Posted on

Involuntary Hospitalization Bill Introduced in DC

29 April 2024 |  In what seems reminiscent of NY Governor’s push for quarantine camps, DC Councilmembers have introduced measures which would allow for involuntary hospitalization.

Also known as involuntary commitment or civil commitment, involuntary hospitalization “is the legal process that mandates an individual to enter a hospital or psychiatric facility without their consent, temporarily, for mental health evaluation and treatment.”

Could mental health become weaponized to detain and drug individuals based on the assessment of an “expert?” Much wider public scrutiny of this legislation is warranted.

This legislation could open the door to massive abuse

Link To Document HERE

 

“The bill proposes broadening the pool of qualified healthcare professionals authorized to initiate involuntary commitment
processes, incorporating Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioners who are recognized for their expertise in mental health assessments.”

Many people are aware of efforts by the WHO  to mandate “health” protocols, and rightfully so.  Let’s continue  to monitor and challenge legislation in our nation, as policymakers at home have not been so faithful in protecting our Constitution and God-given rights.

A public hearing on B25-0692 is to be held in July.

 


 

Related

New Yorkers Uniting to Stop Governor’s Quarantine Camps

 


 

Posted on

Legal Remedies for “Cloud-Seeding” Activities

November 21, 2023 | ZeroGeoEngineering.com |1960 Duke Law Journal article examines cases addressing the question of liability for “cloud-seeding”.

In the decision of Southwest Weather Research, Inc. v. Duncan, “The court’s holding that the plaintiffs have rights in the water in the clouds is based on the common-law doctrine of natural rights.8 The landowner is said to have the right to the reasonable use and enjoyment of his land in its natural condition, free from the interference of others.
The activities of the defendants, in depriving’ the plaintiffs of the natural amount of rainfall, violated one of their natural rights and gave them a right of action in equity.10”

The article discusses subsequent cases which established precedent that “landowners are entitled to legal protection from “cloud-seeding” which constitutes an unreasonable interference with their right to natural precipitation.”

 


 

Legal Remedies for “Cloud-Seeding” Activities: Nuisance or Trespass? (1960). Duke Law Journal, 1960(2), 305–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/1370980

 

Link to Full Article HERE

Legal Remedies for Cloud-Seeding Activities Nuisance or Trespass 1960

 


 

CIA Weather

 

Forest Fire As A Military Weapon

 

National Weather Modification Policies and Programs

 

Weather Control Policy in U.S. States

 


 

Related

CLOUD SEEDING – The technology of fraud and deceit

Legal Response to Environmental Concerns about Weather Modification

The Governing of the Air: A Case Study in the Chinese Experience

Enhancing the weather: governance of weather modification activities in Australia

Governance of Weather Modification Activities of the United States

Europe – Solar Radiation Modification: Governance of Research

 


 

To learn more about advocating for legislation to prohibit weather modification, cloud seeding, and other atmospheric/environmental hazards email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com.

 

 


 

Posted on

FY2024 DoE Congressional Funding Request for Biological and Environmental Research

October 15, 2023 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | DoE FY2024 Congressional Request |

U.S. policy provides for funding and coordination of weather engineering activities. 

According to The National Weather Modification Policy Act of 1976 (P.L. 94-490), the U.S. Secretary of Commerce and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and other government agencies are authorized to engage in atmospheric and weather modification research and in international atmospheric science activities.

There currently exists no regulatory oversight or public consent for weather engineering programs, though several USA States – Connecticut, Illinois, and Rhode Island, introduced legislation this year that would prohibit intentional atmospheric polluting activities, including solar radiation modification (SRM).

The Department of Energy (DoE) FY2024 Congressional Request includes appropriations for studies on atmospheric physics and chemistry involving clouds and aerosols.

Far more public scrutiny and regulatory oversight is essential, as scientific, military, and classified research is not yet subject to safety regulations or appropriate ethical constraints.

As President Eisenhower warned in his farewell address to Americans, “Public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”

 


 

DOE FY 2024 Budget Request Vol 5 Science (energy.gov)

 

 

 

Link To Full Document HERE

 


 

 

RELATED

Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Management   June 2023

Solar Geoengineering Congressional Report May 2023

2010 Geoengineering GAO Report

The cost of stratospheric aerosol injection through 2100

Geoengineering Map

National Weather Modification Programs and policy – 1978 Report

BIOETHICS.TECH

 


 

 

MORE CONTEXT

Advancing Precipitation Enhancement in California 2024

Weather and Climate Modification

 

Weather Control Policy in U.S. States

 

Meteorology, Climate Control, and Rebranding The Federal Weather Enterprise

 

National Weather Modification Policies and Programs

 

Aurora Flight Sciences – Geoengineering Cost Analysis

 

White House Announces Solar Radiation Modification Plan to Block the Sun

 

Weather Engineering by Artificial Satellites

 

Despite consensus narratives, there is no climate emergency

 

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

 

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

 

Depopulation Club: The Story of the Committee of 300

 

When will policymakers and POTUS candidates denounce UN Agenda 21/2030?

