Category: National Security

Posted on by

New U.S. Treasury Policy Doesn’t Add Up

New U.S. Treasury Policy Doesn’t Add Up

August 31st, 2022 | Jolie Diane | Image source

In case you missed it, the U.S. Treasury announced[1] a cyber security partnership with Israel’s Ministry of Finance on August 25, 2022.

One may wonder why the U.S. Treasury would be getting involved in cyber security matters or would be inviting a foreign government agency to enter into our economic system.

Cyber security cooperation is not new, as the U.S. Department of Homeland Security ( DHS ) signed[2][3] a joint declaration on cyber defense with Israel back in 2016.

However, let’s keep in mind that the 2020 election disaster featured the DHS[4] in a central role, to “secure cyber security”.  Those familiar with this three letter alphabet agency, brought to us by George Bush Jr., understand the corruption[5] that plagues the Department of Homeland Security.

Additionally, the role of the UN/NATO[6] in American cyber security affairs is unclear.  Another problem, is knowing what partnerships Israel may have that could potentially create conflicts of interest in USA economic affairs and national security.[7]   Will biometric surveillance, social credit scores, 5G,[8] and digital currency be part of the “cyber security” cooperation equation?

Adding together foreign government actors, multiplied by unknown factors, might not necessarily increase America’s cyber security or economic strength.

 

 

Reference

[1] https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0929

[2] https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/06/22/readout-deputy-secretary-mayorkas-trip-israel

[3] https://www.defensedaily.com/u-s-and-israel-sign-agreement-to-increase-operative-cyber-defense-cooperation-3/uncategorized/

[4] https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/471577-dhs-cyber-agency-invests-in-election-auditing-tool-to-secure-2020/

[5] https://reason.com/2019/09/10/the-department-of-homeland-security-is-a-mess-of-misconduct-and-ineptitude/

[6] https://ccdcoe.org/uploads/2018/10/IL_NCSO_final.pdf

[7]https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR2600/RR2641/RAND_RR2641.pdf

[8] https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Regional-Presence/Europe/Documents/Events/2020/5G_EUR_CIS/5G_Israel-final.pdf

 

 

 

Dual Citizens in Congress? We Need to Know; The Problem of Dual Citizenship

LINK

 

 

Posted on by

Maj. General: Vaxx Mandate Threatens Military Readiness

 

Maj. General: Vaxx Mandate Threatens Military Readiness

On August 4th, 2022, Maj. Gen. James O. Eifert wrote a Wall Street Journal op-ed article stating that the mandatory vaxx policy puts national security at risk and seriously threatens military readiness.

The policy to force our military ( or anyone ) to participate in an experimental government medical intervention ( the CV-19 Vaxx is EUA ) such as Americans have been subjected to via ‘Operation Warp Speed’, is unethical, unlawful and needs to end immediately. -JD

 

 

August 9, 2022 | By Mark Hensch  |  NGAUS.org |

Adjutant General: Vaccine Mandate a ‘Threat’ to Readiness

The adjutant general of Florida says the Defense Department’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate seriously threatens military readiness.

Maj. Gen. James O. Eifert adds making American troops get the vaccine endangers national security.

“I’ve never been more worried about the future of the U.S. armed forces than I am right now,” he said in a Wall Street Journal op-ed published last week.

“One of the military’s most foundational duties is to recruit and retain men and women willing to defend their country,” Eifert added. “Unfortunately, current federal policy is rendering that goal unobtainable.”

Eifert is thought to be the first general officer to speak out on the vaccine mandate, doing so in his capacity as a state official.

Eifert’s byline didn’t include his rank. He decried the DoD requirement’s potential impact on Guardsmen across the U.S.

“The Army secretary’s deadline for all reserve component soldiers to be vaccinated expired on June 30, leaving almost 40,000 National Guard members and 20,000 Army Reservists nationwide at risk of involuntary termination,” he argued.

“My Florida National Guard formations face the potential loss of about 1,000 unvaccinated guardsmen out of 12,000 total airmen and soldiers,” Eifert continued. “That leaves us shorthanded as our state enters hurricane season, while more than 1,000 soldiers and airmen are also deployed on federal missions around the world.”

Eifert claimed the vaccine policy comes amid domestic recruiting and retention struggles and rising global tensions.

“Only 23% of recruitment-age Americans meet eligibility requirements, and fewer still are even interested,” he noted. “Why should we further damage military readiness by discharging honorably serving military members and shunning unvaccinated new recruits?”

“Our world is only becoming more dangerous,” Eifert concluded. “I’m hopeful than an open-minded self-assessment leads to a solution that addresses this most serious threat to force readiness – before it’s too late.”

Army Guardsmen and Army Reservists had until June 30 to get fully or partially vaccinated against COVID-19.

Since July 1, the unvaccinated members of both components have been forbidden from federally funded drills, trainings and other duties.

