Posted on

NSF Funding Sulfate Aerosol Injection 2023

November 25, 2022 | ZeroGeoengineering.com |  NSF Funding Sulfate Aerosol Injection 2023   |   National Science Foundation (NSF)

At a 2013 Geoengineering debate, Harvard professor David Keith admitted that sulfate aerosol injection is likely to kill tens of thousands of people when he stated,“So if I made a decision, or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision…”

Keith remarked that he and his colleague Alan Robock (who was also on the debate panel ) have different views relative to the moral hazard of making a decision to do “research” that directly kills people. Link to_Full Video

Regardless, Robock, Keith, and other grant-dependent academics receive MILLIONS of dollars in funding for sulfate aerosol injection “research” also known as geoengineering.

On October 13th of this year, the White House announced the plan to push ahead with sulfate aerosol injection, in spite of the moral hazard and harm to be caused to human health and the environment, potentially on a global scale.

It’s entirely possible that other biological hazards could be released and extreme weather events could be engineered. The announcement underscores the urgency for strong public opposition, demanding an immediate halt to aerosol injection activities. Criminalizing atmospheric testing, with provisions for enforcement to include severe penalties, has precedent and is essential NOW, in order to protect human health, nature, and our environment.

 

Every USA State could adapt The Clean Atmosphere Act model to outlaw Geoengineering:

 


 

Link To National Science Foundation Awards Stratospheric Aerosol Injection 

 

NSF Rutgers 2020-2023
Colorado 2018-2023
Columbia New York 2021-2023
University of Wyoming Continuing Grant 2010-2016
NSF Research in all 50 states

Link To Source

 

 


 

 

To learn more about advocating for a ban on Geoengineering, email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 

 


 

 

White House Promotes Environmental Warfare SO2 Aerosol Injection

LINK

 


 

Posted on

1980 NASA: Changing the Climate With Aerosol Modification

November 20, 2022 | ZEROGeoengineering.com |

1980 NASA document provides a detailed description of a Stratospheric Aerosol Modification program designed to release tons of Sulfur Dioxide and other hazardous emissions into the atmosphere with the intention of changing the climate.

NASA and collaborating agencies CIA and DOD lack critical public oversight and scrutiny which is one reason why Geoengineering [environmental warfare] has occurred for decades and continues with zero regulations.

The White House recently announced funding for Sulfur Aerosol Injection programs for the next 5 years.  -JD

 


 

NASA 1980

Stratospheric Aerosol Modification by Supersonic Transport Operations With Climate Implications

 

 

 

Link To Full Document_Stratospheric Aerosol Modification_1980_NASA

 

 


 

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

LINK

 


 

 

Link To_CIA Director John O. Brennan speaks at Council on Foreign Relations meeting about Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI).

June 29, 2016

Link To Video

 

 

Link To_1960 CIA Climate Control

 


 

 

“So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision.”   Link To_ David Keith_2013

Link To Video  Image Source_Youtube Screenshot

 

 


 

 

To learn more about advocating for a ban on Geoengineering, email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 

 


 

Posted on

Maine Lobstering Industry Takes on NOAA and Wind Farms

October 22, 2022 | Maine Lobstering Industry Takes on NOAA and Wind Farms | https://www.mainelobstermen.org

Those following politics understand too well that government is better at causing problems than solving them. A case in point is in Maine where the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has attempted to place devastating restrictions on the hard working men and women of the iconic lobstering industry.

Protesting Lobstermen call on Maine to join lawsuit against NOAA

Behind the narrative of protecting right whale entanglement ( that hasn’t happened in 20 years ) is a well funded wind farm industry that apparently has their eyes on the gulf of Maine. Notably, offshore wind and shipping industries are not subject to the same strict regulations as the fishing industry.

Maine Congressional delegation backed HUGE spending increases for agency threatening lobster industry

Lobstermen launch campaign to save Maine industry; new threats on the horizon

Coming from an administration and agency that funds programs to intentionally  pollute the atmosphere, it’s highly unlikely that politicians and special interests are being entirely honest about their motives or love of whales.

‘You have failed us’: Maine lobstermen face federal regulators over new rules

Court Agrees to Fast-Track Maine Lobstering Group’s Appeal of Whale Rules

Massachusetts and Rhode Island got bamboozled into wind farms by politicians and special interests groups and it looks like California is next.

From WhyNotWind: “Billions of dollars have gone into erecting the wind and solar “traps” and trying to convince people there exists a clean, free energy source.  The result is devastated landscapes, expensive, unreliable power and no more than a small fraction of the power promised is ever generated.”

