Posted on

Flying Syringes: Scientists Genetically Engineer V@xx-Injecting Mosquitos

Flying Syringes: Scientists Genetically Engineer V@xx-Injecting Mosquitos

September 28, 2022 | The Counter Signal  | Technocracy News

In  recent clinical trials[1], mosquitoes were used to see if they could “vaccinate” humans. The experiments involved 26 participants who were paid $4,100 to put their arm in a box filled with hungry mosquitoes. The genetically modified insects deliver live malaria-causing Plasmodium parasites which are claimed to not make people sick.  The trials were funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).  Lead author of the study[2], Dr. Sean Murphy said, “We use the mosquitoes like they’re 1,000 small flying syringes”.

If you’re thinking that this sounds just like a Bill Gates scheme[3] you’re correct.  Back in 2008, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation awarded $100,000 to Hiroyuki Matsuoka of Jichi Medical University in Japan, to research  genetically modified mosquitoes that could deliver “vaccines”.  There are numerous ethical problems with this concept, one of which is the question of consent in the real world. How could assurance be made that these genetically modified flying syringes would stay in the lab?

It’s important to note that expert eugenist Bill Gates is not a licensed medical doctor nor was he ever elected to make health decisions for the human population. -JD

 

Reference

[1] https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2022/09/21/1112727841/a-box-of-200-mosquitoes-did-the-vaccinating-in-this-malaria-trial-thats-not-a-jo

[2] https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.abn9709

[3] https://sarahwestall.com/flying-syringes-bill-gates-wants-to-release-genetically-modified-mosquitoes-to-inject-you-with-vaccines/

 


 

Genetically Modified Mosquitoes Vaccinate A Human

Mike Campbell | September 27, 2022 |  The Counter Signal

A box full of genetically modified mosquitos successfully vaccinated a human against malaria in a trial funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH).

Genetically modified mosquitoes vaccinate a human 

The study involved about 200 hungry mosquitos biting a human subject’s arm. Human participants placed their arms directly over a small box full of the bloodsuckers.

“We use the mosquitoes like they’re 1,000 small flying syringes,” said researcher Dr. Sean Murphy, as reported by NPR.

Three to five “vaccinations” took place over 30-day intervals.

The mosquitos gave minor versions of malaria that didn’t make people sick, but gave them antibodies. Efficacy from the antibodies lasted a few months.

“Half of the individuals in each vaccine group did not develop detectable P. falciparum infection, and a subset of these individuals was subjected to a second CHMI 6 months later and remained partially protected. These results support further development of genetically attenuated sporozoites as potential malaria vaccines,” researchers concluded.

Carolina Reid was one of twenty-six participants in the study.

“My whole forearm swelled and blistered. My family was laughing, asking like, ‘why are you subjecting yourself to this?’”

Reid enjoyed her experience so much that she says she wants to participate in as many vaccine trials as she can. For this research, each participant received $4,100 as an incentive.

Adverse reactions were what one would expect after getting bit by hundreds of mosquitos and nothing more.

Dr. Kirsten Lyke calls the research “a total game changer.”

Lyke led the phase 1 trials for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine and was a co-investigator for Moderna and Novavax COVID vaccines.

Link To Full Article HERE

 

 


 

 

2017 Flying syringes
Gates_US military

 

 


 

Posted on

New York City Judge Rules NYPD CV-19 Vaxx Mandate Is Invalid

New York City Judge Rules NYPD CV-19 Vaxx Mandate Is Invalid

September 23, 2022 | Image source

A huge victory was handed down in New York City where the judge ruled that police officers can’t be fired for refusing the  CV-19 vaxx.  The judge ordered that NYPD officers who were fired for refusing to take the jab be reinstated to their positions. All vaxx mandates need to end. -JD

 


 

Judge rules NYC vaxx mandate for NYPD is invalid

Link To Video


 

 

 

Posted on

New Harvard Study Indicates Jab More Dangerous than CV-19

New Harvard Study Indicates Jab More Dangerous than CV-19

September 23, 2022 | Author’s conclusion characterize vaxx mandates as, “severe infringements of individual liberty” that are “ethically unjustifiable.” |

A recent pre-print study conducted by researchers from Harvard and Johns Hopkins argues against vaxx mandates especially for young people. Their findings reveal that serious adverse events are to be expected.

