Posted on

CDC Quietly Ends Differentiation on Covid Vaccination Status

Hopefully many are now aware that the CDC is a corrupt organization and will stop allowing this agency to make any decisions in our lives. -JD

Did you know?

CDC.gov | “The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the government of China have collaborated for the past 30 years addressing public health priorities affecting the U.S., China, and the world.”

CDC is listed on Dunn & Bradstreet as a for-profit corporation.

 


 

CDC Quietly Ends Differentiation on Covid Vaccination Status

 

August 12, 2022 | By MICHAEL SENGER | BROWNSTONE INSTITUTE |

Today, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) quietly ended its policy of differentiating within COVID-19 prevention guidance between those who have received Covid vaccines and those who have not.

CDC’s COVID-19 prevention recommendations no longer differentiate based on a person’s vaccination status because breakthrough infections occur, though they are generally mild, and persons who have had COVID-19 but are not vaccinated have some degree of protection against severe illness from their previous infection.

nonpharma interventions

As explained by the CDC’s Greta Massetti, lead author of the new guidance:

Both prior infection and vaccination confer some protection against severe illness, and so it really makes the most sense to not differentiate with our guidance or our recommendations based on vaccination status at this time.

Someone might want to tell the millions of workers who lost their jobs, the millions of students who received injections out of anticipation for school mandates, and the millions of law-abiding citizens who have been, and often continue to be, excluded from everyday life activities and basic medical care due to their unwillingness to show proof that they received an mRNA shot they neither wanted nor needed, a differentiation that the CDC now admits does not make sense. All cool, I’m sure.

 

 

Link To Full Article Here


 

Posted on

DATA SHOWS THAT CV VAXX SHOULD BE HALTED IMMEDIATELY

DATA SHOWS THAT CV VAXX SHOULD BE HALTED IMMEDIATELY

 


 

August 10, 2022 | By Steve Kirsch | Substack

You are 25X more likely to be injured and 20X more likely to die if you get the COVID shot

When you combine this result with negative vaccine efficacy, the COVID shots are completely nonsensical. Nobody should take them. We couldn’t find a single supportive anecdote!

Executive summary

I recently learned about conservative radio show host Wayne Root’s stunning anecdotal evidence about the 200 people who attended his wedding. He tracked what happened just 8 months after the wedding: 26 were injured and 7 died in the vaccinated group but nothing happened to people in the unvaccinated group, even though Wayne estimated that most of the guests were unvaccinated.

I loved the setup: it’s an almost “as good as it gets real-life randomized trial.”

A single anecdote isn’t compelling. What is compelling is that others are observing the same huge event rates. Wayne is hardly an outlier. And the fact we can’t seem to find any stories equally extreme on the opposite side has got to be very troubling for those supporting the “safe and effective” narrative.

This is the type of post-marketing research the CDC should be doing: they should follow matched (or randomly selected) groups of vaxxed and unvaxxed people over time to document injuries and deaths just like Wayne did. If Wayne can do this, why can’t the CDC? The signal is huge.

Since none of Wayne’s friends died pre-vaccine (Wayne is 61), this suggests that hypotheses such as this one are consistent with what Wayne observed:

In the year after you are vaccinated with the COVID “vaccines”

  • you are 25X more likely to be injured and 20X more likely to die
  • expect at least a 7% rate of serious injury and a 2% chance of death

would be consistent with Wayne’s observations.

I validated that Wayne’s numbers weren’t just a fluke with surveys of my reader base. Over 600 readers responded and the numbers were very similar: 21 injuries and 5 deaths per 100 vaccinated, which is very close to the numbers reported by Wayne (assuming he had an even mix of vaxxed/unvaxxed guests).

An article on The Expose just claimed that 1 in every 246 Vaccinated People has died within 60 days of Covid-19 Vaccination in England according to the UK Governmentwhich is a factor of 5 lower than my hypothesis, but that’s just limited to the first 60 days after a single dose.

And then I went even further looking for anecdotal evidence that Wayne was wrong. I asked my 50,000 followers on Gab for opposite anecdotes. None of the 372 people had an anecdote supporting use of the vaccine. Stunning.

Just comparing the number of anecdotes on each side of the narrative makes it very clear that the vaccines are making things worse.

When you combine this with the evidence of negative vaccine efficacy (VE), such as this article on San Diego by my good friend Mathew Crawford, we are left with the inevitable conclusion that there isn’t any benefit at all in any dimension to support the use of the COVID “vaccines.”

