September 28, 2023 | ZERO5G.com | Thankfully, many are aware of the FCC/FEMA emergency alert system test scheduled for October 4th and recognize that they can power off the phone in order to withdraw from participation.
According to their news release, FEMA, in coordination with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), will conduct a nationwide test of the Emergency Alert System (EAS) and Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA). The announcement states that beginning at approximately 2:20 p.m. ET, cell towers will broadcast the test for approximately 30 minutes. During this time, WEA-compatible wireless phones that are switched on, within range of an active cell tower, and whose wireless provider participates in WEA.
Best practices to significantly reduce radiation exposure and withdrawing participation from data harvesting and tracking include: using cell phones less often, or ditching ‘smart’ phones and other wireless devices, preferring wiredconnectionsinstead.
Those who have studied the harms of wireless radiation are aware that exposure to Radiofrequency/Microwave (RF/MW) Radiation is known to cause adverse bioeffects including flu-like symptoms.
“This Article introduces the ongoing progression of the Internet of Things (IoT) into the Internet of Bodies (IoB)—a network of human bodies whose integrity and functionality rely at least in part on the Internet and related technologies, such as artificial intelligence.IoB devices will evidence the same categories of legacy security flaws that have plagued IoT devices. However, unlike most IoT, IoB technologies will directly, physically harm human bodies—a set of harms courts, legislators, and regulators will deem worthy of legal redress.” LINK
In addition to finding ways to begin reducing RF/Microwave Radiation exposure as best we can, it’s important to address the polluting infrastructure.
We can do this by educating elected representatives, strengthening local ordinances, and getting involved in policy making at the local and state level with regard to regulations governing wireless infrastructure.
September 20, 2023 | ZERO5G.com | Image source |Voice your opposition to pro-telecom bills that are moving quickly through the U.S. House and Senate.
Federal bills are running against strong public opposition in the U.S. The attempt to remove regulatory barriers is a euphemism for removing our voices and consent.
Check to see if your legislators are in any of the House or Senate Committees on Commerce, on Natural Resources, on Transportation and Infrastructure, on Agriculture, on Armed Services, on National/Homeland Security, on Communications Media & Broadband, on Rules.
National Security Risks of S.1648 (HR 682), HR 1123, HR 1353, HR 4510, HR 3565, HR 1338
Bills That Jeopardize National Security and Cybersecurity:
US FEDERAL BILLS WOULD FAST-TRACK WIRELESS NETWORKS NATIONWIDE
Congress is currently considering nearly 50 bills in both chambers that, collectively, would promote significant proliferation of wireless antennas and infrastructure across the country and in space, likely leading to wireless antenna proliferation and/or higher levels of wireless radiation in the environment.
Instead of fast-tracking wireless networks, Congress should ensure it is protecting the public and environment.
Pending Bills Would:
Preempt local zoning authority on the placement of antennas
Exempt most wireless deployments from certain environmental and historic preservation laws
Encourage deployment on federal land, including National Forests and National Parks
Increase availability of spectrum for commercial use by reallocating from federal users
Make federal broadband funds available for wireless deployment
Fast-track approvals for satellite networks
Encourage wireless radiation in agriculture, which depends on pollinators
Virtually eliminates states’ rights and local authority over communications facilities, allows cell towers to be placed almost anywhere, and exempts most wireless deployments, including all small cells, from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA).
No agency with health or environmental expertise is funded to consider radiofrequency (RF) effects from environmental emitters (e.g., cell towers, small cells, 5G/4G wireless network antennas).
No oversight, monitoring, or compliance program exists.
No safety regulations exist to protect wildlife, trees or plants, despite evidence of serious harm, with pollinators being uniquely vulnerable.
Outdated FCC Wireless RF Exposure Regulations:
FCC RF exposure limits remain unchanged since 1996.
No federal agency has conducted a comprehensive review of the current body of science on the health and environmental impacts of wireless RF radiation.
“We find the [FCC’s radiofrequency] order arbitrary and capricious in its complete failure to respond to comments concerning environmental harm caused by RF radiation.”