 


 

To learn more about how to get involved in advocacy for legislation to prohibit weather engineering and other atmospheric / environmental hazards email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com 

 


 

Posted on

Help Push DC Policymakers to Pass WHO Withdrawal Act

October 14, 2023 | WHO Withdrawal Act   H.R. 79 | Demand Congress STOP FUNDING and EXIT the United Nations (UN) World Health Organization (WHO)– Send Message to DC Policymakers HERE

The World Health Organization (WHO) is one of the many UN agencies that the U.S. is funding. According to the April 26, 2023, Congressional Research Report, “The United States is the single largest financial contributor to the United Nations (U.N.) system.” China is the second largest funder of the UN, and Japan is the third largest funder.

China is busy strengthening ties with the UN WHO in attempting to implement global “health” policy.

NOTE: The CDC is a for profit agency acting in partnership with China’s CDC and the WHO.

Americans will recall that U.S. policymakers implemented China-WHO-CDC protocols during the CV19 event. In case anyone missed it, depopulation (acceleration of fertility decline) is a UN priority.

So far, 53 members of the HOUSE have Sponsored or Co-sponsored H.R. 79 and ZERO Senators have introduced or supported the effort to withdraw from the WHO.

Contact your U.S. Representatives and Senators, to urge them to defund and withdraw from the UN WHO!  Send Message HERE

 

Stop the WHO Power Grab 

WHO Withdrawal Act (H.R. 79)

No Taxpayer Funding for the World Health Organization Act (H.R. 343)

No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act (S. 444)

Contact your U.S. Representatives and Senators, to urge them to defund and withdraw from the WHO!  Send Message HERE

 

 


 

 

Related

Contact Congressmembers Today to Demand USA Exit the WHO

 

Why are leading POTUS candidates embracing United Nations WHO policies?

 

When will policymakers and POTUS candidates denounce UN Agenda 21/2030?

 

EXIT and DEFUND the W.H.O.

 

Exit and Defund the UN

 

Depopulation Club: The Story of the Committee of 300

 

1981: Pandemic Genocide Predicted by Globalist Banker

 


 

More context

U.S.-UN-WHO-China-CDC Partnership

1974 Kissinger Report

The Amazing Deception 

There is never going to be another “deadly global pandemic.” There have not been any in the past.


 

Posted on

Why are leading POTUS candidates embracing United Nations WHO policies?

October 10, 2023 | Depopulation is a United Nations Agenda 

Both the Trump and Biden administrations adopted United Nations (UN) World Health Organization (WHO)-China protocols as their CV19 strategy.

When asked how he would address the next pandemic, Robert Kennedy Jr. stated that he would follow the pandemic protocols from the WHO and the CDC.

It is not the government’s job to protect our health. It is the government’s job to protect our rights (and our borders, including airspace). 

WHO-China protocols are presented in the Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), which states: “The Joint Mission consisted of 25 national and international experts from China, Germany, Japan, Korea, Nigeria, Russia, Singapore, the United States of America and the World Health Organization (WHO).”

The collaboration of national governments in following the exact same CV19 program was not an accident, but a pre-planned event.

Related

The Amazing Deception

Image Source

 

More pandemics are planned, including The SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028, brought to us by: The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.

Link To Full Document_SPARS-Pandemic-Scenario

 

The United Nations and the WHO are corrupt organizations, and the CDC is a for profit corporation that has been in partnership with China for over 30 years.

It is necessary to defund and withdraw from the WHO and the UN, shut down the CDC, and prosecute those who are responsible for CV19 crimes against humanity.

 


 

For more perspective on the deliberate sidestepping of the U.S. Constitutional legal system into the implementation of UN WHO International Health Regulations (IHR), writer and paralegal at Bailiwick News, Katherine Watt provides documentation in The American Domestic Bioterrorism Program, HERE.