I invite all fact checkers to:

  1. Verify my data. The survey data, including the full contact info for each of the 600 respondents, is available for any fact checker to verify.
  2. Do their own survey. Mine was done in full public view.
  3. Explain why nobody I asked knew of any positive anecdotes.

When you combine all of this with the fact that

The COVID vaccines kill people at a rate that is 1,000X times higher than the Smallpox vaccine (which is deemed too unsafe to use),

it is hard to come to any conclusion other than that the “vaccines” should be stopped immediately.

Introduction

After I wrote my article on Wayne Root’s wedding, it inspired me to see for myself if other people were having the same experience as Wayne.

Wayne told me he’s 61 and he can’t recall any of his friends dying on him in his entire life. Now, in just the last 8 months, of the 200 people at his wedding, he’s learned that 7 have died and 26 have had very serious injuries (heart attack, stroke, severe cancers, etc). All of these people were vaccinated! He has heard of no incidents from his unvaccinated friends in the same time period (which is consistent with his experience with his friends pre-vaccine).

Here’s the kicker: Wayne is a conservative and most of his friends (he estimates 70%) are unvaccinated. So for all 7 deaths to be from his vaccinated friends, that’s unexplainable.

So if Wayne is telling the truth (which I believe), it means that either:

  1. Wayne is a very unlucky guy or
  2. the CDC is lying to everyone about the safety of the COVID vaccine

I liked the fact that this was almost like a real life randomized trial. Wayne’s friends self-selected as to who got the vaccine. The vaccine takers presumably would be the healthier cohort since taking a vaccine is considered to be an attribute of healthy people. Thus, if anything, we’d have expected the vaccine group to do better due to the healthy patient bias. Instead, the opposite was observed.

There were two major potential problems with Wayne’s data, so I decided to try to independently validate it by asking my followers to fill out a simple poll which more systematically collects the data that Wayne did.

My poll just asked my readers to report what they observed since 2021, not to assess causality. In other words, it was just like Wayne did… he didn’t judge causality, he just noticed a differential in the injury and death reports of his friends.

The reason for using my followers instead of an outside polling agency is that my followers are much more likely to take the time to properly answer each question. Also, the biases should be minor as I point out below.

Here is the survey data I received.

The result was stunning: my readers reported 21 injuries and 5 deaths per 100 vaccinated, which is very close to the numbers reported by Wayne.

In addition, the people who were unvaccinated had a much lower rate of injury/death (25X for the injuries; 20X for the deaths).

Our survey numbers are consistent with Wayne’s numbers.

Here is the punchline from the poll

If you’ve been vaccinated, you are:

  • 25X more likely to be seriously injured compared to the COVID unvaxxed
  • 20X more likely to die compared to the COVID unvaxxed

This means that Wayne’s results were in fact, pretty much in line with expectations based on what I discovered in the poll.

Since Wayne is a conservative, he’s going to have fewer friends who are vaccinated than the national average (70%).

If Wayne had only 125 vaccinated friends and 75 unvaccinated friends, here are the actuals and my prediction using the survey data in parens:

Wayne Root’s actuals vs. my prediction based on stats from my users. My prediction is in (). It’s nearly an exact match which suggests that Wayne’s experience is actually not so unusual.

As you can see, the estimate (in parens) is quite close to what was observed suggesting we are close to the target in the survey of my followers.

The details

Here’s the data I used. That link doesn’t disclose name and contact info (for privacy reasons), but the contact info is available for any “fact checker” who wants to verify each record. The comments are most enlightening as well.

At the time I did the calculation, there were 631 records submitted that passed basic sanity checks, all from different people.

vaxxed: 4910, 1039, 235 (total, injured, dead)
unvaxxed: 3475, 29, 8 (total, injured, dead)

Vaxxed
1039/4910 = 21.1% injured
235/4910 = 4.7% dead
Unvaxxed
29/3475 = 0.83% injured
8/3475 = 0.23% dead

Implications (from 2021 to present). If you are vaccinated, you are:
21.1/.83 = 25 X more likely to be injured
4.7/.23 = 20 X more likely to be killed

Note: the people taking the survey did not make any judgments at all as to causality. They just entered numbers observed for each category. You can see from the comments that they were appalled by what they observed.

So we have quite a stunning result that is easy to remember: you are >20X more likely to be injured or die if you’ve been vaccinated.

Adjusting the numbers based on the bias of my followers

Now we need to possibly adjust the numbers because my followers do not represent a random cross section of America.

Let’s look at the makeup of my followers:

So this just results in a higher % of unvaccinated responses in the survey since I’m basically asking unvaccinated people. If I was doing a survey on % vaccinated in America, surveying my followers would be a very bad idea! But for this topic, where we are looking at the injury rate of vaxxed compared to unvaxed, having mostly all unvaccinated responders doesn’t skew the results at all; it simply means I have more unvaxed data points in my ratio (and even with the skew, there are still more total vaxxed data points).

