Posted on

NSF Funding Sulfate Aerosol Injection 2023

November 25, 2022 | ZeroGeoengineering.com |  NSF Funding Sulfate Aerosol Injection 2023   |   National Science Foundation (NSF)

At a 2013 Geoengineering debate, Harvard professor David Keith admitted that sulfate aerosol injection is likely to kill tens of thousands of people when he stated,“So if I made a decision, or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision…”

Keith remarked that he and his colleague Alan Robock (who was also on the debate panel ) have different views relative to the moral hazard of making a decision to do “research” that directly kills people. Link to_Full Video

Regardless, Robock, Keith, and other grant-dependent academics receive MILLIONS of dollars in funding for sulfate aerosol injection “research” also known as geoengineering.

On October 13th of this year, the White House announced the plan to push ahead with sulfate aerosol injection, in spite of the moral hazard and harm to be caused to human health and the environment, potentially on a global scale.

It’s entirely possible that other biological hazards could be released and extreme weather events could be engineered. The announcement underscores the urgency for strong public opposition, demanding an immediate halt to aerosol injection activities. Criminalizing atmospheric testing, with provisions for enforcement to include severe penalties, has precedent and is essential NOW, in order to protect human health, nature, and our environment.

 

Every USA State could adapt The Clean Atmosphere Act model to outlaw Geoengineering:

 


 

Link To National Science Foundation Awards Stratospheric Aerosol Injection 

 

NSF Rutgers 2020-2023
Colorado 2018-2023
Columbia New York 2021-2023
University of Wyoming Continuing Grant 2010-2016
NSF Research in all 50 states

Link To Source

 

 


 

 

To learn more about advocating for a ban on Geoengineering, email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 

 


 

 

White House Promotes Environmental Warfare SO2 Aerosol Injection

LINK

 


 

Posted on

1980 NASA: Changing the Climate With Aerosol Modification

November 20, 2022 | ZEROGeoengineering.com |

1980 NASA document provides a detailed description of a Stratospheric Aerosol Modification program designed to release tons of Sulfur Dioxide and other hazardous emissions into the atmosphere with the intention of changing the climate.

NASA and collaborating agencies CIA and DOD lack critical public oversight and scrutiny which is one reason why Geoengineering [environmental warfare] has occurred for decades and continues with zero regulations.

The White House recently announced funding for Sulfur Aerosol Injection programs for the next 5 years.  -JD

 


 

NASA 1980

Stratospheric Aerosol Modification by Supersonic Transport Operations With Climate Implications

 

 

 

Link To Full Document_Stratospheric Aerosol Modification_1980_NASA

 

 


 

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

LINK

 


 

 

Link To_CIA Director John O. Brennan speaks at Council on Foreign Relations meeting about Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI).

June 29, 2016

Link To Video

 

 

Link To_1960 CIA Climate Control

 


 

 

“So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision.”   Link To_ David Keith_2013

Link To Video  Image Source_Youtube Screenshot

 

 


 

 

To learn more about advocating for a ban on Geoengineering, email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 

 


 

Posted on

The Microwave Radiation Invasion

Image: 5G tower at Mulberry Street and Bayard Street, New York City.   Photo credit: AD

November 11, 2022 | Zero5G.comThe Microwave Radiation Invasion | Who is monitoring and measuring MICROWAVE RADIATION?

A recent article in the New York Times citing “mysterious towers looming over New York’s sidewalks” has drawn much needed attention to the problem of reckless deployment of polluting wireless irradiating antennas, being marketed as “5G”.  

What is unknown to most cell phone users, is that in addition to the advertised “faster downloads,” other purposes of “4G-5G-6G” may include, unwarranted biometric surveillance and data collection, track and trace, vaxx surveillance with interactive capabilities, digital currency, digital ID, weather modification, weaponry aspects, and other globalist, technocratic intrusions.