Ms. Watt’s recent article on this topic states:

International law foundations that currently authorize governments to torture and kill people with legal impunity (by blocking civil and criminal prosecution) include treaties such as the 1946 treaty establishing the World Health Organization, and 2005 amendments to the WHO International Health Regulations that entered into force in 2007.

National governments around the world have adopted domestic laws to implement the WHO-IHR. The coordinated global Covid-19 programs rendered those domestic laws, and the triggering WHO-IHR provisions, more visible.

In the United States, implementing statutes include 21 USC 360bbb (“expanded access to unapproved therapies and diagnostics,” also known as the Emergency Use Authorization program) and 42 USC 247d, “public health emergencies.”

Key pillars of these two American legal structures were enacted by members of Congress and signed into law by then-President George W. Bush: Project Bioshield Act in 2004 and Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act in 2005 (Division C: last 14 pages of DoD Emergency Supplemental Appropriations bill post-Hurricane Katrina). Both programs have been expanded and developed further through amendments adopted since 2005.

 

Link To PDF Compilations – by Katherine Watt

Dec. 2022 nutshell version

January 2023 abstract for an academic paper

 

American Domestic Bioterrorism Program – by Katherine Watt 

Link To Video

Click here for the document describing the kill box:
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.files.wordpress.com/2023/01/kill-box-presentation-1.pdf

 

 


 

MORE CONTEXT

BY IAIN DAVIS

“The Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P) is a worldwide network of stakeholder capitalists and their partners. This collective of stakeholders (the capitalists and their partners) comprises global corporations (including central banks), philanthropic foundations (multi-billionaire philanthropists), policy think tanks, governments (and their agencies), non-governmental organisations, selected academic and scientific institutions, global charities, labour unions and other chosen “thought leaders.”  Source

Link To Source HERE

 


 

Related

Vaccine Bait & Switch: As Millions Pulled From WHO, Trump Gives Billions To Gates-Founded GAVI Link To Article

 Biden Gives $4 BILLION to WHO and Bill Gates for Global COVID Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Link To Article

Next Plandemic: Marburg

Is Marburg the next Pl@ndemic

As planned, Marburg Emerges

Is your city following Agenda 2030 instead of following the Constitution?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Image source

 

Posted on

August 2023 Report – Injecting Aerosols for SAI

September 25, 2023 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | Report |According to authors of a recent report Optimizing injection locations relaxes altitude-lifetime trade-off for stratospheric aerosol injection, “Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) is the deliberate introduction of aerosols or aerosol precursors into the stratosphere,” in an attempt to block sunlight and manipulate Earth’s temperature.

The activity of SAI is based upon climate hypothesis, now disputed by over 1,000 scientists as being politically, not scientifically driven, based on a globalist agenda.

In ongoing government sponsored academic programs to contaminate the air with aerosol pollution, there is no consideration of adverse SAI health and environmental impacts. Authors reference estimated aerosol injection of Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) at 1 Teragram per year – Tera denotes a factor of a trillion / 1,000,000,000,000 grams.

 

Related

The cost of stratospheric aerosol injection through 2100

 

To protect life on Earth, the current and long-standing policy allowing for funding and coordinating of SAI (aka environmental warfare) must be abolished and the activity of engineering weather and climate, prohibited. 

 


 

Sun, H., Bourguet, S., Eastham, S., & Keith, D. (2023). Optimizing injection locations relaxes altitude-lifetime trade-off for stratospheric aerosol injection. Geophysical Research Letters, 50, e2023GL105371. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105371

1 School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA,

2 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA,

3 Laboratory for Aviation and the Environment, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA,

4 Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA,

5 Department of the Geophysical Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

Link To Article HERE

Geophysical Research Letters – 2023 – Sun

 


 

 

What can be done to ban weather engineering and other hazardous emissions:

Regulatory measures at the state and national level can be enacted and implemented to prohibit weather manipulation and the release of hazardous emissions in our skies and at ground level.

Mexico banned Solar Geoengineering experimentation in January 2023.

PennsylvaniaMaryland, and West Virginia provide precedent from the 1960’s for prohibiting and preventing cloud seeding and weather modification activities. These kinds of policies could be reenacted at the state and national level today.

The Atmosphere Protection Act was introduced in Rhode Island in 2023 to prohibit deliberate polluting activities in the atmosphere and at ground level, including both aerosol injection and RF/MW Radiation.

Legislation to tackle geoengineering and weather modification pollution was also introduced in Connecticut and Illinois this year.

Take Action HERE

 

 

To learn more about advocating for laws to prohibit weather modification, geoengineering, and other atmospheric/environmental hazards email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com.