The CDC, an agency collaborating with China for the last 30 years, has consistently provided the public with false information. It’s time to stop following the advice of corrupt alphabet agencies and #StopTheShots immediately. -JD

 


 

September 14, 2022 | By JONAS VESTERBERGThe Florida Standard

CDC Director Rochelle Walensky has also stated that the boosters must be expedited in order to work properly. A delay would potentially render the shots “outdated” as new variants would form, Walensky argues.

STUDY: WORSE THAN THE VIRUS

A new study conducted by scientists from Harvard and Johns Hopkins, currently in pre-print, reveals that the COVID-19 vaccines were up to 98 times worse than the virus itself. The study is critical of the booster requirement for American university students, stating in the abstract: “Using CDC and sponsor-reported adverse event data, we find that booster mandates may cause a net expected harm: per COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented in previously uninfected young adults, we anticipate 18 to 98 serious adverse events, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities.”

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

Covid-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: A risk-benefit assessment and five ethical arguments against mandates at universities_Link To Preprint Article 

 

Link To Preprint Article_Covid-19 vaccine boosters for young adults- A risk-benefit assessment and five ethical arguments against mandates at universities 


 

Posted on

Presence of graphene-based carbon nanotubes in Pfizer v@xx

 

Presence of graphene-based carbon nanotubes in Pfizer v@xx

La Quinta Columna researcher, Ricardo Delgado Martín, presents  optical microscope analysis of the Comirnaty Pfizer injectable. The magnification, up to 2000x, reveals self-assembling carbon nanotubes, graphene oxide, glowing nano particles and other debris..

Martín explains the role of microwave radiation in activating graphene oxide and other v@xx components. Sharp edges of graphene oxide and long carbon nano tubes illustrate the potential cause of catastrophic injuries and deaths that have resulted from these hazardous materials in the bloodstream. -JD

**Rice University was researching ‘teslaphoresis‘ or self assembly of nanotubes at a distance, in 2016.

 


September 16, 2022 | By Ricardo Delgado Martín | La Quinta Columna

 

Link To Video

Link To Video at Bitchute

 


September 5, 2022 | By  |

Pablo Campra, PhD in Chemical Sciences, and Degree in Biological Sciences, identified and evidenced the existence of graphene in Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen vaccines.

Link To Video

Download the Campra report:  https://www.laquintacolumna.info/docs/docs/campra-informe-tecnico-en.pdf

 


 

April 14, 2016 | Rice University | Carbon nanotubes self-assemble

LINK

 


 

“The novel coronavirus vaccine contains graphene oxide”

Chinese Patent CN112220919A CV Vaxx contains graphene oxide 

LINK

 

 


 

2015 study discusses potential to implant nano sensors into human organs to function as part of a wireless nanosensor network (WNSN) to possibly be used for intrabody disease detection. The article states that, “nanosensors deployed in WNSN, equipped with graphene-based nanopatch antennas [3], can detect symptoms or virus by means of molecules [7] or bacteria behaviors [8]. In fact, the large surface area and the excellent electrical conductivity of graphene allow rapid electron transfer that facilitates accurate and selective detection of biomolecules.”

Design of Wireless Nanosensor Networks for Intrabody Application

Link

 


 

3D Reduced Graphene Oxide/Sio 2 Composite For Ice Nucleation 

US Patent 2022/0002159 A1 | The present invention relates to the field of cloud seeding.

3D Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles for Cloud Seeding Patent US 2022/0002159 A1

LINK

 


 

Posted on

Judge Rules CV Vaxx Mandate For D.C. Gov. Workers Is Unlawful

Judge Rules CV Vaxx Mandate For D.C. Gov. Workers Is Unlawful

August 26, 2022 |  D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser’s order mandating all District employees receive the experimental CV-19 vaxx, was struck down by D.C. Superior Court Judge, Maurice A. Ross. The Plaintiffs included the Fraternal Order of Police, the Metropolitan Police Department Labor Committee, and the D.C. Police Union.

Gregg Pemberton, the D.C. Police Union Chairman stated in response to the decision, “Now, all of our members can go back to doing the necessary work of trying to protect our communities from crime and violence without unlawful threats of discipline and termination.”