Unvaccinated Army Guardsmen and Army Reservists have also been barred from receiving payment or retirement credit.

Army data released last week shows 88% of the Army National Guard is fully vaccinated against COVID-19, while another 1.6% has received one dose of the vaccine.

While 9,795 Army Guardsmen have refused the vaccine, the service hasn’t separated anyone.

As of August 4, the Army National Guard has approved 8,533 temporary exemptions for the vaccine, including requests for permanent exemptions.

Of 58 requests for permanent medical exemptions, six have been granted and 38 disapproved.

The Army National Guard hasn’t approved any permanent religious exemptions out of 1,444 requests, but 43 applications have been rejected.

The Air Force National Guard had a Dec. 2, 2021, vaccination deadline.

Air Force data published July 12 states 94.1% of Guard airmen are fully vaccinated, while 0.2% more have gotten one vaccination dose.

Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis appointed Eifert the Florida adjutant general in 2019.

Link To Source HERE

 

 

Posted on by

DOD mRNA Vaxx Mandate Is Injuring Soldiers

DOD mRNA Vaxx Mandate Is Injuring Soldiers 

The following article provides shocking testimonials from military whistleblowers, providing clear evidence that DOD leadership is failing to protect the health of American service men and women. The Biden Administration and DOD’s mandate to force our soldiers to be used as human test subjects for the experimental mRNA injection indicates that the United States military leadership may be severely compromised.

An immediate halt to mandated mRNA shots, an independent investigation into the current policy and accountability of top leadership is crucial to correcting what appears to be the intentional destruction of the American military’s health, morale and readiness. -JD

 

 

Military whistleblowers: DOD’s legally dubious mRNA mandate has harmed readiness, produced widespread injuries

Dozens of first hand testimonials and internal documents

August 17, 2022 | by Jordan Schachtel | The Dossier |

A group of active U.S. military pilots are coming forward as whistleblowers to challenge both the legal and moral nature of the Department of Defense mRNA mandate, and they’ve produced some shocking testimonials that challenge virtually all of the mainstream narratives about a supposedly “safe and effective” mRNA vaccine.

The Dossier got in contact with the whistleblowers and acquired a series of documents that showcase the damage wrought by the mRNA mandate. It serves as a troubling account of a Biden Administration Defense Department that has damaged military readiness, alienated those who challenge the arguably illegal mandate, and created an environment in which many are deciding to not come forward with additional vaccine injuries, for fear of being sidelined from the service.

In the PDF files below you will find two separate reports dozens of accounts solicited from this small group of whistleblowers within their military network. These files have been submitted to select Congressional offices, but unfortunately, legislators have not yet taken action on the information.

Examples Of Vaccine Injury Within The Dod
188KB ∙ PDF File

Read now

Congressional Injury Report
13MB ∙ PDF File

Read now

 

Below you’ll find a few accounts from the first report, from direct testimony and internal documents provided from active service members to the whistleblowers. I encourage you to read the whole thing. Again, Congress has this information and can act upon it should they so choose.

Again, this evidence was provided to The Dossier by a small group of whistleblower pilots in the military. It all comes from a network of hundreds of active service members. It is a tiny sample size of the undoubtedly widespread post-mRNA injection issues faced by service members.

Military service members are not seriously threatened by the novel coronavirus, and the Defense Department was well aware of that prior to issuing its legally contested mandate in August of 2021, on the fraudulent basis that there was an FDA approved (not under emergency use authorization) vaccine available to service members.

The DOD’s own numbers have attributed 95 military service member deaths to COVID-19 since early 2020. Mysteriously, the vast majority of these deaths occurred shortly after they instituted the vaccine mandate for all service members. Prior to the mandate, the active military was registering about one COVID death per month on average.

 

Link To Read Full Article HERE

 

 

Link To Article: Biden Admin officials scramble to escape blame for unlawful Pentagon order mandating mRNA for troops

 

 

 

LINK

 

 

 

DOD Hides CV-19 V@xx Injuries as U.S. Military is Decimated by the Mandatory Shots

LINK

 

 

 

VACCINE SYNDROME: HOW THE EXPERIMENTAL ANTHRAX VACCINE KILLED 35,000 MILITARY MEN AND WOMEN

VACCINE SYNDROME: HOW THE EXPERIMENTAL ANTHRAX VACCINE KILLED 35,000 MILITARY MEN AND WOMEN

LINK

 

 

 

 

Posted on by

Virginia NATO Base is “fully operational” and ready to support the “international order”

Virginia NATO Base is “fully operational” and ready to support the “international order”

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul recently introduced an amendment to reaffirm that NATO cannot supersede Congress in declaring U.S. involvement in war, however it was rejected by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.[1]

Few Americans may realize that Virginia is home to the NATO Allied Joint Force Command in Norfolk.[2] The United States continues[3] to finance NATO as it has done for decades.[4][5][6]

Did you know?  

