactivation rate parameterisations, and (4) to discuss methods for conversion of concentrations to infection probabilities (concerning quantitative microbial risk assessment).

The studies included human, livestock, and industrial sources. Important factors for dispersion included wind speed, atmospheric stability, topographic effects, and deposition. Inactivation was mainly governed by humidity, temperature, and ultraviolet radiation.

Link To Full Article HERE

Atmospheric dispersion modelling of bioaerosols that are pathogenic to humans and livestock – A review to inform risk assessment studies

 


 

Related

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025] • Zero Geoengineering

 

Aerosolized Nanobot Described in 2012 Geoengineering Business Model

Aerosolized Nanobot Described in 2012 Geoengineering Business Model • Zero Geoengineering

 

 

Towards a High-Resolution, Implantable Neural Interface (darpa.mil)

 

 

Ray Kurzweil describes taking “some kind of medication that would have nanobots go through our bloodstream and they would find the end of the neocortex and attach themselves there and communicate outside so you could have a computer on your body but more likely you’re really in the cloud…”

Link

 

 

Oblivion: Weather Engineering Warfare

Oblivion: Weather Engineering Warfare • Zero Geoengineering

 


 

 

PennsylvaniaMaryland, and West Virginia provide precedent from the 1960’s for prohibiting cloud seeding and weather modification. These kinds of policies could be reenacted at the state and national level today.

Research the Atmosphere Protection Act

Take Action in the USA HERE

To learn more about advocating for laws to prohibit solar radiation modification, geoengineering, and other hazardous atmospheric/environmental activities email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com.

 

 


 

Posted on

MosquitoGates

July 1, 2023 | Zero-GMO.com | Image Source |Many are noticing the fascinating “coincidence” that malaria alerts have been issued in Florida and Texas, the same states that Bill Gates funded Oxitec mosquitos have been released.

In July 2009, Gates lectured about malaria and joked about releasing mosquitos:

Link To Video HERE

 

Bill Gates invests in a company called Oxitec, funded for “research” on mosquitos and malaria.

Oxitec | Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

 

Related

HORROR SHOW UPDATE: Are Genetically Modified Mosquitoes That Vaccinate Humans Now Causing U.S. Malaria Cases For First Time Since 2003?

Are Bill Gates & George Soros Funding Dangerous Genetically Altered Mosquito Projects? 

 

 

Centers For Disease Control and Prevention Company Profile | Atlanta, GA | Competitors, Financials & Contacts – Dun & Bradstreet 

 

The CDC, a for-profit company working with China that helped to promote and market CV19, is again at the forefront of hyping malaria “cases” and prospects of a vaxx.

 

Malaria is being reported in Florida. Everything you need to know from signs to prospects of a vaccine

LINK To Full Article HERE

 

Unsurprisingly, Gates has funded malaria vaxx “research”.

 

Other “research” on GMO mosquitos has been funded by DARPA, NIH, NSF, and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences:

Combating mosquito-borne diseases using genetic control technologies | Nature Communications

Combating mosquito-borne diseases using genetic control technologies DARPA

 


 

Toxic Mosquito Aerial Release System: “A device for the aerial release of mosquitoes includes an unmanned aerial vehicle operable by remote control.”  LINK

Link To US8967029 B1 Toxic Mosquito Aerial Release System Mar. 3, 2015

 

With so much preparation, research and investment in GMO mosquitos, coincidences seem unlikely.

 

Finally, there are effective anti-malarial remedies so no vaxx is needed.

 


 

Related

Sarasota for Vaccination Choice | Defending informed consent & exemptions. Questioning safety, efficacy, & ethics. Opposing expanded or mandatory vaccinations. 

*Flying Syringes: Scientists Genetically Engineer V@xx-Injecting Mosquitos 

*2017 Flying syringes
*Gates_US military

Citizen Fury As One Billion GMO Mosquitos To Be Released In Florida

*Genetically Modified Mosquitoes Set to Be Released in California and Florida 

*Help Stop Genetically Engineered Mosquito Release in California!

🪳Edible Bugs or Weapon? 