Also, my followers will have higher awareness of injury and death around them than the typical blue pilled person, so the numbers will likely be closer to the truth. They aren’t going to make up injuries that are not present but they are less likely to miss injuries that ARE present.

Finally, we are looking at the damage ratios of the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed so again, this is invariant of the mix of the responders (vaxxed vs. unvaxxed).

Because I have ~2% vaccine injured, that’s lower than surveys show for neutral audiences so if we applied a correction, we’d have to make the vaccine numbers worse!

I likely have a smarter and healthier group of readers than normal, so that might skew the numbers somewhat. If my readers are much less likely to die than average, then that could explain the much larger effect of the vaccine on them.

The biggest bias is respondent bias. Unlike a survey company, I didn’t pick the respondents. I asked my readers to complete the poll. You are much more likely to fill out the poll if you have a compelling story to tell. This is why my numbers are much higher than normal.

So we have an upper bound. For that reason, it is unlikely that the actual numbers are worse than this:

Vaxxed
1039/4910 = 21.1% injured
235/4910 = 4.7% dead

But here’s the really interesting point. If Wayne had 125 vaccinated guests out of 200, then the figures we got match his observations.

So while these numbers seem very high, they do match Wayne’s numbers.

Note that we didn’t track the age of our readers or the people they reported. That would be a much tougher survey to complete.

There is also likely to be some bias in that people who have seen damages may be more likely to fill out the survey than people who haven’t seen any damages at all. So if anything our survey might overstate the percentages.

However, the fact that our numbers are pretty close to what Wayne observed suggests we are over the target.

Data inconsistency

These numbers aren’t consistent with other numbers. Which one is right? We don’t have enough trustable information to answer that question right now.

Tracking numbers outside the family unit

This “problem” is happening to pretty everyone who is aware of what is going on around them.

Read this post by Anita Jader. She’s exceptional because she’s been very methodical about tracking what’s happening around her.

Have you ever seen a post like this in your life? I have not. That alone should tell you that something is very wrong. She lists 18 unusual events happening to people she’s in touch with and then asks, “How much more do you need before you’ll see an association?”

If the vaccine is safe and effective, the anecdotes are hard to explain. The lack of anecdotes on the pro-vaccine side again suggests we are over the target.

Reliable entries

When people take a lot of time to fill out the form (with comments) and have a compelling anecdote (in this case a tight knit community), this provides some of the most dramatic data points.

Here’s an example:

I live in a fishing village in Ecuador of about 3000. I estimate I know about 100 in the town by name and face. 90% of the men make their living fishing with nets. After the vaxes started my fishermen friends told me that many cannot do the work anymore. I know 6 that died right after their shot. First a 76 year old who did work everyday, the father of a friend, died the same day he got the shot. 2 of his neighbors were very sick and close to death also. They did not die but have never recovered. Others are aged 18, 23, 35, 2 in their 60’s and one 65. There are a good number of expats living here, mostly jabbed. The week of the first boosters, 3rd shots, 5 heart attacks and one death of a heart attack.

He knows 100 people.

Among the 80 vaccinated:

  • 25% rate of vax injury
  • 7.5% rate of vax death (even more compelling due to the temporal proximity of the shot)

Among the 20 unvaccinated:

  • 0% injury
  • 0% death

But the # unvaxxed is small so anything under 5% will look like 0.

Still you can see the differential here on the injury rate of the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed in this one anecdote… it’s substantial.

Here’s the kicker:

The numbers from this fishing village in Ecuador are nearly identical to Wayne Root’s numbers!

Isn’t that interesting?

I didn’t cherry pick this from the responses because it matched Wayne’s data. I cherry picked it because it was a large tight knit village case where people know each other.

Negative vaccine efficacy

The numbers we’ve been discussing above are for all-cause injury and mortality. They are definitive and all you need.

Still it is useful to compare with the efficacy of the vaccine in counteracting that.

What we find is the vaccine also has a negative effect for COVID as well.

Mathew Crawford again demonstrated that the vaccines cause you to be more likely to be infected, hospitalized, and die from COVID.

Negative VE means the shots make you more likely to be infected, hospitalized, and die:

Vaccine efficacy turns negative after you get your first booster. In this case, if you’ve been boosted, you are 12% more likely to die if you get COVID.

