Posted on

Addressing The Threat of Human Engineering

February 25, 2023 |  Addressing The Threat of Human Engineering  | Image Source

We were warned about the rise of unwarranted influence both sought and unsought by the military-industrial [intelligence-pharmaceutical-media] complex by President Eisenhower in 1961.

The military industry and billionaire “philanthropists” have partnered to control every aspect of the natural world including engineering of the food, medicine, and even the weather.  Human beings are another target of engineering.  The following article by Spartacus explores the globalist effort to re-engineer humanity.

We have seen how Schwab and other anti-human organizers of C19 are obsessed with controlling (and reducing) the world’s population.  The plan to enslave humanity through bio surveillance under the skin, a digital ID, vaxx passport, social credit system, QR codes, and central bank digital currency (CBDC), has not been a secret.

However, many people choose freedom and understand their ability to derail this scheme. There are many things we can all do to buck the system: using cash whenever we shop, powering off the cell phones and wi-fi, consciously unplugging from social media, reigning in the ‘smart’ grid with safety regulations, and connecting with others who share our values to work together at the local level to help enact better policies. Most important is the urgent need for public oversight and bioethics in technology.

 


 

 

By Spartacus

Link To Video HERE

Here’s the problem: he’s not wrong. People get pissed off when they hear statements like master of the world because they think it’s an empty threat; little more than the idle bluster of a megalomaniac. It most certainly isn’t. The reason why people don’t see what this technology is capable of is because, for one thing, they aren’t cursed with an overactive imagination, and for another, they aren’t used to holistic systems thinking, and lastly, there has been next to no mainstream media coverage of synthetic biologybecause if there was, people would rightly be having a conniption fit.

I’m going to ask you something that may strike you as a little bit strange. What is an internal organ? The textbook answer is something along the lines of specialized tissue in the body that performs a specific function. But what if I told you that an internal organ can be whatever the heck we want it to be?

RSC – A morphospace for synthetic organs and organoids: the possible and the actual

Efforts in evolutionary developmental biology have shed light on how organs are developed and why evolution has selected some structures instead of others. These advances in the understanding of organogenesis along with the most recent techniques of organotypic cultures, tissue bioprinting and synthetic biology provide the tools to hack the physical and genetic constraints in organ development, thus opening new avenues for research in the form of completely designed or merely altered settings. Here we propose a unifying framework that connects the concept of morphospace (i.e. the space of possible structures) with synthetic biology and tissue engineering. We aim for a synthesis that incorporates our understanding of both evolutionary and architectural constraints and can be used as a guide for exploring alternative design principles to build artificial organs and organoids. We present a three-dimensional morphospace incorporating three key features associated to organ and organoid complexity. The axes of this space include the degree of complexity introduced by developmental mechanisms required to build the structure, its potential to store and react to information and the underlying physical state. We suggest that a large fraction of this space is empty, and that the void might offer clues for alternative ways of designing and even inventing new organs.

What if the organs found in humans and animals – kidneys, spleen, liver, heart, brain, et cetera – do not represent all possible configurations of cells, but only the narrowly defined ones selected by evolution? What if there is a giant unexamined blank spot where you can have things like thinking muscle tissue chock-full of neurons, or an all-in-one liver and kidney (lidney?) right under your skin that makes you sweat filtered toxins out? What if we could manufacture entirely new organs from scratch that never existed in nature before and have completely novel functions? What if a guy could have little brains implanted in every joint in his body and give his arms and legs a mind of their own, like an octopus?

This is something that has been explored in science fiction numerous times, in the past. In Warhammer 40,000, the highly augmented and superhuman Space Marines are implanted with numerous scratch-built organs, and if you’ve ever read Bacigalupi’s The Windup Girl or the late Greg Bear’s Blood Music, then you know exactly how bizarre this sort of thing can get. There’s just one problem, here, and it’s that this stuff is getting alarmingly close to not being science fiction anymore, and there are basically no ethical frameworks in place to make sure it isn’t horribly abused.

This is just one example of what you can do with synthetic biology. Another thing you can do is design completely new enzymes from scratch, insert the genes coding for them into bacteria, and use them as reagents to produce entirely new compounds.