*Tell the Florida Keys Mosquito Control District: Stop GMO Mosquito Experimentation in Florida!

Link To Source HERE

 


 

Further Reading

 

Gates Partners with Beijing on infectious disease research 

 

The Truth About Bill Gates

 

Bill Gates India

 

Bill Gates Media

 

Bill Gates Jeffrey Epstein

 

Bill Gates V@ccines    

 

Bill Gates CDC

 

Bill Gates Marburg

 

Bill Gates Vaxx Investment Return

 

Bill Gates 5G    

 

Bill Gates Geoengineering

 

Bill Gates GMO’s

 

Bill Gates Farmland

 

Bill Gates Eugenics_Agenda

 

Bill Gates DNA Mining

 

Bill Gates UN WHO

 

Bill Gates Cryptocurrency_MICROSOFT_Patent_WO2020060606A1

 

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6f/c2/6e/bf894ad1738dc5/US9067047.pdf

 


 

Posted on

Vaxx in the Veggies?

April 3, 2023 | ZeroMandatoryVaxx.com | Zero-GMO.com  | Image Source

In his recent article, “Eat Your Vaccines!… I Mean Vegetables! … Said Bill Gates,” Tom Renz has illuminated the grave threat to our health and food supply by edible “vaccines.” Big Pharma does not want people to know that their edible vax could be in the food. These GMO-vaxx “frankenfood” products could alter human genetics, contaminate the food supply, and harm wildlife.

Lobbyists from Big Pharma are working hard to prevent disclosure of their GMO-Vaxx products in the food supply by trying to stop legislation in Missouri that would require informed consent.

Missouri House Bill No. 1169 would require disclosure of vaxx components or genetically modified materials in food and other products.

Every state legislature could introduce and pass similar legislation to protect health, farmers, the environment, and ensure informed consent for consumers with regard to GMO-vaxx products.

 

UPDATE:

mRNA IS in Food – There’s ONLY 1 Way to Stop This

Call Members on Emerging Issues committee to urge their support for HB 1169 – Contact info HERE

 


Link To Video

mRNA Gene Therapy Is Coming to the Food Supply: What We Can Do About it w/ Attorney Tom Renz – DailyClout

 

April 2, 2023 | By Tom Renz | tomrenz.substack.com

Link To Full Article HERE

Renz Missouri House Testimony – BioTech Admits Gate’s GMO Factory Food IS a Gene Therapy – Tom Renz

 


Link To House Bill No. 1169 HERE

 


 

Related

“Edible Vaccine”? PHARMING: Food that Changes YOU • Vaccine toxicity, laws, actions to take – ZEROMANDATORYVAXX.com

Insects As Flying Syringes For Genetic Modification, Eugenics And Population Control • ZERO GMO (zero-gmo.com)

 


 

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

Related

Bill introduced prohibiting purchase of U.S. farmland by foreign adversaries 

2018 Johns Hopkins Report: Self-Spreading Vaxx 

 

 


 

Posted on

Addressing The Threat of Human Engineering

February 25, 2023 |  Addressing The Threat of Human Engineering  | Image Source

We were warned about the rise of unwarranted influence both sought and unsought by the military-industrial [intelligence-pharmaceutical-media] complex by President Eisenhower in 1961.

The military industry and billionaire “philanthropists” have partnered to control every aspect of the natural world including engineering of the food, medicine, and even the weather.  Human beings are another target of engineering.  The following article by Spartacus explores the globalist effort to re-engineer humanity.

We have seen how Schwab and other anti-human organizers of C19 are obsessed with controlling (and reducing) the world’s population.  The plan to enslave humanity through bio surveillance under the skin, a digital ID, vaxx passport, social credit system, QR codes, and central bank digital currency (CBDC), has not been a secret.

However, many people choose freedom and understand their ability to derail this scheme. There are many things we can all do to buck the system: using cash whenever we shop, powering off the cell phones and wi-fi, consciously unplugging from social media, reigning in the ‘smart’ grid with safety regulations, and connecting with others who share our values to work together at the local level to help enact better policies. Most important is the urgent need for public oversight and bioethics in technology.