NATO is a close partner of the UN.[7]

NATO is interested in forming their own bank and deploying 5G.[8] / NATO-Financing-Gap

George Soros wrote Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO in 1993

Is the US Operating Under NATO Command? LINK

-JD

 

 

August 14, 2022 |  By Renee Parsons | sarahwestall.com |

HERE ARE THE FACTS: Norfolk NATO Base is “fully operational” and ready to support the “international order”

Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff Mark Milley stated that NATO new headquarters at the NAVAL base in Norfolk, VA has “full readiness” and is now “fully operational” in support of the “international order” and in anticipation of the “Battle of the Atlantic”.

Pentagon spokesman, John Kirby, stated that “placing the U.S. Carrier Strike Force under NATO shows our commitment to the alliance.”

Question: Is the Norfolk NAVAL base now under the command of NATO? Or, maybe more likely, is it ready to be put under full NATO command at any time?

 

HERE ARE THE FACTS

By Renee Parsons

In October 2019, the U.S. Navy celebrated its 244th Birthday.   Beginning as privateers hired by the colonists to attack British commerce vessels during the Revolutionary War, the Continental Congress established a naval force in October, 1775.   President John Adams signed the Act to formally establish the Department of the Navy in 1798.

Described as the largest naval station in the world, the Norfolk Naval Base was established in 1917 with 3,400 acres including four miles of waterfront space, eleven miles of pier and wharf space to accommodate seventy-five ships, one hundred thirty four aircraft, fourteen piers and eleven air craft hangars.

 

NATO and the UN have had a cooperative relationship to “global crisis management” since the 1990’s in support of UN Security Council resolutions in the Balkans, Afghanistan, Libya and now Ukraine.  On June 4, 2021, NATO Chief Jan Stoltenberg called for more investment from the Alliance and adherence to NATO’s 2030 Agenda as it takes a more global approach.

NATO apologists say that there is ‘no evidence that Naval Station Norfolk was surrendered to NATO” and that the US Department of Defense “refuted the claim.”

By creating a military and political alliance, why would the US Government or the Pentagon relinquish its largest and most strategically important Naval base at Norfolk to any foreign military entity including NATO?   Perhaps a better word than “surrender’ might be that the US Government has ‘abdicated’ its responsibility for Norfolk or that it has “relinquished’ its global supremacy and its authority to NATO.   Where is the DOD’s refutation?  Questions remain about how the Pentagon allowed NATO’s invasive presence at Norfolk and we remain committed to discover the true  story.

It is true that no national news outlets have reported on NATO’s acquisition of the Norfolk base with no press release from the Department of Defense, the Navy and NATO informing the American public or explaining the NATO-Norfolk association.  That is exactly the point!  There has been a national news black out with no public notice or announcement except in the localized Norfolk area.

NATO-opens-new-Atlantic-Command-at-Norfolk-Va-370935251-300x200 HERE ARE THE FACTS: Norfolk NATO Base is "fully operational" and ready to support the "international order"
Royal Navy Rear Adm. Andrew Betton, deputy commander of Joint Force Command Norfolk, (left) and U.S. Vice Adm. Andrew Lewis, commander of the command, cut the ribbon during an Initial Operational Capability ceremony on Thursday. Photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Theodore Green/U.S. Navy
  • The truth is that two months prior to the 2020 election on September 17, 2020 (see Action Alert), Royal Navy Admiral Andrew Betton of the JFC and US Admiral Andrew Lewis cut the ribbon inaugurating the ‘initial operational capability ceremony’ of NATO at the Norfolk Naval facility. No member of the Trump Administration was in attendance.
  • By October 16, 2020, seventeen days before the 2020 election, a new sign “Welcome to Norfolk – NATO’s Home in North America” was unveiled at the arrival gate of the Norfolk Airport. By that time, Norfolk had become home to both the NATO-Allied Command Transformation (ACT) and NATO’s Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFC).
    20201016orf-tn-300x192 HERE ARE THE FACTS: Norfolk NATO Base is "fully operational" and ready to support the "international order"
    Norfolk, VA – Alongside City of Norfolk Mayor Kenneth Alexander, PhD., Commander, Joint Force Command Norfolk Vice Admiral Andrew Lewis, US Navy, and Chairman of the Norfolk Airport Authority Board of Commissioners Captain Malcolm P. Branch, US Navy (Ret.), General André Lanata, North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s Supreme Allied Commander, Transformation, unveiled new NATO signs to be placed around the City of Norfolk
  • Miley-speaking-300x171 HERE ARE THE FACTS: Norfolk NATO Base is "fully operational" and ready to support the "international order"
    Army Gen. Mark A. Milley spoke to assembled dignitaries on the USS Kearsarge along with the U.S. Navy Vice Adm. Andrew L. Lewis, the Joint Force Command — Norfolk and U.S. Second Fleet commander.