 

 


 

Related

Are Directed Energy Weapons and Geoengineering Triggering Explosive Fires? 

More Evidence Suggests Directed Energy Weapons Caused Fires in Maui 

Despite consensus narratives, there is no climate emergency

How Geoengineering and “5G” are Linked 

What is the impact of satellites covering the Earth with Radiation? 

Weather Warfare Conceals Climate & C0v*d Crimes 

How electromagnetic weapons induce disease and mentally disable entire populations

NATO and the Militarization of 5G 

Military leading the charge on 5G 

Unless Peace Comes – How to Wreck the Environment | A Scientific Forecast of New Weapons • 1968 

Technology Convergence 2035: Humanity vs. AI 

Depopulation Club: The Story of the Committee of 300 

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

Fire Starters 

A Cognitive Model for Exposition of Human Deception and Counterdeception

The Amazing Deception 

Rockefeller’s War On Humanity: UN Agenda 21/2030 & The New World Order 

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

 


 

Posted on

Huntington Beach Bans C19 Vaxx and Mask Mandates

September 7, 2023 | Marketing for the fall fear-of-the-flu campaign is ready to launch, apparently using the same playbook as the last time.

However, unlike the 2020 C19 campaign, many are ready to oppose planned government overreach and reject the United Nations WHO / CDC guidance.

Related

Art of War: US-China-CDC Partnership 

In California, the Huntington Beach City Council passed a resolution to ban masking and vaxx mandates from being enforced in their city.

The resolution’s sponsor, Mayor Pro Tem Gracey Van Der Mark said of the decision, “The city’s policy banning mask and vaccine mandates is simply taking a stand against government overreach on measures that have already proven scientifically to have little benefit, but at the same time, it’s depriving individuals and businesses of their liberties.”

Passage of the resolution makes Huntington Beach a no mask, no vaxx mandate city.

 

“We just believe that the individual and businesses should have a right to make their own decisions.”

-Mayor Van Der Mark

 

Link To Video HERE

 


 

Posted on

HR 3557 and Related Bills are a Lose-Lose for Everyone Except the Wireless Industry

September 5, 2023 | ZERO5G.com | Image Source – Wired Broadband Inc.STOP The Digital Prison |

Pro-telecom bills HR 3557, HR 4141 and 50+ related bills are a lose-lose for everyone except for the wireless industry.

Attorney Jullian Gresser stated: “…We must remember that this wireless infrastructure is intended to facilitate invasions of privacy, and government and corporate surveillance,
in violation at a practical level of numerous state laws protecting consumer privacy. It will authorize intrusion and eliminate protection of your own home, in violation of the fourth and ninth amendments. It will enable massive searches, and indeed assaults, of millions of people in their homes, without their owners’ informed consent. It will violate various state constitution environmental rights…”

Attorneys Andrew Campanelli, Scott McCollough, and Jullian Gresser discuss with Moderator Odette Wilkens HR 3557, HR 4141, and other pro-telecom bills as well as practical actions that people can take locally to oppose and counter these insidious bills.

 

Link To Video HERE

 

Town Hall Re: Federal Bills Transcript HERE

 


 

Brief Summary of Presenter Comments
by Julian Gresser

Andrew Campanelli

The net result of HR 3557 and the collection of over 50+ related bills is to cripple the power of cities, counties, towns, villages, and even states to regulate anything to do with cell tower applications. If passed, states and local communities will have zero power to regulate in any way the placement of wireless facilities on public or private property.

In New York City, if someone files an application to install 12,000 small wireless facilities, how could anyone reasonably expect the permitting authority to make a decision in 90 days?  There is no legitimate purpose for adopting something like this. It is just inherently insidious.

Scott McCollough

This bill and its related bills represent almost everything that telecoms could want.

The telecoms wrote it. You can tell just from looking at it. If you’ve looked at enough legislation, this is not something some staffer wrote. This is not something somebody in Congress was assigned to do. The lobbyists wrote this bill and found somebody to sponsor it. So let’s just make that clear, at the outset.

HR 3557 basically eliminates any existing restrictions in land use laws. Many local jurisdictions have laws that say, for example, in residential areas, you can have a commercial facility, which is what a wireless cell tower is. This bill says: amend your zoning law, or you must grant a variance. It will enable taking private property without adequate compensation. It overrides years of land use precedent and practice. It even implicitly overrules state government Sunshine laws, because no local jurisdiction can meet these deadlines, and still do what you have to do under the Open Meetings Act. There are significant Commerce Clause separation of powers questions: first, fourth, fifth, seventh, ninth, tenth, 11th, and 14th Constitutional amendment problems. Yes, Congress has broad powers, but I don’t think Congress can treat us — the public — in this way.