The fact is, wind farms are not clean or “green” and they are not going to be able to meet the energy needs of our nation.

The hard working men and women of Maine’s lobster industry don’t want to hurt whales. They just want to earn a living as they have done for generations, support their communities and feed their families.  -JD

Source            #SaveMaineLobstermen

 


 

Posted on

HAARP RF Radiation “Experiments” Underway

Image Source | October 21, 2022 | ZEROGeoEngineering.com | HAARP RF Radiation “Experiments” Underway  | UAF Geophysical Institute

The University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF), operating under an agreement with the Air Force, has started 13 new “experiments” radiating the upper atmosphere and ionosphere with up to 3.6 megawatts of power. The Air Force originally developed and owned HAARP (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program) but transferred the facility to UAF in August 2015. The program is made possible by a $9.3 million grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF), one of the original drivers of Weather and Climate Modification in 1965.

These experiments are another example of the lack of meaningful ethical and moral standards in technology. For example, what are the environmental and human health bio-effects of HAARP deploying massive amounts of (PULSED) Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation (RF/MW)? Questions such as this are absent from the “scientific” discussion regarding the pollution footprint created by these reckless “experiments”.

While HAARP may be new to many, research of this kind has been ongoing and explored by militaries as game-changing weaponry, especially since the brain is the battlefield of modern warfare.

A 1975 DARPA report titled, SOVIET DEVELOPMENTS IN WEATHER MODIFICATION, CLIMATE MODIFICATION AND CLIMATOLOGY stated:

“The Institute for the Study of the Brain (sic) of the University of California is cited as engaged in research on the debilitating effect of weak vibrational fields on human behavior.” -p.85

Bioethics in technology is urgently needed to reign in systems and programs which have the potential to harm and destroy life on Earth.  -JD

 


 

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ALTERING A REGION IN THE EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE, IONOSPHERE, AND/OR MAGNETOSPHERE __LINK 

2021_Geoengineering: NSF $9.3 Million Funds HAARP in Gakona, Alaska__LINK

HAARP Weather Control__LINK

Holes In Heaven__LINK

 

 


 

Neuroscientist Dr James Giordano. Neuro-Weapons. Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). Brain Implants.

Presenting developments in the field of ‘Neuro-Weapons’. ‘The Brain is the Battlefield of the Future’ on 09/25/18 at the Modern War Institute, United States Military Academy West Point.

Link To Video

 

The Brain Is The Battlefield For The Future_LINK

McCain Conference 2022: Brain Computer Interface__LINK


 

Link To  5G and the Realities of Neuroweapons

 

 

 


 

From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory__LINK

 

 


 

Microwave Emissions and the Problem of Modern Viral Diseases.__LINK

 

 


 

Evidence for a connection between coronavirus disease-19 and exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless communications including 5G.__LINK

 

 


 

 

Effects of microwave radiation on brain energy metabolism and related mechanisms.__LINK

 

 


 

Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G__LINK

 


 

Technology Convergence 2035:Humanity vs. AI__LINK

 


 

To learn more about advocating for a ban on atmospheric testing, please email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 


 

Posted on

FLASHBACK 2013: Harvard Professor Admits The Truth About Geoengineering

October 17, 2022 | ZEROGeoENGINEERING | Harvard_Geoengineering Budget _SG_Funding_Chart_2008-2018_Updated_Aug_2019 | Image Source Youtube Screenshot |

In light of the recent announcement by the White House that the Biden administration will be moving forward to fund and coordinate Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), it’s important that the public fully understand the criminality of these activities and reject these environmental warfare programs. Legitimate government requires the consent of the governed. Without informed public consent, such radical interventions qualify as assault and warfare.

In a 2013 debate on the topic, Harvard professor David Keith stated, “This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision…”

In spite of false claims that these programs are new, the fact is, that every U.S. administration since President Johnson has pursued cloud-seeding and other forms of weather and climate modification. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) is the world’s leader in orchestrating these destructive atmospheric activities, with 193 nations participating. The programs operate outside legitimate Constitutional governance.

Over 70 years of deliberate intervention in the Earth’s weather is causing significant damage and weather extremes.

It’s time to ban Geoengineering and other harmful atmospheric polluting activities. To learn more about advocating for a ban on Geoengineering and other atmospheric hazards, please email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com.