In the 17-page decision, Judge Ross ruled that the Mayor “lacks legal authority to impose a vaccine mandate” and  ordered full reimbursement be provided for any loss of pay or benefits.

On another front, the Mayor ended up walking back a mandatory CV vaxx requirement for students to attend public school this fall in the District. Thanks to public pressure and pushback through the Courts, Americans are gaining momentum in restoring medical freedom and upholding the Constitution. -JD

 


 

Link To_COVID vaccine mandate for DC government workers is unlawful, judge rules

 

Link To_DC mayor’s ‘no shots, no school’ program postponed hours after separate COVID vaccine mandate struck down

 


 

Source: https://wtop.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Order-granting-MSJ.pdf

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted on

U.S. Marines Win Class Protection from Shot Mandate

 

The U.S. District Court of Florida has granted a classwide preliminary injunction for U.S. Marines from the unlawful covid-19 mRNA shot mandate.  The Biden Administration and the DOD violated the rights of U.S. Maines under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act [RFRA].

 

“CONCLUSION

RFRA directs the district court to award a successful plaintiff an “appropriate remedy” to protect Free Exercise against undue restriction by any component of the federal government, which includes the legislative, the judicial, and the executive branch, including the armed forces and, in this instance, including the Marine Corps.” – p.45

 


 

U.S. Marines Win Class Protection from Shot Mandate

August 19, 2022 | By Liberty Council |

The U.S. District Court of Florida has provided class action relief and granted a classwide preliminary injunction from the unlawful federal COVID shot mandate on behalf of those who are in active or reserve service in the United States Marine Corps. Liberty Counsel sued Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and pursued this class action relief on behalf of all U.S. Marines who were denied religious accommodations from the COVID shots which are associated with aborted fetal cells.

U.S District Court Judge Steven Merryday has now issued the following injunction against the Department of Defense and the U.S. Marine Corps:

“The defendants are PRELIMINARILY ENJOINED (1) from enforcing against a member of the class any order, requirement, or rule to accept COVID-19 vaccination, (2) from separating or discharging from the Marine Corps a member of the class who declines COVID-19 vaccination, and (3) from retaliating against a member of the class for the member’s asserting statutory rights under RFRA [Religious Freedom Restoration Act].”

The class includes:

“All persons on active duty or in the ready reserve (1) who serve under the command of the Marine Corps, (2) who were affirmed by a chaplain as harboring a sincere religious objection, (3) who timely submitted an initial request for a religious accommodation, (4) who were denied the initial request, (5) who timely appealed the denial of the initial request, and (6) who were denied or will be denied after appeal.”

In his order, Judge Merryday notes that 3,733 Marines have requested religious accommodations from receiving the COVID-19 shot ordered by the Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin in August 2021. Yet the Marine Corps has granted only 11 accommodations which includes only those who are due for retirement and prompt separation.

Then the court poses the question: “Is it more likely than not — in nearly all 3,733 cases —that no reasonable accommodation was available?”

The court continues, “Because the record reveals the substantial likelihood of a systemic failure by the Marine Corps to discharge the obligations established by RFRA, a class wide preliminary injunction is warranted to preserve the status quo, to permit the full development of the record without prejudice to the plaintiffs, and to permit both a trial and a detailed, fact-based resolution of the controlling issues of fact and law.”

“When Congress acts to preserve liberty, especially a liberty historically and constitutionally fundamental to the United States, the courts — the intended preserve of liberty — must not evade or equivocate, must not, so to speak, sacrifice the fundamental right of thousands of privates to Free Exercise in order to gratify the preference of a few generals.”

Judge Merryday continues with a strong statement regarding the rights of these service members under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act by stating, “Obviously, RFRA includes everyone from the President to a park ranger, from the Chief Justice of the United States to a probation officer, from the Speaker of the House to a member’s district office staffer, from the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to a military recruiter — even if they don’t like it and even if they don’t agree with it. The Free Exercise Clause and RFRA are the law of the land.”

