At a 2013 Geoengineering debate, Harvard professor David Keith admitted that sulfate aerosol injection is likely to kill tens of thousands of people when he stated,“So if I made a decision, or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision…”
Keith remarked that he and his colleague Alan Robock (who was also on the debate panel ) have different views relative to the moral hazard of making a decision to do “research” that directly kills people. Link to_Full Video
Regardless, Robock, Keith, and other grant-dependent academics receive MILLIONS of dollars in funding for sulfate aerosol injection “research” also known as geoengineering.
On October 13th of this year, the White Houseannounced the plan to push ahead with sulfate aerosol injection, in spite of the moral hazard and harm to be caused to human health and the environment, potentially on a global scale.
It’s entirely possible that otherbiological hazards could be released and extreme weatherevents could be engineered. The announcement underscores the urgency for strong public opposition, demanding an immediate halt to aerosol injection activities. Criminalizing atmospheric testing, with provisions for enforcement to include severe penalties, hasprecedent and is essential NOW, in order to protect human health, nature, and our environment.
Every USA State could adapt The Clean Atmosphere Act model to outlaw Geoengineering:
1980 NASA document provides a detailed description of a Stratospheric Aerosol Modification program designed to release tons of Sulfur Dioxide and other hazardous emissions into the atmosphere with the intention of changing the climate.
NASA and collaborating agencies CIA and DOD lack critical public oversight and scrutiny which is one reason why Geoengineering [environmental warfare] has occurred for decades and continues with zero regulations.
“So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision.” Link To_ David Keith_2013
Image: 5G tower at Mulberry Street and Bayard Street, New York City. Photo credit: AD
November 11, 2022 | Zero5G.com | The Microwave Radiation Invasion | Who is monitoring and measuring MICROWAVE RADIATION?
A recent article in the New York Times citing “mysterious towers looming over New York’s sidewalks” has drawn much needed attention to the problem of reckless deployment of polluting wireless irradiating antennas, being marketed as “5G”.
What is unknown to most cell phone users, is that in addition to the advertised “faster downloads,” other purposes of “4G-5G-6G” may include, unwarranted biometric surveillance and data collection, track and trace, vaxx surveillance with interactive capabilities, digital currency, digital ID, weather modification, weaponry aspects, and other globalist, technocratic intrusions.
The Link5G cell towers shown above and other microwave towers and antennas are designed to transmit and receive pulsed, data-modulated Radiofrequency/MICROWAVE RADIATION(RF/MWR). 12-13-2021_Link5G-PDF
“MICROWAVE RADIATION” is a term that the telecommunications industry does not want the public to talk about or understand.
“5G” is Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation (RF/MWR), a hazardous, xenobiotic (foreign-to-life) physical agent, that is also used by the military and police as a weapon. The idea that the adverse bio-effects and harms of MICROWAVE RADIATION are not known, is false.
Well documented in tens of thousands of scientific studies are significant adverse bio-effects including neurological disorders, blood clotting, cardiomyopathy, DNA damage, diabetes, increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, sleep disruption, sperm damage, even at very low levels of RF/MWR exposure.
Additionally, acute radiation sickness “is just exactly like a terrible flu,” according to Colonel L. AndrewHuff, Director Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute National Naval Medical Center.
Link ToRadiofrequency Electromagnetic Microwave Radiation Exposures
5G is likely to prove to be an ecological disaster without essential local public oversight and safety regulations to immediately reduce and eliminate harmful RF/MWR pollution.
The map below provides an unverified estimate of how many microwave towers and antennas are located within a 3 mile radius of the recently deployed “5G” jumbo tower located at Bayard Street and Mulberry Street in New York City.
According to antennasearch.com, there are 680 microwave towers and 9,688 microwave antennas within a 3 mile radius of this location.
RF Readings taken at Mulberry Street and Bayard Street, New York City on November 10, 2022
Peak RF: 27,960 µW/m² > 1,000 = Extreme Hazard
Peak Volts per Meter 37 V/m >10 = Extreme Hazard
Peak Magnetic Field 49.4 Milligauss mG>5 = Extreme Hazard
Question: Is the jumbo 5G tower on?
Answer: RF/MWR levels at this location are in the extreme hazard range, so if the tower is not operating now, the addition of the jumbo 5G tower will be far more hazardous.
Link ToBiologically-Based RF Microwave Radiation Exposure Guidelines
The UN ITU role of globally standardizing “5G” underscores a key governance flaw: Rather than following the Constitution by protecting the rights (and safety) of individuals, many public officials have been led to believe that the FCC, UN ITU, and industry guidelines trump local oversight and control.