    By July, 15 2021, as confirmed by Defense News, the Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFC) held a ceremony to declare its NATO Norfolk base to be ‘fully operational capability,” at “full readiness as the first operational NATO headquarters in North America”. The term “fully operational” means that the Command is at full staff.   Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff Mark Milley attended to give his blessing to NATO, in support of the ‘international order’ and in anticipation of the “Battle of the Atlantic”.  See Milley’s full speech

  • In February 2022, the USS Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group first sailed under the command of the NATO’s Naval Striking and Support Forces. On July 20, 2022, it was announced that the USS Harry S. Truman CSG was now under NATO tactical and operational command as it participated in an ‘exercise’ with NATO allies.   Such transfer of authority raises the question of whether the US President’s authority as Commander-in-Chief has been unconstitutionally constrained and whether the President’s constitutional authority has been undermined with respect to the conduct of diplomacy.

Link To Read Full Article HERE

 

 

Posted on by

Dr Merritt on V@ccines, Gene Editing, Depopulation & Rockefellers

Image Source

Gene Drive & The Great DNA War: Dr Merritt on V@ccines, Gene Editing, Depopulation & Rockefellers

August 6, 2022 | http://TheMedicalRebel.com

“This is clearly a depopulation thing, by whom? That’s where you get to the real evil here.”

 

Link To Video

Link To Full Interview

 

 

The Truth About Bill Gates

Link

 

 

 

1974: UN WHO Action to Create Conditions for Fertility Decline

 

 

Posted on by

Is Monkeypox Induced by the CV-19 Vaxx?

Is Monkeypox Induced by the CV-19 Vaxx?

 

 

“we may not be witnessing a worldwide outbreak of monkeypox at all, but rather a huge cover-up of the consequences of administering an experimental injection to millions of people”

 

July 26, 2022 |  BY   | PDF

Official Documents suggest Monkeypox is a coverup for damage done to Immune System by COVID Vaccination resulting in Shingles, Autoimmune Blistering Disease & Herpes Infection

Do you not find it curious how in the space of 50 years, monkeypox has never really gotten off the ground outside of a couple of countries in Africa, but then within two years of the alleged emergence of Covid-19, monkeypox is suddenly in every Western nation and being hyped up by public health authorities and the mainstream media?

Even the Director General of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, has just overruled the World Health Organization and single-handedly declared monkeypox a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.

If you don’t find any of the above curious then you won’t want to read this because you may miss the latest episode of BBC News at 6 pm. But if you do, you may or may not be surprised to find that evidence suggests the alleged monkeypox outbreak could actually be a result of the Covid-19 vaccination programme.

How?

Well, it has something to do with herpes, shingles, auto-immune blistering disease and the fact that Covid-19 vaccination greatly damages the natural immune system.

Here’s a map showing countries where “confirmed” cases of monkeypox have been reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) since the middle of May 2022 –

Only joking. The above is actually a map showing the main distributions of the Pfizer vaccine.

 

Here’s the actual map showing countries where “confirmed” cases of monkeypox have been reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) since the middle of May 2022 –

Source

 

Here’s both maps together so you can play a game of spot the difference with them –

Apart from a couple of countries, there isn’t really any difference, and every country that has reported alleged cases of monkeypox since May 2022 where it was not already endemic, is a country that also distributed the Pfizer Covid-19 injection.

Now, this could of course just be another coincidence in a long line of “coincidences” that have occurred since early 2020. But unfortunately, evidence suggests otherwise.

Human monkeypox was first identified in humans in 1970 in the Democratic Republic of Congo in a 9-year-old boy. Since then, human cases of monkeypox have been reported in 11 African countries. It wasn’t until 2003 that the first monkeypox outbreak outside of Africa was recorded, and this was in the United States.

According to a scientific study published in 1988, between 1981-1986, 977 persons with skin eruption not clinically diagnosed as human monkeypox were laboratory tested in Zaire (now known as the Democratic Republic of Congo).

The Scientists who conducted the study stated the following –

The diagnostic difficulties were mainly based on clinical features characteristic of chickenpox: regional pleomorphism (in 46% of misdiagnosed cases), indefinite body-distribution of skin eruptions (49%), and centripetal distribution of skin lesions (17%). Lymph-node enlargement was observed in 76% of misdiagnosed patients. In the absence of smallpox, the main clinical diagnostic problem is the differentiation of human monkeypox from chickenpox.’

In Layman’s terms, distinguishing monkeypox from chickenpox is incredibly difficult, and chickenpox is caused by a type of herpes virus.

The chickenpox virus is technically known as the varicella-zoster virus, and just like its close relative the herpes simplex virus, it becomes a lifelong resident in the body.

