November 17, 2022 | Analysis on Ukraine Situation by Retired US Army Col
Retired US Army Colonel and former Pentagon senior advisor Douglas Macgregor, provides insight on the military situation in Ukraine and recent calls for diplomacy by top US General Mark Milley. Sobering discussion on reality of the conflict and forward strategy. -JD
Retired Army Col. Douglas Macgregor on the World War III scare in Poland and the reported Pentagon-State Department split over Ukraine-Russia peace.
After accusing Russia of firing missiles into Poland — and triggering calls from Ukraine for direct NATO military intervention — US officials are now acknowledging that Ukrainian air defenses were likely responsible.
Douglas Macgregor, a retired Army Colonel and former senior Pentagon adviser, says the Poland scare underscores why the US top military officer, Gen. Mark Milley, has split from White House bureaucrats to call for diplomacy with Russia in order to end the Ukraine war.
Guest: Douglas Macgregor. Retired US Army Colonel and former Pentagon senior advisor.
Former Senator / Retired Col. Urges Congress to End Ukraine War
Former Virginia State Senator and Marine combat veteran, retired Colonel Richard Black wrote an open letter to Congress calling for an immediate end to the war by making Ukraine a non-aligned, neutral state, “just as we did during the Cold War with Austria in 1955.”
Col. Black questions why globalists are marching toward nuclear disaster when the “U.S. could have achieved peace by simply pressing Ukraine to implement the 2014 Minsk Peace Agreements which it had signed, establishing a clear framework for settling outstanding issues peacefully.”
ContactRepresentatives and Senators today to demand they stop funding and promoting war in Ukraine, and begin negotiating now to achieve lasting peace. -JD
“the United States has a strategic policy of using proxies to engage in war. And our objective was to overthrow the legitimate government of Syria, and in order to do that, we employed proxy soldiers who were the most vile of all terrorists. Something very similar is happening right now in in Ukraine…
…the United States war against Syria is a war of aggression. We put a highly secretive CIA special activities center—these are kind of the James Bond guys of the Central Intelligence Agency, total Machiavellian; they will do anything, there’s no it’s no holds barred with these guys. We sent them in and we started the war in Syria. The war didn’t exist until we sent the CIA to coordinate with Al Qaeda elements. So we began the war and we were not invited into Syria.”
Link To The Schiller Institute Article @ Source HERE
Lindsey Graham_August 2022:
“I like the structural path we’re on here. As long as we help Ukraine with the weapons they need and economic support, they will fight till the last person.”
The Bilderberg group, formed in 1954, is an exclusive club of some of the most wealthy and powerful individuals in the world. This private club is made up of International Bankers, Prime Ministers, Presidents, Military Leaders, Senators and Congress members, and Royalty. Some well known members include George Soros, Bill Gates, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Angela Merkel, Peter Thiel, Klaus Schwab, and so on.
Their goal is to install a One World Government or a New World Order. Some organizations with whom the Bilderbergers are affiliated include the Council on Foreign Relations, The Trilateral Commission, The United Nations, and NATO.
The Exposé article below names Bilderberg members who played a role in organizing the CV-19 event. FAR from being a health emergency, CV-19 was in fact, a skillfully orchestrated psychological operation, a catalyst to change the world system by attempting to destroy the sovereignty of nations and steer global control into a centralized government led by the UN. -JD
The Names of The Bilderbergers Who’ve Played a Role in The Covid Event
“Over 150 Bilderbergers (of the 1861 who are still alive) have played important parts in the Covid-19 event. Many, perhaps most, of the below have been active in various roles; this page attempts to list them under the most important played.” – Wikispooks
Since 25 August, Wikispooks has been the victim of a DNS attack and their website is inaccessible for most. We are sharing some of their articles until their website is, once again, accessible to all. To avoid complications with sharing our article we have not included the many embedded links on the Wikispooks page, some of which may be links to other pages within their website. However, we have attached a pdf copy of their page which includes those links. Please bear in mind that their pages are edited and updated from time to time.
It is unknown whether a 2021 Bilderberg Meeting was held; the group’s website stated that it “had to be cancelled, due to travel and meeting restrictions.” Of the 1861 living Bilderbergers, over 140, listed below, have played significant roles in managing the COVID-19 event: Many of those listed below are also on the list of COVID-19 WEF perpetrators.
Over 150 Bilderbergers (of the 1861 who are still alive) have played important parts in the COVID-19 event.
Many, perhaps most, of the below have been active in various roles; this page attempts to list them under the most important played. Steering committee members (both present and former) are underlined.