This error was addressed by a Federal Judge in New York on July 29, 2022 in the case of Extenet Systems Inc. v. The Village of Flower Hill. In a far reaching decision, the Court reaffirmed the power preserved to State and local governments by the United States Congress (47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(A)) entitled “general authority,” to regulate placement, construction, siting, and maintenance of cell towers and wireless facilities within their respective jurisdictions.
Now is the time for individuals in their local and state jurisdictions to step up together and prioritize public health and safety by controlling and regulating operations of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (WTFs).
Examples of USA communities and jurisdictions that have stopped 5G, prevented cell towers or addressed the RF/MWR crisis:
Congress is moving forward on classified 6G wireless communications systems, even though microwave irradiating infrastructures (+4G-5G-6G+) are opposed by communities around the nation and worldwide, due to their hazardous pollution emissions continuously contaminating the environment, and the built-in, unwarranted surveillance capabilities.
According to microwave weapons expert Barrie Trower, 5G and wireless radiation constitutesweaponry. LINK
More and more communities are putting the brakes on these harmful antenna systems.LINK
The federal government 6G push is led by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). These agencies are in fact members of the UN International Telecommunications Union (UN ITU).
“The federal government should continue to support private, robust networks built on consensus-based global standards driven by the private sector and aggressively remove local barriers to deployment.” p.9
The University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF), operating under an agreement with the Air Force, has started 13 new “experiments” radiating the upper atmosphere and ionosphere with up to 3.6 megawatts of power. The Air Force originally developed and owned HAARP (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program) but transferred the facility to UAF in August 2015. The program is made possible by a $9.3 million grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF), one of the original drivers of Weather and Climate Modification in 1965.
These experiments are another example of the lack of meaningful ethical and moral standards in technology. For example, what are the environmental and human health bio-effects of HAARP deploying massive amounts of (PULSED) Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation (RF/MW)? Questions such as this are absent from the “scientific” discussion regarding the pollution footprint created by these reckless “experiments”.
While HAARP may be new to many, research of this kind has been ongoing and explored by militaries as game-changing weaponry, especially since the brain is the battlefield of modern warfare.
A 1975 DARPA report titled, SOVIET DEVELOPMENTS IN WEATHER MODIFICATION, CLIMATE MODIFICATION AND CLIMATOLOGYstated:
“The Institute for the Study of the Brain (sic) of the University of California is cited as engaged in research on the debilitating effect of weak vibrational fields on human behavior.” -p.85
Bioethics in technology is urgently needed to reign in systems and programs which have the potential to harm and destroy life on Earth. -JD
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ALTERING A REGION IN THE EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE, IONOSPHERE, AND/OR MAGNETOSPHERE __LINK
2021_Geoengineering: NSF $9.3 Million Funds HAARP in Gakona, Alaska__LINK
According to the researchers, the current RFR [radiofrequency radiation] exposure limits do not consider potential synergistic effects that reflect modern day exposures to multiple environmental agents. Current guidelines also do not consider duration of exposure to RFR.
Adverse health effects at exposures far below the threshold dose claimed by these agencies, are well documented in scientific studies that according to Dr. Ronald Melnick, “have demonstrated oxidative effects associated with exposure to low-intensity RFR [radiofrequency radiation], and significant adverse effects including cardiomyopathy, carcinogenicity, DNA damage, neurological disorders, increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, and sperm damage.”
View 15 minute slide presentation reviewing the paper HERE
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G
In light of the recent announcement by the White House that the Biden administration will be moving forward to fund and coordinate Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), it’s important that the public fully understand the criminality of these activities and reject these environmental warfare programs. Legitimate government requires the consent of the governed. Without informed public consent, such radical interventions qualify as assault and warfare.
In a 2013 debate on the topic, Harvard professor David Keith stated, “This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision…”
In spite of false claims that these programs are new, the fact is, that every U.S. administration since President Johnson has pursued cloud-seeding and other forms of weather and climate modification. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) is the world’s leader in orchestrating these destructive atmospheric activities, with 193 nations participating. The programs operate outside legitimate Constitutional governance.
Over 70 years of deliberate intervention in the Earth’s weather is causing significant damage and weather extremes.