Still not convinced? If you go on the Government of Canada’s website, right now, this is one of the articles they have up. I recommend archiving it.

Policy Horizons Canada – Exploring Biodigital Convergence

I wake up to the sunlight and salty coastal air of the Adriatic sea. I don’t live anywhere near the Mediterranean, but my AI, which is also my health advisor, has prescribed a specific air quality, scent, and solar intensity to manage my energy levels in the morning, and has programmed my bedroom to mimic this climate.

The fresh bed sheets grown in my building from regenerating fungi are better than I imagined; I feel rested and ready for the day. I need to check a few things before I get up. I send a brain message to open the app that controls my insulin levels and make sure my pancreas is optimally supported. I can’t imagine having to inject myself with needles like my mother did when she was a child. Now it’s a microbe transplant that auto adjusts and reports on my levels.

Everything looks all right, so I check my brain’s digital interface to read the dream data that was recorded and processed in real time last night. My therapy app analyzes the emotional responses I expressed while I slept. It suggests I take time to be in nature this week to reflect on my recurring trapped-in-a-box dream and enhance helpful subconscious neural activity. My AI recommends a “forest day”. I think “okay”, and my AI and neural implant do the rest.

I touched on this in the last Spartacast, but I don’t think I really got the point across. Biotech and information technology are completely intertwined, and they have been for decades, now. Anyone remember Folding@home, where people used their PlayStations to contribute processor power to a distributed supercomputer network?

That was back in 2007, and the actual software client itself has existed since 2000. They do everything on a computer, now. The whole idea behind mRNA vaccines is basically to digitize vaccines by reducing them to synthetic gene sequences and using human cells as bioreactors to make the actual protein, skipping over a bunch of manufacturing steps.

Okay, so you have CRISPR. You have DREADDs. You have nanotransducers. You have the ability to create engineered amyloids, like Ehud Gazit’s amyloid semiconductors. You have even more than that, too. A friend of mine on Twitter, C.M. (who currently goes by @CRISPR_Cas69), alerted me to a paper on implementing an entire von Neumann architecture in nothing but lipid nanoparticles:

Science Advances – Nanoparticle-based computing architecture for nanoparticle neural networks

The lack of a scalable nanoparticle-based computing architecture severely limits the potential and use of nanoparticles for manipulating and processing information with molecular computing schemes. Inspired by the von Neumann architecture (VNA), in which multiple programs can be operated without restructuring the computer, we realized the nanoparticle-based VNA (NVNA) on a lipid chip for multiple executions of arbitrary molecular logic operations in the single chip without refabrication. In this system, nanoparticles on a lipid chip function as the hardware that features memory, processors, and output units, and DNA strands are used as the software to provide molecular instructions for the facile programming of logic circuits. NVNA enables a group of nanoparticles to form a feed-forward neural network, a perceptron, which implements functionally complete Boolean logic operations, and provides a programmable, resettable, scalable computing architecture and circuit board to form nanoparticle neural networks and make logical decisions.

What happens if we integrate all of these disparate ideas together into a single platform? What could we create? Could we inject someone with a substance that generates wirelessly manipulated smart tissues in someone’s body? Think about it. Let’s say we use mRNA to produce Yamanaka factors in someone’s cells to turn them into stem cells in vivo, and then, let’s say we spliced new genes into those cells to generate an entirely new, synthetic cell line with entirely novel functionality. Then, let’s say these collections of cells were coaxed into performing specific tasks by manipulating their membrane potential with nanotransducers, or by using chemogenetics. What if these cells migrated throughout the body, divided, and formed colonies, like a symbiotic organism, all while evading the immune system by giving off signals identical to human cells? What if these cells could be made to secrete neurotransmitters or hormones into the extracellular space to manipulate the functions of the subject’s normal cells? What if they could be used to construct tissue scaffolds around the subject’s existing organs and manipulate or monitor their function, through extracellular matrix remodeling?