For fact checkers

The full dataset is available to any fact checker who is willing to verify the entries, signs an NDA to keep the names and contacts private, and who guarantees to publish the result, even if it is counter-narrative. After all, it’s important for America to know the truth, isn’t it? That’s what the fact checkers are supposed to do!

Summary

The all-cause morbidity and mortality data that anyone can collect (just like I did) is consistent with other evidence and shows that COVID vaccine program should be stopped immediately.

This is also obvious when looking for negative anecdotes vs. positive anecdotes. I couldn’t find a single positive anecdote. None of the 876 anecdotes from my readers individually supported use of the vaccine and in aggregate, there was no comparison. See for yourself and read the comments as well.

 

Link To Source Here

 


 

Posted on

Strong Advocacy by Parents in California Prompts School Superintendents to Take Action Against CV Mandate

Thanks to effective advocacy by California parents, school superintendents took action to stop CV vaxx mandates. -JD

 


August 8, 2022 | By Informed consent Action Network | ICAN |

PARENTS, TAKE NOTE: Grassroots Activism by Parents in California Prompts School Superintendents to Take Action Against COVID Mandate

Supporters of ICAN know that actions taken at the grassroots level can have a big impact on public health policy.  A recent example of this took place in Shasta County, California, when, on October 18, 2021, 45% of families across Shasta County public schools kept their students at home in order to demonstrate their opposition to COVID-19 vaccine mandates for school children.  What’s more, 80% of families in the community expressed their hesitation to COVID-19 vaccines for their children, even voicing their plans to withdraw their children if COVID-19 vaccines were to be mandated.

After ICAN’s attorneys submitted a  records request  to the California Health and Human Services Agency, ICAN discovered that those parents’ small action – merely keeping their children home and voicing their objection to a proposed mandate – had a big impact.  Just weeks later, the superintendents of 21 out of a total of 25 school districts in Shasta County, in addition to the Superintendent of the Shasta County Office of Education, wrote Governor Newsom and other California public health officials, urging them not to move forward with COVID-19 vaccine legislation in order to leave intact parents’ option for a personal belief exemption.  The letter noted that the county’s public schools otherwise stood to lose up to 70% of their students.

When the California Department of Public Health’s Director received the letter, he shared it internally with Mark Ghaly, Secretary of the California Health and Human Services Agency, and the agency’s Undersecretary, Marko Mijic.  Notably, the state of California has not yet mandated that students receive a COVID-19 vaccine.

This just goes to show that parents can have a big impact in their community by simply making their voices heard.  As the past two years have shown us, right now it is more important than ever to take action against coercive mandates.  There is strength in numbers and parents who demand the right to make their own decisions for their children are most certainly not the minority!

Link To Source Here

 


 

Posted on

Dr Merritt on V@ccines, Gene Editing, Depopulation & Rockefellers

Image Source

Gene Drive & The Great DNA War: Dr Merritt on V@ccines, Gene Editing, Depopulation & Rockefellers

August 6, 2022 | http://TheMedicalRebel.com

“This is clearly a depopulation thing, by whom? That’s where you get to the real evil here.”

 

Link To Video

Link To Full Interview

 


 

The Truth About Bill Gates

Link

 

 


 

1974: UN WHO Action to Create Conditions for Fertility Decline

 

 

Posted on

Lawsuit Update Re: ILLEGAL INJECTION MANDATES

 

Lawsuit Update Re: ILLEGAL INJECTION MANDATES

August 2, 2022 | Dr. David Martin | Prosecute Now – Griner v. Biden Case UPDATE | PDF

Please support us in our mission to continue to seek and obtain justice and accountability from our elected officials, and those who serve them … and deserve, We The People.  Here’s how you can help and actively get involved….

We’ve updated the PN website with a new section that allows you or a loved one to report any type of medical discrimination or injury due to the jab.  You can go there now to upload your claim.

Please continue to send your demand letters each day – you can now see how many letters have been sent to each state representative from your State on the letter selection page when you scroll down. LINK

Link To Source Here

 


 

 

700 Million Worldwide Will Die from CV19 Vax by 2028 – Dr. David Martin | By Greg Hunter | USA Watchdog.com

Link To_Video

 


 

Posted on

Is Monkeypox Induced by the CV-19 Vaxx?

Is Monkeypox Induced by the CV-19 Vaxx?

 


 

“we may not be witnessing a worldwide outbreak of monkeypox at all, but rather a huge cover-up of the consequences of administering an experimental injection to millions of people”

 

July 26, 2022 |  BY   | PDF

Official Documents suggest Monkeypox is a coverup for damage done to Immune System by COVID Vaccination resulting in Shingles, Autoimmune Blistering Disease & Herpes Infection

Do you not find it curious how in the space of 50 years, monkeypox has never really gotten off the ground outside of a couple of countries in Africa, but then within two years of the alleged emergence of Covid-19, monkeypox is suddenly in every Western nation and being hyped up by public health authorities and the mainstream media?

