The globalization process of developing worldwide uniformity involves a totalitarian restructuring of the world via UN Agenda 21/2030 and the use of “SMART” devices and networks.
The Digital Prison including CBDC is built upon globalist communications systems marketed as “+4G-5G-6G+AI”. The gigantic “SMART” tracking and control system is designed to control all gas, electric, travel, water, food, weather, financial and information systems in the world.
In California, the Huntington Beach City Council passed a resolution to ban masking and vaxx mandates from being enforced in their city.
The resolution’s sponsor, Mayor Pro Tem Gracey Van Der Mark said of the decision, “The city’s policy banning mask and vaccine mandates is simply taking a stand against government overreach on measures that have already proven scientifically to have little benefit, but at the same time, it’s depriving individuals and businesses of their liberties.”
Passage of the resolution makes Huntington Beach a no mask, no vaxx mandate city.
“We just believe that the individual and businesses should have a right to make their own decisions.”
Pro-telecom bills HR 3557, HR 4141 and 50+ related bills are a lose-lose for everyone except for the wireless industry.
Attorney Jullian Gresser stated: “…We must remember that this wireless infrastructure is intended to facilitate invasions of privacy, and government and corporate surveillance, in violation at a practical level of numerous state laws protecting consumer privacy. It will authorize intrusion and eliminate protection of your own home, in violation of the fourth and ninth amendments. It will enable massive searches, and indeed assaults, of millions of people in their homes, without their owners’ informed consent. It will violate various state constitution environmental rights…”
Attorneys Andrew Campanelli, Scott McCollough, and Jullian Gresser discuss with Moderator Odette Wilkens HR 3557, HR 4141, and other pro-telecom bills as well as practical actions that people can take locally to oppose and counter these insidious bills.
Brief Summary of Presenter Comments
by Julian Gresser
Andrew Campanelli
The net result of HR 3557 and the collection of over 50+ related bills is to cripple the power of cities, counties, towns, villages, and even states to regulate anything to do with cell tower applications. If passed, states and local communities will have zero power to regulate in any way the placement of wireless facilities on public or private property.
In New York City, if someone files an application to install 12,000 small wireless facilities, how could anyone reasonably expect the permitting authority to make a decision in 90 days? There is no legitimate purpose for adopting something like this. It is just inherently insidious.
Scott McCollough
This bill and its related bills represent almost everything that telecoms could want.
The telecoms wrote it. You can tell just from looking at it. If you’ve looked at enough legislation, this is not something some staffer wrote. This is not something somebody in Congress was assigned to do. The lobbyists wrote this bill and found somebody to sponsor it. So let’s just make that clear, at the outset.
HR 3557 basically eliminates any existing restrictions in land use laws. Many local jurisdictions have laws that say, for example, in residential areas, you can have a commercial facility, which is what a wireless cell tower is. This bill says: amend your zoning law, or you must grant a variance. It will enable taking private property without adequate compensation. It overrides years of land use precedent and practice. It even implicitly overrules state government Sunshine laws, because no local jurisdiction can meet these deadlines, and still do what you have to do under the Open Meetings Act. There are significant Commerce Clause separation of powers questions: first, fourth, fifth, seventh, ninth, tenth, 11th, and 14th Constitutional amendment problems. Yes, Congress has broad powers, but I don’t think Congress can treat us — the public — in this way.
Julian Gresser
The blizzard of 50+ bills now before the U.S. Congress, beginning with HR 3557, taken together, will have the effect of fatally disempowering and stripping away Constitutional rights and prerogatives of local communities to protect and to secure their health, safety, environment, privacy and basic wellbeing. The combined effect will be to cripple local resilience and interdependence, which are critical conditions for states and local communities to meet a host of environmental, cybersecurity, and other challenges.
False Claims and Premises. The 50+ bills are based on a series of false claims and premises that are not rendered truthful by their being widely asserted, disseminated, and asseverated by the wireless telecom industry and members of Congress:
Wireless infrastructure is safe. It is well documented to be unsafe.