These are just a couple hypothetical examples. There are many more possible implementations, here, including using tissue engineering to make entirely new, 3D-printed “cybernetic” organs. Soldiers in the future might not wear gas masks at all. Why bother, when they’ve all been implanted with an organ that instantly secretes atropine the moment they get a whiff of VX, or when their acetylcholine receptors have been completely altered to resist binding by organophosphates? What if intelligence officers all had 200 IQ and perfect recall because their neural lace links their brains together into a hive mind with a bunch of printed brains in vats?

These sorts of questions, and many more, are being asked in top military think tanks in the US, Russia, and China. Nobody wants to lose strategic surprise by being the one country that didn’t make supermen in time for World War III. DARPA know that China’s track record for ethics is extremely poor, and that it’s likely that they’re engaging in human experimentation behind the scenes. That tempts our own leaders to do the same (and, indeed, they are).

That’s not all you can do with synthetic biology. Assassinations without the possibility for attribution, debilitating specific people by inducing chronic health issues, destroying enemy agriculture with novel plant pathogens, engineering scratch-made viruses and bacteria to produce hyper-lethal bioweapons, engineering obedience and docility into people by altering the balance of androgens and neurotransmitters in their bodies to blunt aggression and drive for reward, the list goes on and on.

When Klaus Schwab says that those who master these technologies will master the world, if anything, he is underselling it. With these technologies, you could re-engineer an entire species – including humans – into something completely different.

I cannot stress this enough. There needs to be a public conversation about synthetic biology and neurotechnology, right now, and there need to be policies enacted that strictly define international and binding limits for its use. If not, then the human beings of the future will inevitably be reduced to engineered products.

The people behind all of this are anti-personalists. They see no value in the person per se, the person itself. Only the collective good matters to them.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy – Personalism

Personalists regard personhood (or “personality”) as the fundamental notion, as that which gives meaning to all of reality and constitutes its supreme value. Personhood carries with it an inviolable dignity that merits unconditional respect. Personalism has for the most part not been primarily a theoretical philosophy of the person. Although it does defend a unique theoretical understanding of the person, this understanding is in itself such as to support the prioritization of practical or moral philosophy, while at the same time the moral experience of the person is such as to decisively determine the theoretical understanding. For personalists, a person combines subjectivity and objectivity, causal activity and receptivity, unicity and relation, identity and creativity. Stressing the moral nature of the person, or the person as the subject and object of free activity, personalism tends to focus on practical, moral action and ethical questions.

Human beings are regarded by the agents of the NWO as resource-hungry, tribalistic, and aggressive. Basically, an invasive nuisance species. All it would take is for one panel of bioethicists to decide, “Gee, civilization sure would be better if we engineered the capacity for crime, aggressive behavior, bigotry, and fanaticism out of humans.”

Then, before you know it, one day, people line up for their “vaccines”, and years later, they start having kids that are more carpenter ant than human, utterly incapable of personhood, of the intrinsically valuable experience of becoming a man or woman.

People still think this is just about a virus or a vaccine. It’s not. Much, much more than that is at stake, here. More than most can even fathom.

-Spartacus

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

Posted on

Pfizer executive discusses the c0v*d ca$h cow

January 25, 2023 | Pfizer executive discusses the c0v*d ca$h cow | Image Source

Pfizer executive Jordon Trishton Walker spoke with a journalist from Project Veritas about how Pfizer is exploring ways to engineer viruses in order to preemptively develop new vaxxines:
“One of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why don’t we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create — preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we’re gonna do that though, there’s a risk of like, as you could imagine — no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses”.
Mr. Walker casually explains how the Big Pharma, government, FDA revolving door is good for industry but bad for everybody else in America.  This revealing admission underscores the need to close the revolving door, prosecute CV crimes and shut down the vaxx industry for good. -JD

 

 

 

Link To Video HERE

Link To Article @Project Veritas HERE

CV Vaxx Effect on Women’s Reproductive Health – JDfor2024

 


 

 

January 26, 2023 |  By Katherine Watt  | Bailiwick News |

 

Link To Full Article HERE

 


Posted on

Edible Bugs or Weapon?

