The globalization process of developing worldwide uniformity involves a totalitarian restructuring of the world via UN Agenda 21/2030 and the use of “SMART” devices and networks.
The Digital Prison including CBDC is built upon globalist communications systems marketed as “+4G-5G-6G+AI”. The gigantic “SMART” tracking and control system is designed to control all gas, electric, travel, water, food, weather, financial and information systems in the world.
In California, the Huntington Beach City Council passed a resolution to ban masking and vaxx mandates from being enforced in their city.
The resolution’s sponsor, Mayor Pro Tem Gracey Van Der Mark said of the decision, “The city’s policy banning mask and vaccine mandates is simply taking a stand against government overreach on measures that have already proven scientifically to have little benefit, but at the same time, it’s depriving individuals and businesses of their liberties.”
Passage of the resolution makes Huntington Beach a no mask, no vaxx mandate city.
“We just believe that the individual and businesses should have a right to make their own decisions.”
Pro-telecom bills HR 3557, HR 4141 and 50+ related bills are a lose-lose for everyone except for the wireless industry.
Attorney Jullian Gresser stated: “…We must remember that this wireless infrastructure is intended to facilitate invasions of privacy, and government and corporate surveillance, in violation at a practical level of numerous state laws protecting consumer privacy. It will authorize intrusion and eliminate protection of your own home, in violation of the fourth and ninth amendments. It will enable massive searches, and indeed assaults, of millions of people in their homes, without their owners’ informed consent. It will violate various state constitution environmental rights…”
Attorneys Andrew Campanelli, Scott McCollough, and Jullian Gresser discuss with Moderator Odette Wilkens HR 3557, HR 4141, and other pro-telecom bills as well as practical actions that people can take locally to oppose and counter these insidious bills.
Brief Summary of Presenter Comments
by Julian Gresser
The net result of HR 3557 and the collection of over 50+ related bills is to cripple the power of cities, counties, towns, villages, and even states to regulate anything to do with cell tower applications. If passed, states and local communities will have zero power to regulate in any way the placement of wireless facilities on public or private property.
In New York City, if someone files an application to install 12,000 small wireless facilities, how could anyone reasonably expect the permitting authority to make a decision in 90 days? There is no legitimate purpose for adopting something like this. It is just inherently insidious.
This bill and its related bills represent almost everything that telecoms could want.
The telecoms wrote it. You can tell just from looking at it. If you’ve looked at enough legislation, this is not something some staffer wrote. This is not something somebody in Congress was assigned to do. The lobbyists wrote this bill and found somebody to sponsor it. So let’s just make that clear, at the outset.
HR 3557 basically eliminates any existing restrictions in land use laws. Many local jurisdictions have laws that say, for example, in residential areas, you can have a commercial facility, which is what a wireless cell tower is. This bill says: amend your zoning law, or you must grant a variance. It will enable taking private property without adequate compensation. It overrides years of land use precedent and practice. It even implicitly overrules state government Sunshine laws, because no local jurisdiction can meet these deadlines, and still do what you have to do under the Open Meetings Act. There are significant Commerce Clause separation of powers questions: first, fourth, fifth, seventh, ninth, tenth, 11th, and 14th Constitutional amendment problems. Yes, Congress has broad powers, but I don’t think Congress can treat us — the public — in this way.
The blizzard of 50+ bills now before the U.S. Congress, beginning with HR 3557, taken together, will have the effect of fatally disempowering and stripping away Constitutional rights and prerogatives of local communities to protect and to secure their health, safety, environment, privacy and basic wellbeing. The combined effect will be to cripple local resilience and interdependence, which are critical conditions for states and local communities to meet a host of environmental, cybersecurity, and other challenges.
False Claims and Premises. The 50+ bills are based on a series of false claims and premises that are not rendered truthful by their being widely asserted, disseminated, and asseverated by the wireless telecom industry and members of Congress:
Wireless infrastructure is safe. It is well documented to be unsafe.
Wireless infrastructure is resilient. In fact, it is less resilient than one based on fiber.
Wireless infrastructure is energy efficient. In fact, it is shown to be vastly energy consumptive.
Wireless infrastructure is cybersecure. In fact, wireless is substantially less secure that optical fiber which facilitates identification of the point of attack, and resilient response.
Wireless infrastructure is climate change friendly. In fact, it is the very opposite.
Wireless infrastructure promotes Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI) especially in minority communities, when in fact these same communities are too economically challenged and lack legal representation to escape.
Wireless infrastructure will close the Digital Divide, when it caused it in the first place and will expand it.
Wireless is long-lived, whereas the wireless industry and supporting legislators know full well that wireless is short-lived and given to early obsolescence.
HR 3557 and its associated complementary bills represent a tyrannical attempt by the telecom-wireless industry to shift forever the reasonable and historic balance between the federal government, states, and local communities. Many of these bills offend the Constitution; some significantly abridge hard fought civil liberties; others intentionally and cynically promote and disseminate false claims, or are predicated on them. A few, building on the mayhem created by HR 3557, will jeopardize national security, especially by crippling resilience and interdependent emergency response at the state and local levels to cyberattacks.