Julian Gresser

 The blizzard of 50+ bills now before the U.S. Congress, beginning with HR 3557, taken together, will have the effect of fatally disempowering and stripping away Constitutional rights and prerogatives of local communities to protect and to secure their health, safety,  environment, privacy and basic wellbeing. The combined effect will be to cripple local resilience and interdependence, which are critical conditions for states and local communities to meet a host of environmental, cybersecurity, and other challenges.

 False Claims and Premises. The 50+ bills are based on a series of false claims and premises that are not rendered truthful by their being widely asserted, disseminated, and asseverated by the wireless telecom industry and members of Congress:

  • Wireless infrastructure is safe. It is well documented to be unsafe.

  • Wireless infrastructure is resilient. In fact, it is less resilient than one based on fiber.

  • Wireless infrastructure is energy efficient. In fact, it is shown to be vastly energy consumptive.

  • Wireless infrastructure is cybersecure. In fact, wireless is substantially less secure that optical fiber which facilitates identification of the point of attack, and resilient response.

  • Wireless infrastructure is climate change friendly. In fact, it is the very opposite.

  • Wireless infrastructure promotes Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI) especially in minority communities, when in fact these same communities are too economically challenged and lack legal representation to escape.

  • Wireless infrastructure will close the Digital Divide, when it caused it in the first place and will expand it.

  • Wireless is long-lived, whereas the wireless industry and supporting legislators know full well that wireless is short-lived and given to early obsolescence.

 HR 3557 and its associated complementary bills represent a tyrannical attempt by the telecom-wireless industry to shift forever the reasonable and historic balance between the federal government, states, and local communities. Many of these bills offend the Constitution; some significantly abridge hard fought civil liberties; others intentionally and cynically promote and disseminate false claims, or are predicated on them. A few, building on the mayhem created by HR 3557, will jeopardize national security, especially by crippling resilience and interdependent emergency response at the state and local levels to cyberattacks.

 At the very least members of Congress must conduct comprehensive risk assessment and due diligence on HR 3557 et al. before voting to approve them. It is political malpractice to fail to do so.

 

Link To Source HERE

 


 

The Congressional representatives listed below have co-sponsored H.R.3557.

Contact their offices, ask them to take a closer look at the proposed bill and encourage them to change their minds, and remove their name as co-sponsors.

Click on the links below to access their websites.

Sponsor:

Earl L. “Buddy” Carter [GA-1]

Co-Sponsors:

Debbie Lesko [AZ-8]

Neal P. Dunn [FL-2]

Kat Cammack [FL-3]

Gus M. Bilirakis [FL-12]

Greg Pence [IN-6]

Tim Walberg [MI-5]

Bill Johnson [OH-6]

Nathaniel Moran [TX-1]

Dan Crenshaw [TX-2]

Randy K. Weber Sr. [TX-14]

 

 


 

Related

 

STOP The Digital Prison 

Red and Blue States Introducing Biometric Digital Prison IDs 

Is your city following UN Agenda 2030 instead of the Constitution?

 

 


 

 

Link To Article HERE

 


 

Link To Article HERE

 


 

 

Link To Article HERE

 

 


 

Posted on

Beware of the Next Round of Rushed mRNA Injections

 

September 2, 2023 | ZeroMandatoryVaxx.com |  Mr. Biden last week announced a request to Congress for more funding of CV shots for all Americans, quickly drawing strong opposition.

Hopefully, important lessons were learned from the deadlyOperation Warp Speed” government medical intervention. According to FDA information, experimental mRNA gene therapy injections were known to have potential harmful effects prior to the roll out.
Link To Source HERE
CV19 “Spike Protein” is Pathogenic 
According to a recent study, ‘Spikeopathy’: COVID-19 Spike Protein Is Pathogenic, from Both Virus and Vaccine mRNA presenting evidence of widespread vaxx harm, “unprecedented high rates of adverse events” occurred following injections, including multiple organ failures, neuropathies and death.
The conclusion of the study states, “In this narrative review, we have established the role of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, especially the S1 subunit, as pathogenic. It is also now apparent that widely biodistributed spike proteins, produced by mRNA and adenovectorDNA gene codes, induce a wide variety of diseases.”