January 23, 2023 | Zero-GMO.com | Image Source

The advertising around bug-eating is getting louder, but the truth is that bugs are loaded with parasites and are not healthy for human beings to eat. Turns out that bugs may contain pathogens, toxins, and be genetically modified. In the article below, Celeste Solum examines the many ways that bugs have been weaponized by the military. -JD

 


January 23, 2023 | By Celeste Solum | Shepherds Heart |

 

DARPA 2016

GO GREEN, EAT BUGS IS THE MESSAGING

By now you have heard the message loud and clear that we are all to trade in our delicious diets for a subsistence diet of bugs, grasshoppers, worms, and  beetles. You know the food supply is shrinking by design. Many of you may be thinking eating bugs is better than starving, but is it?

The reports that I research and hear, and I am listening very closely, never give you some key facts about this new insect diet:

  • These bugs will not come to you from nature, by mandate of the UN.
  • You will not be free to roam around the countryside choosing which bugs to include in your diet.
  • The bugs that will be provided to you are weaponized. More on this fact later in this article.
  • The bug products will be 3D printed using energy, water, and air with microbes only for flavoring. You are skeptical?  Look up DARPA’s Cornucopia Program which enables deployable, on-demand production of appetizing, microbial-origin food starting from water, air, and electricity with minimal to no supplementation. The program eliminates the logistical burden of food transportation, humanitarian assistance, and disaster relief operations.
  • The bug products will be sold either by the molecule or 1/1000 of a calorie.
  • They will contain a plethora of gene-editing platforms, pathogens, toxins, and therapeutics (drugs).

For instance, compare this US Army and Public Health Command Chart (2010) with the new experiments going on at National Agro and Bio BSL4 Bioweapon Lab located at Manhattan, Kansas:

 

Entomological warfare is a type of biological warfare that uses insects to:

  • Interrupt supply lines by damaging crops,
  • Directly harm “enemy combatants,”
  • Harm civilian populations.

Many countries, including the United States, have used and will escalate entomological warfare in the days to come.  How do I know this?  The new NBAF in Manhattan, Kansas has an Insectary to advance weaponization of insects.

Link

 

Link To Read the Full Article HERE

 


 

 

 

 


 

Posted on

CV-19 mRNA Injections Are Deadly Bioweapons

December 6, 2022 |  Zero Mandatory Vaxx  |  Sarasota For Vaccination Choice |  CV-19 mRNA Injections Are Deadly Bioweapons |

According to current statistics tens of thousands have been severely injured or killed from the experimental CV-19 mRNA injections. It’s critical to bring a FULL STOP to the shots NOW to prevent genocide and protect humanity.

Under 18 U.S.Code § 176 Seizure, forfeiture, and destruction, every American State Attorney General has the authority to seize and destroy any biological agent without a warrant. Karen Kingston provides evidence in the form of historical documentation, patents, and law in the articles below, demonstrating clearly why CV19 shots must be criminalized and banned.

Accountability and immediate prosecutions are essential for those responsible for funding, promoting, profiting and mandating CV-19 mRNA injections. -JD

 

 


 

 

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

December 4, 2022 | By

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

 

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

 

December 7, 2022 | By Karen Kingston | substack

Link To Full Article HERE


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted on

CV19 V@xx Shedding to Unv@xxed?

December 5, 2022 | ZeroMandatoryVaxx.com | CV19 V@xx Shedding to Unv@xxed? | Image Source |

New research examines possible mechanisms of shedding from v@xxed to unv@axxed.

The study, titled, Current state of knowledge on the excretion of mRNA and spike produced by anti-COVID-19 mRNA vaccines; possibility of contamination of the entourage of those vaccinated by these products, in the journal Infectious Diseases Research by Helene Banoun states, “There are numerous reports of symptoms and pathologies identical to the adverse effects of mRNA vaccines in unvaccinated persons in contact with freshly vaccinated persons”.

-JD

 


 

“It Looks Like the mRNA is Transferring from the Vaccinated to the Unvaccinated”

Link To Video

 


 

Link To Article HERE

Link To Study:Current state of knowledge on the excretion of mRNA and spike produced by anti-COVID-19 mRNA vaccines; possibility of contamination of the entourage of those vaccinated by these products


 

Posted on

Technocratic control schemes of the parasite class

November 28, 2022 | Technocratic control schemes of the parasite class |

Technocracy can be defined as a scientific dictatorship.