Wireless infrastructure is resilient. In fact, it is less resilient than one based on fiber.
Wireless infrastructure is energy efficient. In fact, it is shown to be vastly energy consumptive.
Wireless infrastructure is cybersecure. In fact, wireless is substantially less secure that optical fiber which facilitates identification of the point of attack, and resilient response.
Wireless infrastructure is climate change friendly. In fact, it is the very opposite.
Wireless infrastructure promotes Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI) especially in minority communities, when in fact these same communities are too economically challenged and lack legal representation to escape.
Wireless infrastructure will close the Digital Divide, when it caused it in the first place and will expand it.
Wireless is long-lived, whereas the wireless industry and supporting legislators know full well that wireless is short-lived and given to early obsolescence.
HR 3557 and its associated complementary bills represent a tyrannical attempt by the telecom-wireless industry to shift forever the reasonable and historic balance between the federal government, states, and local communities. Many of these bills offend the Constitution; some significantly abridge hard fought civil liberties; others intentionally and cynically promote and disseminate false claims, or are predicated on them. A few, building on the mayhem created by HR 3557, will jeopardize national security, especially by crippling resilience and interdependent emergency response at the state and local levels to cyberattacks.
At the very least members of Congress must conduct comprehensive risk assessment and due diligence on HR 3557 et al. before voting to approve them. It is political malpractice to fail to do so.
The Congressional representatives listed below have co-sponsored H.R.3557.
Contact their offices, ask them to take a closer look at the proposed bill and encourage them to change their minds, and remove their name as co-sponsors.
Click on the links below to access their websites.
HR-3557 and HR-4141 are proposed federal telecommunications bills that would eliminate nearly all state and local control over Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (WTF) and would enable the construction of a Digital Prison for Americans.
H.R. 3557:
“We must oppose this bill. This is the worst bill I have seen in my entire life with respect to telecommunications. You have to understand how bad this is…
THIS is the Digital Prison right here.
THIS is the bill you cannot let them pass!”
-Paul G.
H.R. 4141:
The title of the proposed bill pretty much says it all:
“To provide that certain communications projects are not subject to requirements to prepare certain environmental or historical preservation reviews, and for other purposes.”
On May 24, 2023, the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee marked up and voted through HR-3557, either to the next committee or to the House floor; a decision to be made by House leaderships
On July 26, 2023, the U.S. House Natural Resources Committee Marked Up and Voted through Committee HR-4141, either to the next committee or to the House floor; a decision to be made by House leaderships
HR-3557 and HR-4141 are heavy-handed bills with unacceptable federal overreach into local land use, permitting, and franchise negotiations. Congress must respect the local zoning and permitting for wired broadband and wireless telecommunications infrastructure, as intended in prior Congressional Acts, to ensure that such infrastructures are only deployed as and where needed to serve the public interest and protect valuable public resources including safety, health and property.
If H.R. 3557 passes, it could result in a truly unrestricted proliferation of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (WTFs) of any size in residential zones, near schools, parks, playgrounds, and sensitive care facilities without any local or community input.
Local governments have always been the stewards of these finite public resources and must remain so.
We need to stop HR-3557 and HR-4141.
REGISTER NOW to attend this 2-hour Zoom Meeting on Wednesday, August 16, 2023
“ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS.—No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the operation, placement, construction, or modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions…
Proposed House bills H.R. 3557 and HR-4141 are companion bills that, if signed into law, would establish an unnecessary and massive federal power grab designed to strip away nearly all state and local control in the permitting and review of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (WTFs).
The bills would eliminate the cooperative federalism and local control principles that were upheld by the US Supreme Court in its 2005 Ruling in Abrams vs Palos Verdes. The bills would also violate the very purposes of the Act they aim to amend: the 1934 Communications Act, as amended in 1996 and 2012: promoting safety of life and property.