The FCC has not complied with the DC Circuit Court order to explain how U.S. RF limits address:
impacts on children
non-cancer effects of long-term exposure
the ubiquity of wireless technology since 1996
impacts on the environment (pollinators, plants and animals)
An Unsupported Basis for Bills Fast-tracking Wireless:
Pending bills are being promoted under the banners of “streamlining”, “removing barriers to entry”, and “closing the digital divide.”
In fact, these bills ignore constitutional protections, conflict with existing federal law, remove states’ rights, and would perpetuate the digital divide.
Increasing RF levels across the country will put people, wildlife, and the natural environment at serious risk of harm. Federal accountability and environmental safeguards are needed before allowing unfettered wireless proliferation.
Solutions:
Instead of fast tracking wireless networks, Congress should ensure the public and environment are adequately protected. Accountability actions include:
Require qualified, independent federal agencies to assess the evidence on wireless impacts and develop science-based exposure limits for humans, wildlife and the natural environment.
Fund the EPA to establish a federal program for nationwide RF measurements, environmental monitoring, oversight and compliance.
Exercise Congressional oversight authority over FCC and its lack of compliance with the DC Circuit order.
Encourage deployment of high-speed, affordable, wired broadband to every home in America to bridge the digital divide with infrastructure that is faster, safer, and more secure.
Below is a wagon-load – 11,000 pages – of scientific evidence documenting harm from RadioFrequency / Microwave (RF/MW) Radiation:
The U.S. Courts of Appeals (DC Cir.) accepted and based its Aug 13, 2021 ruling on 27 volumes of scientific evidence concluding multiple significant biological damages caused by pulsed, modulated RF electromagnetic radiation exposure at power levels that are millions of times lower than the RF electromagnetic radiation exposure guidelines recommended by NCRP Report No. 86. The judges considered the 11,000+ pages of peer-reviewed, scientific evidence (see links listed, below) in their ruling in Case 20-1025, Environmental Health Trust, et al. v FCC and a issued a mandate to the FCC: Vol-1, Vol-2, Vol-3, Vol-4, Vol-5, Vol-6, Vol-7Vol-8, Vol-9, Vol-10, Vol-11, Vol-12, Vol-13, Vol-14, Vol-15, Vol-16, Vol-17, Vol-18, Vol-19, Vol-20, Vol-21, Vol-22, Vol-23, Vol-24, Vol-25, Vol-26 and Vol-27.
September 17, 2023 | Zero5G.com | There is no “safe” level of microwave radiation.
Due to high radiation levels, French regulators have ordered a halt on certain cell phone sales, reported to exceed the European standard specific absorption rate of 4.0 watts per kilogram.
The spotlight on harms of cell phone RADIATION is extremely important since most customers have no idea that their cell phone and other wireless devices transmit harmful Radiofrequency/ Microwave (RF/MW) RADIATION continuously while powered on.
Just as big tobacco’s smoking “products” were protected by regulators for decades, big telecom’s RADIATION “product” is also protected, not only by regulatory agencies such as the FCC that are captured by the industries that they are supposed to regulate, but by policy makers and unelected boards and commissions.
RF/MW Radiation exposure is not only being absorbed from a cell phone or a wireless device. Microwave antenna networks (and satellites) are constantly transmitting RADIATION at the device ((THE USER)) when powered on. Many people may also be unaware that RF/MW RADIATION may be used as a weapon.
Koppel T and Koppel T: Measurements of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, including 5G, in the city of Columbia, SC, USA. World Acad Sci J 4: 22, 2022
It’s time to stop giving Big Industry a free pass to pollute our homes and communities with RADIATION. Forced involuntary exposure to RADIATION is NOT a “service” it is an assault.
September 15, 2023 | Image source | A recent report on the Maui fires examinesevidence regarding directed energy weapons (DEW) via satellites as a possible cause for the devastating fires. As many have reported, the destruction looks like a bomb went off, quite similar to the aftermath of California and Colorado fires, where cars melted, certain homes turned to dust, while other homes, some trees, grass, and shrubs were not impacted.