 


 

 

By Spartacus

Link To Video HERE

Here’s the problem: he’s not wrong. People get pissed off when they hear statements like master of the world because they think it’s an empty threat; little more than the idle bluster of a megalomaniac. It most certainly isn’t. The reason why people don’t see what this technology is capable of is because, for one thing, they aren’t cursed with an overactive imagination, and for another, they aren’t used to holistic systems thinking, and lastly, there has been next to no mainstream media coverage of synthetic biologybecause if there was, people would rightly be having a conniption fit.

I’m going to ask you something that may strike you as a little bit strange. What is an internal organ? The textbook answer is something along the lines of specialized tissue in the body that performs a specific function. But what if I told you that an internal organ can be whatever the heck we want it to be?

RSC – A morphospace for synthetic organs and organoids: the possible and the actual

Efforts in evolutionary developmental biology have shed light on how organs are developed and why evolution has selected some structures instead of others. These advances in the understanding of organogenesis along with the most recent techniques of organotypic cultures, tissue bioprinting and synthetic biology provide the tools to hack the physical and genetic constraints in organ development, thus opening new avenues for research in the form of completely designed or merely altered settings. Here we propose a unifying framework that connects the concept of morphospace (i.e. the space of possible structures) with synthetic biology and tissue engineering. We aim for a synthesis that incorporates our understanding of both evolutionary and architectural constraints and can be used as a guide for exploring alternative design principles to build artificial organs and organoids. We present a three-dimensional morphospace incorporating three key features associated to organ and organoid complexity. The axes of this space include the degree of complexity introduced by developmental mechanisms required to build the structure, its potential to store and react to information and the underlying physical state. We suggest that a large fraction of this space is empty, and that the void might offer clues for alternative ways of designing and even inventing new organs.

What if the organs found in humans and animals – kidneys, spleen, liver, heart, brain, et cetera – do not represent all possible configurations of cells, but only the narrowly defined ones selected by evolution? What if there is a giant unexamined blank spot where you can have things like thinking muscle tissue chock-full of neurons, or an all-in-one liver and kidney (lidney?) right under your skin that makes you sweat filtered toxins out? What if we could manufacture entirely new organs from scratch that never existed in nature before and have completely novel functions? What if a guy could have little brains implanted in every joint in his body and give his arms and legs a mind of their own, like an octopus?

This is something that has been explored in science fiction numerous times, in the past. In Warhammer 40,000, the highly augmented and superhuman Space Marines are implanted with numerous scratch-built organs, and if you’ve ever read Bacigalupi’s The Windup Girl or the late Greg Bear’s Blood Music, then you know exactly how bizarre this sort of thing can get. There’s just one problem, here, and it’s that this stuff is getting alarmingly close to not being science fiction anymore, and there are basically no ethical frameworks in place to make sure it isn’t horribly abused.

This is just one example of what you can do with synthetic biology. Another thing you can do is design completely new enzymes from scratch, insert the genes coding for them into bacteria, and use them as reagents to produce entirely new compounds.

Still not convinced? If you go on the Government of Canada’s website, right now, this is one of the articles they have up. I recommend archiving it.

Policy Horizons Canada – Exploring Biodigital Convergence

I wake up to the sunlight and salty coastal air of the Adriatic sea. I don’t live anywhere near the Mediterranean, but my AI, which is also my health advisor, has prescribed a specific air quality, scent, and solar intensity to manage my energy levels in the morning, and has programmed my bedroom to mimic this climate.

The fresh bed sheets grown in my building from regenerating fungi are better than I imagined; I feel rested and ready for the day. I need to check a few things before I get up. I send a brain message to open the app that controls my insulin levels and make sure my pancreas is optimally supported. I can’t imagine having to inject myself with needles like my mother did when she was a child. Now it’s a microbe transplant that auto adjusts and reports on my levels.

Everything looks all right, so I check my brain’s digital interface to read the dream data that was recorded and processed in real time last night. My therapy app analyzes the emotional responses I expressed while I slept. It suggests I take time to be in nature this week to reflect on my recurring trapped-in-a-box dream and enhance helpful subconscious neural activity. My AI recommends a “forest day”. I think “okay”, and my AI and neural implant do the rest.