The method of control is through a centrally organized, linked, and monitored monetary and economic system.

The 1938 Technocrat Magazine described technocracy as “The science  of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population.”

The UN is the vehicle attempting to install technocratic world governance. In lockstep with Agenda 21/2030, 193 nations have collaborated to replace individual liberty, national sovereignty, and free enterprise, with collectivism, control and slavery.

One way to begin rejecting the technocrat control scheme is by turning off the “smart” phone, which functions as a globalist weapon for monitoring and enslavement.

Another way to unplug from the globalist agenda is by organizing locally, working with State and Local legislators to enforce the Constitution and protect individual and State sovereignty. -JD

 


 

By Iain Davis |  November 25, 2022  |  off-guardian.org  |

Totalitarianism is a form of government that attempts to assert total control over the lives of its citizens. It is characterized by strong central rule that attempts to control and direct all aspects of individual life through coercion and repression. It does not permit individual freedom. Traditional social institutions and organizations are discouraged and suppressed, making people more willing to be merged into a single unified movement. Totalitarian states typically pursue a special goal to the exclusion of all others, with all resources directed toward its attainment, regardless of the cost.

That “special” goal is sustainable development and no cost, either financial or humanitarian, is too great to tackle the alleged “climate crisis.” In reality, climate change is simply the excuse for sustainable development and it is through the global policy commitment to “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs) that technocracy is being installed.

A technocratic society is called a Technate and the world’s first Technate has emerged in China. In this two part exploration we will look at how this system was constructed, who was behind it and why technocracy is now being foisted upon all of us.

These articles are drawn largely from my 2021 publication Pseudopandemic. It is free to subscribers to my blog.

GLOBAL TECHNOCRATIC GOVERNANCE

In order for global technocracy to be rolled-out, authority needs to be centrally controlled at the global level. Governments, intergovernmental organisations and multinational corporations have collaborated to form a global public-private partnership  (G3P) for this purpose.

Throughout the 20th and 21st century the G3P network has sought to construct global governance. In turn, global governance enables the worldwide distribution of the technocracy that governments then convert into national policy commitments. Many components of global technocratic governance have already been established.

The World Heath Organisation (WHO) delivers global governance of public health; global access to technological development is meted out through the World Intellectual Property Organization; the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) works to coordinate economic policies between nation-states and global trade is monitored and controlled through the trade agreements overseen by the World Trade Organisation.

The Bank For International Settlements (BIS) coordinates global monetary policy and the flow of capital; the direction of education, academia, the sciences and cultural development is steered through the U.N Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and the seizure of the global commons and the “financialisation” of nature—through natural asset companies and other mechanisms—is nearing completion.

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are centrally controlled through global governance, primarily by the U.N Development and Environmental programs (UNDP & UNEP). The necessary global scientific consensus on climate change is centrally administered and the appropriate research funding streams allocated, by the U.N’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The powerful individuals, pushing the G3P project forward, are a collective of mass polluters, robber barons, land grabbers and the world’s leading exponents of worker exploitation, market manipulation, monetary extortion (usury) and oppression. They form what would otherwise be considered a criminal cartel but have greenwashed their reputations through their commitment to so-called “sustainable development.”

Often referred to as the elite, a more fitting description is “the parasite class.”

The G3P has managed to convince billions that it is committed to sustainable, net zero, environmentalism and wants to “save the planet.” It is actually determined to empower global governance and enforce technocracy upon humanity through SDGs and the associated policy Agendas. Regardless of what you think about the causes of climate change or the level of risk it presents, SDGs do nothing to address itand are designed to serve no-one and nothing other than the G3P and its interests.

In order to requisition, commodify, audit and ultimately divide up the Earth’s resources among themselves, the stakeholder capitalists, at the heart of the G3P, also need technocratic control. Once humanity figures out what has happened, technocracy will enable the G3P to shutdown resistance through literal population control.

Every human being will be individually monitored by Artificial Intelligence (AI) networks which will punish or reward them, depending upon their behaviour. Biosecurity and environmental concerns are set to provide the justification for this enslavement.