The court continues, “The Marine Corps persistently and resolutely clings to the belief that their accustomed and unfettered command discretion need not yield — on the narrow and specific question of Free Exercise — to the statutory command of RFRA or to an order under RFRA from a district court (actually, at this moment, orders from several district courts), the forum selected by Congress and enacted in RFRA to resolve a dispute under RFRA (in other words, Congress and the President, not the district court, chose the district court as the proper forum for service members to assert the RFRA claim asserted in this action). The Marine Corps repeatedly asserts, ‘The Supreme Court has made clear: ‘Judges are not given the task of running the Army,’ a quote from Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 93 (1953), a dispute resolved forty years before the enactment of RFRA. Although certainly not ‘given the task of running the Army,’ the courts in the narrow instance of RFRA are assigned to, and entrusted to, ensure that those who run the Marine Corps (and the military in general and every other component of the federal government) conform their actions to the governing law, to RFRA, to which the admirals and the generals and the commandants are unquestionably subordinate — just like the President, the Speaker of the House, the Chief Justice, and every other person in the federal government. To repeat: Yes, Congress and the President, not the courts, govern the military. But Congress and the President in governing the military and by enacting RFRA have established — for the narrow category of Free Exercise — an action and a remedy in the district court, have specified and placed the burden of proof on the military, and have allowed for an ‘appropriate remedy’ to ensure a service member’s Free Exercise. That conclusion is not fairly contestable, and the military must acquiesce to the command of Congress and the President in that respect. A service member can sue in a district court to enjoin a violation of RFRA. And the pursuit of relief from a systemic deprivation of Free Exercise, preserved and protected by RFRA, presents a claim uniquely susceptible to resolution in the district court. This order and this action will proceed accordingly.”

Judge Merryday also addresses Liberty Counsel’s First Lieutenant plaintiff and others who were given only two days’ notice for discharge from the Marine Corps and ordered to leave their homes.

“And the resort to two-day warnings of discharge (and, in the instance of First Lieutenant and undoubtedly others, suddenly charging daily rent of more than $100 to remain in military housing while packing one’s family and searching for civilian housing) suggests retribution and retaliation, the existence of which detracts from the Marine Corps’s claim elsewhere in this action to good faith treatment of a religious objector.”

“The Marine Corps’s blanket rejection of RFRA’s burden confuses the sincerity inquiry with the substantial burden inquiry, which further reveals the systemic failure under which the Marine Corps’s resolution of religious accommodations labors. Of course, the injection into the body of a substance against which the recipient harbors a sincere religious objection is morally repugnant (to the class) and perforce burdens Free Exercise. And the burden is substantial not because the vaccine and the aborted tissue satisfy some arbitrary degree of connectedness but because the order to accept injection of the vaccine forces the religiously objecting Marine to choose between betraying a sincere religious conviction and suffering court martial or separation from the military and, likely, visiting adverse consequences on the Marine’s family (such as the abrupt eviction from military housing and disenrollment from military schools).”

“Although Marines of different faiths, different education, and different acumen might understand or explain this objection differently and with more or less clarity, many Marines, including Christians and Muslims, object that the COVID-19 vaccine was developed from cell lines derived from electively aborted fetuses and that introducing an mRNA-active substance into their body either desecrates their body, a temple of the Holy Spirt, or is haram, forbidden. In any case, neither the military nor the judiciary can judge the validity of a religious objection (unless the objection is irrational, delusional, or the like) — but can judge only the sincerity of the belief, which is demonstrated firmly in the administrative record by the chaplain’s assessment of sincerity.”

The court continues with statements that the DOD has failed to uphold the religious freedom of Marines who choose to decline the COVID shots for religious reasons—a decision which does not affect their ability to serve in their military positions.

Link To Read Full Article HERE

 


 

Posted on

DOD mRNA Vaxx Mandate Is Injuring Soldiers

DOD mRNA Vaxx Mandate Is Injuring Soldiers 

The following article provides shocking testimonials from military whistleblowers, providing clear evidence that DOD leadership is failing to protect the health of American service men and women. The Biden Administration and DOD’s mandate to force our soldiers to be used as human test subjects for the experimental mRNA injection indicates that the United States military leadership may be severely compromised.

An immediate halt to mandated mRNA shots, an independent investigation into the current policy and accountability of top leadership is crucial to correcting what appears to be the intentional destruction of the American military’s health, morale and readiness. -JD

 


 

Military whistleblowers: DOD’s legally dubious mRNA mandate has harmed readiness, produced widespread injuries

Dozens of first hand testimonials and internal documents

August 17, 2022 | by  | The Dossier |

A group of active U.S. military pilots are coming forward as whistleblowers to challenge both the legal and moral nature of the Department of Defense mRNA mandate, and they’ve produced some shocking testimonials that challenge virtually all of the mainstream narratives about a supposedly “safe and effective” mRNA vaccine.

