Posted on

New peer-reviewed paper presents scientific evidence challenging safety of current wireless exposure limits

October 18, 2022 | ZERO5G.com | Press Release | Report | Fact Sheet | Flawed Assumptions FCC & ICNRP| Environmental Health Trust | New peer-reviewed paper presents scientific evidence challenging safety of current wireless exposure limits |

The International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF), authors of a recent scientific study, have confirmed that the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the International Commission on Nonionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) wireless exposure guideline, based on science from the 1980’s, is wrong and needs to be revised.

According to the researchers, the current RFR [radiofrequency radiation] exposure limits do not consider potential synergistic effects that reflect modern day exposures to multiple environmental agents. Current guidelines also do not consider duration of exposure to RFR.

Adverse health effects at exposures far below the threshold dose claimed by these agencies, are well documented in scientific studies that according to Dr. Ronald Melnick, “have demonstrated oxidative effects associated with exposure to low-intensity RFR [radiofrequency radiation], and significant adverse effects including cardiomyopathy, carcinogenicity, DNA damage, neurological disorders, increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, and sperm damage.”

View 15 minute slide presentation reviewing the paper HERE

-JD


 

Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G

 

Link To Document HERE

 

 


 

 

Link To Press Release HERE

 

 


 

Posted on

FLASHBACK 2013: Harvard Professor Admits The Truth About Geoengineering

October 17, 2022 | ZEROGeoENGINEERING | Harvard_Geoengineering Budget _SG_Funding_Chart_2008-2018_Updated_Aug_2019 | Image Source Youtube Screenshot |

In light of the recent announcement by the White House that the Biden administration will be moving forward to fund and coordinate Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), it’s important that the public fully understand the criminality of these activities and reject these environmental warfare programs. Legitimate government requires the consent of the governed. Without informed public consent, such radical interventions qualify as assault and warfare.

In a 2013 debate on the topic, Harvard professor David Keith stated, “This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision…”

In spite of false claims that these programs are new, the fact is, that every U.S. administration since President Johnson has pursued cloud-seeding and other forms of weather and climate modification. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) is the world’s leader in orchestrating these destructive atmospheric activities, with 193 nations participating. The programs operate outside legitimate Constitutional governance.

Over 70 years of deliberate intervention in the Earth’s weather is causing significant damage and weather extremes.

It’s time to ban Geoengineering and other harmful atmospheric polluting activities. To learn more about advocating for a ban on Geoengineering and other atmospheric hazards, please email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com.

 


 

 

August 7, 2013 Geoengineering Debate MIT

Speakers: Oliver Morton, Alan Robock, Daniel Schrag, David Keith, and Stephen Gardiner

 

Link To Video

 

“This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year, let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision. I think that has moral consequences, I don’t sweep that under the rug. This is a case where I take this much differently from Alan and think it’s a much more serious issue. Now, it’s true that part of doing that, you would hope that the overall benefits of human mortality would be so that you would save many many more people than that. But the fact that you uh, would save more people than you kill, doesn’t mean there’s no moral impact (laughs) of making a decision that directly kills people. And I think that we who talk about this have a duty to be clear-eyed about the direct risks involved in doing it.”   -David Keith @ 1:10:15

 

Link To Video Clip_2013 Geoengineering David Keith_@1:10:15

Image Source_Youtube Screenshot

 


 

David Keith Presents Solar Geoengineering Lectures

LINK

 


 

Posted on

White House Promotes Environmental Warfare SO2 Aerosol Injection

October 13, 2022 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | Harvard Geoengineering Research Budget | White House Promotes Environmental Warfare SO2 Aerosol Injection  | White House_Geoengineering.pdf

“Public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”   -President Eisenhower, 1961

The Biden administration is openly admitting the truth about government funded environmental warfare programs to spray sulfur dioxide ( SO2) from airplanes. No real environmentalist could advocate for poisoning the Earth. Grant dependent academics are the “scientific technological elite” that Eisenhower warned about in 1961.

Sulfur aerosol injection is not new, the plan to deliberately release harmful contaminants into the atmosphere, such as sulfur dioxide (SO2).