Much like the quack pseudo-science of eugenics, which many G3P “thought leaders” seem to believe, Technocracy was the social sciencecertainty of its day. Like eugenics, while it has subsequently faded from public consciousness, it is still avidly pursued by the G3P’s compartmentalised hierarchy.

TECHNOCRACY

In 1911, arguably the worlds first management consultant, Frederick Winslow Taylor, published The Principles of Scientific Management. His publication came at the culmination of the Progressive Era in the United States.

This was a period marked by the political activism of the US middle class who mainly sought to address the underlying social problems, as they saw them, of excessive industrialisation, immigration and political corruption. So-called “Taylorism,” fixated with the imminent exhaustion of natural resources and advocating efficient “scientific management systems,” was in the spirit of the age.

Taylor wrote:

In the past the man has been first; in the future the system must be first. [. . .] The best management is a true science, resting upon clearly defined laws, rules, and principles. [. . . ] The fundamental principles of scientific management are applicable to all kinds of human activities, from our simplest individual acts to the work of our great corporations.

 

Link To Full Article HERE


 

 

Image Source

Posted on

2019: Fauci Testimony on Self-assembling Nanoparticle V@xx

November 27, 2022 | ZeroMandatoryVaxx.com  | 2019: Fauci Testimony on Self-assembling Nanoparticle V@xx | Image Source

Investigation into harmful v@xx ingredients has revealed a wide range of hazardous contaminants including components that self assemble. Pandemic Timeline has provided documentation in substantiation, with 2019 testimony from Fauci and an Executive Order 13887, signed by Trump on September 19, 2019.

It’s notable that Fauci was in a leadership role at National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, serving in 7 presidential administrations.  -JD

 


 

By Pandemic Timeline | Source

Link To_Testimony – Fauci (NIH) 12.04.2019

Link To_Executive Order 13887_Trump 09.19.2019

See also, on this site:

 

Link To Article @ Source_HERE

 


 

 

“Teslaphoresis” is self-assembly at a distance.

 

 

April 14, 2016 | Mike Williams | Rice University |  Source |Link To Video

 


 

Design of Wireless Nanosensor Networks for Intrabody Application

LINK

 


 

NEUROWeapons: 5G + VAXX = WMD

LINK

 


 

Art of War: US-China-CDC Partnership

LINK

 


 

Posted on

Nanobots, Construction process of Microchips in C19 injectables, new insights on Shedding

November 15, 2022 |  ZeroMandatoryVaxx.com  | Re: The Operation Warp Speed War on Humanity

Groundbreaking research revealing self-assembling transbiologicals, synthetic biologicals and nanotech found in the blood and excretions of vaxxed – and also unvaxxed. -JD

 


Nanobots, Construction process of Microchips in C19 injectables, new insights on Shedding | By Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD PHD

Dr. David Nixon, Dr. Shimon Yanowitz, Electrical Engineer Matt Taylor and Dr. Ana Mihalcea Present Updates on Research Findings

In this video Dr. David Nixon presents new images evaluating the Nanorobots that are constructing the microchips. We discuss the light transmission of certain circuitry and possible explanations of optical communication. We discuss the hydrogel construction base that appears to carry the software imprint on the self assembly process. I present new images of Live blood Analysis in vaccinated people from Dr Nixon and unvaccinated showing similar self assembly structures. Dr. Yanowitz shows self assembly ribbons from C19 vials and how they are the same thing we see in the live blood from shedding and environmental exposure. Do not miss this information packed update!

Rumble:

Nanobots, Construction process of Microchips in C19 injectables, new insights on Shedding

Brighteon:

Nanobots, Construction process of Microchips in C19 injectables, new insights on Shedding

 

 

 


 

Aerosolized Nanobot Described in 2012 Geoengineering Business Model

LINK

 


 

Doctors find “shards” of graphene shedding from vaxxed to unvaxxed

Link

 


 

Detox Protocols

Graphene Oxide Detox Protocols For The Vaxxed and Unvaxxed

LINK

 


 

Design of Wireless Nanosensor Networks for Intrabody Application

LINK

 


 

Vaxx Tracking / US Patent 11,107,588 B2

LINK

 


 

Nano-tech in C19 Injections

Nano-Technology in C0v|d Injections – It’s for Communications, It’s Technological Parasitism