The NYT must have missed the story in 2021, when the proposed deployment of such hazardous “5G” infrastructure (Link5G) was strongly opposed by New Yorkers. Residents were ignored and dismissed by the office of Mayor Adams, NYC Council Members and NY state officials.  

 

Source     Jumbo “small cells”-  Link5G

 

The Link5G cell towers shown above and other microwave towers and antennas are designed to transmit and receive pulsed, data-modulated Radiofrequency/MICROWAVE RADIATION(RF/MWR).     12-13-2021_Link5G-PDF

 


“MICROWAVE RADIATION” is a term that the telecommunications industry does not want the public to talk about or understand.

 

 

“5G” is Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation (RF/MWR), a hazardous, xenobiotic (foreign-to-life) physical agent, that is also used by the military and police as a weapon. The idea that the adverse bio-effects and harms of MICROWAVE RADIATION are not known, is false.

Well documented in tens of thousands of scientific studies are significant adverse bio-effects including neurological disorders, blood clotting, cardiomyopathy, DNA damage, diabetes, increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, sleep disruption, sperm damage, even at very low levels of RF/MWR exposure.

Additionally, acute radiation sickness “is just exactly like a terrible flu,” according to Colonel L. Andrew Huff, Director Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute National Naval Medical Center.

 

Link to What is 5G?

Link To Congress is moving forward on classified 6G wireless

Link To MICROWAVE RADIATION Primer       

Link To Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Microwave Radiation Exposures

 

 

 


5G is likely to prove to be an ecological disaster without essential local public oversight and safety regulations to immediately reduce and eliminate harmful RF/MWR pollution.

 

The map below provides an unverified estimate of how many microwave towers and antennas are located within a 3 mile radius of the recently deployed “5G” jumbo tower located at Bayard Street and Mulberry Street in New York City.

Source: Antennasearch.com

According to antennasearch.com, there are 680 microwave towers and 9,688 microwave antennas within a 3 mile radius of this location.

 

 

RF Readings taken at Mulberry Street and Bayard Street, New York City on November 10, 2022

Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation (RF/MWR) detected at Mulberry Street and Bayard Street in NYC.   Photo credit: AD

 

Peak RF: 27,960 µW/m²  > 1,000 = Extreme Hazard

Peak Volts per Meter  37 V/m  >10 = Extreme Hazard  

Peak Magnetic Field 49.4 Milligauss mG  >5 = Extreme Hazard

 

Question: Is the jumbo 5G tower on?

Answer: RF/MWR levels at this location are in the extreme hazard range, so if the tower is not operating now, the addition of the jumbo 5G tower will be far more hazardous.

 

Link To Biologically-Based RF Microwave Radiation Exposure Guidelines

 

 


 

Complaints?

Contact the Mayor HERE

Contact NYC Council Members HERE

 

Reference:

Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G

https://icbe-emf.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/ICBE-EMF-paper-12940_2022_900_OnlinePDF_Patched-1.pdf

 

Building biology, an empirical science, and tens of thousands of peer-reviewed studies have positively established adverse bio-effects of  RF/MWR.

 

There is no “safe” level of exposure to MICROWAVE RADIATION.

 

 

MICROWAVE RADIATION bio-effects increase synergistically, not merely additively.          Chart of Microwavelengths for 5G here

Harvard School of Pubic Health Researcher Susan Clark on Microwave Radiation Hazards

 

 


 

 

Evidence for a connection between coronavirus disease-19 and exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless communications including 5G.LINK

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34778597/

 

 

 


 

It’s crucial to recognize that the FCC is following the international standard set by the United Nations ITU.

 

United Nations ITU – The most important agency you have never heard of:

 


 

 

The UN ITU role of globally standardizing “5G” underscores a key governance flaw: Rather than following the Constitution by protecting the rights (and safety) of individuals, many public officials have been led to believe that the FCC, UN ITU, and industry guidelines trump local oversight and control.

