Posted on

VORTEX Tornadoes and other Federal Weather Experiments

May 4, 2024 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | How’s the weather? | Image Source: H.R. 6093, the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Reauthorization Act | As nearly a dozen States have started taking legislative action to prohibit weather manipulation, the federal government and other U.S. states are continuing decades of weather experiments. Colorado HB 1435 provides millions of dollars for weather modification programs. 29 states and Washington, D.C. have policies which allow for weather modification experimentation.

It is notable that western states that have long standing artificial “weather” experimentation programs have experienced the worst drought, flooding, and catastrophic fires. 

 

Keep in mind that in 1961 JFK promoted United Nations world government, weather control (geoengineering), and the use of satellites, which function now as overarching architecture of a globalist digital prison (AI/5G). Weather engineering systems, branded as “weather research” utilize networks of interoperable ground-based, airborne, and space-based facilities.   

System for facilitating cloud formation and cloud precipitation 

 

 

 

The use of weather as a weapon of war has long been discussed in military and academic literature. The 1975 DARPA report entitled “Soviet Developments in Weather Modification, Climate Modification, and Climatology,” includes a section about the threat of covert environmental warfare:  

“…the particular danger of environmental warfare lies in the possibility that the aggressor nation may be secretly, over the course of many years, employing any of a whole arsenal of hostile geophysical techniques against another nation which would be unaware of the origin of the “natural” disasters afflicting her and thus incapable of initiating any counteraction.”   p.92                                      

How to “Build Back Better?” First, destruction.

 

Link To video HERE

 

Lack of public consent, oversight, and accountability for potential damage and harm.

 

H.R. 6093, the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Reauthorization Act

Source

The “Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment (VORTEX)” has a budget appropriations of $20,000,000 in H.R. 6093.  Other areas of focus for federal experimental weather schemes include appropriations for atmospheric research, water management, hurricane, tsunami, flooding, and storms. Satellites and data collection are an integral part of weather management, compartmentalized under NESDIS. Partnerships and data transfers are also mentioned without providing specific entities.   

 

H.R. 6093 is the reauthorization of The Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Act of 2017, H.R. 353, enacted by the Trump administration to improve coordination of the U.S. weather enterprise.

H.R.353 – Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Act of 2017

STRATEGIC PLAN FOR FEDERAL WEATHER ENTERPRISE

 

H.R. 6093, the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Reauthorization Act is rooted upon H.R. 2130, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Authorization Act of 1992, authorizing “appropriations to the Secretary of Commerce for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for: (1) National Weather Service operations and research; (2) certain public warning and weather forecast systems and programs; (3) climate and air quality research, including climate and global changes; (4) atmospheric research; and (5) satellite observing systems.”

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, H.R. 6093 was passed in the House, then referred to the Senate, read twice and referred to the: Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

H.R. 6093 Summary : “To improve the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s weather research, support improvements in weather forecasting and prediction, expand commercial opportunities for the provision of weather data, and for other purposes.”

Link To Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Reauthorization Act of 2023

The Interagency Council for Advancing Meteorological Services listed in H.R. 6093 is also mentioned with regard to SRM coordination in the Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Modification.

Why was ICAMS created?

“In April of 2017, the President signed into law the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Act (Public Law No. 115-25, Title IV, sec. 402, 15 U.S.C. § 8542 – link takes you to a non-icams-portal.gov website). The Act required the Director of The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) to establish an Interagency Committee for Advancing Weather Services – ICAMS meets this requirement. As indicated in the Act, ICAMS will serve “to improve coordination of relevant weather research and forecast innovation activities across the Federal Government.””  Link to ICAMS HERE

Readers may notice the lack of funding or coordination for “geoengineering” programs.

Sophisticated branding such as “weather research” allows a never-ending revenue stream to continue flowing for atmospheric experiments or “other purposes,” avoiding public opposition to weather control and legislative measures to prohibit environmental manipulation at  State and National levels.

Find contact info to call Committee Senators HERE and urge Members to OPPOSE the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Reauthorization Act of 2023.