The Dossier got in contact with the whistleblowers and acquired a series of documents that showcase the damage wrought by the mRNA mandate. It serves as a troubling account of a Biden Administration Defense Department that has damaged military readiness, alienated those who challenge the arguably illegal mandate, and created an environment in which many are deciding to not come forward with additional vaccine injuries, for fear of being sidelined from the service.

In the PDF files below you will find two separate reports dozens of accounts solicited from this small group of whistleblowers within their military network. These files have been submitted to select Congressional offices, but unfortunately, legislators have not yet taken action on the information.

Examples Of Vaccine Injury Within The Dod
188KB ∙ PDF File

Read now

Congressional Injury Report
13MB ∙ PDF File

Read now

 

Below you’ll find a few accounts from the first report, from direct testimony and internal documents provided from active service members to the whistleblowers. I encourage you to read the whole thing. Again, Congress has this information and can act upon it should they so choose.

Again, this evidence was provided to The Dossier by a small group of whistleblower pilots in the military. It all comes from a network of hundreds of active service members. It is a tiny sample size of the undoubtedly widespread post-mRNA injection issues faced by service members.

Military service members are not seriously threatened by the novel coronavirus, and the Defense Department was well aware of that prior to issuing its legally contested mandate in August of 2021, on the fraudulent basis that there was an FDA approved (not under emergency use authorization) vaccine available to service members.

The DOD’s own numbers have attributed 95 military service member deaths to COVID-19 since early 2020. Mysteriously, the vast majority of these deaths occurred shortly after they instituted the vaccine mandate for all service members. Prior to the mandate, the active military was registering about one COVID death per month on average.

 

Link To Read Full Article HERE

 

 

Link To Article: Biden Admin officials scramble to escape blame for unlawful Pentagon order mandating mRNA for troops

 

 


 

LINK

 


 

 

DOD Hides CV-19 V@xx Injuries as U.S. Military is Decimated by the Mandatory Shots

LINK

 


 

 

VACCINE SYNDROME: HOW THE EXPERIMENTAL ANTHRAX VACCINE KILLED 35,000 MILITARY MEN AND WOMEN

VACCINE SYNDROME: HOW THE EXPERIMENTAL ANTHRAX VACCINE KILLED 35,000 MILITARY MEN AND WOMEN

LINK

 

 

 


 

Posted on

CDC Quietly Ends Differentiation on Covid Vaccination Status

Hopefully many are now aware that the CDC is a corrupt organization and will stop allowing this agency to make any decisions in our lives. -JD

Did you know?

CDC.gov | “The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the government of China have collaborated for the past 30 years addressing public health priorities affecting the U.S., China, and the world.”

CDC is listed on Dunn & Bradstreet as a for-profit corporation.

 


 

CDC Quietly Ends Differentiation on Covid Vaccination Status

 

August 12, 2022 | By MICHAEL SENGER | BROWNSTONE INSTITUTE |

Today, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) quietly ended its policy of differentiating within COVID-19 prevention guidance between those who have received Covid vaccines and those who have not.

CDC’s COVID-19 prevention recommendations no longer differentiate based on a person’s vaccination status because breakthrough infections occur, though they are generally mild, and persons who have had COVID-19 but are not vaccinated have some degree of protection against severe illness from their previous infection.

nonpharma interventions

As explained by the CDC’s Greta Massetti, lead author of the new guidance:

Both prior infection and vaccination confer some protection against severe illness, and so it really makes the most sense to not differentiate with our guidance or our recommendations based on vaccination status at this time.

Someone might want to tell the millions of workers who lost their jobs, the millions of students who received injections out of anticipation for school mandates, and the millions of law-abiding citizens who have been, and often continue to be, excluded from everyday life activities and basic medical care due to their unwillingness to show proof that they received an mRNA shot they neither wanted nor needed, a differentiation that the CDC now admits does not make sense. All cool, I’m sure.