 


 

 

August 7, 2013 Geoengineering Debate MIT

Speakers: Oliver Morton, Alan Robock, Daniel Schrag, David Keith, and Stephen Gardiner

 

Link To Video

 

“This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year, let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision. I think that has moral consequences, I don’t sweep that under the rug. This is a case where I take this much differently from Alan and think it’s a much more serious issue. Now, it’s true that part of doing that, you would hope that the overall benefits of human mortality would be so that you would save many many more people than that. But the fact that you uh, would save more people than you kill, doesn’t mean there’s no moral impact (laughs) of making a decision that directly kills people. And I think that we who talk about this have a duty to be clear-eyed about the direct risks involved in doing it.”   -David Keith @ 1:10:15

 

Link To Video Clip_2013 Geoengineering David Keith_@1:10:15

Image Source_Youtube Screenshot

 


 

David Keith Presents Solar Geoengineering Lectures

LINK

 


 

Posted on

White House Promotes Environmental Warfare SO2 Aerosol Injection

October 13, 2022 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | Harvard Geoengineering Research Budget | White House Promotes Environmental Warfare SO2 Aerosol Injection  | White House_Geoengineering.pdf

“Public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”   -President Eisenhower, 1961

The Biden administration is openly admitting the truth about government funded environmental warfare programs to spray sulfur dioxide ( SO2) from airplanes. No real environmentalist could advocate for poisoning the Earth. Grant dependent academics are the “scientific technological elite” that Eisenhower warned about in 1961.

Sulfur aerosol injection is not new, the plan to deliberately release harmful contaminants into the atmosphere, such as sulfur dioxide (SO2).

In fact, in the 1975 DARPA report titled, “SOVIET DEVELOPMENTS IN WEATHER MODIFICATION, CLIMATE MODIFICATION AND CLIMATOLOGY,” Environmental Warfare was listed as a topic of investigation. The report stated:

“..within a few decades world heat production could rise from the present level of 0.2%, of the received power of the Sun to a level of 2%, thus causing a 1-1.5 C mean global temperature increase.  Such a potentially harmful warming trend could, in principle, be checked by artificially increasing the planetary cloud cover.” -p83

“…method of moderating planetary warming trends by temporarily increasing the concentration of sulfate aerosol particles in the lower stratosphere and thereby reducing global radiation.” -i

If this narrative sounds familiar, it’s because it is, the same story that has been perpetuated for decades by academic grant dependent ‘researchers,’ military, and government agencies. This ‘scientific technological elite’ engage in planning and operations of environmental warfare techniques such as Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), with complete disregard for life on Earth, because there is endless funding, an absence of applied ethical or moral standards and furthermore, there are no laws preventing the use of our atmosphere as a physics lab.

President John F. Kennedy called for a ban on atmospheric research testing in the same 1961 speech where he announced proposals for international weather prediction and weather control.   –Link To Full Speech Quote @ 22:02

 


 

 

To learn more about advocating for a ban on Geoengineering, email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 

 


 

 

Geoengineering Must Be Outlawed To Protect Life on Earth.

 

 

 


 

“You could actually spray sulfuric acid in the stratosphere”  —– David Keith_Link To_Video

 

Link To Video

 

 

 

Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere

Harvard Professor David Keith Explains Solar Radiation Management (SRM) Geoengineering:

“…involves modifying a fleet of jets to spray sulfates into the stratosphere where they would combine with water vapor to form aerosols.  Dispersed by winds, these particles would cover the globe with a haze…”

 

 

 


 

 

2010: David Keith “Do this in just a jet in a very simple way, make high quality alumina particles just by spraying aluminum vapor out which oxidizes so it’s certainly in principle possible to do that and theres a big literature that’s already looked at that.” SCoPEx-Harvard Projects | Bill Gates-Geoengineering |Funding Climate Scientists |FICER | Aurora 2011 Geoengineering Cost Analysis Report

 

David Keith:Geoengineering using Aluminum Vapor in the Stratosphere-Better than Sulfur. Proposed program using jets-Royal Flight Sciences working on delivery options. 2010 Power Point Presentation Link

 


 

 

 

 

 

Posted on

Are we witnessing weaponized weather?

Are we witnessing weaponized weather?

October 1, 2022

The arrogance and idiocy of intentionally interfering with the weather is historically documented[1] in patents[2], academic research[3][4], budgets[5], government[6], intelligence[7][8], and military[9] programs[10][11].