I touched on this in the last Spartacast, but I don’t think I really got the point across. Biotech and information technology are completely intertwined, and they have been for decades, now. Anyone remember Folding@home, where people used their PlayStations to contribute processor power to a distributed supercomputer network?

That was back in 2007, and the actual software client itself has existed since 2000. They do everything on a computer, now. The whole idea behind mRNA vaccines is basically to digitize vaccines by reducing them to synthetic gene sequences and using human cells as bioreactors to make the actual protein, skipping over a bunch of manufacturing steps.

Okay, so you have CRISPR. You have DREADDs. You have nanotransducers. You have the ability to create engineered amyloids, like Ehud Gazit’s amyloid semiconductors. You have even more than that, too. A friend of mine on Twitter, C.M. (who currently goes by @CRISPR_Cas69), alerted me to a paper on implementing an entire von Neumann architecture in nothing but lipid nanoparticles:

Science Advances – Nanoparticle-based computing architecture for nanoparticle neural networks

The lack of a scalable nanoparticle-based computing architecture severely limits the potential and use of nanoparticles for manipulating and processing information with molecular computing schemes. Inspired by the von Neumann architecture (VNA), in which multiple programs can be operated without restructuring the computer, we realized the nanoparticle-based VNA (NVNA) on a lipid chip for multiple executions of arbitrary molecular logic operations in the single chip without refabrication. In this system, nanoparticles on a lipid chip function as the hardware that features memory, processors, and output units, and DNA strands are used as the software to provide molecular instructions for the facile programming of logic circuits. NVNA enables a group of nanoparticles to form a feed-forward neural network, a perceptron, which implements functionally complete Boolean logic operations, and provides a programmable, resettable, scalable computing architecture and circuit board to form nanoparticle neural networks and make logical decisions.

What happens if we integrate all of these disparate ideas together into a single platform? What could we create? Could we inject someone with a substance that generates wirelessly manipulated smart tissues in someone’s body? Think about it. Let’s say we use mRNA to produce Yamanaka factors in someone’s cells to turn them into stem cells in vivo, and then, let’s say we spliced new genes into those cells to generate an entirely new, synthetic cell line with entirely novel functionality. Then, let’s say these collections of cells were coaxed into performing specific tasks by manipulating their membrane potential with nanotransducers, or by using chemogenetics. What if these cells migrated throughout the body, divided, and formed colonies, like a symbiotic organism, all while evading the immune system by giving off signals identical to human cells? What if these cells could be made to secrete neurotransmitters or hormones into the extracellular space to manipulate the functions of the subject’s normal cells? What if they could be used to construct tissue scaffolds around the subject’s existing organs and manipulate or monitor their function, through extracellular matrix remodeling?

These are just a couple hypothetical examples. There are many more possible implementations, here, including using tissue engineering to make entirely new, 3D-printed “cybernetic” organs. Soldiers in the future might not wear gas masks at all. Why bother, when they’ve all been implanted with an organ that instantly secretes atropine the moment they get a whiff of VX, or when their acetylcholine receptors have been completely altered to resist binding by organophosphates? What if intelligence officers all had 200 IQ and perfect recall because their neural lace links their brains together into a hive mind with a bunch of printed brains in vats?

These sorts of questions, and many more, are being asked in top military think tanks in the US, Russia, and China. Nobody wants to lose strategic surprise by being the one country that didn’t make supermen in time for World War III. DARPA know that China’s track record for ethics is extremely poor, and that it’s likely that they’re engaging in human experimentation behind the scenes. That tempts our own leaders to do the same (and, indeed, they are).

That’s not all you can do with synthetic biology. Assassinations without the possibility for attribution, debilitating specific people by inducing chronic health issues, destroying enemy agriculture with novel plant pathogens, engineering scratch-made viruses and bacteria to produce hyper-lethal bioweapons, engineering obedience and docility into people by altering the balance of androgens and neurotransmitters in their bodies to blunt aggression and drive for reward, the list goes on and on.

When Klaus Schwab says that those who master these technologies will master the world, if anything, he is underselling it. With these technologies, you could re-engineer an entire species – including humans – into something completely different.