In fact, in the 1975 DARPA report titled, “SOVIET DEVELOPMENTS IN WEATHER MODIFICATION, CLIMATE MODIFICATION AND CLIMATOLOGY,” Environmental Warfare was listed as a topic of investigation. The report stated:

“..within a few decades world heat production could rise from the present level of 0.2%, of the received power of the Sun to a level of 2%, thus causing a 1-1.5 C mean global temperature increase.  Such a potentially harmful warming trend could, in principle, be checked by artificially increasing the planetary cloud cover.” -p83

“…method of moderating planetary warming trends by temporarily increasing the concentration of sulfate aerosol particles in the lower stratosphere and thereby reducing global radiation.” -i

If this narrative sounds familiar, it’s because it is, the same story that has been perpetuated for decades by academic grant dependent ‘researchers,’ military, and government agencies. This ‘scientific technological elite’ engage in planning and operations of environmental warfare techniques such as Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), with complete disregard for life on Earth, because there is endless funding, an absence of applied ethical or moral standards and furthermore, there are no laws preventing the use of our atmosphere as a physics lab.

President John F. Kennedy called for a ban on atmospheric research testing in the same 1961 speech where he announced proposals for international weather prediction and weather control.   –Link To Full Speech Quote @ 22:02

 


 

 

To learn more about advocating for a ban on Geoengineering, email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 

 


 

 

Geoengineering Must Be Outlawed To Protect Life on Earth.

 

 

 


 

“You could actually spray sulfuric acid in the stratosphere”  —– David Keith_Link To_Video

 

Link To Video

 

 

 

Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere

Harvard Professor David Keith Explains Solar Radiation Management (SRM) Geoengineering:

“…involves modifying a fleet of jets to spray sulfates into the stratosphere where they would combine with water vapor to form aerosols.  Dispersed by winds, these particles would cover the globe with a haze…”

 

 

 


 

 

2010: David Keith “Do this in just a jet in a very simple way, make high quality alumina particles just by spraying aluminum vapor out which oxidizes so it’s certainly in principle possible to do that and theres a big literature that’s already looked at that.” SCoPEx-Harvard Projects | Bill Gates-Geoengineering |Funding Climate Scientists |FICER | Aurora 2011 Geoengineering Cost Analysis Report

 

David Keith:Geoengineering using Aluminum Vapor in the Stratosphere-Better than Sulfur. Proposed program using jets-Royal Flight Sciences working on delivery options. 2010 Power Point Presentation Link

 


 

 

 

 

 

Posted on

Lewis County Tennessee Resolution Passed Requesting Research Proving Safety of 5G

Lewis County Tennessee Resolution Passed Requesting Research Proving Safety of 5G

Image Source_Koppel, T., Hardell, L.”Measurements of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, including 5G, in the city of Columbia, SC, USA”. World Academy of Sciences Journal 4, no. 3 (2022): 22. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2022.157

October 12, 2022 | Zero5G.com | Environmental Health Trust

In April 2022, the Lewis County Board of Commissioners passed a resolution requesting more research on 5G wireless facilities to determine if the technology is safe for humans before allowing more deployment.

Note: “5G” is a marketing term.  The real agent is microwave radiation, a hazardous physical agent that is also used as a weapon. -JD

 


 

The Lewis County Board of Commissioners

RESOLUTION : Requesting our State & Federal Governments Conduct More Research on 5G Wireless Facilities to Determine if Such Technology is Safe for Humans Before Allowing More Deployment of 5G 

WHEREAS, according to the World Health Organization, there is limited research on the  frequencies used in 5G technology and its effect on humans; and

WHEREAS, as the result of such limited research, several local residents have repeatedly  expressed to the Lewis County Board of Commissioners that they would like to see our state and  federal governments, specifically the Federal Communications Commission, conduct an in-depth  independent study to re-evaluate the health effects of 5G wireless technology on humans;

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the legislative body of Lewis County meeting in  regular session this 18th day of April, 2022, that we hereby request our state and federal  governments, and especially the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), conduct more  research on 5G Wireless Facilities to determine if such technology is safe for humans, before  allowing more deployment of 5G;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon passage, a copy of this Resolution shall be mailed  to each of our elected state and federal representatives, including State Representative David  Byrd, State Senator Joey Hensley, U.S. Congressman Mark Green, U.S. Senator Marsha Blackburn, and U.S. Senator Bill Hagerty.

We, the undersigned County Commissioners, move the adoption of the above resolution.