As we mourn and recover from disastrous recent[12] weather events, it’s absolutely critical to prohibit geoengineering, weather modification, cloud seeding, and other atmospheric ‘testing’ schemes which have the potential to result in catastrophic damage and loss of life.  -JD

 


Disney 1959 weather modification documentary “Eyes in Outer Space”

Screenshot: Disney “Eye in Outer Space”

 

Link To Video

 


Modifying the Hurricane Hazard: Dream or Reality

Hurricane Mitigation Forum | Orlando, Florida |  February 21-22, 2008

https://zerogeoengineering.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/presentation_iginis.pdf

 

https://zerogeoengineering.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/presentation_iginis.pdf

 

Link To Full Document

 


 

Link To US Patent  20030085296A1  

WEATHER WARFARE: HURRICANE AND TORNADO CONTROL DEVICE

LINK

 


 

Air Force / Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025_LINK

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025

 

Link To_BIOTECHNOLOGY: GENETICALLY ENGINEERED PATHOGENS

 


 

https://ia800206.us.archive.org/27/items/historyofproject00have/historyofproject00have.pdf

 

Link To History of Project Cirrus_1952

 


 

Reference

 

[1]https://zerogeoengineering.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/US20030085296A1.pdf

[2]https://zerogeoengineering.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/WO2008072227A1.pdf

[3]https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2010GL043975

[4]https://keith.seas.harvard.edu/files/tkg/files/weisenstein_et_al._2022_an_interactive_stratospheric_aerosol_model_intercomparison.pdf?m=1653588568

[5]https://zerogeoengineering.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/sg_funding_chart_2008-2018_updated_aug_2019.pdf

[6]https://zerogeoengineering.com/2022/us-government-coordinating-and-funding-geoengineering/

[7]https://zerogeoengineering.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/CIA-RDP78-03425A002100020014-2-3.pdf

[8]https://zerogeoengineering.com/2019/cia-director-john-o-brennan-speaks-at-the-council-on-foreign-relations/

[9]https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a325418.pdf

[10]https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19680002906

[11]https://ia800206.us.archive.org/27/items/historyofproject00have/historyofproject00have.pdf

[12]https://www.cbsnews.com/dfw/video/floridians-recover-from-hurricane-ian/

 

Image Source_From the Smithsonian Magazine Article: Weather Control as a Cold War Weapon


 

 

Posted on

Aerosolized Nanobot Described in 2012 Geoengineering Business Model

Aerosolized Nanobot Described in 2012 Geoengineering Business Model

 

A 2012 patent for deployment of aerosolized nanoparticles ( “nanobot” ) describes a geoengineering business model using a carbon credit scheme to generate income based on hypothetical climate models. These inaccurate models were designed by schemers to profit from the deliberate contamination of our atmosphere and environment.

Geoengineering must be criminalized and banned. -JD

 


 

Geoengineering Method Of Business Using Carbon Counterbalance Credits

“4. The method of claim 1 wherein the agent is a light-scattering nanomaterial, such as a nanopowder, nanorod, nanocrystal, or nanobot.”

Source

https://app.patentinspiration.com/#report/1186d6221Be3/analysis/4692322d8088/patents/[5]/US2012117003A1

“d) monetizing said credit by selling said credit or exchanging for other valuable instruments to the second or to a third party, such instruments including cash, notes, loans, materials, currencies, or other tradable instruments.”

 


 

US2012117003A1 Geoengineering Method Of Business Using Carbon Counterbalance Credits

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/046020574/publication/US2012117003A1?q=US2012117003A1

 


May 10, 2012

US 2012:0117003 A1

Source


 

https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-2012117003-A1

Patent_US-2012117003-A1


 

Image Source

 

Link to_ZeroGeoengineering.com

 

Posted on

Geoengineering: Scientists promote environmental warfare technique of spraying sulfur dioxide into atmosphere

Geoengineering: Scientists promote environmental warfare technique of spraying sulfur dioxide into atmosphere

September 20, 2022 | ZeroGeoengineering | Image Source| Link To Harvard_Solar Geoengineering_Funding_Chart

“Public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”   -President Eisenhower, 1961

Sulfur aerosol injection is not new, the plan to deliberately release harmful contaminants into the atmosphere, such as sulfur dioxide (SO2).

 

In fact, in the 1975 DARPA report titled, “SOVIET DEVELOPMENTS IN WEATHER MODIFICATION, CLIMATE MODIFICATION AND CLIMATOLOGY,” Environmental Warfare was listed as a topic of investigation. The report stated:

“..within a few decades world heat production could rise from the present level of 0.2%, of the received power of the Sun to a level of 2%, thus causing a 1-1.5 C mean global temperature increase.  Such a potentially harmful warming trend could, in principle, be checked by artificially increasing the planetary cloud cover.” -p83

“…method of moderating planetary warming trends by temporarily increasing the concentration of sulfate aerosol particles in the lower stratosphere and thereby reducing global radiation.” -i

If this narrative sounds familiar, it’s because it is the same story that has been perpetuated for decades by academic grant dependent ‘researchers,’ military, and government agencies. This ‘scientific technological elite’ engage in planning and operations of environmental warfare techniques such as Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), with complete disregard for life on Earth, because there is endless funding, an absence of applied ethical or moral standards and furthermore, there are no laws preventing the use of our atmosphere as a physics lab.