 

Related

The Whole Truth: Covid-19 Vaccines

Flashback 1981: Pandemic Genocide Predicted by Globalist Banker

 


 

Parry, P.I.; Lefringhausen, A.; Turni, C.; Neil, C.J.; Cosford, R.; Hudson, N.J.; Gillespie, J. ‘Spikeopathy’: COVID-19 Spike Protein Is Pathogenic, from Both Virus and Vaccine mRNA. Biomedicines 202311, 2287. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082287

Link To Full Article HERE

‘Spikeopathy’: COVID-19 Spike Protein Is Pathogenic, from Both Virus and Vaccine mRNA


 

Conflicting Evidence of mRNA Technology Raises Serious Concerns About Rush for Use in New Vaccine Development (theepochtimes.com)

News Analysis By Megan Redshaw, J.D.

The U.S. government and pharmaceutical companies are investing a substantial amount to develop new mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases and cancer, fueling a lucrative mRNA platform valued at $136.2 billion.

A newly established White House program announced on Aug. 23 that it is granting a total of $25 million over three years to Emory University, Yale School of Medicine, and the University of Georgia to develop personalized therapeutic vaccines against cancers and emerging infections, similar to how COVID-19 mRNA vaccines target SARS-CoV-2. They aim to use mRNA—an essential element in COVID-19 vaccines developed to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections—to program a unique class of immune cells called dendritic cells to initiate a desired immunological response.

Pharmaceutical companies such as Moderna, BioNTech, and CureVac are conducting clinical trials using mRNA-based vaccines with advanced melanoma, ovarian, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. The National Institutes of Health is partnering with BioNTech to develop a personalized vaccine for pancreatic cancers. In addition to COVID-19 and cancer, other mRNA-based vaccines in development target influenza, genital herpes, respiratory viruses, and shingles.

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

American Domestic Bioterrorism Program – by Katherine Watt 

Link To Video

Click here for the document describing the kill box:
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.files.wordpress.com/2023/01/kill-box-presentation-1.pdf

 


 

Related

 

Operation Warp Speed CV19 Biochemical Weapons Under Scrutiny

 

Scientific Study: mRNA vaxx not safe or effective, it’s dangerous

 

CV-19 mRNA Injections Are Deadly Bioweapons

 


 

Image source

 

Posted on

Mask Mandates Prohibited in Texas

September 1, 2023 | Image SourceMaskCharade.com | Cat In The Hat

The Texas ban on mask mandates went into effect today.

Besides being unconstitutional to force medical mandates in a free society, there are many glaring flaws with politician’s, unelected agencies, and store clerks trying to prevent human beings from breathing oxygen, by attempting to mandate oxygen restriction via forced face masking.

Intentionally impeding the normal breathing of a man, woman, or child, by covering the mouth, nose, or both, is the definition of “suffocating” under 18 U.S.C. § 113 – U.S. Code – a crime under federal law:

18 U.S.C. § 113 – U.S. Code – Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 113. Assaults within maritime and territorial jurisdiction

“…the term suffocating means intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly impeding the normal breathing of a person by covering the mouth of the person, the nose of the person, or both, regardless of whether that conduct results in any visible injury or whether there is any intent to kill or protractedly injure the victim.”

In addition to violating every person’s God-given right to breathe air, evidence positively establishes that masking is harmful and has been weaponized as a political tool for dividing and controlling the population.

As the advertising for the next planned “outbreak” ramps up to frighten the population into submission, it’s critical to scrutinize the information and to NOT comply with mandates.

 

 


 

COVID Mandates Are Now Illegal In Texas 

Link To Article HERE

 


 

BARRICADE GARAGE | Video | MASK OFF | Bitchute

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect anyone who comes near that precious jewel.”

Link To Video HERE

 


We all need oxygen to survive

Why do we need oxygen to survive?

Link To Video HERE

 


 

Related

Mississippi Gov Says There Will Be No More Mask Mandates

Review of scientific reports of harms caused by face masks, up to February 2021

Face Masks Pose Serious Risks to the Healthy

Scientific Review Concludes mask Wearing Should not be Mandated

Cochrane Report Conclusion: No Evidence to Support Use of Masks

Are Face Masks Effective? The Evidence. 

Masks Don’t Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy 

New Scientific Research Shows Masks Don’t Work 

Guantanamo Torture: “surgical masks make breathing more difficult”

 

Is the mask attack back?

 

MASK OFF. CDC does not have Constitutional authority to create or enforce laws.

 

FACT CHECK: Are politicians practicing medicine without a license?