I cannot stress this enough. There needs to be a public conversation about synthetic biology and neurotechnology, right now, and there need to be policies enacted that strictly define international and binding limits for its use. If not, then the human beings of the future will inevitably be reduced to engineered products.

The people behind all of this are anti-personalists. They see no value in the person per se, the person itself. Only the collective good matters to them.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy – Personalism

Personalists regard personhood (or “personality”) as the fundamental notion, as that which gives meaning to all of reality and constitutes its supreme value. Personhood carries with it an inviolable dignity that merits unconditional respect. Personalism has for the most part not been primarily a theoretical philosophy of the person. Although it does defend a unique theoretical understanding of the person, this understanding is in itself such as to support the prioritization of practical or moral philosophy, while at the same time the moral experience of the person is such as to decisively determine the theoretical understanding. For personalists, a person combines subjectivity and objectivity, causal activity and receptivity, unicity and relation, identity and creativity. Stressing the moral nature of the person, or the person as the subject and object of free activity, personalism tends to focus on practical, moral action and ethical questions.

Human beings are regarded by the agents of the NWO as resource-hungry, tribalistic, and aggressive. Basically, an invasive nuisance species. All it would take is for one panel of bioethicists to decide, “Gee, civilization sure would be better if we engineered the capacity for crime, aggressive behavior, bigotry, and fanaticism out of humans.”

Then, before you know it, one day, people line up for their “vaccines”, and years later, they start having kids that are more carpenter ant than human, utterly incapable of personhood, of the intrinsically valuable experience of becoming a man or woman.

People still think this is just about a virus or a vaccine. It’s not. Much, much more than that is at stake, here. More than most can even fathom.

-Spartacus

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

Posted on

Pfizer executive discusses the c0v*d ca$h cow

January 25, 2023 | Pfizer executive discusses the c0v*d ca$h cow | Image Source

Pfizer executive Jordon Trishton Walker spoke with a journalist from Project Veritas about how Pfizer is exploring ways to engineer viruses in order to preemptively develop new vaxxines:
“One of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why don’t we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create — preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we’re gonna do that though, there’s a risk of like, as you could imagine — no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses”.
Mr. Walker casually explains how the Big Pharma, government, FDA revolving door is good for industry but bad for everybody else in America.  This revealing admission underscores the need to close the revolving door, prosecute CV crimes and shut down the vaxx industry for good. -JD

 

 

 

Link To Video HERE

Link To Article @Project Veritas HERE

CV Vaxx Effect on Women’s Reproductive Health – JDfor2024

 


 

 

January 26, 2023 |  By Katherine Watt  | Bailiwick News |

 

Link To Full Article HERE

 


Posted on

Edible Bugs or Weapon?

January 23, 2023 | Zero-GMO.com | Image Source

The advertising around bug-eating is getting louder, but the truth is that bugs are loaded with parasites and are not healthy for human beings to eat. Turns out that bugs may contain pathogens, toxins, and be genetically modified. In the article below, Celeste Solum examines the many ways that bugs have been weaponized by the military. -JD

 


January 23, 2023 | By Celeste Solum | Shepherds Heart |

 

DARPA 2016

GO GREEN, EAT BUGS IS THE MESSAGING

By now you have heard the message loud and clear that we are all to trade in our delicious diets for a subsistence diet of bugs, grasshoppers, worms, and  beetles. You know the food supply is shrinking by design. Many of you may be thinking eating bugs is better than starving, but is it?

The reports that I research and hear, and I am listening very closely, never give you some key facts about this new insect diet:

  • These bugs will not come to you from nature, by mandate of the UN.
  • You will not be free to roam around the countryside choosing which bugs to include in your diet.
  • The bugs that will be provided to you are weaponized. More on this fact later in this article.
  • The bug products will be 3D printed using energy, water, and air with microbes only for flavoring. You are skeptical?  Look up DARPA’s Cornucopia Program which enables deployable, on-demand production of appetizing, microbial-origin food starting from water, air, and electricity with minimal to no supplementation. The program eliminates the logistical burden of food transportation, humanitarian assistance, and disaster relief operations.
  • The bug products will be sold either by the molecule or 1/1000 of a calorie.
  • They will contain a plethora of gene-editing platforms, pathogens, toxins, and therapeutics (drugs).