President John F. Kennedy called for a ban on atmospheric research testing in the same 1961 speech where he announced proposals for international weather prediction and weather control.   –Link To Full Speech Quote @ 22:02

 


 

 

To learn more about advocating for a ban on Geoengineering, email:contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 

 


 

19 September 2022 | By Thomas Moore | SkyNews

“A fleet of 125 military air-to-air refuelling tankers would release a cloud of microscopic sulphur dioxide particles”

 

Source

Scientists have outlined a controversial plan to refreeze the North and South Poles, and dial down the global thermostat.

They say high-flying jets could spray microscopic aerosol particles into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight and cool the melting icecaps.

Around 175,000 flights a year would be needed, releasing millions of tonnes of carbon dioxide.

But a former UK chief scientist backed the plans, telling Sky News that polar warming is now critical – and refreezing the ice could hold back the rise in global sea levels.

The new study was led by Wake Smith from Yale University in the United States.

Link To Read Full Article HERE

 


 

 

PubChem Sulfur Dioxide

LINK

 


 

 

“Studies of alternative lofting concepts such as balloons, rockets, guns, or tethered hoses conclude that at 20 km, the most efficient and reliable lofting technology would be fixed- wing, self-propelled, air-breathing jets” Link

Wake Smith et al 2022 Environ. Res. Commun. 4 031002

 

Link To Full Document_Stratospheric Aerosol Injection_Smith_2022_Environ._Res._Commun._4_031002

 


 

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

LINK

 


 

Geoengineering is an Environmental Health Hazard, BAN NEEDED ASAP

LINK

 


 

Posted on

Forest Fire As A Military Weapon

 

Forest Fire As A Military Weapon

 

August 12, 2022 | The 1970 “secret” document, Forest Fire As A Military Weapon, is a report on military weaponry designed to intentionally burn and destroy large areas of forest and jungle in Vietnam. The architects and participants of these warcrimes were never prosecuted even though they destroyed land and massacred innocent human beings.

Discussed in this report is the “science” of optimal burning, including methods such as aerial spraying, use of chemicals, ideal weather conditions to start fires, examples of potential target locations worldwide, the best time of year to apply desiccation treatments and the best month to burn.

The US Department of Agriculture Forest Service in the US, included in the 1970 report, is currently engaged in forest herbicide treatments.

Montana, Texas, Florida, California, Idaho, and other states/nations permit cloud seeding, which involves the release of silver iodide, a combustible agent, and other hazardous pollutants. Rhode Island is the first state to introduce legislation that would prohibit harmful atmospheric activities such as cloud seeding and weather modification.

If you’d like to learn more and get involved in efforts to end cloud seeding and other hazards in order to preserve a clean atmosphere, please email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com  or director@zerogeoengineering.com.

 


 

 

June 1970 | U.S. Department of Agriculture — Forest Service | Authors: Craig C. Chandler, Jay R. Bentley | Sponsored by Advanced Research Projects Agency Order No. 818 | 

 

Forest Fire as a Military Weapon

A June 1970 Report of study commissioned by the Department of Defense.

 

In 1965 the Joint Chiefs of Staff requested that the Secretary of Defense initiate research to determine the feasibility of measuring the flammability characteristics of forests and jungle growth, modifying flammability so that vegetation would readily support combustion and developing measures to destroy large areas of forest or jungle growth by fire. This research has been conducted by the Forest Service of the Department of Agriculture, under sponsorship of the Advanced Research Projects Agency through ARPA Order 818. The primary research attention was given to the flammability characteristics of jungle growth in tropical and monsoonal climates where forest fires seldom occur naturally.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source material from Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA), Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Secret Service, National Security Council, Department of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Department of Justice, National Archive Records and Administration, and Presidential Libraries.

 

Link To Document_Forest Fire As A Military Weapon

 


 

 

Is Weather Modification Increasing Explosive Fires in Western States?

LINK

 

 


 

 

Who Owns The Weather? CHARTER of the Interagency Council for Advancing Meteorological Services (ICAMS); The Federal Weather Enterprise: Fiscal Year 2021 Budget and Coordination Report; WHITEHOUSE FY 2022 Research & Development Budget

LINK