 


 

 

Link To Read Full EHT Article HERE

 


 

1985 | CNN Special Investigation | “Imagine the implications of a weapon with no visible trace…”

Link To Video

 


 

Posted on

Aerosolized Nanobot Described in 2012 Geoengineering Business Model

Aerosolized Nanobot Described in 2012 Geoengineering Business Model

 

A 2012 patent for deployment of aerosolized nanoparticles ( “nanobot” ) describes a geoengineering business model using a carbon credit scheme to generate income based on hypothetical climate models. These inaccurate models were designed by schemers to profit from the deliberate contamination of our atmosphere and environment.

Geoengineering must be criminalized and banned. -JD

 


 

Geoengineering Method Of Business Using Carbon Counterbalance Credits

“4. The method of claim 1 wherein the agent is a light-scattering nanomaterial, such as a nanopowder, nanorod, nanocrystal, or nanobot.”

Source

https://app.patentinspiration.com/#report/1186d6221Be3/analysis/4692322d8088/patents/[5]/US2012117003A1

“d) monetizing said credit by selling said credit or exchanging for other valuable instruments to the second or to a third party, such instruments including cash, notes, loans, materials, currencies, or other tradable instruments.”

 


 

US2012117003A1 Geoengineering Method Of Business Using Carbon Counterbalance Credits

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/046020574/publication/US2012117003A1?q=US2012117003A1

 


May 10, 2012

US 2012:0117003 A1

Source


 

https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-2012117003-A1

Patent_US-2012117003-A1


 

Image Source

 

Link to_ZeroGeoengineering.com

 

Posted on

Geoengineering: Scientists promote environmental warfare technique of spraying sulfur dioxide into atmosphere

Geoengineering: Scientists promote environmental warfare technique of spraying sulfur dioxide into atmosphere

September 20, 2022 | ZeroGeoengineering | Image Source| Link To Harvard_Solar Geoengineering_Funding_Chart

“Public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”   -President Eisenhower, 1961

Sulfur aerosol injection is not new, the plan to deliberately release harmful contaminants into the atmosphere, such as sulfur dioxide (SO2).

 

In fact, in the 1975 DARPA report titled, “SOVIET DEVELOPMENTS IN WEATHER MODIFICATION, CLIMATE MODIFICATION AND CLIMATOLOGY,” Environmental Warfare was listed as a topic of investigation. The report stated:

“..within a few decades world heat production could rise from the present level of 0.2%, of the received power of the Sun to a level of 2%, thus causing a 1-1.5 C mean global temperature increase.  Such a potentially harmful warming trend could, in principle, be checked by artificially increasing the planetary cloud cover.” -p83

“…method of moderating planetary warming trends by temporarily increasing the concentration of sulfate aerosol particles in the lower stratosphere and thereby reducing global radiation.” -i

If this narrative sounds familiar, it’s because it is the same story that has been perpetuated for decades by academic grant dependent ‘researchers,’ military, and government agencies. This ‘scientific technological elite’ engage in planning and operations of environmental warfare techniques such as Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), with complete disregard for life on Earth, because there is endless funding, an absence of applied ethical or moral standards and furthermore, there are no laws preventing the use of our atmosphere as a physics lab.

President John F. Kennedy called for a ban on atmospheric research testing in the same 1961 speech where he announced proposals for international weather prediction and weather control.   –Link To Full Speech Quote @ 22:02

 


 

 

To learn more about advocating for a ban on Geoengineering, email:contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 

 


 

19 September 2022 | By Thomas Moore | SkyNews

“A fleet of 125 military air-to-air refuelling tankers would release a cloud of microscopic sulphur dioxide particles”

 

Source

Scientists have outlined a controversial plan to refreeze the North and South Poles, and dial down the global thermostat.

They say high-flying jets could spray microscopic aerosol particles into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight and cool the melting icecaps.

Around 175,000 flights a year would be needed, releasing millions of tonnes of carbon dioxide.

But a former UK chief scientist backed the plans, telling Sky News that polar warming is now critical – and refreezing the ice could hold back the rise in global sea levels.

The new study was led by Wake Smith from Yale University in the United States.