 

Related:  FAA Reauthorization of 2024  /  H. R. 3935

 


 

More Context 

WEATHER WARFARE: HURRICANE AND TORNADO CONTROL DEVICE

 

The Need For A Climate Control Study Program    CIA 1960 Report:

Technological developments of the past two decades have provided the understanding, the techniques, and the means necessary for an assault on the problems of climate control. Control of any kind requires capabilities in all these areas. Meteorology is just now beginning to acquire such capabilities.” LINK

The Need For A Climate Control Study Program – November 1960 – CIA

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

5Z 2005 OSTP Letter RE: S. 517 Rebranding Weather Modification

First Comprehensive Weather Policy Update Since 1992 Now Law / H.R. 353

The Federal Weather Enterprise: Fiscal Year 2021 Budget and Coordination Report

Meteorology, Climate Control, and Rebranding The Federal Weather Enterprise

FY 2024 Congressional Record – NOAA Appropriations

S.3888 Artificial Intelligence, Surveillance, & Weather

California Blizzard, Texas Wildfires, & the UN Climate Agenda

NATO’s Unexpected Role in Shaping Air Quality Policies

Freedom or Agenda 21? 

 


 

For information on advocacy for legislation to prohibit environmental manipulation, and other atmospheric pollution hazards in your state or nation email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

Send a message to your State legislators HERE

Americans4ACleanAtmosphere

 


 

Posted on

Researchers Study Link Between RF Radiation Exposure and CV19

March 26, 2024 | Image source | An interesting  2021 study explores links between Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) exposure, CV19 and other diseases.

“Effect of Coronavirus Worldwide through Misusing of Wireless Sensor Networks,” was published in the American Journal of Bioinformatics Research. Authors studied impacts of exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless devices, networks and sensors concluding, “Corona is a sensory technical virus to spread as a non-communicable disease in animals and human beings. This virus is not biological, it is spread by technological programming and remote sensing.”

The abstract states: “…The study aims to evaluate the maltreating of wireless sensor networks that affect individuals within the body boundary area. Wireless sensor data were collected from individual’s profile, diagnosis and sensor node records at laboratory experiments. The study shows the effect of processed sensor nodes among individual’s body organs to compare with the existing environments. The study illustrates all individuals suffer from sensor disease due to reflecting of wavered sensors at open eyes sights with high speed electromagnetic-radio tracking systems…”

Link To Source HERE

 

 

There have been other studies linking virus activation and CV19 with increased exposure to RFR:

Evidence for a connection between coronavirus disease-19 and exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless communications including 5G

Microwave Emissions and the Problem of Modern Viral Diseases

 

The inducing and triggering of diseases by means of increasing RFR exposure warrants consideration.

How electromagnetic weapons induce disease and mentally disable entire populations

 

RFR has crept up on humanity. If we follow the marketing for new devices and services there’s no mention of the harms of RFR exposure. If we follow military weapons research and development, it’s clear that RFR is a weapon.

 

1975 DARPA report, “Soviet Developments in Weather Modification, Climate Modification, and Climatology:”  Potential geophysical warfare techniques: “the creation of ‘windows” in the atmospheric ozone layer; the hostile deployment of ultra- and infra-acoustic fields; the manipulation of atmospheric electricity to depress the mental activity of large groups of people…”

Source   

 

The installation of a sophisticated surveillance system built with RFR-transmitting infrastructure inclusive of satellite networks and interoperable ground based instruments that are continuously polluting the environment with RFR has been termed the “digital prison.”

 

Amazon’s Satellites Strengthen Digital Prison

 

Source

These systems such as “5G”, “6G”, FutureG and interactive components comprise the internet of everything, the internet of bodies, as well as the foundation of global weather engineering and weather monitoring networks built inside of an overarching globalist designed Artificial Intelligence.

 

Nanobots, Construction process of Microchips in C19 injectables, new insights on Shedding

The Whole Truth About Covid-19 Vaccines — Professor Jean-Bernard Fourtillan

Artificial Intelligence, ‘SMART DUST,’ and the IoT Challenge

Is the purpose of AI to enslave humans?