In H.R. 3557 , the wireless industry is proposing new expansive definitions of “Antenna“, “Communications Service” , “Personal Wireless Service“, and “Effective Prohibition” of Personal Wireless Service. The bill also attempts to establish unreasonable terms for WTF review and attempts to pre-empt local zoning authority with language like this:
“including with respect to an area that has not previously been zoned for personal wireless service facilities”
Agenda 2030’s Sustainable Development Goals are deceptive goals designed to eliminate Americans’ God-given inalienable rights, freedoms and liberties. Don’t be confused by any “pleasant sounding” language in these UN Globalist goals; Agenda 2030 is the inventory and control plan that would create a digital prison in your community.
The Agenda 2030 plan requires HR-3557 and HR-4141 to construct a 24/7 wireless surveillance system created by hazardous 24/7 RF-Microwave radiation antennas placed far too close to homes (closer than 2500 feet) at far too high radio signal strengths (more than -85 dBm in areas accessible to people)
Agenda 2030 would enable the unlimited taking of personal property/wealth to enrich governments and Globlalist-sponsored public-private partnerships via Digital-ID, Digital Currency and Tracing/Tracking/Control of individuals’ movements and financial transactions.
Yes, it is that bad. We cannot allow this Digital Prison to be built in our communities. Instead, Americans can stand together to eliminate HR-3557’s and HR-4141 in order to preserve:
Americans’ God-given inalienable rights, freedoms and liberties
Local control over the construction of last-mile telecommunications and broadband infrastructure,
States’, counties’ and localities’ rights to decide for themselves the best mix of wired broadband (fiber optic, coaxial and copper lines) and wireless infrastructure.
We must oppose and not comply with any plans or actions that would enable federal, state and local governments to build such a 24/7 wireless surveillance infrastructure in our communities. The vast majority of internet access can and should be provided by fiber optic cables directly to homes and businesses to protect Americans from the public safety, privacy and property value hazards created by a 24/7 wireless surveillance infrastructure grid in residential zones. Wireless Telecommunications Facilities constructed in the public rights-of-ways in residential zones are simply not necessary for broadband.
Also, if we have learned anything over the last three years, NO so-called “pandemic”, “climate emergency” or “fear story du jour” justifies the elimination of Americans’ God-given inalienable rights, freedoms and liberties. We cannot be fooled again.
Americans must stand together to fully oppose HR-3557’s and HR-4141’s attempt to build an “Agenda 2030” Digital Prison.
-Paul G.
Proposed bill H.R. 3557 aims to speed up the deployment of wireless and other communications facilities through a massive federal power grab that strips away state and local control in the permitting and regulatory review processes – the very mechanisms designed to protect citizens from the threats posed by wireless facilities.
In May of 2023, the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee passed H.R. 3557 – which completely eliminates the ability of Americans to use State and local governmental authorities to modify placement of wireless antenna facilities based on the safety of life and property, and on aesthetic and historic values.
This is a very heavy-handed example of federal overreach into local land use, permitting, and franchise negotiation decisions. Local people deserve the opportunity to decide whether public investment in, and/or ownership of, broadband infrastructure is the right choice for their communities. Congress must respect the fact that these processes are best managed at the level of government that is closest and most responsive to the people.
Local zoning and permitting for wired and wireless communications build outs, are intended, per prior Congressional Acts, to ensure that such infrastructures are only deployed as and where needed to serve the public interest and protect valuable public resources including safety, health and property.
If H.R. 3557 passes, it could result in a truly unrestricted proliferation of cell towers and small cell installations near schools, playgrounds, and homes without any local or community input.
Override state and local government police powers and property rights and would preempt local authority to manage public rights-of-way and land use for telecommunications infrastructure. This represents a substantial federal overreach into the oversight of the placement of wireless facilities on public rights of way, which is a fundamentally local process and must remain so.