 

 

Link To Full Article Here


 

Posted on

DATA SHOWS THAT CV VAXX SHOULD BE HALTED IMMEDIATELY

DATA SHOWS THAT CV VAXX SHOULD BE HALTED IMMEDIATELY

 


 

August 10, 2022 | By Steve Kirsch | Substack

You are 25X more likely to be injured and 20X more likely to die if you get the COVID shot

When you combine this result with negative vaccine efficacy, the COVID shots are completely nonsensical. Nobody should take them. We couldn’t find a single supportive anecdote!

Executive summary

I recently learned about conservative radio show host Wayne Root’s stunning anecdotal evidence about the 200 people who attended his wedding. He tracked what happened just 8 months after the wedding: 26 were injured and 7 died in the vaccinated group but nothing happened to people in the unvaccinated group, even though Wayne estimated that most of the guests were unvaccinated.

I loved the setup: it’s an almost “as good as it gets real-life randomized trial.”

A single anecdote isn’t compelling. What is compelling is that others are observing the same huge event rates. Wayne is hardly an outlier. And the fact we can’t seem to find any stories equally extreme on the opposite side has got to be very troubling for those supporting the “safe and effective” narrative.

This is the type of post-marketing research the CDC should be doing: they should follow matched (or randomly selected) groups of vaxxed and unvaxxed people over time to document injuries and deaths just like Wayne did. If Wayne can do this, why can’t the CDC? The signal is huge.

Since none of Wayne’s friends died pre-vaccine (Wayne is 61), this suggests that hypotheses such as this one are consistent with what Wayne observed:

In the year after you are vaccinated with the COVID “vaccines”

  • you are 25X more likely to be injured and 20X more likely to die
  • expect at least a 7% rate of serious injury and a 2% chance of death

would be consistent with Wayne’s observations.

I validated that Wayne’s numbers weren’t just a fluke with surveys of my reader base. Over 600 readers responded and the numbers were very similar: 21 injuries and 5 deaths per 100 vaccinated, which is very close to the numbers reported by Wayne (assuming he had an even mix of vaxxed/unvaxxed guests).

An article on The Expose just claimed that 1 in every 246 Vaccinated People has died within 60 days of Covid-19 Vaccination in England according to the UK Governmentwhich is a factor of 5 lower than my hypothesis, but that’s just limited to the first 60 days after a single dose.

And then I went even further looking for anecdotal evidence that Wayne was wrong. I asked my 50,000 followers on Gab for opposite anecdotes. None of the 372 people had an anecdote supporting use of the vaccine. Stunning.

Just comparing the number of anecdotes on each side of the narrative makes it very clear that the vaccines are making things worse.

When you combine this with the evidence of negative vaccine efficacy (VE), such as this article on San Diego by my good friend Mathew Crawford, we are left with the inevitable conclusion that there isn’t any benefit at all in any dimension to support the use of the COVID “vaccines.”

I invite all fact checkers to:

  1. Verify my data. The survey data, including the full contact info for each of the 600 respondents, is available for any fact checker to verify.
  2. Do their own survey. Mine was done in full public view.
  3. Explain why nobody I asked knew of any positive anecdotes.

When you combine all of this with the fact that

The COVID vaccines kill people at a rate that is 1,000X times higher than the Smallpox vaccine (which is deemed too unsafe to use),

it is hard to come to any conclusion other than that the “vaccines” should be stopped immediately.

Introduction

After I wrote my article on Wayne Root’s wedding, it inspired me to see for myself if other people were having the same experience as Wayne.

Wayne told me he’s 61 and he can’t recall any of his friends dying on him in his entire life. Now, in just the last 8 months, of the 200 people at his wedding, he’s learned that 7 have died and 26 have had very serious injuries (heart attack, stroke, severe cancers, etc). All of these people were vaccinated! He has heard of no incidents from his unvaccinated friends in the same time period (which is consistent with his experience with his friends pre-vaccine).

Here’s the kicker: Wayne is a conservative and most of his friends (he estimates 70%) are unvaccinated. So for all 7 deaths to be from his vaccinated friends, that’s unexplainable.

