Posted on

Nebraska passes sound money bill

May 12, 2024 | Image source | Nebraska is the 12th state to end capital gains taxes on sales of gold and silver. LB 1317 also revised Nebraska’s definition of money stating, “Money does not include central bank digital currency.”

Bill sponsor Senator Hansen said, “I believe we have to be extra vigilant in our assessment and application of a Central bank digital currency to make sure they do not become a danger to our freedom. That’s why we defined in LB 1317 that CBDC’s are not classified as currency in Nebraska, which should help protect against unwarranted mandates for their use in the future.”

Kentucky, Utah, and Wisconsin have enacted similar sound money legislation this year. Anti CBDC measures have passed in Florida, Indiana, South Dakota, and Tennessee, as state lawmakers work to protect the public from increasing federal debt.

Gold and silver are the only forms of currency mentioned in our Constitution and with that comes the people’s ability to use it as such without penalty from the government. Saving, and using, gold and silver is our right and one of the only checks and balances to our federal government’s unending devaluation of our paper currency.

-Nebraska Senator Ben Hansen

 

At the federal level, U.S. Representative Alex Mooney of West Virginia reintroduced the Monetary Metals Tax Neutrality Act, which would remove federal income tax from silver and gold coins and bullion.

 


 

Nebraska Ends Income Taxes on Gold and Silver, Declares CBDC’s Are Not Lawful Money | Mises Institute

Link To Full Article HERE


 

Posted on

Involuntary Hospitalization Bill Introduced in DC

29 April 2024 |  In what seems reminiscent of NY Governor’s push for quarantine camps, DC Councilmembers have introduced measures which would allow for involuntary hospitalization.

Also known as involuntary commitment or civil commitment, involuntary hospitalization “is the legal process that mandates an individual to enter a hospital or psychiatric facility without their consent, temporarily, for mental health evaluation and treatment.”

Could mental health become weaponized to detain and drug individuals based on the assessment of an “expert?” Much wider public scrutiny of this legislation is warranted.

This legislation could open the door to massive abuse

Link To Document HERE

 

“The bill proposes broadening the pool of qualified healthcare professionals authorized to initiate involuntary commitment
processes, incorporating Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioners who are recognized for their expertise in mental health assessments.”

Many people are aware of efforts by the WHO  to mandate “health” protocols, and rightfully so.  Let’s continue  to monitor and challenge legislation in our nation, as policymakers at home have not been so faithful in protecting our Constitution and God-given rights.

A public hearing on B25-0692 is to be held in July.

 


 

Related

New Yorkers Uniting to Stop Governor’s Quarantine Camps

 


 

Posted on

Alabama HB408 Provides No Jurisdiction to UN, WHO, or WEF

April 11, 2024 |  Alabama HB408 |  Rather than “wait and see” what will happen with the WHO power grab for global governance, Alabama has introduced HB 408 which provides no jurisdiction to the UN, WHO, or WEF in Alabama. A similar Bill, LA SB 133,  passed in the Louisiana Senate.

Related: The WHO Accord: Global Governance is a Real Threat to American Sovereignty

Alabama HB408 states: “The World Health Organization, the United Nations, and the World Economic Forum shall have no jurisdiction or power within the State of Alabama. No rule, regulation, fee, tax, policy, or mandate of any kind of the World Health Organization, the United Nations, or the World Economic Forum shall be enforced or implemented by this state or any agency, department, board, commission, or political subdivision of this state, including any governmental entity of this state, any governmental entity of any county or municipality of this state, or any other political entity.”

 

If passed, the Act would become effective on October 1st, 2024, though it would seem to make more sense to bring into effect immediately.

 


 

Why is the U.S. Congress funding the United Nations and the WHO?

According to the Congressional Research Service report below, the United States is the single largest financial contributor to the United Nations. China is the second leading contributor followed by Japan.

 

U.S. Funding

“Congress generally appropriates U.N. system funding through the Department of State and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) accounts in annual Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs (SFOPS)…”

 

Related: Is USAID the New CIA?

Link To Full Document HERE

 

 


 

Related

Another Former Associate with Jeffrey Epstein Files to Run for U.S. President in 2024

 

Mr. Burns Goes to the White House

 

Link To The Vatican & The Jesuits

 

The Amazing Deception

When will policymakers and POTUS candidates denounce UN Agenda 21/2030?

Freedom or Agenda 21? 

 

Defund and Exit the United Nations

Is NATO with US or Against US?

Open Secrets

Dual citizens or freemasons in public offices?