Though this critical investigation points toward CCP satellites that may have been directly over the target zones at the time of ignition, it’s also important to acknowledge that the U.S. and China are actuallypartners (as well as competitors) in the deployment of global satellite infrastructure and telecommunications networks within the organizing principle of the United Nations WMO and UN ITU.
It may seem astonishing that the US and China (and Russia and Ukraine) are global partners in satellite system management. However, this fact underscores that all roads to world governance lead back to the UN and Agenda 21/2030/2050, reaffirming the urgent need for the USA to Exit and Defund the UN.
Prioritizing the defense of USA airspace and borders is an absolute imperativeinaddition to strict regulatory control and prohibition of foreign satellites or space weaponsabove us.
The U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) is a federal program mandated by Congress to coordinate federal research and investments; USGCRP facilitates collaboration and cooperation across its 13 federal member agencies.
August 18, 2023 | Zero5G.com | Image source_Biological Effects Of RadioFrequency Radiation 1984
A 1978 Government Accounting Office (GAO) report on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) efforts to protect the public from exposure to low-level radiation was requested by New York Congressmember Elizabeth Holtzman, in August 1977.
The potential harmful health effects of low-level radiation were recognized and became a subject of national interest.
According to the 15 page report, symptoms attributed to low-level exposure to radiation include, “headache, weariness, dizziness, irritability, emotional instability, partial loss of memory, loss of appetite, cardiovascular effects, electroencephalogram changes, blood chemistry changes, changes in respiration, and possible genetic effects.”
Today there are zero agencies monitoring or measuring radiation to protect public health and environmental safety.
Despite the lack of a protective safety standard and the failure of government agencies to stop radiation, individuals and communities everywhere are organizing to establish strong regulatory barriers at the local level to stop radiation deployments, prevent harm, and protect all life.
Efforts by the Environmental Protection Agency To Protect the Public from Environmental Nonionizing Radiation Exposures
“–the U.S. standard for extended human occupational exposure to microwave radiation is approximately 1,000 times greater than the Soviet Union’s published standard.” -p. 3
HR-3557 and HR-4141 are proposed federal telecommunications bills that would eliminate nearly all state and local control over Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (WTF) and would enable the construction of a Digital Prison for Americans.
H.R. 3557:
“We must oppose this bill. This is the worst bill I have seen in my entire life with respect to telecommunications. You have to understand how bad this is…
THIS is the Digital Prison right here.
THIS is the bill you cannot let them pass!”
-Paul G.
H.R. 4141:
The title of the proposed bill pretty much says it all:
“To provide that certain communications projects are not subject to requirements to prepare certain environmental or historical preservation reviews, and for other purposes.”
On May 24, 2023, the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee marked up and voted through HR-3557, either to the next committee or to the House floor; a decision to be made by House leaderships
On July 26, 2023, the U.S. House Natural Resources Committee Marked Up and Voted through Committee HR-4141, either to the next committee or to the House floor; a decision to be made by House leaderships
HR-3557 and HR-4141 are heavy-handed bills with unacceptable federal overreach into local land use, permitting, and franchise negotiations. Congress must respect the local zoning and permitting for wired broadband and wireless telecommunications infrastructure, as intended in prior Congressional Acts, to ensure that such infrastructures are only deployed as and where needed to serve the public interest and protect valuable public resources including safety, health and property.
If H.R. 3557 passes, it could result in a truly unrestricted proliferation of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (WTFs) of any size in residential zones, near schools, parks, playgrounds, and sensitive care facilities without any local or community input.
Local governments have always been the stewards of these finite public resources and must remain so.
We need to stop HR-3557 and HR-4141.
REGISTER NOW to attend this 2-hour Zoom Meeting on Wednesday, August 16, 2023
“ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS.—No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the operation, placement, construction, or modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions…
Proposed House bills H.R. 3557 and HR-4141 are companion bills that, if signed into law, would establish an unnecessary and massive federal power grab designed to strip away nearly all state and local control in the permitting and review of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (WTFs).