And like its other cousin, genital herpes, varicella may be silent for many years, hiding out inside nerve cells and can reactivate later, wreaking havoc in the form of the excruciating skin disorder, shingles, which is a blistering, burning skin rash.

Unfortunately, or fortunately; depending on whether you chose to get the Covid-19 injection, official Government data and confidential Pfizer documents strongly suggest the Covid-19 injection may be reactivating the dormant chickenpox virus or herpes virus due to the frightening damage it does to the immune system.

This means we may not be witnessing a worldwide outbreak of monkeypox at all, but rather a huge cover-up of the consequences of administering an experimental injection to millions of people.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine safety data for 75 years despite approving the injection after only 108 days of safety review on December 11th, 2020.

But in early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered them to release 55,000 pages per month. They released 12,000 pages by the end of January.

Since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website. The latest drop happened on June 1st 2022.

One of the documents contained in the data dump is ‘reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf’. Page 21 of the confidential document contains data on adverse events of special interest, with one of these specifically being herpes viral infections.

Source

According to the document by the end of February 2021, just 2 months after the Pfizer vaccine was granted emergency use authorisation in both the USA and UK, Pfizer has received 8,152 reports relating to herpes infection, and 18 of these had already led to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.

Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) is a systemic, dysfunctional inflammatory response that requires long intensive care unit (ICU) stay. It is characterized with a high mortality rate depending on the number of organs involved. It can be caused by herpes infection as this scientific study found here proves.

Further evidence published by the U.S Government, but more specifically the Centers for Disease Control shows that cases of herpes, shingles and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome really exploded in the USA following the administration of the Covid-19 injection.

The following chart shows the number of herpes infections/complications that have been reported to VAERS as adverse reactions to all vaccines (including the Covid-19 jabs) by the year reported, and the Covid-19 vaccines only by the year reported –

Source Data

The following chart shows adverse events to the Covid-19 injections reported to the CDCrelating to herpes, shingles and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome up to 13th May 2022.

It also shows the number of adverse events reported against the Flu Vaccines, all vaccines combined (excluding Covid-19 injections) and the HPV/Smallpox vaccines between 2008 and 2020 –

Source Data

As you can see the Covid-19 injections have caused the most herpes related infections, and this is within 17 months. When comparing these to the number of flareups reported against the HPV/Smallpox vaccines in 13 years, these numbers are extremely concerning.

This isn’t because so many people have been given a Covid-19 injection either. Official CDC numbers actually show 1.7 billion doses of influenza vaccine alone were administered between 2008 and 2020. Whereas, as of 6th May 2022, 580 million doses of Covid-19 vaccine had been administered in the USA.

The following chart shows the rate per 1 million doses administered of adverse events related to herpes, shingles and multiple organ syndrome –

The rate of herpes-related infections reported as adverse reactions to the Flu jabs is 0.75 adverse events per 1 million doses administered. But the rate of herpes-related infections reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections is 31.31 adverse events per 1 million doses administered.

That’s a 4,075% difference, and indicative of a very serious problem. A serious problem that is being caused by the fact the Covid-19 injections decimate the immune system.

The following chart shows the Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness among the triple vaccinated population in England in the UK Health Security Agency Week 3, Week 7 and Week 13Vaccine Surveillance reports of 2022 –

Data shows that vaccine effectiveness fell month on month, with the lowest effectiveness recorded among 60-69-year-olds at a shocking minus-391%. This age group also experienced the sharpest decline, falling from minus-104.69% in week 3.

But one of the more concerning declines in vaccine effectiveness has been recorded among 18-29-year-olds, falling to minus-231% by Week 12 of 2022 from +10.19% in Week 3.

A negative vaccine effectiveness indicates immune system damage because vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of the effectiveness of a vaccine. It is a measure of a vaccine recipient’s immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.

The Covid-19 injection specifically instructs cells to produce the alleged SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein. The immune system is supposed to take care of the rest and then remember to do it again if it ever encounters the SARS-CoV-2 virus. So when the authorities state that the effectiveness of the vaccines weakens over time, what they really mean is that the performance of your immune system weakens over time.

The following chart shows the Covid-19 death rates per 100,000 by vaccination status across England in March 2022 based on data published by the UKHSA –

As you can see, most vaccinated age groups have a higher Covid-19 death rate than the unvaccinated age groups. That’s not indicative of an effective vaccine, it’s indicative of damage done to the immune system by having the Covid vaccine. How else can you explain the fact the vaccinated are more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated?

 

Link To Read The Full Article Here

 

 

 

Twitter Censors Pfizer-Injured Israeli COVID Vaccine Director

“Prof. Shmuel Shapira MD MPH (Col.), who served as Director of the Israel Institute for Biological Research between 2013 and 2021, suggested that the monkeypox outbreak was connected to mRNA vaccines.