 


 

Posted on

“Traveler Privacy Protection Act” Would Prohibit Use of Facial Recognition Scanners at Airports

January 30, 2024 | Image source | TSA has been expanding the use of facial recognition scanners at U.S. airports for a “biometrically-enabled curb-to-gate passenger experience.”  CAT-2 scanners  take photos of travelers without permission and it’s not widely understood that people may opt out of screening. These systems are violating the freedom of Americans to travel freely, further reinforcing the architecture of a digital prison, constantly tracking and collecting personal data.

The “Traveler Privacy Protection Act of 2023,” S. 3361, was introduced with bipartisan support at the end of last year and would prohibit the use of facial recognition technology in airports.

Sponsoring Senator Jeff Merkley stated “The TSA program is a precursor to a full-blown national surveillance state. Nothing could be more damaging to our national values of privacy and freedom. No government should be trusted with this power.”

Contact Senators to urge them to co-Sponsor and help to pass S. 3361, The Traveler Privacy Protection Act HERE

 


 

Link To Source HERE

 


 

S. 3361 The Traveler Privacy Protection Act

 

 


TSA uses ‘minimum’ data to fine-tune its facial recognition, but some experts still worry 

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

Posted on

North Dakota Law Review Article on Weather Modification Governance

January 22, 2024 | Image sourceCongressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Modification|

Zero Geoengineering.com |

North Dakota Law Review 2020 article, “IT’S RAINING, IT’S POURING, WEATHER MODIFICATION REGULATION IS SNORING: A PROPOSAL TO FILL THE GAP IN WEATHER MODIFICATION GOVERNANCE,” addresses the current state of weather modification governance in the United States. 

Absent from the review is the necessary requirement for informed public consent to weather experimentation and further, mechanisms to prohibit the intentional manipulation of weather and climate systems, inclusive of penalties for violation of such prohibition.

The thesis is based upon outdated assumptions that weather modification, typically involving the intentional release of polluting emissions, has legitimate environmental benefit. Additionally, in order to “make rain” in one area means that precipitation must be stolen from neighboring areas.

This may explain why states with longstanding weather modification programs such as Texas, California, New Mexico, Colorado and surrounding states have significant problems with drought. According to the article, Flood or Drought: How Do Aerosols Affect Precipitation?, “the radiative effects of aerosols on clouds mostly act to suppress precipitation.”

 


 

“In sum, federal and state governance over weather modification has failed to fill the gap left by the common law…

…While the federal government provides no substantive guidance, only twenty-nine states have statutes or regulations that mention weather modification.200 Of those states, few govern weather modification in a meaningful way. Importantly, no state has a framework under which those injured by weather modification may be compensated.” -p.52.

 

Link To Full Document HERE

NORTH DAKOTA LAW REVIEW – IT’S RAINING, IT’S POURING, WEATHER MODIFICATION .PDF

 


 

 

Over 70 years of weather and climate modification without meaningful safety regulations and environmental protection has resulted in weather and climate extremes often mischaracterized as “climate change.”

Many states are beginning to take legislative action to fill the gaps in weather modification governance with regulatory prohibition to protect life and property.

The Clean Atmosphere Preservation Act

The Atmosphere Protection Act

The Weather Modification Act

 

 


 

 

Related

Governance of Geoengineering 

Governance of Weather Modification Activities of the US 

Feasibility of Space-Based Monitoring for Governance of Solar Radiation Management Activities

National Weather Modification Policies and Programs 

Weather Control Policy in U.S. States 

Enhancing the Weather: Governance of Weather Modification Activities in Australia 

 

1967 Weather Modification Hearings

1980 NASA: Changing the Climate With Aerosol Modification

 


 

 

To learn more about how to get involved in advocacy for legislation to prohibit weather engineering and other atmospheric / environmental hazards in your state or nation email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com 

Americans4ACleanAtmosphere

 

 


 

Posted on

DEFUND Act Introduced to Exit From the United Nations

December 12, 2023 | Link To “The DEFUND Act of 2023″  | House and Senate companion bills, H.R. 6645 and S. 3428, titled the Disengaging Entirely From the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act were introduced on December 6th.

According to the press release, the legislation would defund the United Nations and remove the United States from its membership. Additionally, the bill would repeal U.S. participation in the World Health Organization.

Sponsor Representative Roy said, “The UN doesn’t deserve one single dime of American taxpayer money or one bit of our support; we should defund it and leave immediately.” 

The DEFUND Act is critical to pass at this time because the UN is attempting to impose radical health and climate agendas that undermine American liberty, national security and prosperity.