The bills would eliminate the cooperative federalism and local control principles that were upheld by the US Supreme Court in its 2005 Ruling in Abrams vs Palos Verdes. The bills would also violate the very purposes of the Act they aim to amend: the 1934 Communications Act, as amended in 1996 and 2012: promoting safety of life and property.
In H.R. 3557 , the wireless industry is proposing new expansive definitions of “Antenna“, “Communications Service” , “Personal Wireless Service“, and “Effective Prohibition” of Personal Wireless Service. The bill also attempts to establish unreasonable terms for WTF review and attempts to pre-empt local zoning authority with language like this:
“including with respect to an area that has not previously been zoned for personal wireless service facilities”
Agenda 2030’s Sustainable Development Goals are deceptive goals designed to eliminate Americans’ God-given inalienable rights, freedoms and liberties. Don’t be confused by any “pleasant sounding” language in these UN Globalist goals; Agenda 2030 is the inventory and control plan that would create a digital prison in your community.
The Agenda 2030 plan requires HR-3557 and HR-4141 to construct a 24/7 wireless surveillance system created by hazardous 24/7 RF-Microwave radiation antennas placed far too close to homes (closer than 2500 feet) at far too high radio signal strengths (more than -85 dBm in areas accessible to people)
Agenda 2030 would enable the unlimited taking of personal property/wealth to enrich governments and Globlalist-sponsored public-private partnerships via Digital-ID, Digital Currency and Tracing/Tracking/Control of individuals’ movements and financial transactions.
Yes, it is that bad. We cannot allow this Digital Prison to be built in our communities. Instead, Americans can stand together to eliminate HR-3557’s and HR-4141 in order to preserve:
Americans’ God-given inalienable rights, freedoms and liberties
Local control over the construction of last-mile telecommunications and broadband infrastructure,
States’, counties’ and localities’ rights to decide for themselves the best mix of wired broadband (fiber optic, coaxial and copper lines) and wireless infrastructure.
We must oppose and not comply with any plans or actions that would enable federal, state and local governments to build such a 24/7 wireless surveillance infrastructure in our communities. The vast majority of internet access can and should be provided by fiber optic cables directly to homes and businesses to protect Americans from the public safety, privacy and property value hazards created by a 24/7 wireless surveillance infrastructure grid in residential zones. Wireless Telecommunications Facilities constructed in the public rights-of-ways in residential zones are simply not necessary for broadband.
Also, if we have learned anything over the last three years, NO so-called “pandemic”, “climate emergency” or “fear story du jour” justifies the elimination of Americans’ God-given inalienable rights, freedoms and liberties. We cannot be fooled again.
Americans must stand together to fully oppose HR-3557’s and HR-4141’s attempt to build an “Agenda 2030” Digital Prison.
-Paul G.
Proposed bill H.R. 3557 aims to speed up the deployment of wireless and other communications facilities through a massive federal power grab that strips away state and local control in the permitting and regulatory review processes – the very mechanisms designed to protect citizens from the threats posed by wireless facilities.
In May of 2023, the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee passed H.R. 3557 – which completely eliminates the ability of Americans to use State and local governmental authorities to modify placement of wireless antenna facilities based on the safety of life and property, and on aesthetic and historic values.
This is a very heavy-handed example of federal overreach into local land use, permitting, and franchise negotiation decisions. Local people deserve the opportunity to decide whether public investment in, and/or ownership of, broadband infrastructure is the right choice for their communities. Congress must respect the fact that these processes are best managed at the level of government that is closest and most responsive to the people.
Local zoning and permitting for wired and wireless communications build outs, are intended, per prior Congressional Acts, to ensure that such infrastructures are only deployed as and where needed to serve the public interest and protect valuable public resources including safety, health and property.
If H.R. 3557 passes, it could result in a truly unrestricted proliferation of cell towers and small cell installations near schools, playgrounds, and homes without any local or community input.
Override state and local government police powers and property rights and would preempt local authority to manage public rights-of-way and land use for telecommunications infrastructure. This represents a substantial federal overreach into the oversight of the placement of wireless facilities on public rights of way, which is a fundamentally local process and must remain so.