 

State and local safety regulations are a cure for the plague of RFR pollution assaulting our civilization.

 

How do we know for sure that RFR is pollution?   AT&T and Verizon offer us the definition:

 

 

Alphabet agencies that are in partnership with the United Nations such as the FCC are not capable of proper regulatory oversight.

 

Source

The EPA has known for decades about the hazards of RFR exposure and failed to protect the public.

1978 EPA Report: Efforts to Protect the Public from Radiation

 

The federal government in partnership with the UN is not capable of reigning in the problem because the federal government is funding these activities.

 

Source     p.179

 

Source  p.180

 

White House Report: Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Modification (SRM)

 

Congress moving forward on classified 6G wireless

 

 

Many states have introduced legislation to tackle RFR and SRM pollution, pursuant to the Tenth Amendment.

 

To learn more and get involved visit Americans4aCleanAtmosphere

 

 


 

Related

Microwave Radiation Is A Bigger Problem Than Tiktok

1981: Pandemic Genocide Predicted by Globalist Banker

Fast Tracking the Quiet War: White House Update

Microwave Weapons

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

NATO’s Unexpected Role in Shaping Air Quality Policies

Freedom or Agenda 21? 

 

 


 

Posted on

How Much Pollution Will NASA’s Artemis Rocket Release ?

November 15, 2023 | Image credit: NASA | As a result of Operation Paperclip, Dr. Wernher von Braun and more than 100 NAZI scientists were brought to the United States to lead the NASA space program.  For decades NASA has had a huge budget, though there is a lack of meaningful oversight over their activities.

For example, in the hype around NASA’s Artemis Missions, very little discussion happens regarding how much air pollution is released by rockets.

With the non-stop marketing of zero “emissions,” somehow the biggest polluters of all, rockets, aviation, and wireless infrastructure are exempt from meaningful regulatory standards to prevent hazardous pollution and protect health and safety.

 

How Much Do Rockets Pollute? Are They Bad For Our Air?

Link To Video HERE

Rocket exhaust emissions include:

H20 (big white cloud from the water-cooling system at the launch pad)
CO2
CARBON SOOT
CARBON MONOXIDE
CHLORINE
OXIDES OF  NITROGEN NITROGEN  NITROGEN
ALUMINIA
SULFURIC COMPOUNDS
AND
many other TRACE GASES claimed to be “insignificant”.
Types of rocket fuel
RP-1 often mixed with liquid Oxygen- highly refined jet fuel – or kerosene
Methane
Hydrogen
solid rocket fuel
hypergolic fuel
SOLID ROCKET BOOSTERS (SRB) are the most polluting in first stage of launch
SRB made from:
Hydrochloric Acid
Ammonium
Perchlorates
Salt of Perchloric Acids
Ammonia
Aluminum or Magnesium Powder
booster oxidizers HTPB and PBAN
Aluminum oxide
Soot
CO2
Hydrogen Chloride
Nitrogen Oxides
Hydrogen
Trace gases

 


 

Emissions regulations placed on the automotive industry are necessary to protect health and the environment but are worthless without similar pollution preventing requirements also applied to rockets, aircraft, and radiation transmissions from satellites.

 


 

The article below discusses environmental impacts of rockets while perpetuating the hypothesis regarding demonized greenhouse gases. Water vapor, ((a greenhouse gas)) emitted by rockets and other emitters in the aviation sector are not included in the pollution equation underscoring the contradiction and inaccuracy of climate models.

 

The environmental impact of rocket launches: The ‘dirty’ and the ‘green’ | Space

Link To Article HERE

 


 

What is in Elon Musk’s New Mega Rocket? Get to Know NASA’s New Artemis Freemason Space Program 

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

Related

Zero Geoengineering NASA Archive

 

THE POLICY AND SCIENCE OF ROCKET EMISSIONS

 

1980 NASA: Changing the Climate With Aerosol Modification

 

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

 

Tri-methyl Aluminum, Lithium, and Barium Atmospheric Releases

 

1973: Observations of Chemical Releases From High Flying Aircraft

 


 

Posted on

Potential for Aerosol Dissemination of Biological Weapons

July 9, 2023 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | Image source |It’s critical to address the protection of our airspace, especially following the CV19 eventMosquitoGates, and fires.