Empower providers to install facilities where they choose regardless of local zoning, thus eliminating the ability of local governments to impose reasonable standards.
Weaken the authority of local governments to regulate the use of our public rights-of-way, and diminishes their authority to locally determine appropriate compensation for such use.
Mandate that all wireless siting decisions be “deemed granted” if not denied by a local government within much shorter periods than the federal government for similar projects. The federal government has 270 days to act, while locals must act as fast as 60 days. It is not appropriate for Congress to apply stricter timelines and restrictions on local governments for these processes than it does on federal agencies.
Mandate that sites be constructed “without any further action by the government,” without notice to the local government, or obligation to comply with safety laws. This would provide no public safety protections for construction of facilities that had been “deemed granted.”
Impose artificially short timelines that are virtually impossible to meet, create technical grounds for defeating incompleteness notices and require local governments to draft, publish, and deliver a written denial decision with reasons to an applicant on the same day that the local governing body hears and votes on the application — a virtually impossible task because such written decisions typically require the examination and analysis of evidence presented to local council.
Require that “all proceedings required by a State or local government or instrumentality thereof for the approval of the request” be taken within the timeline.
Limit the fees that local governments could require which, unlike the current FCC rules, the local government must justify based on a complex rate-making formula.
Substitute the FCC for the local federal district court as the reviewing body for challenges to local government decisions regarding wireless facility applications, thus breaking the promise made by Congress in 1996 that local governments would not be required to travel to Washington to defend local decisions.
Impose new and similarly flawed timelines and “deemed granted” remedies on applications for wireline telecommunications facilities
Undermine the property rights of local governments and damage their ability to protect and preserve the safety, well-being, and aesthetics of their communities. Congress has historically recognized these rights in Sections 224, 253 and 332 of the Telecommunications Act.
Make virtually any local government decision not to allow the installation of a proposed wireless facility at a provider’s request a “prohibition” preempted by federal law.
Eliminate cable franchise renewals, thereby restricting the ability of state or local franchising authorities to enforce franchise obligations such as public, educational, and government channel capacity and facilities, customer service requirements, and system build-out requirements.
Grant cable operators the right to use local rights-of-way to provide non-cable services while prohibiting localities from imposing any fees on non-cable services for use of those rights-of-way.
Pre-empt local governments’ rights-of-way compensation and management authority, zoning powers, cable franchising authority, and property rights.
Impose costs on local governments, burdens on our taxpayers, interfere with public safety and otherwise remove local protections that are the heart of communities while offering no improvement in broadband service.
Create unfunded mandates on local governments and inhibit their ability to be directly responsive to residents and good stewards of public resources.
Bestow on broadband providers an unprecedented federal grant of access to state and local public property, but impose no obligations on those providers to serve “unserved” and “underserved” Americans.
The National Health Federation:
Americans are waking up to the assault of constant 24/7 exposure to radio frequency radiation (RFR) from wireless technology installed and being installed in our homes, cars, streets, local businesses, schools, and communities without our informed consent. While many property owners would prefer to restrict wireless facility expansion in residential neighborhoods, past and current legislation has made that extremely difficult for localities.
In Biden’s 2021 infrastructure bill (Public Law No: 117-58), Big Telecom received $65 billion towards the proliferation of unsafe and untested 5G (and beyond) technology without a single mention of safety precautions or even any monitoring of the increase in radiation levels within communities.[1]
Over 90% of surveyed Americans don’t want wireless technology near their homes.[3]
In 2018, the National Institutes of Health’s National Toxicology Program (NTP) found wireless causes cancer and alters DNA.[4]
When the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended long-term safety studies of the Electromagnetic Frequency (EMF) environmental pollutant, Congress – tragically – defunded that effort.[5]
More recently in 2021, the D.C. Court of Appeals challenged the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for lying about their wireless safety guidelines that were found not to be science-based.[6]
Instead of sitting idly by as America is saturated in wireless deployment, Congress needs to hold hearings on Big Telecom’s concealment of wireless health and safety dangers, and pass NHF-recommended legislation to initiate the monitoring of wireless radiation that will trigger mitigation measures when permissible RFR exposure levels are exceeded.[10]
Americans want affordable and safe wired connectivity in their communities, and Congress urgently needs to hold hearings about why we’re getting unsafe and untested wireless instead.