Virus R & D
See Wikispoooks’ full article: COVID-19/Origins
A lot of evidence suggests that SARS-CoV2 did not occur naturally, but was genetically manipulated from a naturally occurring bat coronavirus and possibly parts of additional viruses . Bilderberg members have done important work in developing the CRISPR gene editing technique:
Bernard Cazeneuve – 2018 – In 2017 attended the founding ceremony of the BSL-4 lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, together with Yves Lévy, whose wife abruptly banned over-the-counter sales of hydroxychloroquine in France in January 2020, declaring it “poisonous” without explanation.
Emmanuelle Charpentier – 2016 – Pioneered CRISPR as a tool for genome editing (for which she was co-recipient of a Nobel prize in 2020)
Sean Parker – 2010 – Billionaire who was the first to gain NIH approval for a trial of CRISPR 
See Wikispooks’ full article: Pandemic/Planning
Many Bilderbergers have worked repeatedly at Pandemic Planning; the group has been well represented at such exercises for at least 20 years. Those with the most obvious ties:
Gro Harlem Brundtland – 1982, 1983, introduced A Spreading Plague (2019 Pandemic planning exercise), and attended Atlantic Storm, and the February 2020 Preventing Global Catastrophic Biological Risks exercise
Avril Haines – 2017 – US Deep State actor who participated in Event 201 and the February 2020 Preventing Global Catastrophic Biological Risks exercises. Deputy Director of the CIA 2013-15, Director of National Intelligence since 2021
Sam Nunn – 1997, 1996 – Long experience in pandemic planning, Operation Dark Winter, A Spreading Plague, the February 2020 Preventing Global Catastrophic Biological Risks exercise
Judith Rodin – 2005 – As President of the Rockefeller Foundation took part in the Lock Step exercise which foresaw a pandemic as the means by which a techno totalitarian government might unfold.
See Wikispooks’ full article: COVID-19 Task Force
In Spring 2020, many nation states formed COVID-19 Task Forces, many of which had, or acted as if they had, “state of emergency” powers to override standard operating procedure.
National Task Forces
Vittorio Colao – 2018 – Leader of a special task force to handle “Phase 2” of the Italian Covid Task Force
Christopher Liddell – 2017 – Member of Trump’s White House Coronavirus Task Force
Matthew Pottinger – 2019 – Member of Trump’s White House Coronavirus Task Force. His wife Yen Pottinger was explaining the importance of social distancing in mid-March 2020
Kathleen Sebelius – 2008, 2007 – Member of Biden’s White House Coronavirus Task Force  and a board member of the Kaiser Family Foundation 
Jeffrey Zients – 2017 – Became White House coronavirus coordinator in 2021, announced in August that year that “it’s time to impose some requirements” where COVID jabs are concerned.
Image source | September 11, 2022 | ‘Ukraine war is a proxy-war’
Former U.S. Intelligence Officer John Kiriakou says the war in Ukraine is a proxy-war between the United States and Russia. He describes how after 911, the U.S. transitioned into a full time war-like economy, where we almost always have to be at war.
Endless war policy from D.C. bureaucrats has resulted in unnecessary escalation of conflict, needless death and destruction and continuous enrichment of the military industrial-intelligence complex. -JD
September 10, 2022 | By https://t.me/militarywave
‘Ukraine war is a proxy-war’
Military aid provided by the West won’t turn the tide in the Ukrainian conflict. It only protracts it, resulting in more unnecessary deaths among civilians and the military.
Additionally, thousands have been killed or injured by the experimental mRNA injection, that the Biden administration mandated, while weaponizing restrictions. With recent CDC admissions, it’s becoming clear that all the mandates and shots were not necessary, and ended up causing irreparable harm to Americans and small businesses.
Engineered crisis and orchestrated distractions are to be expected by this administration because it is plagued by corruption. With more and more people getting involved every day and working together to solve problems, accountability is on the table for those who have failed to keep their oath of office, committed crimes against humanity, and violated the public trust. -JD
Virginia NATO Base is “fully operational” and ready to support the “international order”
Kentucky Senator Rand Paul recently introduced an amendment to reaffirm that NATO cannot supersede Congress in declaring U.S. involvement in war, however it was rejected by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Few Americans may realize that Virginia is home to the NATO Allied Joint Force Command in Norfolk. The United States continues to finance NATO as it has done for decades.
HERE ARE THE FACTS: Norfolk NATO Base is “fully operational” and ready to support the “international order”
Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff Mark Milley stated that NATO new headquarters at the NAVAL base in Norfolk, VA has “full readiness” and is now “fully operational” in support of the “international order” and in anticipation of the “Battle of the Atlantic”.
Pentagon spokesman, John Kirby, stated that “placing the U.S. Carrier Strike Force under NATO shows our commitment to the alliance.”