2015 research paper titled, “Atmospheric dispersion modelling of bioaerosols that are pathogenic to humans and livestock – A review to inform risk assessment studies,” examines the generation and transport of pathogenic bioaerosols.

According to the authors, “Bioaerosols are small, airborne particles consisting of biological material (from bacteria, viruses, spores, fungi, algae, protozoa, and pollen) either attached to particulate matter or not (Bovallius and Roffey, 1987Després et al., 2012Dungan, 2010Gilbert and Duchaine, 2009Griffin, 2007Stärk, 1999Wéry, 2014).”

Potential for Aerosol Dissemination of Biological Weapons, a 2003 article, discusses technological feasibility of disseminating biological weapons from aircraft.

The paper states: “These findings should be understood by those with responsibility for preventing or responding to the consequences of bioterrorist attacks.”

 

In 1961 President Eisenhower warned:

“The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present-and is gravely to be regarded…

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”

 

Laws to prohibit the release of aerosols and other hazardous contaminants in Earth’s atmosphere and environment are urgently needed to protect all biological life. 

Take Action (USA) HERE 

 


 

J.P.G. Van Leuken, A.N. Swart, A.H. Havelaar, A. Van Pul, W. Van der Hoek, D. Heederik, Atmospheric dispersion modelling of bioaerosols that are pathogenic to humans and livestock – A review to inform risk assessment studies, Microbial Risk Analysis, Volume 1, 2016, Pages 19-39, ISSN 2352-3522, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mran.2015.07.002.

Abstract

In this review we discuss studies that applied atmospheric dispersion models (ADM) to bioaerosols that are pathogenic to humans and livestock in the context of risk assessment studies. Traditionally, ADMs have been developed to describe the atmospheric transport of chemical pollutants, radioactive matter, dust, and particulate matter. However, they have also enabled researchers to simulate bioaerosol dispersion.

To inform risk assessment, the aims of this review were fourfold, namely (1) to describe the most important physical processes related to ADMs and pathogen transport, (2) to discuss studies that focused on the application of ADMs to pathogenic bioaerosols, (3) to discuss emission and inactivation rate parameterisations, and (4) to discuss methods for conversion of concentrations to infection probabilities (concerning quantitative microbial risk assessment).

The studies included human, livestock, and industrial sources. Important factors for dispersion included wind speed, atmospheric stability, topographic effects, and deposition. Inactivation was mainly governed by humidity, temperature, and ultraviolet radiation.

Link To Full Article HERE

Atmospheric dispersion modelling of bioaerosols that are pathogenic to humans and livestock – A review to inform risk assessment studies

 


 

Related

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025] • Zero Geoengineering

 

Aerosolized Nanobot Described in 2012 Geoengineering Business Model

Aerosolized Nanobot Described in 2012 Geoengineering Business Model • Zero Geoengineering

 

 

Towards a High-Resolution, Implantable Neural Interface (darpa.mil)

 

 

Ray Kurzweil describes taking “some kind of medication that would have nanobots go through our bloodstream and they would find the end of the neocortex and attach themselves there and communicate outside so you could have a computer on your body but more likely you’re really in the cloud…”

Link

 

 

Oblivion: Weather Engineering Warfare

Oblivion: Weather Engineering Warfare • Zero Geoengineering

 


 

 

PennsylvaniaMaryland, and West Virginia provide precedent from the 1960’s for prohibiting cloud seeding and weather modification. These kinds of policies could be reenacted at the state and national level today.

Research the Atmosphere Protection Act

Take Action in the USA HERE

To learn more about advocating for laws to prohibit solar radiation modification, geoengineering, and other hazardous atmospheric/environmental activities email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com.