Call your Representatives (H.R. 6645) and Senators (S. 3428) and urge them to cosponsor and support the Disengaging Entirely From the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act.

Contact information for Representatives and Senators HERE

 


 

Bills Introduced to Withdraw U.S. From UN – The New American

Excerpt from Article:

H.R. 6645 and S. 3428, which are identical, would fully withdraw the United States from the United Nations, restoring U.S. national sovereignty. Specifically, the bill would:

  • Repeal the United Nations Participation Act of 1945, which established U.S. membership in the UN.
  • Repeal the United Nations Headquarters Agreement Act, thus evicting the UN from its headquarters in New York City.
  • Prohibit any U.S. funding for the UN and its affiliated organizations.
  • Prohibit U.S. participation in UN peacekeeping operations.
  • Revoke diplomatic immunity for UN entities and employees.
  • Rescind U.S. membership in the World Health Organization (WHO).
  • End participation “in any conventions and agreements with the United Nations” and its affiliates.
  • Prohibit the U.S. president from unilaterally entering into agreements with the UN or its affiliates.

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

 

THE UNITED NATIONS exposed by G. Edward Griffin

Link To Video

 


 

 

Related

 

On the omission of the July 28, 1945 Senate ratification vote, from a draft Congressional repeal bill purporting to withdraw the US from the United Nations.

 

Defund and Exit the United Nations

REJECT UN Power Grab! USA OUT of the W.H.O. 

Sovereignty Coalition Press Conference: Get the US out of the W.H.O. 

Depopulation is a UN Agenda 

Defund and Exit the United Nations 

The Amazing Deception 

Exit and Defund the UN 

Get the US Out of the UN – The Public Demands It! 

Is your city following the UN Agenda instead of following The Constitution?

Unplugging the Control Grid 

EXIT The WHO 

The American Sovereignty Declaration

USA Must Reject Illegal Proposals and Exit the WHO 

EXIT and DEFUND the W.H.O.

 

Exit and Defund the UN

 


 

Posted on

REJECT the Amendments and Exit The WHO

November 27, 2023 | The United Nations (UN) and World Health Organization (WHO) are attempting a global power grab that threatens USA sovereignty and individual rights.

Take Action to #RejectTheAmendments HERE

Take Action to #ExitTheWHO HERE

Contact information for Representatives and Senators HERE

The World Health Organization (WHO) is one of the UN agencies that the U.S. is funding. According to the April 26, 2023, Congressional Research Report, “The United States is the single largest financial contributor to the United Nations (U.N.) system.” China is the second largest funder of the UN, and Japan is the third largest funder.

The US must immediately stop funding and EXIT the UN and the WHO.

 


 

U.N. Agenda 21/2030 Sustainable Development is the action plan being rolled out worldwide to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, all finance, and all human beings in the world.

2013 – Rosa Koire Sustainable Development – UN Agenda 21 Exposed 

 

 


 

Send Message to Congress to Trash Agenda 21 / 2030 HERE

Reject Agenda 2030  HERE

WHO Withdrawal Act (H.R. 79)

 


 

Contact Congressmembers Today to Demand USA Exit the WHO

 

Defund and Exit the United Nations

 

Why are leading POTUS candidates embracing United Nations WHO policies?

 


Image Source

Posted on

Legal Remedies for “Cloud-Seeding” Activities

November 21, 2023 | ZeroGeoEngineering.com |1960 Duke Law Journal article examines cases addressing the question of liability for “cloud-seeding”.

In the decision of Southwest Weather Research, Inc. v. Duncan, “The court’s holding that the plaintiffs have rights in the water in the clouds is based on the common-law doctrine of natural rights.8 The landowner is said to have the right to the reasonable use and enjoyment of his land in its natural condition, free from the interference of others.
The activities of the defendants, in depriving’ the plaintiffs of the natural amount of rainfall, violated one of their natural rights and gave them a right of action in equity.10”

The article discusses subsequent cases which established precedent that “landowners are entitled to legal protection from “cloud-seeding” which constitutes an unreasonable interference with their right to natural precipitation.”

 


 

Legal Remedies for “Cloud-Seeding” Activities: Nuisance or Trespass? (1960). Duke Law Journal, 1960(2), 305–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/1370980

 

Link to Full Article HERE

Legal Remedies for Cloud-Seeding Activities Nuisance or Trespass 1960

 


 

CIA Weather

 

Forest Fire As A Military Weapon

 

National Weather Modification Policies and Programs

 

Weather Control Policy in U.S. States

 


 

Related

CLOUD SEEDING – The technology of fraud and deceit

Legal Response to Environmental Concerns about Weather Modification

The Governing of the Air: A Case Study in the Chinese Experience

Enhancing the weather: governance of weather modification activities in Australia

Governance of Weather Modification Activities of the United States

Europe – Solar Radiation Modification: Governance of Research

 


 

To learn more about advocating for legislation to prohibit weather modification, cloud seeding, and other atmospheric/environmental hazards email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com.