 

This error was addressed by a Federal Judge in New York on July 29, 2022 in the case of Extenet Systems Inc. v. The Village of Flower Hill. In a far reaching decision, the Court reaffirmed the power preserved to State and local governments by the United States Congress (47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(A)) entitled “general authority,” to regulate placement, construction, siting, and maintenance of cell towers and wireless facilities within their respective jurisdictions.

https://casetext.com/case/extenet-sys-v-vill-of-flower-hill

 

 


 

Now is the time for individuals in their local and state jurisdictions to step up together and prioritize public health and safety by controlling and regulating operations of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (WTFs).

 

 


 

 

Examples of USA communities and jurisdictions that have stopped 5G, prevented cell towers or addressed the RF/MWR crisis:

Ithaca, New York ( Strengthened Ordinance ) 2020
Letter from Mayor — Scarsdale, New York  2020
Woodstock, New York 2021
Idaho, Dalton Gardens 2022
Easton, Connecticut 2020
Ocean City, Maryland 2021
Lewis County Tennessee 2022

 

 

Montclair, New Jersey 2020

https://zero5g.com/2020/montclair-new-jersey-victory/

 

Governor of Wyoming FCC Letter to immediately address RF Radiation Levels 2022

https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Governor-Gordon-Letter-to-FCC-.pdf

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 


 

 

Industry RF/MW Radiation Guideline Is NOT A Safety Standard

LINK

 

 


 

Posted on

Congress moving forward on classified 6G wireless

October 27, 2022 |  Zero5G.com |  Congressional Record Source  |

Congress is moving forward on classified 6G wireless communications systems, even though microwave irradiating infrastructures (+4G-5G-6G+) are opposed by communities around the nation and worldwide, due to their hazardous pollution emissions continuously contaminating the environment, and the built-in, unwarranted surveillance capabilities.

According to microwave weapons expert Barrie Trower, 5G and wireless radiation constitutes weaponry. LINK

More and more communities are putting the brakes on these harmful antenna systems. LINK

A recent study by The International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF), entitled “Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G,” confirmed that FCC and ICNIRP guidelines, set in the 1990’s are not protective of human health or the environment and need to be updated.

The federal government 6G push is led by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). These agencies are in fact members of the UN International Telecommunications Union (UN ITU).

According to the NTIA, the UN ITU sets the global standard for 5G. The UN ITU is focused on implementation of Agenda 2030. LINK

RELATED: The International Telecommunication Union: The Most Important UN Agency You Have Never Heard Of_Link

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link To Congressional Record

 

 


 

 

 

U.S. Senate Seeks to Establish Classified Council for 6G Development and International Cooperation

LINK

 

 


 

“The federal government should continue to support private, robust networks built on consensus-based global standards driven by the private sector and aggressively remove local barriers to deployment.” p.9

AT&T 5G UN ITU Global Standards

LINK

 

 


 

Posted on

HAARP RF Radiation “Experiments” Underway

Image Source | October 21, 2022 | ZEROGeoEngineering.com | HAARP RF Radiation “Experiments” Underway  | UAF Geophysical Institute

The University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF), operating under an agreement with the Air Force, has started 13 new “experiments” radiating the upper atmosphere and ionosphere with up to 3.6 megawatts of power. The Air Force originally developed and owned HAARP (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program) but transferred the facility to UAF in August 2015. The program is made possible by a $9.3 million grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF), one of the original drivers of Weather and Climate Modification in 1965.

These experiments are another example of the lack of meaningful ethical and moral standards in technology. For example, what are the environmental and human health bio-effects of HAARP deploying massive amounts of (PULSED) Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation (RF/MW)? Questions such as this are absent from the “scientific” discussion regarding the pollution footprint created by these reckless “experiments”.

While HAARP may be new to many, research of this kind has been ongoing and explored by militaries as game-changing weaponry, especially since the brain is the battlefield of modern warfare.