 

 


 

Posted on

White House Announces Plan to Block the Sun

July 2, 2023 |ZeroGeoengineering.com |

“Public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”-President Eisenhower, 1961

The White House has released a new report, “Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Management,” outlining the plan to deploy geoengineering programs, that are being framed as “research”.

The schemes involve the intentional release of chemical aerosols to block sunlight from reaching the Earth.  The document acknowledges harmful potential consequences of deliberately contaminating the air, such as increased public exposure to particulate matter and toxic air pollution, psychological impacts, changes in the color of the sky, precipitation reduction, reduction of crop yields, and other “known unknowns.”  

The proposal is not new, it actually reiterates other programs for geoengineering “research” such as Obama-Biden’s 2010 “A Coordinated Strategy Could Focus Federal Geoengineering Research and Inform Governance Efforts” and “Preliminary Observations on Geoengineering Science, Federal Efforts, and Governance Issues.”

Trump’s Geoengineering program was called The Federal Weather Enterprise. (Weather and climate engineering history follows a continuum, regardless of political party).

Additionally, the report calls for international cooperation and governance via the United Nations (UN) World Meteorology Organization (WMO), an agency that is already engaged in “research of atmospheric aerosol dispersion.”

This report is an attempt seeking to legitimize geoengineering, a form of environmental warfare involving deliberate poisoning of the air and blocking the sunlight. The public does not consent to geoengineering.

Link To 2013 Video -Geoengineering-David-Keith: “This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision…”

Politicians are acting as though they are not aware that weather manipulation is official U.S. policy and that every administration since the 1940’s has promoted climate interventions with origins in environmental warfare.

Lawmakers cool on sci-fi climate fix – POLITICO

 


 

Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Management (whitehouse.gov)

 

Link To Full Document Congressionally-Mandated-Report-on-Solar-Radiation-Modification June 2023

Role of USGCRP in Climate Data Provision 

NSF FY 2020 Budget USGCRP 

The U.S. Global Change Research Program 2022-2031 Strategic Plan_USGCRP_2022-2031_Decadal_Strategic_Plan

Meteorology, Climate Control, and Rebranding The Federal Weather Enterprise • Zero Geoengineering

 


 

 

Related:

Geoengineering Parts I, II, and III

Geoengineering: Governance and Technology Policy

A Coordinated Strategy Could Focus Federal Geoengineering Research and Inform Governance Efforts

Preliminary Observations on Geoengineering Science, Federal Efforts, and Governance Issues

Weather and Climate Modification

Solar Geoengineering 2023 CRS

National Weather Modification Policies and Programs 

DARPA-DOD Funding for Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Scenarios 

 DOD Management Issues Related to Chaff 

Are Directed Energy Weapons and Geoengineering Triggering Explosive Fires?

Forest Fire As A Military Weapon 

Fire Starters 

Ways to Address Reckless Government Spending 

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars 

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

 

 


 

 

Laws Needed to Protect Against UN “Governance” of Geoengineering • Zero Geoengineering

World Economic Forum Parrots SAI Geoengineering Strategies • Zero Geoengineering

PennsylvaniaMaryland, and West Virginia provide precedent from the 1960’s for prohibiting cloud seeding and weather modification. These kinds of policies could be reenacted at the state and national level today.

Research the Atmosphere Protection Act

Take Action HERE

To learn more about advocating for legislation to prohibit solar radiation modification, geoengineering, and other atmospheric/environmental hazards email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com.

 

 


 

Posted on

2023 Congressional Solar Geoengineering Report Acknowledges Likely Transboundary Effects

June 27, 2023 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | The Congressional Research Service published a report in May of this year which outlines various geoengineering methods, including stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), marine cloud brightening (MCB), and cirrus cloud thinning (CCT). Policymakers are interested establishing a governance framework for solar geoengineering (SG).