LINK

 


 

 

Vaccine nanotechnology

LINK

 


 

Posted on

7 Reasons Why Gene Editing is Dangerous and Unpredictable

Gene editing and GMO’s are another example where safety regulations and ethics need to be inserted into the fields of science and engineering. -JD

 


7 Reasons Why Gene Editing is Dangerous and Unpredictable

October 6, 2022 | By The Institute For Responsible Technology – IRT |  Gene editing threatens our food and the genetic integrity of all living things  | Image Source_Youtube

 

 

Gene editing is cheap, easy, prone to side effects, poorly regulated and can permanently alter nature’s gene pool-a recipe for disaster.

 

 


 

Exposing The Fraud

 

According to the world’s most prestigious journals, gene editing creates damage to the genome. Nature describes it as “Chromosomal Mayhem”. So how does the biotech industry get away with claiming the opposite?

We are witnessing a well-funded disinformation campaign, reminiscent of the tactics used by Monsanto for decades. They feed scripted talking points and ghostwritten materials to a coordinated chorus of promoters, front groups, paid scientists, captured regulatory agencies, and biotech friendly media. Government sanctioned pro-GMO committees are often comprised of industry-approved members with clear conflicts of interest. On the other hand, highly credentialed, independent experts are not invited to share their evidence of potential harm from gene editing.

Link To Read More HERE

 

 

 

Link To Full Article HERE

Link To Video HERE

Link To Join IRT in the fight against GMOs HERE

 


Zero-GMO.com

Posted on

Federal government ramps up research to manipulate the human brain and engineer DNA

Federal government ramps up research to manipulate the human brain and engineer DNA

September 30, 2022 |

Acting president Biden recently intensified his war against Americans with an executive order ramping up genetic modification and brain manipulation. This blatant violation of ethics and human rights is clearly unconstitutional, however these kinds of policies seem to be the standard from corporate politicians serving in Washington, D.C.  -JD

 


 

 


 

Karen Kingston Warns That Joe Biden’s Executive Order Makes Crimes Against Humanity Mandatory

September 22, 2022 | By

Link To Video

 

 


 

Source: https://thefederalist.com/2022/09/29/federal-research-on-manipulating-brains-and-rewriting-dna-should-worry-us-all/

 

The future of evolution is now in our hands. Or rather, the godlike power to alter biology rests in a few scientists’ hands, and we’re all going to pay for it, one way or another. The U.S. government is pouring billions of dollars into understanding genetics and the human brain, and most consequentially, how to manipulate those systems.

Last week, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) launched its “BRAIN 2.0” initiative (Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnology), ramping up an existing program started eight years ago. Comparable to the Human Genome Project in scope and scale, BRAIN 2.0 grants $600 million to fully map our 86 billion neurons and their uncounted connections. The project is expected to reach a grand total cost of $5 billion by 2026.

In theory, once scientists have created this detailed brain atlas in silicothey can directly alter neural function using digital devices. The director of the BRAIN Initiative, John Ngai, exhibits a troubling fixation on this method.

In a recent interview with Stat News, Ngai noted two concrete results of his current neuro-mapping efforts. One is an advanced brain-computer interface — implanted last year at the University of California, San Francisco — that allows for astounding thought-to-text communication. The other is a major breakthrough in deep brain stimulation at Baylor University, where electrodes are implanted to alter mood and behavior, relieving depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Ngai’s cyborg obsession is shared by his close government partner, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), where “man-computer symbiosis” has been a longstanding paradigm. The defense agency’s involvement in the BRAIN Initiative is open and well documented. However, beyond the NIH’s declared mission to heal, our top military minds also have a deep interest in human enhancement.

“DARPA has been a pioneer in brain-machine interface technology since the 1970s, but we began investing heavily in the early 2000s,” boasted Justin Sanchez, the director of DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office. “We’ve laid the groundwork for a future in which advanced brain interface technologies will transform how people live and work.”

This transformation involves neural implants, to an extent, but also non-invasive devices, such as wearable neuro-bands or skull caps. “Imagine what will become possible when we upgrade our tools to really open the channel between the human brain and modern electronics,” said DARPA program manager Phillip Alvelda, whose goals include “Bridging the Bio-Electronic Divide” and developing a “High-Resolution, Implantable Neural Interface.”