Empower providers to install facilities where they choose regardless of local zoning, thus eliminating the ability of local governments to impose reasonable standards.
Weaken the authority of local governments to regulate the use of our public rights-of-way, and diminishes their authority to locally determine appropriate compensation for such use.
Mandate that all wireless siting decisions be “deemed granted” if not denied by a local government within much shorter periods than the federal government for similar projects. The federal government has 270 days to act, while locals must act as fast as 60 days. It is not appropriate for Congress to apply stricter timelines and restrictions on local governments for these processes than it does on federal agencies.
Mandate that sites be constructed “without any further action by the government,” without notice to the local government, or obligation to comply with safety laws. This would provide no public safety protections for construction of facilities that had been “deemed granted.”
Impose artificially short timelines that are virtually impossible to meet, create technical grounds for defeating incompleteness notices and require local governments to draft, publish, and deliver a written denial decision with reasons to an applicant on the same day that the local governing body hears and votes on the application — a virtually impossible task because such written decisions typically require the examination and analysis of evidence presented to local council.
Require that “all proceedings required by a State or local government or instrumentality thereof for the approval of the request” be taken within the timeline.
Limit the fees that local governments could require which, unlike the current FCC rules, the local government must justify based on a complex rate-making formula.
Substitute the FCC for the local federal district court as the reviewing body for challenges to local government decisions regarding wireless facility applications, thus breaking the promise made by Congress in 1996 that local governments would not be required to travel to Washington to defend local decisions.
Impose new and similarly flawed timelines and “deemed granted” remedies on applications for wireline telecommunications facilities
Undermine the property rights of local governments and damage their ability to protect and preserve the safety, well-being, and aesthetics of their communities. Congress has historically recognized these rights in Sections 224, 253 and 332 of the Telecommunications Act.
Make virtually any local government decision not to allow the installation of a proposed wireless facility at a provider’s request a “prohibition” preempted by federal law.
Eliminate cable franchise renewals, thereby restricting the ability of state or local franchising authorities to enforce franchise obligations such as public, educational, and government channel capacity and facilities, customer service requirements, and system build-out requirements.
Grant cable operators the right to use local rights-of-way to provide non-cable services while prohibiting localities from imposing any fees on non-cable services for use of those rights-of-way.
Pre-empt local governments’ rights-of-way compensation and management authority, zoning powers, cable franchising authority, and property rights.
Impose costs on local governments, burdens on our taxpayers, interfere with public safety and otherwise remove local protections that are the heart of communities while offering no improvement in broadband service.
Create unfunded mandates on local governments and inhibit their ability to be directly responsive to residents and good stewards of public resources.
Bestow on broadband providers an unprecedented federal grant of access to state and local public property, but impose no obligations on those providers to serve “unserved” and “underserved” Americans.
The National Health Federation:
Americans are waking up to the assault of constant 24/7 exposure to radio frequency radiation (RFR) from wireless technology installed and being installed in our homes, cars, streets, local businesses, schools, and communities without our informed consent. While many property owners would prefer to restrict wireless facility expansion in residential neighborhoods, past and current legislation has made that extremely difficult for localities.
In Biden’s 2021 infrastructure bill (Public Law No: 117-58), Big Telecom received $65 billion towards the proliferation of unsafe and untested 5G (and beyond) technology without a single mention of safety precautions or even any monitoring of the increase in radiation levels within communities.[1]
Over 90% of surveyed Americans don’t want wireless technology near their homes.[3]
In 2018, the National Institutes of Health’s National Toxicology Program (NTP) found wireless causes cancer and alters DNA.[4]
When the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended long-term safety studies of the Electromagnetic Frequency (EMF) environmental pollutant, Congress – tragically – defunded that effort.[5]
More recently in 2021, the D.C. Court of Appeals challenged the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for lying about their wireless safety guidelines that were found not to be science-based.[6]
Instead of sitting idly by as America is saturated in wireless deployment, Congress needs to hold hearings on Big Telecom’s concealment of wireless health and safety dangers, and pass NHF-recommended legislation to initiate the monitoring of wireless radiation that will trigger mitigation measures when permissible RFR exposure levels are exceeded.[10]
Americans want affordable and safe wired connectivity in their communities, and Congress urgently needs to hold hearings about why we’re getting unsafe and untested wireless instead.