Link To Read Full Article HERE

 


 

 

PubChem Sulfur Dioxide

LINK

 


 

 

“Studies of alternative lofting concepts such as balloons, rockets, guns, or tethered hoses conclude that at 20 km, the most efficient and reliable lofting technology would be fixed- wing, self-propelled, air-breathing jets” Link

Wake Smith et al 2022 Environ. Res. Commun. 4 031002

 

Link To Full Document_Stratospheric Aerosol Injection_Smith_2022_Environ._Res._Commun._4_031002

 


 

NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

LINK

 


 

Geoengineering is an Environmental Health Hazard, BAN NEEDED ASAP

LINK

 


 

Posted on

[5G] Wireless Radiation Exposure in the Hawaiian Islands

[5G] Wireless Radiation Exposure in the Hawaiian Islands

Volunteer citizen researchers with Safe Tech Hawaii detected harmful levels of wireless radiation coming off of cell towers and antennas in Oahu, Maui, Big Island, and Kauai.

In Hawaii and beyond, safety regulations are urgently needed to protect all biological life from the hazards of wireless radiation pollution.-JD

 


September 1, 2022  | By SafeTechHawaii |

The results below are listed in microwatts per meter squared, a standard unit of measure for wireless radiation emissions from cell towers and antennas. The “safe” exposure level, according to the research, is 10 or below. Anything above that is considered biologically harmful. As you can see, almost all levels are far above 10 microwatts per meter squared.

The Safe & Sound Pro II measures the Peak, Maximum and Average radiation levels. Below we have noted only the Maximum, since the human body does not experience in “averages” and peak levels fluctuate. The maximum is the highest level measured at a given location.

The EMF testing project was time and labor intensive. It was a labor of love. We hope the results will be shared far and wide and will be used to inform citizens, educators, health care practitioners, and law makers of the harm from wireless radiation.

Link To Results

Link To SafeTechHawaii

 


 

Posted on

Action Alert: Oppose HR 7266 To Preserve Local Control Over Pesticide Use

Action Alert: Oppose HR 7266 To Preserve Local Control Over Pesticide Use

August 14, 2022 | By Beyond Pesticides | TAKE ACTION NOW

>>Tell your U.S. Representative and Senators to support communities by opposing H.R. 7266 and supporting the Protect America’s Children from Toxic Pesticides Act (PACTPA), which contains a provision affirming local authority to restrict pesticides. >>TAKE ACTION NOW.

The fight to defend the authority of local governments to protect people and the environment has been ongoing for decades, reaching the U.S. Supreme Court in 1991. The Court specifically upheld the authority of local governments to restrict pesticides throughout their jurisdictions under federal pesticide law. In Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. Mortier, the Court ruled that federal pesticide law does not prohibit, or preempt, local jurisdictions from restricting the use of pesticides more stringently than the federal government throughout their jurisdiction.

Link To Article

Thank you for Taking Action HERE

 


 

Posted on

Recent Study Examines Bioeffects of Radiofrequency Radiation ( RFR )

Recent Study Examines Bioeffects of Radiofrequency Radiation ( RFR )

August 12, 2022 | Zero5G.com | This study examines negative consequences of Radiofrequency Radiation ( RFR ) on the human immune system, evaluates RFR modulation impacts on immune cells, and references evidence of RFR as an environmental pollutant.

 


 

Immunotoxicity of radiofrequency radiation

July 18, 2022 | Authors: Himanshi Yadav 1Radhey Shyam Sharma 2Rajeev Singh 3 | PubMed

Abstract

Growing evidence recommends that radiofrequency radiations might be a new type of environmental pollutant. The consequences of RFR on the human immune system have gained considerable interest in recent years, not only to examine probable negative effects on health but also to understand if RFR can modulate the immune response positively. Although several studies have been published on the immune effects of RFR but no satisfactory agreement has been reached. Hence this review aims to evaluate the RFR modulating impacts on particular immune cells contributing to various innate or adaptive immune responses. In view of existing pieces of evidence, we have suggested an intracellular signaling cascade responsible for RFR action. The bio-effects of RFR on immune cell morphology, viability, proliferation, genome integrity, and immune functions such as ROS, cytokine secretion, phagocytosis, apoptosis, etc. are discussed.