Even the Director General of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, has just overruled the World Health Organization and single-handedly declared monkeypox a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.

If you don’t find any of the above curious then you won’t want to read this because you may miss the latest episode of BBC News at 6 pm. But if you do, you may or may not be surprised to find that evidence suggests the alleged monkeypox outbreak could actually be a result of the Covid-19 vaccination programme.

How?

Well, it has something to do with herpes, shingles, auto-immune blistering disease and the fact that Covid-19 vaccination greatly damages the natural immune system.

Here’s a map showing countries where “confirmed” cases of monkeypox have been reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) since the middle of May 2022 –

Only joking. The above is actually a map showing the main distributions of the Pfizer vaccine.

 

Here’s the actual map showing countries where “confirmed” cases of monkeypox have been reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) since the middle of May 2022 –

 

Here’s both maps together so you can play a game of spot the difference with them –

Apart from a couple of countries, there isn’t really any difference, and every country that has reported alleged cases of monkeypox since May 2022 where it was not already endemic, is a country that also distributed the Pfizer Covid-19 injection.

Now, this could of course just be another coincidence in a long line of “coincidences” that have occurred since early 2020. But unfortunately, evidence suggests otherwise.

Human monkeypox was first identified in humans in 1970 in the Democratic Republic of Congo in a 9-year-old boy. Since then, human cases of monkeypox have been reported in 11 African countries. It wasn’t until 2003 that the first monkeypox outbreak outside of Africa was recorded, and this was in the United States.

According to a scientific study published in 1988, between 1981-1986, 977 persons with skin eruption not clinically diagnosed as human monkeypox were laboratory tested in Zaire (now known as the Democratic Republic of Congo).

The Scientists who conducted the study stated the following –

The diagnostic difficulties were mainly based on clinical features characteristic of chickenpox: regional pleomorphism (in 46% of misdiagnosed cases), indefinite body-distribution of skin eruptions (49%), and centripetal distribution of skin lesions (17%). Lymph-node enlargement was observed in 76% of misdiagnosed patients. In the absence of smallpox, the main clinical diagnostic problem is the differentiation of human monkeypox from chickenpox.’

In Layman’s terms, distinguishing monkeypox from chickenpox is incredibly difficult, and chickenpox is caused by a type of herpes virus.

The chickenpox virus is technically known as the varicella-zoster virus, and just like its close relative the herpes simplex virus, it becomes a lifelong resident in the body.

And like its other cousin, genital herpes, varicella may be silent for many years, hiding out inside nerve cells and can reactivate later, wreaking havoc in the form of the excruciating skin disorder, shingles, which is a blistering, burning skin rash.

Unfortunately, or fortunately; depending on whether you chose to get the Covid-19 injection, official Government data and confidential Pfizer documents strongly suggest the Covid-19 injection may be reactivating the dormant chickenpox virus or herpes virus due to the frightening damage it does to the immune system.

This means we may not be witnessing a worldwide outbreak of monkeypox at all, but rather a huge cover-up of the consequences of administering an experimental injection to millions of people.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine safety data for 75 years despite approving the injection after only 108 days of safety review on December 11th, 2020.

But in early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered them to release 55,000 pages per month. They released 12,000 pages by the end of January.

Since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website. The latest drop happened on June 1st 2022.

One of the documents contained in the data dump is ‘reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf’. Page 21 of the confidential document contains data on adverse events of special interest, with one of these specifically being herpes viral infections.

According to the document by the end of February 2021, just 2 months after the Pfizer vaccine was granted emergency use authorisation in both the USA and UK, Pfizer has received 8,152 reports relating to herpes infection, and 18 of these had already led to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.

Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) is a systemic, dysfunctional inflammatory response that requires long intensive care unit (ICU) stay. It is characterized with a high mortality rate depending on the number of organs involved. It can be caused by herpes infection as this scientific study found here proves.

Further evidence published by the U.S Government, but more specifically the Centers for Disease Control shows that cases of herpes, shingles and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome really exploded in the USA following the administration of the Covid-19 injection.

The following chart shows the number of herpes infections/complications that have been reported to VAERS as adverse reactions to all vaccines (including the Covid-19 jabs) by the year reported, and the Covid-19 vaccines only by the year reported –

The following chart shows adverse events to the Covid-19 injections reported to the CDCrelating to herpes, shingles and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome up to 13th May 2022.