The organizations listed below have co-signed the following letter to Congress. Contact them and ask them how you can help support their opposition to H.R. 3557.
The National League of Cities (NLC) is the voice of America’s cities, towns and villages, representing more than 200 million people. NLC works to strengthen local leadership, influence federal policy and drive innovative solutions. Contact: Angelina Panettieri, Legislative Director for Information Technology and Communications, at 202-626-3196 or panettieri@nlc.org
The National Association of Counties (NACo) provides essential services to the nation’s 3,069 counties, serving nearly 40,000 county elected officials and 3.6 million county employees. Since 1935, NACo unites county officials to advocate county priorities in federal policymaking and optimize county and taxpayer resources and cost savings while promoting exemplary county policies and practices. Contact: Seamus Dowdall, Assoc. Legislative Director, Telecommunications & Technology at 202-942-4212 or sdowdall@naco.org
The United States Conference of Mayors (USCM) is the official nonpartisan organization of cities with populations of 30,000 or more. There are 1,400 such cities in the country today. Each city is represented in the Conference by its chief elected official, the mayor. The Conference’s Task Forces examine and act on issues that demand special attention such as civic innovation, exports, hunger and homelessness, and brownfields, transportation and technology. Contact: David W. Burns, Assistant Executive Director, at 202-861-6765 or dburns@usmayors.org
The National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors’ (NATOA) 400 members are local government staff and their advisors offering a wealth of experience and expertise on public rights-of-way management telecom work and communications issues on behalf of local government related to broadband, wireless, cable television, public, educational, and government (PEG) access, public safety communications, consumer protection and PROW management. Contact: Mike Lynch, Legislative Affairs Director, 703-519-8035, x202 or MLynch@NATOA.org
Link to opposition letter — Georgia Municipal Association
The Congressional representatives listed below have co-sponsored H.R.3557.
Contact their offices, ask them to take a closer look at the proposed bill and encourage them to change their minds, and remove their name as co-sponsors.
Click on the links below to access their websites.
Below is a wagon-load – 11,000 pages – of scientific evidence documenting harm from RadioFrequency / Microwave (RF/MW) Radiation:
The U.S. Courts of Appeals (DC Cir.) accepted and based its Aug 13, 2021 ruling on 27 volumes of scientific evidence concluding multiple significant biological damages caused by pulsed, modulated RF electromagnetic radiation exposure at power levels that are millions of times lower than the RF electromagnetic radiation exposure guidelines recommended by NCRP Report No. 86. The judges considered the 11,000+ pages of peer-reviewed, scientific evidence (see links listed, below) in their ruling in Case 20-1025, Environmental Health Trust, et al. v FCC and a issued a mandate to the FCC: Vol-1, Vol-2, Vol-3, Vol-4, Vol-5, Vol-6, Vol-7Vol-8, Vol-9, Vol-10, Vol-11, Vol-12, Vol-13, Vol-14, Vol-15, Vol-16, Vol-17, Vol-18, Vol-19, Vol-20, Vol-21, Vol-22, Vol-23, Vol-24, Vol-25, Vol-26 and Vol-27.
August 7, 2023 | Zero5G.com | The DOD is leading the charge for “5G,” in partnership with the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), a UN ITU partner.
RADIATION is widely advertised using the marketing term “5G.”
The problems with the DOD, NTIA, and Department of Commerce-UN ITU partnership include the fact that the UN ITU is the world’s standardizing body for “5G.”
The UN ITU is an unelected organization dedicated to the installation of a world government ( via Agenda 2030), whose biggest contributor is China.
Microwave antenna infrastructure (5G-6G+AI) to be used as a permanent digital prison is a globalist collaboration by UN Member Nations and leaders of nations, in violation of legitimate governance, individual liberty and national sovereignty.