Question: Is the Norfolk NAVAL base now under the command of NATO? Or, maybe more likely, is it ready to be put under full NATO command at any time?
HERE ARE THE FACTS
By Renee Parsons
In October 2019, the U.S. Navy celebrated its 244th Birthday. Beginning as privateers hired by the colonists to attack British commerce vessels during the Revolutionary War, the Continental Congress established a naval force in October, 1775. President John Adams signed the Act to formally establish the Department of the Navy in 1798.
Described as the largest naval station in the world, the Norfolk Naval Base was established in 1917 with 3,400 acres including four miles of waterfront space, eleven miles of pier and wharf space to accommodate seventy-five ships, one hundred thirty four aircraft, fourteen piers and eleven air craft hangars.
NATO and the UN have had a cooperative relationship to “global crisis management” since the 1990’s in support of UN Security Council resolutions in the Balkans, Afghanistan, Libya and now Ukraine. On June 4, 2021, NATO Chief Jan Stoltenberg called for more investment from the Alliance and adherence to NATO’s 2030 Agenda as it takes a more global approach.
NATO apologists say that there is ‘no evidence that Naval Station Norfolk was surrendered to NATO” and that the US Department of Defense “refuted the claim.”
By creating a military and political alliance, why would the US Government or the Pentagon relinquish its largest and most strategically important Naval base at Norfolk to any foreign military entity including NATO? Perhaps a better word than “surrender’ might be that the US Government has ‘abdicated’ its responsibility for Norfolk or that it has “relinquished’ its global supremacy and its authority to NATO. Where is the DOD’s refutation? Questions remain about how the Pentagon allowed NATO’s invasive presence at Norfolk and we remain committed to discover the true story.
It is true that no national news outlets have reported on NATO’s acquisition of the Norfolk base with no press release from the Department of Defense, the Navy and NATO informing the American public or explaining the NATO-Norfolk association. That is exactly the point! There has been a national news black out with no public notice or announcement except in the localized Norfolk area.
The truth is that two months prior to the 2020 election on September 17, 2020 (see Action Alert), Royal Navy Admiral Andrew Betton of the JFC and US Admiral Andrew Lewis cut the ribbon inaugurating the ‘initial operational capability ceremony’ of NATO at the Norfolk Naval facility. No member of the Trump Administration was in attendance.
By October 16, 2020, seventeen days before the 2020 election, a new sign “Welcome to Norfolk – NATO’s Home in North America” was unveiled at the arrival gate of the Norfolk Airport. By that time, Norfolk had become home to both the NATO-Allied Command Transformation (ACT) and NATO’s Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFC).
By July, 15 2021, as confirmed by Defense News, the Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk (JFC) held a ceremony to declare its NATO Norfolk base to be ‘fully operational capability,” at “full readiness as the first operational NATO headquarters in North America”. The term “fully operational” means that the Command is at full staff. Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff Mark Milley attended to give his blessing to NATO, in support of the ‘international order’ and in anticipation of the “Battle of the Atlantic”. See Milley’s full speech
In February 2022, the USS Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group first sailed under the command of the NATO’s Naval Striking and Support Forces. On July 20, 2022, it was announced that the USS Harry S. Truman CSG was now under NATO tactical and operational command as it participated in an ‘exercise’ with NATO allies. Such transfer of authority raises the question of whether the US President’s authority as Commander-in-Chief has been unconstitutionally constrained and whether the President’s constitutional authority has been undermined with respect to the conduct of diplomacy.
“Western governments in the NATO military alliance are developing tactics of “cognitive warfare,” using the supposed threats of China and Russia to justify waging a “battle for your brain” in the “human domain,” to “make everyone a weapon.”
“NATO is developing new forms of warfare to wage a “battle for the brain,” as the military alliance put it.
The US-led NATO military cartel has tested novel modes of hybrid warfare against its self-declared adversaries, including economic warfare, cyber warfare, information warfare, and psychological warfare.
Now, NATO is spinning out an entirely new kind of combat it has branded cognitive warfare. Described as the “weaponization of brain sciences,” the new method involves “hacking the individual” by exploiting “the vulnerabilities of the human brain” in order to implement more sophisticated “social engineering.”
Until recently, NATO had divided war into five different operational domains: air, land, sea, space, and cyber. But with its development of cognitive warfare strategies, the military alliance is discussing a new, sixth level: the “human domain.”
A 2020 NATO-sponsored study of this new form of warfare clearly explained, “While actions taken in the five domains are executed in order to have an effect on the human domain, cognitive warfare’s objective is to make everyone a weapon.”