At the very least members of Congress must conduct comprehensive risk assessment and due diligence on HR 3557 et al. before voting to approve them. It is political malpractice to fail to do so.
HR-3557 and HR-4141 are proposed federal telecommunications bills that would eliminate nearly all state and local control over Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (WTF) and would enable the construction of a Digital Prison for Americans.
“We must oppose this bill. This is the worst bill I have seen in my entire life with respect to telecommunications. You have to understand how bad this is…
THIS is the Digital Prison right here.
THIS is the bill you cannot let them pass!”
The title of the proposed bill pretty much says it all:
“To provide that certain communications projects are not subject to requirements to prepare certain environmental or historical preservation reviews, and for other purposes.”
“Provides that any form of weather modification shall not be allowed in the State, including the seeding of clouds by plane or ground. Defines “seeding” as a type of weather modification that aims to change the amount or type of precipitation that falls from clouds”.
July 15, 2023 | Zero5G.com |Protect local control over wireless infrastructure deployment. H.R. 3557 would streamline the installation of a digital prison system and must be defeated.
The American Broadband Deployment Act of 2023 (H.R. 3557) would impose new restrictions on the ability of local authorities to regulate and control numerous state and local land use and zoning issues related to the deployment of wireless communications infrastructure. These restrictions include wireless and wireline deployment, in addition to new limits on requirements such as environmental and historic preservation reviews.
July 5, 2023 | Image source | Wyoming Senate Bill 102 (SF102) went into effect July 1st, allowing more producers and sellers of homemade foods to reach Wyoming consumers. The new law adds eggs and dairy products to the list of foods that can be sold at farmer’s markets, as well as ranches, farms, producer’s homes, offices, or other third-party retail stores.
Known as the Food Freedom Act amendments, the law prohibits “a state standard for food and health inspection for homemade foods that is more stringent than any standard promulgated by the United State department of agriculture.”
SF102 is another victory for state’s rights and increases the ability for Wyoming residents to buy fresh, local food.
“Public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”-President Eisenhower, 1961
The White House has released a new report, “Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Management,” outlining the plan to deploy geoengineering programs, that are being framed as “research”.
The schemes involve the intentional release of chemical aerosols to block sunlight from reaching the Earth. The document acknowledges harmful potential consequences of deliberately contaminating the air, such as increased public exposure to particulate matter and toxic air pollution, psychological impacts, changes in the color of the sky, precipitation reduction, reduction of crop yields, and other “known unknowns.”
This report is an attempt seeking to legitimize geoengineering, a form of environmental warfare involvingdeliberate poisoning of the air and blocking the sunlight. The public does not consent to geoengineering.
Link To 2013 Video -Geoengineering-David-Keith: “This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision…”
Pennsylvania, Maryland, and West Virginia provide precedent from the 1960’s for prohibiting cloud seeding and weather modification. These kinds of policies could be reenacted at the state and national level today.
June 29, 2023 | The “End Endless Wars Act,”S. 1872 was introduced in the Senate on June 6th and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. The bill would repeal the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), which has been used to unconstitutionally engage the USA in over 20 wars. Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the U.S. Constitution grants the power to Congress, not a president to declare war.
“If there exists any desire to reclaim our Constitutional power and send a message to the world that we are nation of peace, Congress should pass this bill and repeal the 2001 Authorization for war. After all, the 2001 AUMF never intended to authorize worldwide war, all the time, everywhere, forever,” said S. 1872 sponsor Dr. Rand Paul.
Countless lives and trillions of dollars have been lost as a result of the 2001 AUMF.
Contact your U.S.RepresentativesandSenators, to urge their support for S. 1872, the “End Endless wars Act,” to end permanent U.S. intervention in foreign military conflicts.
The Alabama governor signed into law SB330, which was passed by the House and Senate: “Relating to Central Bank Digital Currency; to prohibit governmental agencies from using this type of currency as payment and from participating in testing the use of this currency by the Federal Reserve.”
Alabama’s SB330 places some roadblocks in front of federal efforts to implement a Central Bank Digital Currency, aka, financial enslavement of Americans.
In SB330, CBDC is defined as, “A digital currency, a digital medium of exchange, or a digital monetary unit of account issued by the United States Federal Reserve System or a federal agency which is made directly available to a consumer by such entities.”
In describing the threat of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC’s) and the installation of a digital prison, Catherine Austin Fitts explains, “unless we have a sovereign state government, protecting sovereign individuals who are free to transact, including transact privately, you know, without invasive technology, we will have no sovereignty and then you’re talking about 100% central control by the bankers…we’re talking about a technology that in combined with other systems, can turn your home, your car and your community into a digital concentration camp. We’re talking about the end of human freedom and centrally controlled, through the financial system. So we must have states and citizens and with them community banks and other financial institutions that have the ability to protect free transactions.” LINK