Public consent, ethical principles, and environmental protection are absent from DOD / UN ITU deployments of microwave antenna systems (“5G”) worldwide.
Link To United Nations International Telecommunications Union (ITU) Members
Civilian leadership to assert local control in order to prevent deployment of microwave antennas and networks is a critical step toward cleaning up RADIATION (“5G”), boosting national security and stability and most importantly, saving life on Earth.
July 31, 2023 | Information warfare is not something that we often think of while scrolling through internet feeds and surfing online. However, each of us is now a target of psychological warfare, designed specifically for us according to our preferences based on our unique online history – to alter our perceptions and change our behaviors.
Dividing and conquering the population and getting people to lose their minds, is a primary objective of cognitive warfare.
A 2022 NATO report titled “Cognitive Warfare”: The Advent of the Concept of “Cognitics” in the Field of Warfare, states:
“Cognitive warfare is now with us. The main challenge is that it is essentially invisible; all you see is its impact, and by then … it is often too late…
It operates on a global stage since humankind as a whole is now digitally connected. It uses information technology and the tools, machines, networks, and systems that come with it. Its target is clear: our individual intelligences, to be considered both individually and as a group.”
We witnessed the success of cognitive warfare strategy achieved during the CV19 operation.
During the planned CV19 event, reasonable and rational people were fooled and coerced into collectivist compliance by means of government and social media propaganda. We were socially engineered to be terrified of an invisible enemy, that we later found out was just a bad flu made in a lab.
The foundation of cognitive warfare is built on wireless communications infrastructures [satellite networks and interoperable microwave antenna systems, aka “+4G+5G+6G+”] toward an overarching Artificial Intelligence (AI).
Counteracting cognitive warfare involves consciously unplugging ourselves from the internet and social media, continually questioning and scrutinizing information for accuracy, gaining local control of wireless infrastructures, while preferring and prioritizing wired connections to boost security.
Amazon also has an initiative to “deploy thousands of satellites in low Earth orbit (LEO) linked to a global network of antennas, fiber, and internet connection points on the ground.” Bill Gates has invested in satellites and “5G” ground-based microwave tower and antenna infrastructure as well.
Some may wonder what’s involved in satellite communications “service” or Wi-Fi delivery from space. Setting aside the skillful use of marketing terms such as “Wi-Fi,” “broadband,” and “connections,” what is actually being transmitted is Radiofrequency/Microwave (RF/MW)Radiation, a harmful physical agent.
What are the consequences of satellites covering the Earth with RF/MW Radiation?
When thinking of microwaves, we often think about the microwave oven, which operates at about the same frequency as wireless, or Wi-Fi, at 2.4 – 2.5 GHz.
The reason why 2.4 to 2.5 GHz is very problematic is that this frequency is a wavelength of about 5″, which is close to the dimensions of the human head and brain, as well as other organs. This means that radiation absorption is maximized in these organs. Further, because of maximized absorption, no exposure level is safe.
Satellite systems interact with ground-based microwave antenna infrastructures. People, plants, animals, bees, and all biological life are being exposed to increased levels of RF/MW Radiation ostensibly for phone and internet “service,” but satellites are also deployed as weaponry as well as for the total surveillance of every inch of the Earth.
Prioritizing future-proof, hard-wired connections, enacting strong safety measures to reign in satellite/ground-based microwave antenna infrastructures, and meaningful public oversight are necessary to protect all life on Earth.
“The Institute for the Study of the Brain (sic) of the University of California is cited as engaged in research on the debilitating effect of weak vibrational fields on human behavior.” p. 84, 85
July 23, 2023 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | The purpose of this article is to examine the link between “5G” (satellite and ground-based microwave antenna systems), Geoengineering / Weather Modification (weather control), and UN-led globalist governance of these activities. Bottom line is that these systems are interactive and may be purposed as weapons. Regulatory measures at local, state, and national levels can be enacted and implemented to prohibit weather manipulation and the release of hazardous emissions in our skies and at ground level.