A 1975 DARPA report titled, SOVIET DEVELOPMENTS IN WEATHER MODIFICATION, CLIMATE MODIFICATION AND CLIMATOLOGY stated:

“The Institute for the Study of the Brain (sic) of the University of California is cited as engaged in research on the debilitating effect of weak vibrational fields on human behavior.” -p.85

Bioethics in technology is urgently needed to reign in systems and programs which have the potential to harm and destroy life on Earth.  -JD

 


 

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ALTERING A REGION IN THE EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE, IONOSPHERE, AND/OR MAGNETOSPHERE __LINK 

2021_Geoengineering: NSF $9.3 Million Funds HAARP in Gakona, Alaska__LINK

HAARP Weather Control__LINK

Holes In Heaven__LINK

 

 


 

Neuroscientist Dr James Giordano. Neuro-Weapons. Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). Brain Implants.

Presenting developments in the field of ‘Neuro-Weapons’. ‘The Brain is the Battlefield of the Future’ on 09/25/18 at the Modern War Institute, United States Military Academy West Point.

Link To Video

 

The Brain Is The Battlefield For The Future_LINK

McCain Conference 2022: Brain Computer Interface__LINK


 

Link To  5G and the Realities of Neuroweapons

 

 

 


 

From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory__LINK

 

 


 

Microwave Emissions and the Problem of Modern Viral Diseases.__LINK

 

 


 

Evidence for a connection between coronavirus disease-19 and exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless communications including 5G.__LINK

 

 


 

 

Effects of microwave radiation on brain energy metabolism and related mechanisms.__LINK

 

 


 

Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G__LINK

 


 

Technology Convergence 2035:Humanity vs. AI__LINK

 


 

To learn more about advocating for a ban on atmospheric testing, please email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 


 

Posted on

New peer-reviewed paper presents scientific evidence challenging safety of current wireless exposure limits

October 18, 2022 | ZERO5G.com | Press Release | Report | Fact Sheet | Flawed Assumptions FCC & ICNRP| Environmental Health Trust | New peer-reviewed paper presents scientific evidence challenging safety of current wireless exposure limits |

The International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF), authors of a recent scientific study, have confirmed that the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the International Commission on Nonionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) wireless exposure guideline, based on science from the 1980’s, is wrong and needs to be revised.

According to the researchers, the current RFR [radiofrequency radiation] exposure limits do not consider potential synergistic effects that reflect modern day exposures to multiple environmental agents. Current guidelines also do not consider duration of exposure to RFR.

Adverse health effects at exposures far below the threshold dose claimed by these agencies, are well documented in scientific studies that according to Dr. Ronald Melnick, “have demonstrated oxidative effects associated with exposure to low-intensity RFR [radiofrequency radiation], and significant adverse effects including cardiomyopathy, carcinogenicity, DNA damage, neurological disorders, increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, and sperm damage.”

View 15 minute slide presentation reviewing the paper HERE

-JD


 

Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G

 

Link To Document HERE

 

 


 

 

Link To Press Release HERE

 

 


 

Posted on

FLASHBACK 2013: Harvard Professor Admits The Truth About Geoengineering

October 17, 2022 | ZEROGeoENGINEERING | Harvard_Geoengineering Budget _SG_Funding_Chart_2008-2018_Updated_Aug_2019 | Image Source Youtube Screenshot |

In light of the recent announcement by the White House that the Biden administration will be moving forward to fund and coordinate Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), it’s important that the public fully understand the criminality of these activities and reject these environmental warfare programs. Legitimate government requires the consent of the governed. Without informed public consent, such radical interventions qualify as assault and warfare.

In a 2013 debate on the topic, Harvard professor David Keith stated, “This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision…”

In spite of false claims that these programs are new, the fact is, that every U.S. administration since President Johnson has pursued cloud-seeding and other forms of weather and climate modification. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) is the world’s leader in orchestrating these destructive atmospheric activities, with 193 nations participating. The programs operate outside legitimate Constitutional governance.

Over 70 years of deliberate intervention in the Earth’s weather is causing significant damage and weather extremes.