“The brain will be the battlefield of the 21st century,” the report stressed. “Humans are the contested domain,” and “future conflicts will likely occur amongst the people digitally first and physically thereafter in proximity to hubs of political and economic power.”
While the NATO-backed study insisted that much of its research on cognitive warfare is designed for defensive purposes, it also conceded that the military alliance is developing offensive tactics, stating, “The human is very often the main vulnerability and it should be acknowledged in order to protect NATO’s human capital but also to be able to benefit from our adversaries’s vulnerabilities.”
In a chilling disclosure, the report said explicitly that “the objective of Cognitive Warfare is to harm societies and not only the military.”
With entire civilian populations in NATO’s crosshairs, the report emphasized that Western militaries must work more closely with academia to weaponize social sciences and human sciences and help the alliance develop its cognitive warfare capacities.
The study described this phenomenon as “the militarization of brain science.” But it appears clear that NATO’s development of cognitive warfare will lead to a militarization of all aspects of human society and psychology, from the most intimate of social relationships to the mind itself.
Such all-encompassing militarization of society is reflected in the paranoid tone of the NATO-sponsored report, which warned of “an embedded fifth column, where everyone, unbeknownst to him or her, is behaving according to the plans of one of our competitors.” The study makes it clear that those “competitors” purportedly exploiting the consciousness of Western dissidents are China and Russia.
In other words, this document shows that figures in the NATO military cartel increasingly see their own domestic population as a threat, fearing civilians to be potential Chinese or Russian sleeper cells, dastardly “fifth columns” that challenge the stability of “Western liberal democracies.”
NATO’s development of novel forms of hybrid warfare come at a time when member states’ military campaigns are targeting domestic populations on an unprecedented level.
The Ottawa Citizen reported this September that the Canadian military’s Joint Operations Command took advantage of the Covid-19 pandemic to wage an information war against its own domestic population, testing out propaganda tactics on Canadian civilians.
Internal NATO-sponsored reports suggest that this disclosure is just scratching the surface of a wave of new unconventional warfare techniques that Western militaries are employing around the world.
Canada hosts ‘NATO Innovation Challenge’ on cognitive warfare
Twice each year, NATO holds a “pitch-style event” that it brand as an “Innovation Challenge.” These campaigns – one hosted in the Spring and the other in the Fall, by alternating member states – call on private companies, organizations, and researchers to help develop new tactics and technologies for the military alliance.
The shark tank-like challenges reflect the predominant influence of neoliberal ideology within NATO, as participants mobilize the free market, public-private partnerships, and the promise of cash prizes to advance the agenda of the military-industrial complex.
“Cognitive warfare seeks to change not only what people think, but also how they act,” the Canadian government wrote in its official statement on the challenge. “Attacks against the cognitive domain involve the integration of cyber, disinformation/misinformation, psychological, and social-engineering capabilities.”
Ottawa’s press release continued: “Cognitive warfare positions the mind as a battle space and contested domain. Its objective is to sow dissonance, instigate conflicting narratives, polarize opinion, and radicalize groups. Cognitive warfare can motivate people to act in ways that can disrupt or fragment an otherwise cohesive society.”
NATO-backed Canadian military officials discuss cognitive warfare in panel event
An advocacy group called the NATO Association of Canada has mobilized to support this Innovation Challenge, working closely with military contractors to attract the private sector to invest in further research on behalf of NATO – and its own bottom line.
“Only an alert and knowledgable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together.”
President Eisenhower – Farewell Address Jan. 17, 1961 Link To Video
“Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron.” Dwight D. Eisenhower, From a speech before the American Society of Newspaper Editors, April 16, 1953 34th president of US 1953-1961 (1890 – 1969)
Kentucky Senator Rand Paul recently introduced an amendment to reaffirm that NATO cannot supersede Congress in declaring U.S. involvement in war, however it was rejected this week by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Few Americans may realize that Virginia is home to the NATO Allied Joint Force Command in Norfolk. The United States continues to finance NATO as it has done for decades.
The calculated undermining of America’s military by vaxx mandates and divisive political ideology pushed by the Biden administration and top military leaders has for the most part, remained unchallenged.
In 1961 President Eisenhower issued a warning that only an alert and knowledgable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty many prosper together. 
WAKE UP CALL
As USA’s armed forces are facing a recruitment crisis, Congressional and military “leadership” are eagerly strengthening other militaries such as Ukraine and NATO.
Americans are needed RIGHT NOW to advocate for our military service members, challenge the treasonous actions of elected public servants and step up to protect and defend our Constitution since apparently those who took the Oath of Office are failing to meet their obligation.
Meanwhile, organizing with friends and family at the local level is something we can continue to do now, to get back to basics and forge a positive path forward toward a brighter future for everyone.