So if Wayne is telling the truth (which I believe), it means that either:

  1. Wayne is a very unlucky guy or
  2. the CDC is lying to everyone about the safety of the COVID vaccine

I liked the fact that this was almost like a real life randomized trial. Wayne’s friends self-selected as to who got the vaccine. The vaccine takers presumably would be the healthier cohort since taking a vaccine is considered to be an attribute of healthy people. Thus, if anything, we’d have expected the vaccine group to do better due to the healthy patient bias. Instead, the opposite was observed.

There were two major potential problems with Wayne’s data, so I decided to try to independently validate it by asking my followers to fill out a simple poll which more systematically collects the data that Wayne did.

My poll just asked my readers to report what they observed since 2021, not to assess causality. In other words, it was just like Wayne did… he didn’t judge causality, he just noticed a differential in the injury and death reports of his friends.

The reason for using my followers instead of an outside polling agency is that my followers are much more likely to take the time to properly answer each question. Also, the biases should be minor as I point out below.

Here is the survey data I received.

The result was stunning: my readers reported 21 injuries and 5 deaths per 100 vaccinated, which is very close to the numbers reported by Wayne.

In addition, the people who were unvaccinated had a much lower rate of injury/death (25X for the injuries; 20X for the deaths).

Our survey numbers are consistent with Wayne’s numbers.

Here is the punchline from the poll

If you’ve been vaccinated, you are:

  • 25X more likely to be seriously injured compared to the COVID unvaxxed
  • 20X more likely to die compared to the COVID unvaxxed

This means that Wayne’s results were in fact, pretty much in line with expectations based on what I discovered in the poll.

Since Wayne is a conservative, he’s going to have fewer friends who are vaccinated than the national average (70%).

If Wayne had only 125 vaccinated friends and 75 unvaccinated friends, here are the actuals and my prediction using the survey data in parens:

Wayne Root’s actuals vs. my prediction based on stats from my users. My prediction is in (). It’s nearly an exact match which suggests that Wayne’s experience is actually not so unusual.

As you can see, the estimate (in parens) is quite close to what was observed suggesting we are close to the target in the survey of my followers.

The details

Here’s the data I used. That link doesn’t disclose name and contact info (for privacy reasons), but the contact info is available for any “fact checker” who wants to verify each record. The comments are most enlightening as well.

At the time I did the calculation, there were 631 records submitted that passed basic sanity checks, all from different people.

vaxxed: 4910, 1039, 235 (total, injured, dead)
unvaxxed: 3475, 29, 8 (total, injured, dead)

Vaxxed
1039/4910 = 21.1% injured
235/4910 = 4.7% dead
Unvaxxed
29/3475 = 0.83% injured
8/3475 = 0.23% dead

Implications (from 2021 to present). If you are vaccinated, you are:
21.1/.83 = 25 X more likely to be injured
4.7/.23 = 20 X more likely to be killed

Note: the people taking the survey did not make any judgments at all as to causality. They just entered numbers observed for each category. You can see from the comments that they were appalled by what they observed.

So we have quite a stunning result that is easy to remember: you are >20X more likely to be injured or die if you’ve been vaccinated.

Adjusting the numbers based on the bias of my followers

Now we need to possibly adjust the numbers because my followers do not represent a random cross section of America.

Let’s look at the makeup of my followers:

So this just results in a higher % of unvaccinated responses in the survey since I’m basically asking unvaccinated people. If I was doing a survey on % vaccinated in America, surveying my followers would be a very bad idea! But for this topic, where we are looking at the injury rate of vaxxed compared to unvaxed, having mostly all unvaccinated responders doesn’t skew the results at all; it simply means I have more unvaxed data points in my ratio (and even with the skew, there are still more total vaxxed data points).

Also, my followers will have higher awareness of injury and death around them than the typical blue pilled person, so the numbers will likely be closer to the truth. They aren’t going to make up injuries that are not present but they are less likely to miss injuries that ARE present.

Finally, we are looking at the damage ratios of the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed so again, this is invariant of the mix of the responders (vaxxed vs. unvaxxed).

Because I have ~2% vaccine injured, that’s lower than surveys show for neutral audiences so if we applied a correction, we’d have to make the vaccine numbers worse!

I likely have a smarter and healthier group of readers than normal, so that might skew the numbers somewhat. If my readers are much less likely to die than average, then that could explain the much larger effect of the vaccine on them.