The organizations listed below have co-signed the following letter to Congress. Contact them and ask them how you can help support their opposition to H.R. 3557.
The National League of Cities (NLC) is the voice of America’s cities, towns and villages, representing more than 200 million people. NLC works to strengthen local leadership, influence federal policy and drive innovative solutions. Contact: Angelina Panettieri, Legislative Director for Information Technology and Communications, at 202-626-3196 or panettieri@nlc.org
The National Association of Counties (NACo) provides essential services to the nation’s 3,069 counties, serving nearly 40,000 county elected officials and 3.6 million county employees. Since 1935, NACo unites county officials to advocate county priorities in federal policymaking and optimize county and taxpayer resources and cost savings while promoting exemplary county policies and practices. Contact: Seamus Dowdall, Assoc. Legislative Director, Telecommunications & Technology at 202-942-4212 or sdowdall@naco.org
The United States Conference of Mayors (USCM) is the official nonpartisan organization of cities with populations of 30,000 or more. There are 1,400 such cities in the country today. Each city is represented in the Conference by its chief elected official, the mayor. The Conference’s Task Forces examine and act on issues that demand special attention such as civic innovation, exports, hunger and homelessness, and brownfields, transportation and technology. Contact: David W. Burns, Assistant Executive Director, at 202-861-6765 or dburns@usmayors.org
The National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors’ (NATOA) 400 members are local government staff and their advisors offering a wealth of experience and expertise on public rights-of-way management telecom work and communications issues on behalf of local government related to broadband, wireless, cable television, public, educational, and government (PEG) access, public safety communications, consumer protection and PROW management. Contact: Mike Lynch, Legislative Affairs Director, 703-519-8035, x202 or MLynch@NATOA.org
Link to opposition letter — Georgia Municipal Association
The Congressional representatives listed below have co-sponsored H.R.3557.
Contact their offices, ask them to take a closer look at the proposed bill and encourage them to change their minds, and remove their name as co-sponsors.
Click on the links below to access their websites.
Below is a wagon-load – 11,000 pages – of scientific evidence documenting harm from RadioFrequency / Microwave (RF/MW) Radiation:
The U.S. Courts of Appeals (DC Cir.) accepted and based its Aug 13, 2021 ruling on 27 volumes of scientific evidence concluding multiple significant biological damages caused by pulsed, modulated RF electromagnetic radiation exposure at power levels that are millions of times lower than the RF electromagnetic radiation exposure guidelines recommended by NCRP Report No. 86. The judges considered the 11,000+ pages of peer-reviewed, scientific evidence (see links listed, below) in their ruling in Case 20-1025, Environmental Health Trust, et al. v FCC and a issued a mandate to the FCC: Vol-1, Vol-2, Vol-3, Vol-4, Vol-5, Vol-6, Vol-7Vol-8, Vol-9, Vol-10, Vol-11, Vol-12, Vol-13, Vol-14, Vol-15, Vol-16, Vol-17, Vol-18, Vol-19, Vol-20, Vol-21, Vol-22, Vol-23, Vol-24, Vol-25, Vol-26 and Vol-27.
“Provides that any form of weather modification shall not be allowed in the State, including the seeding of clouds by plane or ground. Defines “seeding” as a type of weather modification that aims to change the amount or type of precipitation that falls from clouds”.
July 15, 2023 | Zero5G.com |Protect local control over wireless infrastructure deployment. H.R. 3557 would streamline the installation of a digital prison system and must be defeated.