It also shows the number of adverse events reported against the Flu Vaccines, all vaccines combined (excluding Covid-19 injections) and the HPV/Smallpox vaccines between 2008 and 2020 –

As you can see the Covid-19 injections have caused the most herpes related infections, and this is within 17 months. When comparing these to the number of flareups reported against the HPV/Smallpox vaccines in 13 years, these numbers are extremely concerning.

This isn’t because so many people have been given a Covid-19 injection either. Official CDC numbers actually show 1.7 billion doses of influenza vaccine alone were administered between 2008 and 2020. Whereas, as of 6th May 2022, 580 million doses of Covid-19 vaccine had been administered in the USA.

The following chart shows the rate per 1 million doses administered of adverse events related to herpes, shingles and multiple organ syndrome –

The rate of herpes-related infections reported as adverse reactions to the Flu jabs is 0.75 adverse events per 1 million doses administered. But the rate of herpes-related infections reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections is 31.31 adverse events per 1 million doses administered.

That’s a 4,075% difference, and indicative of a very serious problem. A serious problem that is being caused by the fact the Covid-19 injections decimate the immune system.

The following chart shows the Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness among the triple vaccinated population in England in the UK Health Security Agency Week 3, Week 7 and Week 13Vaccine Surveillance reports of 2022 –

Data shows that vaccine effectiveness fell month on month, with the lowest effectiveness recorded among 60-69-year-olds at a shocking minus-391%. This age group also experienced the sharpest decline, falling from minus-104.69% in week 3.

But one of the more concerning declines in vaccine effectiveness has been recorded among 18-29-year-olds, falling to minus-231% by Week 12 of 2022 from +10.19% in Week 3.

A negative vaccine effectiveness indicates immune system damage because vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of the effectiveness of a vaccine. It is a measure of a vaccine recipient’s immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.

The Covid-19 injection specifically instructs cells to produce the alleged SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein. The immune system is supposed to take care of the rest and then remember to do it again if it ever encounters the SARS-CoV-2 virus. So when the authorities state that the effectiveness of the vaccines weakens over time, what they really mean is that the performance of your immune system weakens over time.

The following chart shows the Covid-19 death rates per 100,000 by vaccination status across England in March 2022 based on data published by the UKHSA

As you can see, most vaccinated age groups have a higher Covid-19 death rate than the unvaccinated age groups. That’s not indicative of an effective vaccine, it’s indicative of damage done to the immune system by having the Covid vaccine. How else can you explain the fact the vaccinated are more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated?

 

Link To Read The Full Article Here

 


 

 

Twitter Censors Pfizer-Injured Israeli COVID Vaccine Director

“Prof. Shmuel Shapira MD MPH (Col.), who served as Director of the Israel Institute for Biological Research between 2013 and 2021, suggested that the monkeypox outbreak was connected to mRNA vaccines.

Last week, Twitter censored Prof. Shapira—who was “physically injured” after his third Pfizer vaccine—and forced him to remove a post which said: “Monkey pox cases were rare for years. During the last years a single case was documented in Israel. It is well established the mRNA vaccines affect the natural immune system. A monkey pox outbreak following massive covid vaccination: *Is not a coincidence.”

Link To Article

 

 


 

Posted on

10,000% Increase in Cancers Following COVID-19 Vaccines as Doctors and Scientists Worldwide Sound the Alarm

Confocal microscopy study showing the spiker protein (green) proliferating the cell nucleus (blue)

10,000% Increase in Cancers Following COVID-19 Vaccines as Doctors and Scientists Worldwide Sound the Alarm

August 2, 2022 | by Brian Shilhavy Editor, Health Impact News |

Pathologist Dr. Ute Krueger. Screenshot from video interview (see below).

 

Rates of cancer have exploded following the COVID-19 mass vaccination programs, with doctors and scientists all over the world now sounding the alarm.

Just today a reader contacted us with the following tragic story:

Subject: Cancer after Pfizer vaccine

Hello,

My husband prior to the vaccine was fit and healthy, strong, active. We both had the vaccination on 12.11.2021. about 10 hours kater we spitted first swollen node in his left armpit. Doctors ignored the symptom. Then second node, third… With 6 swollen nodes he was diagnosed with Mantle cell lymphoma. He’s during very aggressive chemotherapy called Nordic regime. He’s only 36 in May, so he was 35 when it all has started. MCL affects people after 60 usually.

Before the vaccination our children brought from school many different viruses, from common flu, tummy bug, chicken pox, ear infections to covid.