Last week, Twitter censored Prof. Shapira—who was “physically injured” after his third Pfizer vaccine—and forced him to remove a post which said: “Monkey pox cases were rare for years. During the last years a single case was documented in Israel. It is well established the mRNA vaccines affect the natural immune system. A monkey pox outbreak following massive covid vaccination: *Is not a coincidence.”

Link To Article

 

 

 

Posted on by

Solar geoengineering by injecting aluminum oxide aerosol into the lower stratosphere is a serious threat to global mental health

Solar geoengineering by injecting aluminum oxide aerosol into the lower stratosphere is a serious threat to global mental health

 

May 30, 2022 | Author: Giovanni Ghirga, Pediatrician |International Society of Doctors for the Environment (ISDE, Italy) – Presented at National Congress of ISDE Italy, San Sepolcro, AR, Italy. | thebmj  | Intended for healthcare professionals  | https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o1150/rr-1  |

 

Solar geoengineering by injecting aluminum oxide aerosol into the lower stratosphere is a serious threat to global mental health

Dear Editor

A possible geoengineering method to mitigate the global warming aspect of climate change is the injection of aerosols into the lower stratosphere, closely mimicking the way large volcanic eruptions cool the climate. This method is called solar-radiation management (SRM) scheme or simply Solar Geoengineering (1). SRM has been suggested to be affordable and have high effectiveness compared with other geoengineering schemes that have been suggested to mitigate global warming (1). While sulphate aerosols are the most studied, it has been recently shown that aerosols with other compositions, aluminium oxide (alumina) and diamond, could be used to dramatically increase the amount of light scatter achieved on a per mass basis. Alumina particles formed after the alumina aerosol injection are more efficient scatterers and may have less severe technology-specific risks than sulfates. Thus, they are expected to be more efficient per unit mass for geoengineering applications (2).

Nevertheless, it has also been suggested that SRM has a low associated safety compared with other geoengineering schemes because of its possible effects on regional climate, stratospheric ozone, high-altitude tropospheric clouds, biological productivity (3), and global biodiversity (4). We want to add a possible severe effect on Global Mental Health that could be caused by using alumina as light scattering.

The average residence time of a particle in the lower stratosphere is approximately 1-2 years (1,3). After eventual transport into the troposphere, alumina particles undergo relatively rapid mixing processes by weather events, turbulence, and cloudscale overturning. They are mostly removed from the atmosphere by dry deposition, sedimentation, or scavenging by clouds, finally polluting the environment (1).

Aluminium has often been regarded as not posing a significant health hazard if the human body burden of aluminium has increased. Nevertheless, epidemiological studies suggest that aluminium may not be as innocuous as was previously thought and that aluminium may actively promote the onset and progression of Alzheimer’s disease. This condition is the most common form of dementia and may contribute to 60 –70 % of cases. In 2015, dementia affected 47 million people worldwide (or roughly 5% of the world’s elderly population), a figure predicted to increase to 75 million in 2030 and 132 million by 2050. Recent reviews estimate that each year nearly 9.9 million people develop dementia globally; this figure translates into one new case every three seconds (5). Even prolonged exposure to low levels of aluminium leads to changes associated with brain ageing and neurodegeneration (6).

Furthermore, aluminium has been included among 200 neurotoxic chemicals that silently erode intelligence, disrupt behaviours, truncate future achievements, and damage societies, perhaps most seriously in developing countries. The latter is called the “Silent Pandemic of Neurodevelopmental Toxicity in Children” (7,8). Recently, the aluminium content of brain tissue in autism spectrum disorder was found to be consistently high (9), and the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder is increasing, last CDC estimated prevalence is 1 in 44 children (10).

Worldwide land precipitation of aluminium following aerosol spraying into the lower stratosphere would increase human body exposure and seriously threaten Global Mental Health.

 

Bibliography

1) Shepherd, J. Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty (The Royal Society, 2009). Albedo Modification Strategies. Climate Intervention by Stratospheric Aerosol Albedo Modification (SAAM), pag. 66.
2) D. K. Weisenstein, D. W. Keith, and J. A. Dykema. Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11835–11859, 2015.
3) F. D. Pope, P. Braesicke, R. G. Grainger, M. Kalberer, I. M. Watson, P. J. Davidson and R. A. Cox Stratospheric aerosol particles and solar-radiation management. Nature Climate Change. 2012;2(10):713-719.
4) Trisos HC, Amatulli G, Gurevitch J, Robock A, Xia L and Zambri B. Potentially dangerous consequences for biodiversity of solar geoengineering implementation and termination. Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 2, pages475–482 (2018).
5) World Health Organization. Global action plan on the public health response to dementia. 2017-2025.
6) Bondy SC. Prolonged exposure to low levels of aluminium leads to changes associated with brain ageing and neurodegeneration. Toxicology 315 (2014) 1-7.
7) Grandjean P, Landrigan PJ. Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals. Lancet. 2006 Dec 16;368(9553):2167-78.
8) Grandjean P, Landrigan PJ. Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity. The Lancet Neurology, Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 330 – 338, March 2014.
9) Mold M, et al. aluminium in brain tissue in autism. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2018.
10) CDC. National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network. 31 March 2022. Accessed 8 April 2022.