The American Broadband Deployment Act of 2023 (H.R. 3557) would impose new restrictions on the ability of local authorities to regulate and control numerous state and local land use and zoning issues related to the deployment of wireless communications infrastructure. These restrictions include wireless and wireline deployment, in addition to new limits on requirements such as environmental and historic preservation reviews.
July 5, 2023 | Image source | Wyoming Senate Bill 102 (SF102) went into effect July 1st, allowing more producers and sellers of homemade foods to reach Wyoming consumers. The new law adds eggs and dairy products to the list of foods that can be sold at farmer’s markets, as well as ranches, farms, producer’s homes, offices, or other third-party retail stores.
Known as the Food Freedom Act amendments, the law prohibits “a state standard for food and health inspection for homemade foods that is more stringent than any standard promulgated by the United State department of agriculture.”
SF102 is another victory for state’s rights and increases the ability for Wyoming residents to buy fresh, local food.
“Public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”-President Eisenhower, 1961
The White House has released a new report, “Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Management,” outlining the plan to deploy geoengineering programs, that are being framed as “research”.
The schemes involve the intentional release of chemical aerosols to block sunlight from reaching the Earth. The document acknowledges harmful potential consequences of deliberately contaminating the air, such as increased public exposure to particulate matter and toxic air pollution, psychological impacts, changes in the color of the sky, precipitation reduction, reduction of crop yields, and other “known unknowns.”
This report is an attempt seeking to legitimize geoengineering, a form of environmental warfare involvingdeliberate poisoning of the air and blocking the sunlight. The public does not consent to geoengineering.
Link To 2013 Video -Geoengineering-David-Keith: “This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision…”
Pennsylvania, Maryland, and West Virginia provide precedent from the 1960’s for prohibiting cloud seeding and weather modification. These kinds of policies could be reenacted at the state and national level today.
June 29, 2023 | The “End Endless Wars Act,”S. 1872 was introduced in the Senate on June 6th and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. The bill would repeal the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), which has been used to unconstitutionally engage the USA in over 20 wars. Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the U.S. Constitution grants the power to Congress, not a president to declare war.
“If there exists any desire to reclaim our Constitutional power and send a message to the world that we are nation of peace, Congress should pass this bill and repeal the 2001 Authorization for war. After all, the 2001 AUMF never intended to authorize worldwide war, all the time, everywhere, forever,” said S. 1872 sponsor Dr. Rand Paul.
Countless lives and trillions of dollars have been lost as a result of the 2001 AUMF.
Contact your U.S.RepresentativesandSenators, to urge their support for S. 1872, the “End Endless wars Act,” to end permanent U.S. intervention in foreign military conflicts.
The Alabama governor signed into law SB330, which was passed by the House and Senate: “Relating to Central Bank Digital Currency; to prohibit governmental agencies from using this type of currency as payment and from participating in testing the use of this currency by the Federal Reserve.”
Alabama’s SB330 places some roadblocks in front of federal efforts to implement a Central Bank Digital Currency, aka, financial enslavement of Americans.
In SB330, CBDC is defined as, “A digital currency, a digital medium of exchange, or a digital monetary unit of account issued by the United States Federal Reserve System or a federal agency which is made directly available to a consumer by such entities.”
Indiana and Florida have also enacted laws banning the use of CBDC’s as money in their states.
In describing the threat of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC’s) and the installation of a digital prison, Catherine Austin Fitts explains, “unless we have a sovereign state government, protecting sovereign individuals who are free to transact, including transact privately, you know, without invasive technology, we will have no sovereignty and then you’re talking about 100% central control by the bankers…we’re talking about a technology that in combined with other systems, can turn your home, your car and your community into a digital concentration camp. We’re talking about the end of human freedom and centrally controlled, through the financial system. So we must have states and citizens and with them community banks and other financial institutions that have the ability to protect free transactions.” LINK