My husband was totally fine that time. His immune system worked brilliantly during September and October when me and our daughters suffered from mentioned diseases. He was working and taking care of us at that time. If he would have MCL then he wouldn’t be able to fight all these viruses. Everything has changed within the hours from the first dose of Pfizer.

At first my husband was ignored by GP as he claimed it was typical side effect which should disappear. When more nodes started swilling gp still claimed we should wait yet in January my husband was advised not to have second dose of the vaccination due to the side effects.

In March I requested blood test to check whether it was cancer. Results returned completely fine. I immediately booked next blood test. Also returned completely fine. So without hesitation I booked appointment with go but this time I asked for different gp. During this appointment my husband was referred for ultrasound scan. From there to cancer clinic. 3 days later biopsy took place. Couple if days later we learnt the diagnosis mantle cell lymphoma.

At this stage we were told it has nothing to do with the vaccination, yet for months we were expected to wait for side effects to disappear.

Also, if the cancer is not in connection to vaccinate then how come my husband survived the 8 waves if different diseases starting from September ? In August we spent holidays in Scotland. Lots of walking and driving. My husband was in a very good shape.

Let me say it again, prior to the vaccination my husband was strong, fit, active and healthy.

Our life as a family has been literally ruined.

We cannot go anywhere, we can’t work, my husband us to weak, I have to care for him now and children. We are facing financial difficulties heading to a place where we won’t be able to cover winter bills.

MCL is incurable. Only treatable.

If we are lucky, we may be back to temporary normality by March/April 2023. MCL comes back. Noone knows when. Second time it hits stronger…

We can’t take girls for holidays, we can’t mix with other people as my husband’s immune system is compromised. I am on standby all the time as I may need to take him to hospital in emergency like it happened already. Most of days we travel to hospital anyway. Sometimes even twice a day.

I have never returned to myself after COVID and vaccination. Before I was very active and fit. Now Im not even at 50% of what I used to be.

Our children will never be vaccinated!

I did a search in the U.S. government Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) to see how many cases of the most common cancers had been reported following COVID-19 vaccines, and it returned a result of 837 cases of cancer, including 88 deaths, 66 permanent disabilities, and 104 life threatening events. (Source.)

And this not an exhaustive list, as I tried to include ALL cancers listed in VAERS, but the database could not handle the query.

I listed the cases by age, and of the 837 cases, 375 of them had no recorded age, although often the age can be found in the description.

So I put those 375 cases on the first page of the results, and starting on the second page you can see how young some of these cancer patients are following COVID-19 vaccines. (Source.)

It begins with a 12-year-old girl and a 15-year-old boy, followed by many young adults in their 20s.

Using the exact same search terms for cancer, I then searched ALL FDA-approved vaccines for the previous 30 yearsand found only 140 cases of cancer reported. (Source.)

That result is for 360 months (30 years), whereas the 837 cases following the experimental COVID-19 vaccines were reported in just 20 months, since the roll out of the COVID-19 shots beginning in December of 2020.

That is an increase of 10,661.4%!

A pathologist who lives in Sweden was just interviewed recently about the increasing rates of cancer she is seeing in her patients following the COVID-19 vaccines.

Her name is Dr. Ute Krueger, and the video is found on the Doctors For Covid Ethics Rumble Channel.

This is an amazing interview! Dr. Krueger is highly credentialed in her field, and yet few of her colleagues are willing to follow where the evidence leads, even though everyone is seeing a huge surge in cancer cases, and her reports to the Swedish Drug Administration have not been addressed. She states:

I studied medicine because I wanted to help people.

But now it feels like I am watching people being killed, and there’s little I can do.


The Exposé has also just published an excellent review of some of the scientific literature showing how the spike proteins are interfering with “the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes.”

The COVID-19 mRNA “Vaccines” cause Cancer; here’s the evidence…

by Joel Smalley; Professional Data Analyst
The Exposé

The homologous recombination DNA repair pathway is one of the mechanisms that the body uses to stop your cells turning cancerous in response to environmental stress.

One of the most important components of this pathway is Tumor protein P53 (p53), the “guardian of the genome”. It protects our cells from cellular damage. Under cellular stress, p53 jumps into action, regulating gene expression to control DNA repair, cell division and cell death. It is the most commonly mutated gene in cancer.

In October 2021, two revered scientists, called Jiang and Mei, had a paper published, after peer review, in MDPI, showing that the SARS-Cov-2 spike protein obliterated the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes.