For instance, compare this US Army and Public Health Command Chart (2010) with the new experiments going on at National Agro and Bio BSL4 Bioweapon Lab located at Manhattan, Kansas:

 

Entomological warfare is a type of biological warfare that uses insects to:

  • Interrupt supply lines by damaging crops,
  • Directly harm “enemy combatants,”
  • Harm civilian populations.

Many countries, including the United States, have used and will escalate entomological warfare in the days to come.  How do I know this?  The new NBAF in Manhattan, Kansas has an Insectary to advance weaponization of insects.

Link

 

Link To Read the Full Article HERE

 


 

 

 

 


 

Posted on

CV-19 mRNA Injections Are Deadly Bioweapons

December 6, 2022 |  Zero Mandatory Vaxx  |  Sarasota For Vaccination Choice |  CV-19 mRNA Injections Are Deadly Bioweapons |

According to current statistics tens of thousands have been severely injured or killed from the experimental CV-19 mRNA injections. It’s critical to bring a FULL STOP to the shots NOW to prevent genocide and protect humanity.

Under 18 U.S.Code § 176 Seizure, forfeiture, and destruction, every American State Attorney General has the authority to seize and destroy any biological agent without a warrant. Karen Kingston provides evidence in the form of historical documentation, patents, and law in the articles below, demonstrating clearly why CV19 shots must be criminalized and banned.

Accountability and immediate prosecutions are essential for those responsible for funding, promoting, profiting and mandating CV-19 mRNA injections. -JD

 

 


 

 

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

December 4, 2022 | By

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

 

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

 

December 7, 2022 | By Karen Kingston | substack

Link To Full Article HERE


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted on

CV19 V@xx Shedding to Unv@xxed?

December 5, 2022 | ZeroMandatoryVaxx.com | CV19 V@xx Shedding to Unv@xxed? | Image Source |

New research examines possible mechanisms of shedding from v@xxed to unv@axxed.

The study, titled, Current state of knowledge on the excretion of mRNA and spike produced by anti-COVID-19 mRNA vaccines; possibility of contamination of the entourage of those vaccinated by these products, in the journal Infectious Diseases Research by Helene Banoun states, “There are numerous reports of symptoms and pathologies identical to the adverse effects of mRNA vaccines in unvaccinated persons in contact with freshly vaccinated persons”.

-JD

 


 

“It Looks Like the mRNA is Transferring from the Vaccinated to the Unvaccinated”

Link To Video

 


 

Link To Article HERE

Link To Study:Current state of knowledge on the excretion of mRNA and spike produced by anti-COVID-19 mRNA vaccines; possibility of contamination of the entourage of those vaccinated by these products


 

Posted on

Technocratic control schemes of the parasite class

November 28, 2022 | Technocratic control schemes of the parasite class |

Technocracy can be defined as a scientific dictatorship.

The method of control is through a centrally organized, linked, and monitored monetary and economic system.

The 1938 Technocrat Magazine described technocracy as “The science  of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population.”

The UN is the vehicle attempting to install technocratic world governance. In lockstep with Agenda 21/2030, 193 nations have collaborated to replace individual liberty, national sovereignty, and free enterprise, with collectivism, control and slavery.

One way to begin rejecting the technocrat control scheme is by turning off the “smart” phone, which functions as a globalist weapon for monitoring and enslavement.

Another way to unplug from the globalist agenda is by organizing locally, working with State and Local legislators to enforce the Constitution and protect individual and State sovereignty. -JD

 


 

By Iain Davis |  November 25, 2022  |  off-guardian.org  |

Totalitarianism is a form of government that attempts to assert total control over the lives of its citizens. It is characterized by strong central rule that attempts to control and direct all aspects of individual life through coercion and repression. It does not permit individual freedom. Traditional social institutions and organizations are discouraged and suppressed, making people more willing to be merged into a single unified movement. Totalitarian states typically pursue a special goal to the exclusion of all others, with all resources directed toward its attainment, regardless of the cost.