The biggest bias is respondent bias. Unlike a survey company, I didn’t pick the respondents. I asked my readers to complete the poll. You are much more likely to fill out the poll if you have a compelling story to tell. This is why my numbers are much higher than normal.

So we have an upper bound. For that reason, it is unlikely that the actual numbers are worse than this:

Vaxxed
1039/4910 = 21.1% injured
235/4910 = 4.7% dead

But here’s the really interesting point. If Wayne had 125 vaccinated guests out of 200, then the figures we got match his observations.

So while these numbers seem very high, they do match Wayne’s numbers.

Note that we didn’t track the age of our readers or the people they reported. That would be a much tougher survey to complete.

There is also likely to be some bias in that people who have seen damages may be more likely to fill out the survey than people who haven’t seen any damages at all. So if anything our survey might overstate the percentages.

However, the fact that our numbers are pretty close to what Wayne observed suggests we are over the target.

Data inconsistency

These numbers aren’t consistent with other numbers. Which one is right? We don’t have enough trustable information to answer that question right now.

Tracking numbers outside the family unit

This “problem” is happening to pretty everyone who is aware of what is going on around them.

Read this post by Anita Jader. She’s exceptional because she’s been very methodical about tracking what’s happening around her.

Have you ever seen a post like this in your life? I have not. That alone should tell you that something is very wrong. She lists 18 unusual events happening to people she’s in touch with and then asks, “How much more do you need before you’ll see an association?”

If the vaccine is safe and effective, the anecdotes are hard to explain. The lack of anecdotes on the pro-vaccine side again suggests we are over the target.

Reliable entries

When people take a lot of time to fill out the form (with comments) and have a compelling anecdote (in this case a tight knit community), this provides some of the most dramatic data points.

Here’s an example:

I live in a fishing village in Ecuador of about 3000. I estimate I know about 100 in the town by name and face. 90% of the men make their living fishing with nets. After the vaxes started my fishermen friends told me that many cannot do the work anymore. I know 6 that died right after their shot. First a 76 year old who did work everyday, the father of a friend, died the same day he got the shot. 2 of his neighbors were very sick and close to death also. They did not die but have never recovered. Others are aged 18, 23, 35, 2 in their 60’s and one 65. There are a good number of expats living here, mostly jabbed. The week of the first boosters, 3rd shots, 5 heart attacks and one death of a heart attack.

He knows 100 people.

Among the 80 vaccinated:

  • 25% rate of vax injury
  • 7.5% rate of vax death (even more compelling due to the temporal proximity of the shot)

Among the 20 unvaccinated:

  • 0% injury
  • 0% death

But the # unvaxxed is small so anything under 5% will look like 0.

Still you can see the differential here on the injury rate of the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed in this one anecdote… it’s substantial.

Here’s the kicker:

The numbers from this fishing village in Ecuador are nearly identical to Wayne Root’s numbers!

Isn’t that interesting?

I didn’t cherry pick this from the responses because it matched Wayne’s data. I cherry picked it because it was a large tight knit village case where people know each other.

Negative vaccine efficacy

The numbers we’ve been discussing above are for all-cause injury and mortality. They are definitive and all you need.

Still it is useful to compare with the efficacy of the vaccine in counteracting that.

What we find is the vaccine also has a negative effect for COVID as well.

Mathew Crawford again demonstrated that the vaccines cause you to be more likely to be infected, hospitalized, and die from COVID.

Negative VE means the shots make you more likely to be infected, hospitalized, and die:

Vaccine efficacy turns negative after you get your first booster. In this case, if you’ve been boosted, you are 12% more likely to die if you get COVID.

For fact checkers

The full dataset is available to any fact checker who is willing to verify the entries, signs an NDA to keep the names and contacts private, and who guarantees to publish the result, even if it is counter-narrative. After all, it’s important for America to know the truth, isn’t it? That’s what the fact checkers are supposed to do!

Summary

The all-cause morbidity and mortality data that anyone can collect (just like I did) is consistent with other evidence and shows that COVID vaccine program should be stopped immediately.

This is also obvious when looking for negative anecdotes vs. positive anecdotes. I couldn’t find a single positive anecdote. None of the 876 anecdotes from my readers individually supported use of the vaccine and in aggregate, there was no comparison. See for yourself and read the comments as well.

 

Link To Source Here