 

 


 

Posted on

Tenth Amendment Remedies

November 19, 2023 | Image source | Where federal programs have become oppressive or destructive, State’s rights and authorities are correctly exerted pursuant to the Tenth Amendment: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.”

During the CV19 event, the public witnessed elected representatives abandon and violate their oath to the Constitution and the People to instead adopt and coordinate United Nations/WHO-China policies.  See:  WHO-China Joint Mission on CV19 

Weaponized countermeasures against the flu (rebranded as CV19) such as: house arrest (lockdown) of law-abiding men, women, and children, forced ‘testing’, forced masking, school closures, church closures, small businesses closures, and experimental bioweapon injections were embraced and mandated by nearly every government ‘official’ in the world.

The damage to the American people and the destruction of the economy and small businesses is incalculable.

The Tenth Amendment provides a lawful remedy to nullify or repeal ‘public health emergency’ laws (and other matters of urgency) at state and local levels, in order to protect the rights of Americans and correct the course moving forward.

Related:  Exit and Defund the UN        Exit and Defund the WHO

 

Tennessee Model Nullification Bill

“Restoring State Sovereignty Through Nullification Act” Introduced in Tennessee 

Model Restoring State Sovereignty Through Nullification Act: Tennessee HB726

Nullification bill in Tennessee – Please read and subscribe to Karen Bracken 

TN Citizens for State Sovereignty – Tennessee Putting Teeth in the Tenth

Tennessee UN LawTennessee-2023-SB1147 | TN SB1147 


 

Paralegal and researcher Katherine Watt has provided extremely valuable resources outlining how ‘public health emergency’ laws were already in place to implement UN WHO China CV19 protocols: Legal History: American Domestic Bioterrorism Program.

Ms. Watt states, “A whole lot of things that once were federal and state crimes and civil rights violations have been legalized by Congress through legislative, statutory revisions to the United States Code, signed by US Presidents, and implemented at the administrative, regulatory level by the Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Defense through the Code of Federal Regulations.”

 

Using the Tenth Amendment to repeal and / or nullify ‘public health emergency’ laws

Opportunities for US state lawmakers to shield their populations from the next ‘public health emergency’-predicated federal assaults.

Link To Full Article HERE

PDF compilations of Bailiwick News posts are linked below, for readers who want to save the material offline and/or print.

The files compile two years of research and writing in support of this synopsis from a January 2023 abstract for an academic paper:

…Through gradual, covert statutory reclassification and program transfers, reinforced through Presidential Executive Orders and related executive branch declarations, and implemented through hundreds of regulatory amendments, the US Government’s Chemical and Biological Warfare Program originally housed in the Department of Defense (DOD), became the Public Health Emergency [PHE]-Emergency Use Authorization [EUA]-Medical Countermeasures program housed in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

The bioterrorism program is now jointly operated by DOD, HHS, Department of Homeland Security, Department of State, most other US federal agencies and their subordinate departments, divisions, offices, authorities, enterprises, committees, advisory boards and employees, in collaboration with the World Health Organization, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and other public, private and public-private hybrid institutions around the world…


PDF compilations and other materials are stored at Bailiwick News archives at WordPress.

 


 

For those working at the state and county level in the United States. 

Legislative acts to repeal the ‘public health emergency’ management laws at the state and county level — and thus break key links in the chain of legal authority enabling the killing programs — will include a ‘findings’ section, laying out the web of lies as spun by federal public health officials led by HHS Secretaries Alex Azar (2020-2021) and Xavier Becerra (2021-present):

The ‘findings’ sections will include summaries of

  • Federal government subordination to UN-WHO International Health Regulations on ‘public health emergencies;’ American implementing statutes, regulations and programs; and prohibitions on legislative and judicial oversight (1944-present)
  • Federal government execution of the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act lobbying campaign at the state level (2001-present), driving the ‘public health emergency’ fraud into state law in all 50 states and District of Columbia
  • State and county LEO and public health emergency indoctrination programs (federally-funded and directed)
  • Falsified case-fatality-rate data
  • Falsified diagnostic data program (PCR tests and “dashboards”)
  • Falsified safety and efficacy data for off-label use of existing medications
  • Federally-incentivized/directed hospital ICD-10 medical coding fraud
  • Federally-incentivized/directed hospital homicide/Remdesivir protocols
  • Federally-incentivized/directed cause-of-death and all-cause-mortality data fraud
  • Falsified clinical drug/device/biologics development/clinical trial procedures and records
  • Falsified FDA regulatory authorization/approval compliance procedures and records
  • Falsified FDA manufacturing compliance/contamination control procedures and records
  • Falsified CDC safety monitoring procedures and records (VAERS, V-safe)

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

Related

Top 10 US federal laws Congress should repeal to end worldwide vaccination, mutilation and killing programs — World Health Organization meetings and satellite “medical freedom” summits are a sideshow.