According to the paper, “The 117th Congress appropriated funds for FY2022 for activities related to SG in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022…These included the preparation of a report by the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) in conjunction with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Science Foundation (NSF)…Further, under this legislation OSTP, working with NOAA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the Department of Energy (DOE), is tasked to form an interagency working group to manage SG risk and research and to develop a governance framework for publicly funded SG research.”

In addition to acknowledging likely transboundary effects, the report cites the potential for SAI to reduce precipitation as well as potentially having a damaging effect on stratospheric ozone.

Omitted from the report is Mexico’s ban on Solar Geoengineering, health hazards, and the lack of informed public consent for weather and climate modification. 

 

 

Related:

Geoengineering Parts I, II, and III

Geoengineering: Governance and Technology Policy

A Coordinated Strategy Could Focus Federal Geoengineering Research and Inform Governance Efforts

Preliminary Observations on Geoengineering Science, Federal Efforts, and Governance Issues

Weather and Climate Modification

 


 

 

 

Link To Full Report HERE

Solar Geoengineering 2023 CRS

 


 

 

To learn more about advocating for legislation to prohibit weather modification, solar geoengineering, and other atmospheric/environmental hazards email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com.

 

 


 

Related

National Weather Modification Policies and Programs 

DARPA-DOD Funding for Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Scenarios 

 DOD Management Issues Related to Chaff 

Are Directed Energy Weapons and Geoengineering Triggering Explosive Fires?

Forest Fire As A Military Weapon 

Fire Starters 

Ways to Address Reckless Government Spending 

 

 


 

Posted on

Geoengineered

May 8, 2023 | ZeroGeoengineering.com (ZG)| Geoengineering Monitor has compiled an interactive map providing information on past and present geoengineering programs. Main categories include weather modification, solar radiation management, and greenhouse gas removal.

Source: https://map.geoengineeringmonitor.org/

 

 

One thing that all these programs have in common is there is no public consent for the activities.

 

 


 

 

In the US, geoengineering programs are coordinated and funded through various federal agencies such as National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Energy (DOE), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Department of Commerce (DOC), Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM), and others.

 

 


 

 

One of the geoengineering programs documented on the map is known as stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), ongoing in the State of Washington, led by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL).

Source: https://map.geoengineeringmonitor.org/

 

Source: https://map.geoengineeringmonitor.org/

 

“Much of the SRM-related research is conducted in collaboration with NOAA (US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration).”

 

Also see:

The climate response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering can be tailored using multiple injection locations | PNNL

Search | PNNL

 


 

 

In addition to federal geoengineering programs, many USA states allow weather modification, cloud seeding, and other atmospheric testing schemes – many programs happening for over 70 years:

Florida

California

Colorado

New Mexico

Idaho

Washington

Texas

 

 


 

 

In a 1961 speech at the UN, JFK stated, “We propose further cooperative efforts between all nations in weather prediction and eventually in weather control.”

JFK speaks to UN on Weather Control in 1961 • Zero Geoengineering

 

Of course, it’s unlikely that many at that time understood that Kennedy was proposing geoengineering and interactive wireless infrastructures comprised of satellites and microwave antennas — to cover the Earth in a system of mass surveillance, disguised as weather forecasting and research.

 

Also see:

The Internet of Bodies

Systems, computer media, and methods for using electromagnetic frequency (emf) identification (id) devices for monitoring, collection, analysis, use and tracking of personal data, biometric data, medical data, transaction data, electronic payment data, and location data for one or more end user, pet, livestock, dairy cows, cattle or other animals, including use of unmanned surveillance vehicles, satellites or hand-held devices 

 

 


 

 

There is precedent for prohibiting weather control programs. PennsylvaniaMaryland, and West Virginia banned or restricted cloud seeding in the 1960’s. These laws can be reenacted at the state and national level today.

Also see: INTRODUCED: The Atmosphere Protection Act 

 

Additionally, Mexico banned geoengineering in January 2023.

 

The people have the right and ability to bring an end to these programs forever.

Demand it!

Take Action – USA 

 


 

 

Related

US Weather Modification & Climate Control 

White House Promotes Environmental Warfare SO2 Aerosol Injection 

What Percent of Our Atmosphere is CO2? 