Competing interests: No competing interests

 

Link To Source Here

 

 

Posted on by

10,000% Increase in Cancers Following COVID-19 Vaccines as Doctors and Scientists Worldwide Sound the Alarm

Confocal microscopy study showing the spiker protein (green) proliferating the cell nucleus (blue)

10,000% Increase in Cancers Following COVID-19 Vaccines as Doctors and Scientists Worldwide Sound the Alarm

August 2, 2022 | by Brian Shilhavy Editor, Health Impact News |

Pathologist Dr. Ute Krueger. Screenshot from video interview (see below).

 

Rates of cancer have exploded following the COVID-19 mass vaccination programs, with doctors and scientists all over the world now sounding the alarm.

Just today a reader contacted us with the following tragic story:

Subject: Cancer after Pfizer vaccine

Hello,

My husband prior to the vaccine was fit and healthy, strong, active. We both had the vaccination on 12.11.2021. about 10 hours kater we spitted first swollen node in his left armpit. Doctors ignored the symptom. Then second node, third… With 6 swollen nodes he was diagnosed with Mantle cell lymphoma. He’s during very aggressive chemotherapy called Nordic regime. He’s only 36 in May, so he was 35 when it all has started. MCL affects people after 60 usually.

Before the vaccination our children brought from school many different viruses, from common flu, tummy bug, chicken pox, ear infections to covid.

My husband was totally fine that time. His immune system worked brilliantly during September and October when me and our daughters suffered from mentioned diseases. He was working and taking care of us at that time. If he would have MCL then he wouldn’t be able to fight all these viruses. Everything has changed within the hours from the first dose of Pfizer.

At first my husband was ignored by GP as he claimed it was typical side effect which should disappear. When more nodes started swilling gp still claimed we should wait yet in January my husband was advised not to have second dose of the vaccination due to the side effects.

In March I requested blood test to check whether it was cancer. Results returned completely fine. I immediately booked next blood test. Also returned completely fine. So without hesitation I booked appointment with go but this time I asked for different gp. During this appointment my husband was referred for ultrasound scan. From there to cancer clinic. 3 days later biopsy took place. Couple if days later we learnt the diagnosis mantle cell lymphoma.

At this stage we were told it has nothing to do with the vaccination, yet for months we were expected to wait for side effects to disappear.

Also, if the cancer is not in connection to vaccinate then how come my husband survived the 8 waves if different diseases starting from September ? In August we spent holidays in Scotland. Lots of walking and driving. My husband was in a very good shape.

Let me say it again, prior to the vaccination my husband was strong, fit, active and healthy.

Our life as a family has been literally ruined.

We cannot go anywhere, we can’t work, my husband us to weak, I have to care for him now and children. We are facing financial difficulties heading to a place where we won’t be able to cover winter bills.

MCL is incurable. Only treatable.

If we are lucky, we may be back to temporary normality by March/April 2023. MCL comes back. Noone knows when. Second time it hits stronger…

We can’t take girls for holidays, we can’t mix with other people as my husband’s immune system is compromised. I am on standby all the time as I may need to take him to hospital in emergency like it happened already. Most of days we travel to hospital anyway. Sometimes even twice a day.

I have never returned to myself after COVID and vaccination. Before I was very active and fit. Now Im not even at 50% of what I used to be.

Our children will never be vaccinated!

I did a search in the U.S. government Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) to see how many cases of the most common cancers had been reported following COVID-19 vaccines, and it returned a result of 837 cases of cancer, including 88 deaths, 66 permanent disabilities, and 104 life threatening events. (Source.)

And this not an exhaustive list, as I tried to include ALL cancers listed in VAERS, but the database could not handle the query.

I listed the cases by age, and of the 837 cases, 375 of them had no recorded age, although often the age can be found in the description.

So I put those 375 cases on the first page of the results, and starting on the second page you can see how young some of these cancer patients are following COVID-19 vaccines. (Source.)

It begins with a 12-year-old girl and a 15-year-old boy, followed by many young adults in their 20s.

Using the exact same search terms for cancer, I then searched ALL FDA-approved vaccines for the previous 30 yearsand found only 140 cases of cancer reported. (Source.)

That result is for 360 months (30 years), whereas the 837 cases following the experimental COVID-19 vaccines were reported in just 20 months, since the roll out of the COVID-19 shots beginning in December of 2020.

That is an increase of 10,661.4%!

A pathologist who lives in Sweden was just interviewed recently about the increasing rates of cancer she is seeing in her patients following the COVID-19 vaccines.