If successful, the atlas created by BRAIN 2.0 will be a crucial bridge across this “bio-electronic divide.” The neural territory will be mapped and ready to conquer.

‘The Century of Engineered Biology’

This mad quest to alter basic biology extends all the way down to the genome. Two weeks ago, the White House announced that $2 billion will go to reshaping life as we know it by way of the National Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Initiative. “We need to develop genetic engineering technologies and techniques,” the executive order reads, “to be able to write circuitry for cells and predictably program biology in the same way in which we write software and program computers.” Another $1 billion will go toward creating the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), with a full $6.5 billion requested for its “high-risk, high-reward” projects.

Last Wednesday, the new agency’s inaugural director, Renee Wegrzyn, reminded her colleagues that humans now have the ability to alter DNA at will. But because gene-editing technologies such as CRISPR have become so inexpensive and widespread, she warned, the specters of accidental pathogens or intentional bioweapons pose a grave threat to humankind.

“We’re ushering in the century of engineered biology,” Wegrzyn declared with a weird fake-smile, “whether it’s through gene-editing, or it’s through engineering of living medicines that will be in our gut — or in soil to promote fertilization and growth, especially as we face challenges like climate change.”

What else does this “century of engineered biology” hold in store? According to Wegrzyn, a former DARPA program manager, this revolution will lead to “human-machine convergence” and the creation of “Human 2.0.”

“These are things that are somewhere on the horizon,” she told the Long Now Foundation in 2017, “that genome engineering and gene-editing will be a part of. So how do we make sure we can pursue this future in a safe manner?”

Taking up the transhumanist torch, Wegrzyn lauded “defensive enhancement,” citing the example of mass vaccination to enhance our immune systems. She also addressed “offensive enhancement,” such as improvements in human “performance” and “cognitive state.”

“It’s evolution on steroids,” she said flippantly, “now in our control.” With a strange chuckle, she assured the audience that “we’re solidly on the defensive side.” If that’s the case, her DARPA projects were outliers at the agency.

Thinking about that culture of radical enhancement partnered with the vaccine-crazy NIH, it’s easy to imagine a dark future of increasingly unhinged “safe and effective” campaigns. The creation of ARPA-H appears to be an official marriage of the military-industrial complex to the biomedical establishment, with BRAIN 2.0 standing by the altar like a ring-bearing stepchild.

Federally Funded Transhumanism

Various skeptics, myself included, call this federally funded transhumanism for good reason. The resonance is obvious. In his “Letter to Mother Nature,” penned in 1999, the OG transhumanist Max More declared humanity’s freedom from our natural inheritance:

Through genetic alterations, cellular manipulations, synthetic organs, and any necessary means, we will endow ourselves with enduring vitality and remove our expiration date. … Not content with that, we will seek complete choice of our bodily form and function, refining and augmenting our physical and intellectual capabilities beyond any human in history. … While we pursue mastery of our own biochemistry, we will increasingly integrate our advancing technologies into our selves.

We’ve entered a bizarre era where sculpting human brains and bodies — and the underlying genes — may soon be as commonplace as nose jobs and genetically modified tomatoes are today. The crucial decision to move from healing to enhancement is just over the horizon, and your tax dollars are laying the foundation.

Today, it’s selective abortions and smartphone-symbiosis. Tomorrow, it will be designer babies and wearable brain-computer interfaces. To their credit, both Renee Wegrzyn and John Ngai have said we need public debates about how far we go with these technologies. Up till now, all we’ve seen are trans children, cringy metaverse ads, and vaccine mandates.

Maybe you’re enthusiastic about our transhuman trajectory. Or maybe, like me, you’re appalled by the hubris behind it. My purpose here is not to convince you of which position to take.

What’s important is that you’re thinking about where we’re at, right now, and where these efforts to rewrite DNA and irradiate brains are going. To the extent our voices are heard, we have to insist on making our own plans for the future — because regardless of our opinions, reckless technocrats are busy making those plans for us.

Link To Read Full Article HERE

 


Image Source