Are Directed Energy Weapons and Geoengineering Triggering Explosive Fires? 

Re: The Global Weather Enterprise • Zero Geoengineering

Meteorology, Climate Control, and Rebranding The Federal Weather Enterprise 

Laws Needed to Protect Against UN “Governance” of Geoengineering • Zero Geoengineering

Aircraft aerosol emissions are inducing climate extremes • Zero Geoengineering

California, New Mexico, Texas, & Florida Cloud Seeding 2021 • Zero Geoengineering

Are weather weapons and DEW causing explosive fires and extreme weather? 

 


 

 

To learn more about advocating for legislation to prohibit SAI, weather modification, aerosol injection, cloud seeding, and other environmental hazards email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com.

 

 


 

Posted on

1980 NASA: Changing the Climate With Aerosol Modification

November 20, 2022 | ZEROGeoengineering.com |

1980 NASA document provides a detailed description of a Stratospheric Aerosol Modification program designed to release tons of Sulfur Dioxide and other hazardous emissions into the atmosphere with the intention of changing the climate.

NASA and collaborating agencies CIA and DOD lack critical public oversight and scrutiny which is one reason why Geoengineering [environmental warfare] has occurred for decades and continues with zero regulations.

The White House recently announced funding for Sulfur Aerosol Injection programs for the next 5 years.  -JD

 


 

NASA 1980

Stratospheric Aerosol Modification by Supersonic Transport Operations With Climate Implications

 

 

 

Link To Full Document_Stratospheric Aerosol Modification_1980_NASA

 

 


 

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

LINK

 


 

 

Link To_CIA Director John O. Brennan speaks at Council on Foreign Relations meeting about Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI).

June 29, 2016

Link To Video

 

 

Link To_1960 CIA Climate Control

 


 

 

“So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision.”   Link To_ David Keith_2013

Link To Video  Image Source_Youtube Screenshot

 

 


 

 

To learn more about advocating for a ban on Geoengineering, email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 

 


 

Posted on

1973: Observations of Chemical Releases From High Flying Aircraft

December 1, 1973 | Report for  National Aeronautics and Space Administration ( NASA ) | Washington, D.C. |

 

ABSTRACT

Barium and lithium vapors were released from sounding rockets in the thermosphere and observed from aboard the NASA Convair 990 at an altitude of 40,000 ft. The purpose of the releases were to (1) check out observational and operational procedures associated with the large high altitude barium release from a Scout rocket (BIC); (2) develop an all-weather technique for observing chemical releases; (3) evaluate methods of observing daytime releases, and (4) investigate the possibilities of observations from a manned satellite.

 


 

 

 

Link To_Source_NASA Observations of chemical releases from high flying aircraft

 

 

 

 


 

 

Barium Toxicity

https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/5355457#section=Toxicity

 

 

Lithium Toxicity

https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/3028194#section=Toxicity

 

 

April 2021_Oregon Rain Analysis Aluminum, Barium, Strontium, Sulfur, LITHIUM

Oregon Rain Analysis Aluminum, Barium, Strontium, Sulfur, LITHIUM

LINK

 

 


 

 

2022  Appropriations_ NASA Venture Partnerships with NOAA

https://www.congress.gov/117/crec/2022/03/09/168/42/CREC-2022-03-09-bk3.pdf

 

 


 

 

 

History may be helpful in understanding the present.

 

Excerpts from NASA History:

One of the pioneers of NASA was Dr. Wernher von Braun, who was a member of the Nazi Party and an SS officer. For fifteen years after World War II, Von Braun worked with the U.S. Army in the development of ballistic missiles. As part of a military operation called Operation Paperclip, he and an initial group of about 125 were sent to America. Dr. von Braun eventually became director of NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center.

https://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/history/vonbraun/bio.html

 

 

Operation Paperclip

https://www.cia.gov/static/943643120807dda05c37d73ba0565ea9/Review-Operation-Paperclip.pdf

 

 

Zero Geoengineering:  NASA Archive