It’s time to ban Geoengineering and other harmful atmospheric polluting activities. To learn more about advocating for a ban on Geoengineering and other atmospheric hazards, please email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com.

 


 

 

August 7, 2013 Geoengineering Debate MIT

Speakers: Oliver Morton, Alan Robock, Daniel Schrag, David Keith, and Stephen Gardiner

 

Link To Video

 

“This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year, let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision. I think that has moral consequences, I don’t sweep that under the rug. This is a case where I take this much differently from Alan and think it’s a much more serious issue. Now, it’s true that part of doing that, you would hope that the overall benefits of human mortality would be so that you would save many many more people than that. But the fact that you uh, would save more people than you kill, doesn’t mean there’s no moral impact (laughs) of making a decision that directly kills people. And I think that we who talk about this have a duty to be clear-eyed about the direct risks involved in doing it.”   -David Keith @ 1:10:15

 

Link To Video Clip_2013 Geoengineering David Keith_@1:10:15

Image Source_Youtube Screenshot

 


 

David Keith Presents Solar Geoengineering Lectures

LINK

 


 

Posted on

White House Promotes Environmental Warfare SO2 Aerosol Injection

October 13, 2022 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | Harvard Geoengineering Research Budget | White House Promotes Environmental Warfare SO2 Aerosol Injection  | White House_Geoengineering.pdf

“Public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”   -President Eisenhower, 1961

The Biden administration is openly admitting the truth about government funded environmental warfare programs to spray sulfur dioxide ( SO2) from airplanes. No real environmentalist could advocate for poisoning the Earth. Grant dependent academics are the “scientific technological elite” that Eisenhower warned about in 1961.

Sulfur aerosol injection is not new, the plan to deliberately release harmful contaminants into the atmosphere, such as sulfur dioxide (SO2).

In fact, in the 1975 DARPA report titled, “SOVIET DEVELOPMENTS IN WEATHER MODIFICATION, CLIMATE MODIFICATION AND CLIMATOLOGY,” Environmental Warfare was listed as a topic of investigation. The report stated:

“..within a few decades world heat production could rise from the present level of 0.2%, of the received power of the Sun to a level of 2%, thus causing a 1-1.5 C mean global temperature increase.  Such a potentially harmful warming trend could, in principle, be checked by artificially increasing the planetary cloud cover.” -p83

“…method of moderating planetary warming trends by temporarily increasing the concentration of sulfate aerosol particles in the lower stratosphere and thereby reducing global radiation.” -i

If this narrative sounds familiar, it’s because it is, the same story that has been perpetuated for decades by academic grant dependent ‘researchers,’ military, and government agencies. This ‘scientific technological elite’ engage in planning and operations of environmental warfare techniques such as Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), with complete disregard for life on Earth, because there is endless funding, an absence of applied ethical or moral standards and furthermore, there are no laws preventing the use of our atmosphere as a physics lab.

President John F. Kennedy called for a ban on atmospheric research testing in the same 1961 speech where he announced proposals for international weather prediction and weather control.   –Link To Full Speech Quote @ 22:02

 


 

 

To learn more about advocating for a ban on Geoengineering, email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 

 


 

 

Geoengineering Must Be Outlawed To Protect Life on Earth.

 

 

 


 

“You could actually spray sulfuric acid in the stratosphere”  —– David Keith_Link To_Video

 

Link To Video

 

 

 

Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere

Harvard Professor David Keith Explains Solar Radiation Management (SRM) Geoengineering:

“…involves modifying a fleet of jets to spray sulfates into the stratosphere where they would combine with water vapor to form aerosols.  Dispersed by winds, these particles would cover the globe with a haze…”

 

 

 


 

 

2010: David Keith “Do this in just a jet in a very simple way, make high quality alumina particles just by spraying aluminum vapor out which oxidizes so it’s certainly in principle possible to do that and theres a big literature that’s already looked at that.” SCoPEx-Harvard Projects | Bill Gates-Geoengineering |Funding Climate Scientists |FICER | Aurora 2011 Geoengineering Cost Analysis Report