“This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year, let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision. I think that has moral consequences, I don’t sweep that under the rug. This is a case where I take this much differently from Alan and think it’s a much more serious issue. Now, it’s true that part of doing that, you would hope that the overall benefits of human mortality would be so that you would save many many more people than that. But the fact that you uh, would save more people than you kill, doesn’t mean there’s no moral impact (laughs) of making a decision that directly kills people. And I think that we who talk about this have a duty to be clear-eyed about the direct risks involved in doing it.” -David Keith @ 1:10:15
“Public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.” -President Eisenhower, 1961
The Biden administration is openly admitting the truth about government funded environmental warfare programs to spray sulfur dioxide ( SO2) from airplanes. No real environmentalist could advocate for poisoning the Earth. Grant dependent academics are the “scientific technological elite” that Eisenhower warned about in 1961.
Sulfur aerosol injection is not new, the plan to deliberately release harmful contaminants into the atmosphere, such as sulfur dioxide (SO2).
“..within a few decades world heat production could rise from the present level of 0.2%, of the received power of the Sun to a level of 2%, thus causing a 1-1.5 C mean global temperature increase. Such a potentially harmful warming trend could, in principle, be checked by artificially increasing the planetary cloud cover.” -p83
“…method of moderating planetary warming trends by temporarily increasing the concentration of sulfate aerosol particles in the lower stratosphere and thereby reducing global radiation.” -i
If this narrative sounds familiar, it’s because it is, the same story that has been perpetuated for decades by academic grant dependent ‘researchers,’ military, and government agencies. This ‘scientific technological elite’ engage in planning and operations of environmental warfare techniques such as Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), with complete disregard for life on Earth, because there is endless funding, an absence of applied ethical or moral standards and furthermore, there are no laws preventing the use of our atmosphere as a physics lab.
President John F. Kennedy called for a ban on atmospheric research testing in the same 1961 speech where he announced proposals for international weather prediction and weather control. –Link To Full Speech Quote @ 22:02
David Keith:Geoengineering using Aluminum Vapor in the Stratosphere-Better than Sulfur. Proposed program using jets-Royal Flight Sciences working on delivery options. 2010 Power Point Presentation Link
Lewis County Tennessee Resolution Passed Requesting Research Proving Safety of 5G
Image Source_Koppel, T., Hardell, L.”Measurements of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, including 5G, in the city of Columbia, SC, USA”. World Academy of Sciences Journal 4, no. 3 (2022): 22. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2022.157
In April 2022, the Lewis County Board of Commissioners passed a resolution requesting more research on 5G wireless facilities to determine if the technology is safe for humans before allowing more deployment.
Note: “5G” is a marketing term.The real agent is microwave radiation, a hazardous physical agentthat is alsoused asa weapon. -JD
The Lewis County Board of Commissioners
RESOLUTION : Requesting our State & Federal Governments Conduct More Research on 5G Wireless Facilities to Determine if Such Technology is Safe for Humans Before Allowing More Deployment of 5G
WHEREAS, according to the World Health Organization, there is limited research on the frequencies used in 5G technology and its effect on humans; and
WHEREAS, as the result of such limited research, several local residents have repeatedly expressed to the Lewis County Board of Commissioners that they would like to see our state and federal governments, specifically the Federal Communications Commission, conduct an in-depth independent study to re-evaluate the health effects of 5G wireless technology on humans;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the legislative body of Lewis County meeting in regular session this 18th day of April, 2022, that we hereby request our state and federal governments, and especially the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), conduct more research on 5G Wireless Facilities to determine if such technology is safe for humans, before allowing more deployment of 5G;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon passage, a copy of this Resolution shall be mailed to each of our elected state and federal representatives, including State Representative David Byrd, State Senator Joey Hensley, U.S. Congressman Mark Green, U.S. Senator Marsha Blackburn, and U.S. Senator Bill Hagerty.
We, the undersigned County Commissioners, move the adoption of the above resolution.
Aerosolized Nanobot Described in 2012 Geoengineering Business Model
A 2012 patent for deployment of aerosolized nanoparticles ( “nanobot” ) describes a geoengineering business model using a carbon credit scheme to generate income based on hypothetical climate models. These inaccurate models were designed by schemers to profit from the deliberate contamination of our atmosphere and environment.
Geoengineering must be criminalized and banned. -JD
Geoengineering Method Of Business Using Carbon Counterbalance Credits
“4. The method of claim 1 wherein the agent is a light-scattering nanomaterial, such as a nanopowder, nanorod, nanocrystal, or nanobot.”
“d) monetizing said credit by selling said credit or exchanging for other valuable instruments to the second or to a third party, such instruments including cash, notes, loans, materials, currencies, or other tradable instruments.”
US2012117003A1Geoengineering Method Of Business Using Carbon Counterbalance Credits