Effect of the SARS-CoV-2 virus on homologous repair (HR) efficiency in lymphocytes

The viral spike protein was so toxic to this pathway that it knocked 90% of it out. If the whole spike protein got into the nucleus (in the ovaries), and enough of it was produced and hung around long enough before the body was able to get rid of it all, it would cause cancer. Fortunately, in the case of naturally infection, this is unlikely to occur.

Unfortunately, the experimental mRNA toxshot induces spike protein to be produced (the full length spike exactly matching – amino acid for amino acid – the full length of the viral spike protein¹) in and around the cell nucleus² and is produced for at least 60 days and almost certainly longer³.

“Fact checkers” said the viral spike protein doesn’t get in the nucleus despite the expert scientists showing that it absolutely does.

Confocal microscopy study showing the spiker protein (green) proliferating the cell nucleus (blue)

Public health authorities and regulators said the vaccinal spike protein doesn’t get in the nucleus despite the mRNA manufacturers submitting pictures of it doing so to them as part of their emergency use application.

OK, so it gets into the nucleus but the official narrative says it doesn’t stay in the body for more than a few hours. But, a huge study by one of the most respected molecular biology groups in the world at Stanford university⁴ showed that the mRNA (producing the vaccinal spike antigen) was still present and active in the body after 60 days.

Jiang and Mei, quite logically and reasonably, cautioned that the mRNA spike protein would likely have the same effect as the viral spike protein on p53 and therefore cause cancer.

Two months after this revelation was highlighted by my friend, Jikky the Mouse, the Jiang and Mei paper was retracted due to spurious “expressions of concern” (EOC) about the methods of the study despite them being standard practice.

Moreover, the authors of the EOC were Eric Freed, the head of the US National Institute of Health (NIH) that funded Moderna, the patent holder of the COVID mRNA toxshot⁵ and Oliver Shildgen, the actual editor of the journal that originally accepted the paper! And neither of them declared the conflicts of interest.

Well, despite the retraction, the spike protein circulating in large quantities, in the direct vicinity of the cell nucleus, for elongated periods of time, still has the potential to induce cancer in those cells (ovary, pancreas, breast, prostate, lymph nodes). These cancers can take years to develop and so it’s possible that we don’t see much of a safety signal for 5 or 10 years.

Sources/References

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/spike-proteins-covid-19-and-vaccines/

https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2183-09.pdf

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35148837/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8786601/

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/moderna-covid-vaccine-patent-dispute-national-institutes-health/

Read the full article at The Exposé.

 

Link To Read Full Article Here

 


 

 

Smoking Gun Covid Vaccine is a Bio-Weapon Doctor Michael McDowell

LINK

 

 

 


 

Posted on

The Truth About Bill Gates

How much influence should Bill Gates have over our lives?

 


 

The Truth About Bill Gates  | By Paul Joseph Watson | February 19, 2021

 

Link To Video

 


 

Exposing The Gates Agenda in Africa

Obianuju Ekeocha  |  #ExposeBillGates

Link To Video

 

 


 

 

Bill Gates India

 

Bill Gates Media

 

Bill Gates Jeffrey Epstein

 

Bill Gates V@ccines    

 

Bill Gates CDC

 

Bill Gates Marburg

 

Bill Gates Vaxx Investment Return

 

Bill Gates 5G    

 

Bill Gates Geoengineering

 

Bill Gates GMO’s

 

Bill Gates Farmland

 

Bill Gates Eugenics_Agenda

 

Bill Gates DNA Mining

 

Bill Gates UN WHO

 

Bill Gates Cryptocurrency_MICROSOFT_Patent_WO2020060606A1

 

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6f/c2/6e/bf894ad1738dc5/US9067047.pdf

 

Bill Gates_Injectable Controlled Release Fluid Delivery System_US9067047

 


 

 

Photo Image Source

 

 


 

 

Is it ethical to purchase a lithium battery powered EV?

LINK

 


 

Posted on

Transcript of Evidence / Vaxx Analysis By Prof. Dr. Antonietta Gatti – Nano-pathologist

Transcript of Evidence / Vaxx Analysis By Prof. Dr. Antonietta Gatti – Nano-pathologist

In case you missed Day 4 of the CoVid Grand Jury Trials, Dr. Antonietta Gatti’s testimony below provides verification of the chemical composition and contamination of 42 standard “vaccines”. She discusses the nanotechnological content of the mRNA products and concludes that the direct nano-bio-interaction of nano particles with DNA is very dangerous. Dr. Gatti states, “I don’t see the possibility for the body to counter-act against these stimuli.”

@ 2:32.32:

 

Link To_@ 2:32.32: Transcript of Evidence / Vaxx Analysis By Prof. Dr. Antonietta Gatti with images