That “special” goal is sustainable development and no cost, either financial or humanitarian, is too great to tackle the alleged “climate crisis.” In reality, climate change is simply the excuse for sustainable development and it is through the global policy commitment to “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs) that technocracy is being installed.

A technocratic society is called a Technate and the world’s first Technate has emerged in China. In this two part exploration we will look at how this system was constructed, who was behind it and why technocracy is now being foisted upon all of us.

These articles are drawn largely from my 2021 publication Pseudopandemic. It is free to subscribers to my blog.

GLOBAL TECHNOCRATIC GOVERNANCE

In order for global technocracy to be rolled-out, authority needs to be centrally controlled at the global level. Governments, intergovernmental organisations and multinational corporations have collaborated to form a global public-private partnership  (G3P) for this purpose.

Throughout the 20th and 21st century the G3P network has sought to construct global governance. In turn, global governance enables the worldwide distribution of the technocracy that governments then convert into national policy commitments. Many components of global technocratic governance have already been established.

The World Heath Organisation (WHO) delivers global governance of public health; global access to technological development is meted out through the World Intellectual Property Organization; the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) works to coordinate economic policies between nation-states and global trade is monitored and controlled through the trade agreements overseen by the World Trade Organisation.

The Bank For International Settlements (BIS) coordinates global monetary policy and the flow of capital; the direction of education, academia, the sciences and cultural development is steered through the U.N Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and the seizure of the global commons and the “financialisation” of nature—through natural asset companies and other mechanisms—is nearing completion.

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are centrally controlled through global governance, primarily by the U.N Development and Environmental programs (UNDP & UNEP). The necessary global scientific consensus on climate change is centrally administered and the appropriate research funding streams allocated, by the U.N’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The powerful individuals, pushing the G3P project forward, are a collective of mass polluters, robber barons, land grabbers and the world’s leading exponents of worker exploitation, market manipulation, monetary extortion (usury) and oppression. They form what would otherwise be considered a criminal cartel but have greenwashed their reputations through their commitment to so-called “sustainable development.”

Often referred to as the elite, a more fitting description is “the parasite class.”

The G3P has managed to convince billions that it is committed to sustainable, net zero, environmentalism and wants to “save the planet.” It is actually determined to empower global governance and enforce technocracy upon humanity through SDGs and the associated policy Agendas. Regardless of what you think about the causes of climate change or the level of risk it presents, SDGs do nothing to address itand are designed to serve no-one and nothing other than the G3P and its interests.

In order to requisition, commodify, audit and ultimately divide up the Earth’s resources among themselves, the stakeholder capitalists, at the heart of the G3P, also need technocratic control. Once humanity figures out what has happened, technocracy will enable the G3P to shutdown resistance through literal population control.

Every human being will be individually monitored by Artificial Intelligence (AI) networks which will punish or reward them, depending upon their behaviour. Biosecurity and environmental concerns are set to provide the justification for this enslavement.

Much like the quack pseudo-science of eugenics, which many G3P “thought leaders” seem to believe, Technocracy was the social sciencecertainty of its day. Like eugenics, while it has subsequently faded from public consciousness, it is still avidly pursued by the G3P’s compartmentalised hierarchy.

TECHNOCRACY

In 1911, arguably the worlds first management consultant, Frederick Winslow Taylor, published The Principles of Scientific Management. His publication came at the culmination of the Progressive Era in the United States.

This was a period marked by the political activism of the US middle class who mainly sought to address the underlying social problems, as they saw them, of excessive industrialisation, immigration and political corruption. So-called “Taylorism,” fixated with the imminent exhaustion of natural resources and advocating efficient “scientific management systems,” was in the spirit of the age.

Taylor wrote:

In the past the man has been first; in the future the system must be first. [. . .] The best management is a true science, resting upon clearly defined laws, rules, and principles. [. . . ] The fundamental principles of scientific management are applicable to all kinds of human activities, from our simplest individual acts to the work of our great corporations.

 

Link To Full Article HERE


 

 

Image Source