In a 1961 speech to the UN, JFK stated: “We shall propose further cooperative efforts between all nations in weather prediction and eventually in weather control. We shall propose, finally, a global system of communications satellites linking the whole world in telegraph and telephone and radio and television”.
Weather control involves the intentional release and interaction of two categories of hazardous polluting emissions:
“A hidden part of the information and communication (ICT) networks and devices we all use every day, ITU standards are rarely perceived by users but vital in enabling the interconnection and interoperability of ICT equipment and devices manufactured by hundreds of thousands of different companies around the world.”
The UN WMO and ITU collaborate to coordinate weather control and monitoring activities.
According to Petteri Taalas, WMO Secretary-General ITU “Radiofrequencies are really critical for meteorological services and climate monitoring applications.”
“It is also a growing area of collaboration for the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), as the shared used of radio spectrum is crucial for the study of climate change — and for the implementation of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).”
“Monitoring” may also be interpreted as SURVEILLANCE.
A June 2023 White House report “Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Management,” outlines the plan to deploy geoengineering programs, that are being framed as “research.” The report cites cooperative efforts with the WMO.
Origin of Meteorology see CIA 1960 Climate Control ReportHERE
International Telecommunication Union: The Most Important UN Agency You Have Never Heard OfHERE
Feasibility of Space-Based Monitoring for Governance of Solar Radiation ManagementHERE
Globally interactive systems of weather engineering and wireless communication networks (ALL the “G’s” + Artificial Intelligence) together comprise the foundation for a global, military weapons system.
Public private partnerships provide borderless collaboration and control of Weather and Wireless Telecommunications Systems outside the context of legitimate governance.
More Information on Artificial Intelligence, the ITU and the WMO below:
What can be done to ban weather engineering and other hazardous emissions:
Regulatory measures at the state and national level can be enacted and implemented to prohibit weather manipulation and the release of hazardous emissions in our skies and at ground level.
Mexico banned Solar Geoengineering experimentation in January 2023.
Pennsylvania, Maryland, and West Virginia provide precedent from the 1960’s for prohibiting and preventing cloud seeding and weather modification activities. These kinds of policies could be reenacted at the state and national level today.
The Atmosphere Protection Act was introduced in Rhode Island in 2023 to prohibit deliberate polluting activities in the atmosphere and at ground level, including both aerosol injection and RF/MW Radiation.
Legislation to tackle geoengineering and weather modification pollution was also introduced in Connecticut and Illinois this year.
It’s possible and necessary to take control of wireless infrastructures at the local level.
FromWire America:
Any county or locality can set the following WTF application requirement: the application will remain incomplete until the applicant submits substantial written evidence in the public record proving that the FCC has completed the U.S. Courts of Appeals-mandated work in Cases 18-1129, 18-1051 and 20-1025.
The court vacated the National Environmental Policy Act and National Historic Preservation Act exemptions and vacated the very definition of “Small Wireless Facilities” — a definition that was never subsequently re-established by the FCC. As a result, every single WTF of any size must undergo NEPA and NHPA review and must be considered one-at-a-time, on a case-by-case basis.
The court upheld the FCC’s decision to re-classify broadband Internet as an “information service,” and mobile broadband as a “private mobile service,” making neither subject to common carrier status or Title II regulation. The Court also concluded that the FCC did not show legal authority to issue its Preemption Directive, which would have barred states from imposing any rule or requirement to regulate broadband internet. The court vacated that portion of the order, freeing the states to regulate broadband as they wish.
Case No. 20-1025: Environmental Health Trust v FCC
The court vacated the extension of the FCC RF microwave radiation exposure guideline to frequencies above 6,000 MHz and mandated the FCC to evaluate the 27 volumes of scientific evidence in the court’s record (see links in Appendix B) and then explain how the FCC RF microwave radiation exposure guideline adequately protects against harmful effects of exposure to RF microwave radiation, focusing on impacts on children, biological harms of long-term exposures, and adverse impacts on the environment. The FCC has ignored this U.S. Courts of Appeals-mandate for two years — and counting.