 

David Keith:Geoengineering using Aluminum Vapor in the Stratosphere-Better than Sulfur. Proposed program using jets-Royal Flight Sciences working on delivery options. 2010 Power Point Presentation Link

 


 

 

 

 

 

Posted on

Lewis County Tennessee Resolution Passed Requesting Research Proving Safety of 5G

Lewis County Tennessee Resolution Passed Requesting Research Proving Safety of 5G

Image Source_Koppel, T., Hardell, L.”Measurements of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, including 5G, in the city of Columbia, SC, USA”. World Academy of Sciences Journal 4, no. 3 (2022): 22. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2022.157

October 12, 2022 | Zero5G.com | Environmental Health Trust

In April 2022, the Lewis County Board of Commissioners passed a resolution requesting more research on 5G wireless facilities to determine if the technology is safe for humans before allowing more deployment.

Note: “5G” is a marketing term.  The real agent is microwave radiation, a hazardous physical agent that is also used as a weapon. -JD

 


 

The Lewis County Board of Commissioners

RESOLUTION : Requesting our State & Federal Governments Conduct More Research on 5G Wireless Facilities to Determine if Such Technology is Safe for Humans Before Allowing More Deployment of 5G 

WHEREAS, according to the World Health Organization, there is limited research on the  frequencies used in 5G technology and its effect on humans; and

WHEREAS, as the result of such limited research, several local residents have repeatedly  expressed to the Lewis County Board of Commissioners that they would like to see our state and  federal governments, specifically the Federal Communications Commission, conduct an in-depth  independent study to re-evaluate the health effects of 5G wireless technology on humans;

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the legislative body of Lewis County meeting in  regular session this 18th day of April, 2022, that we hereby request our state and federal  governments, and especially the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), conduct more  research on 5G Wireless Facilities to determine if such technology is safe for humans, before  allowing more deployment of 5G;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon passage, a copy of this Resolution shall be mailed  to each of our elected state and federal representatives, including State Representative David  Byrd, State Senator Joey Hensley, U.S. Congressman Mark Green, U.S. Senator Marsha Blackburn, and U.S. Senator Bill Hagerty.

We, the undersigned County Commissioners, move the adoption of the above resolution.

 


 

 

Link To Read Full EHT Article HERE

 


 

1985 | CNN Special Investigation | “Imagine the implications of a weapon with no visible trace…”

Link To Video

 


 

Posted on

Aerosolized Nanobot Described in 2012 Geoengineering Business Model

Aerosolized Nanobot Described in 2012 Geoengineering Business Model

 

A 2012 patent for deployment of aerosolized nanoparticles ( “nanobot” ) describes a geoengineering business model using a carbon credit scheme to generate income based on hypothetical climate models. These inaccurate models were designed by schemers to profit from the deliberate contamination of our atmosphere and environment.

Geoengineering must be criminalized and banned. -JD

 


 

Geoengineering Method Of Business Using Carbon Counterbalance Credits

“4. The method of claim 1 wherein the agent is a light-scattering nanomaterial, such as a nanopowder, nanorod, nanocrystal, or nanobot.”

Source

https://app.patentinspiration.com/#report/1186d6221Be3/analysis/4692322d8088/patents/[5]/US2012117003A1

“d) monetizing said credit by selling said credit or exchanging for other valuable instruments to the second or to a third party, such instruments including cash, notes, loans, materials, currencies, or other tradable instruments.”

 


 

US2012117003A1 Geoengineering Method Of Business Using Carbon Counterbalance Credits

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/046020574/publication/US2012117003A1?q=US2012117003A1

 


May 10, 2012

US 2012:0117003 A1

Source


 

https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-2012117003-A1

Patent_US-2012117003-A1


 

Image Source

 

Link to_ZeroGeoengineering.com