Tools for illuminating, defying and dismantling kill-box anti-laws: Latypova memo on legal status of EUA countermeasures.

“Federal laws can be nullified by state governments as unconstitutional. One method would be by governor’s letter to Biden and Congress, or even better, by a joint letter from the governors of 20+ states with an interest in upholding constitutional rule of law…”

Reconstitution Starter Pack

American Domestic Bioterrorism Program 

Opportunities for US state lawmakers to shield their populations from the next ‘public health emergency’-predicated federal assaults.

 

 


 

 

American Domestic Bioterrorism Program – by Katherine Watt 

Link To Video

Click here for the document describing the kill box:
https://bailiwicknewsarchives.files.wordpress.com/2023/01/kill-box-presentation-1.pdf

 


 

 

10th Amendment Victory: Louisiana affirms right to nullify unconstitutional acts of the federal government

 

“Restoring State Sovereignty Through Nullification Act” Introduced in Tennessee

 

North & South Dakota Legislators Plan to Nullify Biden’s Executive Orders at the State Level

 

 

Why are leading POTUS candidates embracing United Nations WHO policies?

 

 


 

Posted on

U.S. Senate Passes Amendment to Ban Federal Mask Mandates

November 1, 2023 | In a bipartisan vote of 59-38 Senators passed an amendment introduced by Ohio Senator JD Vance prohibiting the Department of Transportation from using federal funds to enforce mask mandates. The amendment is a positive step, though it falls FAR short of protecting Americans’ God-given freedom to breathe, as it’s in force only through FY 2024. Why the expiration date?

In any case, the ban prevents enforcement of federal mask mandates on public transportation including passenger airlines, commuter rail, and rapid transit buses.

In related news, as DC faces a crime explosion after defunding the police and mandating masks, Mayor Bowser has introduced legislation to ban criminals from wearing masks.

DC crime bill: Muriel Bowser introduces bill that includes ban on criminals wearing masks | Washington Examiner

Link To Full Article HERE

 

Observers have noticed the massive surge in crime resulting from forced masking, as the face covering allows criminals to easily conceal their identity and hide in plain sight.

 


 

Politicians and unelected agencies failed to uphold their obligation to protect and defend the Constitution and the People.

The decision to advocate for United Nations WHO – CDC – China policies caused incalculable physical, psychological and economic harm to millions of Americans that will take a long time to reconcile.

Policymakers and unelected bureaucrats who helped to orchestrate and demand compliance with CV19 countermeasures must be held accountable.

 


 

U.S. collaboration on CV in 2003:

Coronavirus Never Before Seen In Humans Is The Cause Of SARS; Unprecedented Collaboration Identifies New Pathogen In Record Time | ScienceDaily

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

DRAFT landscape of COVID-19 candidate vaccines 20 March 2020 | UN World Health Organization WHO

Link To Full Document HERE

 


 

VANCE STATEMENT ON PASSAGE OF AMENDMENT BANNING MASK MANDATES – Senator Vance (senate.gov)

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

Barrasso, Lummis Vote to Ban Federal Mask Mandates – News Releases – United States Senator John Barrasso (senate.gov)

Link To Full Article HERE 

 


 

Related

Art of War: US-China-CDC Partnership

 

Huntington Beach Bans C19 Vaxx and Mask Mandates

 

Mask Mandates Prohibited in Texas

 

Is the mask attack back?

 

 


 

Related

 

Mississippi Gov Says There Will Be No More Mask Mandates

Review of scientific reports of harms caused by face masks, up to February 2021

Face Masks Pose Serious Risks to the Healthy

Scientific Review Concludes mask Wearing Should not be Mandated

Cochrane Report Conclusion: No Evidence to Support Use of Masks

Are Face Masks Effective? The Evidence. 

Masks Don’t Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy 

New Scientific Research Shows Masks Don’t Work 

Guantanamo Torture: “surgical masks make breathing more difficult”

 

 


 

Image source