Her name is Dr. Ute Krueger, and the video is found on the Doctors For Covid Ethics Rumble Channel.

This is an amazing interview! Dr. Krueger is highly credentialed in her field, and yet few of her colleagues are willing to follow where the evidence leads, even though everyone is seeing a huge surge in cancer cases, and her reports to the Swedish Drug Administration have not been addressed. She states:

I studied medicine because I wanted to help people.

But now it feels like I am watching people being killed, and there’s little I can do.

The Exposé has also just published an excellent review of some of the scientific literature showing how the spike proteins are interfering with “the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes.”

The COVID-19 mRNA “Vaccines” cause Cancer; here’s the evidence…

by Joel Smalley; Professional Data Analyst
The Exposé

The homologous recombination DNA repair pathway is one of the mechanisms that the body uses to stop your cells turning cancerous in response to environmental stress.

One of the most important components of this pathway is Tumor protein P53 (p53), the “guardian of the genome”. It protects our cells from cellular damage. Under cellular stress, p53 jumps into action, regulating gene expression to control DNA repair, cell division and cell death. It is the most commonly mutated gene in cancer.

In October 2021, two revered scientists, called Jiang and Mei, had a paper published, after peer review, in MDPI, showing that the SARS-Cov-2 spike protein obliterated the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes.

Effect of the SARS-CoV-2 virus on homologous repair (HR) efficiency in lymphocytes

The viral spike protein was so toxic to this pathway that it knocked 90% of it out. If the whole spike protein got into the nucleus (in the ovaries), and enough of it was produced and hung around long enough before the body was able to get rid of it all, it would cause cancer. Fortunately, in the case of naturally infection, this is unlikely to occur.

Unfortunately, the experimental mRNA toxshot induces spike protein to be produced (the full length spike exactly matching – amino acid for amino acid – the full length of the viral spike protein¹) in and around the cell nucleus² and is produced for at least 60 days and almost certainly longer³.

“Fact checkers” said the viral spike protein doesn’t get in the nucleus despite the expert scientists showing that it absolutely does.

Confocal microscopy study showing the spiker protein (green) proliferating the cell nucleus (blue)

Public health authorities and regulators said the vaccinal spike protein doesn’t get in the nucleus despite the mRNA manufacturers submitting pictures of it doing so to them as part of their emergency use application.

BioNTech’s submission to the Australian TGA

OK, so it gets into the nucleus but the official narrative says it doesn’t stay in the body for more than a few hours. But, a huge study by one of the most respected molecular biology groups in the world at Stanford university⁴ showed that the mRNA (producing the vaccinal spike antigen) was still present and active in the body after 60 days.

Jiang and Mei, quite logically and reasonably, cautioned that the mRNA spike protein would likely have the same effect as the viral spike protein on p53 and therefore cause cancer.

Two months after this revelation was highlighted by my friend, Jikky the Mouse, the Jiang and Mei paper was retracted due to spurious “expressions of concern” (EOC) about the methods of the study despite them being standard practice.

Moreover, the authors of the EOC were Eric Freed, the head of the US National Institute of Health (NIH) that funded Moderna, the patent holder of the COVID mRNA toxshot⁵ and Oliver Shildgen, the actual editor of the journal that originally accepted the paper! And neither of them declared the conflicts of interest.

Well, despite the retraction, the spike protein circulating in large quantities, in the direct vicinity of the cell nucleus, for elongated periods of time, still has the potential to induce cancer in those cells (ovary, pancreas, breast, prostate, lymph nodes). These cancers can take years to develop and so it’s possible that we don’t see much of a safety signal for 5 or 10 years.

Sources/References

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/spike-proteins-covid-19-and-vaccines/

https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2183-09.pdf

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35148837/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8786601/

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/moderna-covid-vaccine-patent-dispute-national-institutes-health/

Read the full article at The Exposé.

 

Link To Read Full Article Here

 

 

 

Smoking Gun Covid Vaccine is a Bio-Weapon Doctor Michael McDowell

LINK

 

 

 

 

Posted on by

Transcript of Evidence / Vaxx Analysis By Prof. Dr. Antonietta Gatti – Nano-pathologist

Transcript of Evidence / Vaxx Analysis By Prof. Dr. Antonietta Gatti – Nano-pathologist

In case you missed Day 4 of the CoVid Grand Jury Trials, Dr. Antonietta Gatti’s testimony below provides verification of the chemical composition and contamination of 42 standard “vaccines”. She discusses the nanotechnological content of the mRNA products and concludes that the direct nano-bio-interaction of nano particles with DNA is very dangerous. Dr. Gatti states, “I don’t see the possibility for the body to counter-act against these stimuli.”

@ 2:32.32:

 

Link To_@ 2:32.32: Transcript of Evidence / Vaxx Analysis By Prof. Dr. Antonietta Gatti with images