Link To Full Article at Source Here

 


 

Posted on

Solar geoengineering by injecting aluminum oxide aerosol into the lower stratosphere is a serious threat to global mental health

Solar geoengineering by injecting aluminum oxide aerosol into the lower stratosphere is a serious threat to global mental health

 

May 30, 2022 | Author: Giovanni Ghirga, Pediatrician |International Society of Doctors for the Environment (ISDE, Italy) – Presented at National Congress of ISDE Italy, San Sepolcro, AR, Italy. | thebmj  | Intended for healthcare professionals  | https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o1150/rr-1  |

 

Solar geoengineering by injecting aluminum oxide aerosol into the lower stratosphere is a serious threat to global mental health

Dear Editor

A possible geoengineering method to mitigate the global warming aspect of climate change is the injection of aerosols into the lower stratosphere, closely mimicking the way large volcanic eruptions cool the climate. This method is called solar-radiation management (SRM) scheme or simply Solar Geoengineering (1). SRM has been suggested to be affordable and have high effectiveness compared with other geoengineering schemes that have been suggested to mitigate global warming (1). While sulphate aerosols are the most studied, it has been recently shown that aerosols with other compositions, aluminium oxide (alumina) and diamond, could be used to dramatically increase the amount of light scatter achieved on a per mass basis. Alumina particles formed after the alumina aerosol injection are more efficient scatterers and may have less severe technology-specific risks than sulfates. Thus, they are expected to be more efficient per unit mass for geoengineering applications (2).

Nevertheless, it has also been suggested that SRM has a low associated safety compared with other geoengineering schemes because of its possible effects on regional climate, stratospheric ozone, high-altitude tropospheric clouds, biological productivity (3), and global biodiversity (4). We want to add a possible severe effect on Global Mental Health that could be caused by using alumina as light scattering.

The average residence time of a particle in the lower stratosphere is approximately 1-2 years (1,3). After eventual transport into the troposphere, alumina particles undergo relatively rapid mixing processes by weather events, turbulence, and cloudscale overturning. They are mostly removed from the atmosphere by dry deposition, sedimentation, or scavenging by clouds, finally polluting the environment (1).

Aluminium has often been regarded as not posing a significant health hazard if the human body burden of aluminium has increased. Nevertheless, epidemiological studies suggest that aluminium may not be as innocuous as was previously thought and that aluminium may actively promote the onset and progression of Alzheimer’s disease. This condition is the most common form of dementia and may contribute to 60 –70 % of cases. In 2015, dementia affected 47 million people worldwide (or roughly 5% of the world’s elderly population), a figure predicted to increase to 75 million in 2030 and 132 million by 2050. Recent reviews estimate that each year nearly 9.9 million people develop dementia globally; this figure translates into one new case every three seconds (5). Even prolonged exposure to low levels of aluminium leads to changes associated with brain ageing and neurodegeneration (6).

Furthermore, aluminium has been included among 200 neurotoxic chemicals that silently erode intelligence, disrupt behaviours, truncate future achievements, and damage societies, perhaps most seriously in developing countries. The latter is called the “Silent Pandemic of Neurodevelopmental Toxicity in Children” (7,8). Recently, the aluminium content of brain tissue in autism spectrum disorder was found to be consistently high (9), and the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder is increasing, last CDC estimated prevalence is 1 in 44 children (10).

Worldwide land precipitation of aluminium following aerosol spraying into the lower stratosphere would increase human body exposure and seriously threaten Global Mental Health.

 

Bibliography

1) Shepherd, J. Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty (The Royal Society, 2009). Albedo Modification Strategies. Climate Intervention by Stratospheric Aerosol Albedo Modification (SAAM), pag. 66.
2) D. K. Weisenstein, D. W. Keith, and J. A. Dykema. Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11835–11859, 2015.
3) F. D. Pope, P. Braesicke, R. G. Grainger, M. Kalberer, I. M. Watson, P. J. Davidson and R. A. Cox Stratospheric aerosol particles and solar-radiation management. Nature Climate Change. 2012;2(10):713-719.
4) Trisos HC, Amatulli G, Gurevitch J, Robock A, Xia L and Zambri B. Potentially dangerous consequences for biodiversity of solar geoengineering implementation and termination. Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 2, pages475–482 (2018).
5) World Health Organization. Global action plan on the public health response to dementia. 2017-2025.
6) Bondy SC. Prolonged exposure to low levels of aluminium leads to changes associated with brain ageing and neurodegeneration. Toxicology 315 (2014) 1-7.
7) Grandjean P, Landrigan PJ. Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals. Lancet. 2006 Dec 16;368(9553):2167-78.
8) Grandjean P, Landrigan PJ. Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity. The Lancet Neurology, Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 330 – 338, March 2014.
9) Mold M, et al. aluminium in brain tissue in autism. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2018.
10) CDC. National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network. 31 March 2022. Accessed 8 April 2022.

Competing interests: No competing interests

 

Link To Source Here