Posted on

Federal government ramps up research to manipulate the human brain and engineer DNA

Federal government ramps up research to manipulate the human brain and engineer DNA

September 30, 2022 |

Acting president Biden recently intensified his war against Americans with an executive order ramping up genetic modification and brain manipulation. This blatant violation of ethics and human rights is clearly unconstitutional, however these kinds of policies seem to be the standard from corporate politicians serving in Washington, D.C.  -JD

 


 

 


 

Karen Kingston Warns That Joe Biden’s Executive Order Makes Crimes Against Humanity Mandatory

September 22, 2022 | By

Link To Video

 

 


 

Source: https://thefederalist.com/2022/09/29/federal-research-on-manipulating-brains-and-rewriting-dna-should-worry-us-all/

 

The future of evolution is now in our hands. Or rather, the godlike power to alter biology rests in a few scientists’ hands, and we’re all going to pay for it, one way or another. The U.S. government is pouring billions of dollars into understanding genetics and the human brain, and most consequentially, how to manipulate those systems.

Last week, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) launched its “BRAIN 2.0” initiative (Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnology), ramping up an existing program started eight years ago. Comparable to the Human Genome Project in scope and scale, BRAIN 2.0 grants $600 million to fully map our 86 billion neurons and their uncounted connections. The project is expected to reach a grand total cost of $5 billion by 2026.

In theory, once scientists have created this detailed brain atlas in silicothey can directly alter neural function using digital devices. The director of the BRAIN Initiative, John Ngai, exhibits a troubling fixation on this method.

In a recent interview with Stat News, Ngai noted two concrete results of his current neuro-mapping efforts. One is an advanced brain-computer interface — implanted last year at the University of California, San Francisco — that allows for astounding thought-to-text communication. The other is a major breakthrough in deep brain stimulation at Baylor University, where electrodes are implanted to alter mood and behavior, relieving depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Ngai’s cyborg obsession is shared by his close government partner, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), where “man-computer symbiosis” has been a longstanding paradigm. The defense agency’s involvement in the BRAIN Initiative is open and well documented. However, beyond the NIH’s declared mission to heal, our top military minds also have a deep interest in human enhancement.

“DARPA has been a pioneer in brain-machine interface technology since the 1970s, but we began investing heavily in the early 2000s,” boasted Justin Sanchez, the director of DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office. “We’ve laid the groundwork for a future in which advanced brain interface technologies will transform how people live and work.”

This transformation involves neural implants, to an extent, but also non-invasive devices, such as wearable neuro-bands or skull caps. “Imagine what will become possible when we upgrade our tools to really open the channel between the human brain and modern electronics,” said DARPA program manager Phillip Alvelda, whose goals include “Bridging the Bio-Electronic Divide” and developing a “High-Resolution, Implantable Neural Interface.”

If successful, the atlas created by BRAIN 2.0 will be a crucial bridge across this “bio-electronic divide.” The neural territory will be mapped and ready to conquer.

‘The Century of Engineered Biology’

This mad quest to alter basic biology extends all the way down to the genome. Two weeks ago, the White House announced that $2 billion will go to reshaping life as we know it by way of the National Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Initiative. “We need to develop genetic engineering technologies and techniques,” the executive order reads, “to be able to write circuitry for cells and predictably program biology in the same way in which we write software and program computers.” Another $1 billion will go toward creating the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), with a full $6.5 billion requested for its “high-risk, high-reward” projects.

Last Wednesday, the new agency’s inaugural director, Renee Wegrzyn, reminded her colleagues that humans now have the ability to alter DNA at will. But because gene-editing technologies such as CRISPR have become so inexpensive and widespread, she warned, the specters of accidental pathogens or intentional bioweapons pose a grave threat to humankind.

“We’re ushering in the century of engineered biology,” Wegrzyn declared with a weird fake-smile, “whether it’s through gene-editing, or it’s through engineering of living medicines that will be in our gut — or in soil to promote fertilization and growth, especially as we face challenges like climate change.”

What else does this “century of engineered biology” hold in store? According to Wegrzyn, a former DARPA program manager, this revolution will lead to “human-machine convergence” and the creation of “Human 2.0.”

“These are things that are somewhere on the horizon,” she told the Long Now Foundation in 2017, “that genome engineering and gene-editing will be a part of. So how do we make sure we can pursue this future in a safe manner?”

Taking up the transhumanist torch, Wegrzyn lauded “defensive enhancement,” citing the example of mass vaccination to enhance our immune systems. She also addressed “offensive enhancement,” such as improvements in human “performance” and “cognitive state.”

“It’s evolution on steroids,” she said flippantly, “now in our control.” With a strange chuckle, she assured the audience that “we’re solidly on the defensive side.” If that’s the case, her DARPA projects were outliers at the agency.

Thinking about that culture of radical enhancement partnered with the vaccine-crazy NIH, it’s easy to imagine a dark future of increasingly unhinged “safe and effective” campaigns. The creation of ARPA-H appears to be an official marriage of the military-industrial complex to the biomedical establishment, with BRAIN 2.0 standing by the altar like a ring-bearing stepchild.

Federally Funded Transhumanism

Various skeptics, myself included, call this federally funded transhumanism for good reason. The resonance is obvious. In his “Letter to Mother Nature,” penned in 1999, the OG transhumanist Max More declared humanity’s freedom from our natural inheritance:

Through genetic alterations, cellular manipulations, synthetic organs, and any necessary means, we will endow ourselves with enduring vitality and remove our expiration date. … Not content with that, we will seek complete choice of our bodily form and function, refining and augmenting our physical and intellectual capabilities beyond any human in history. … While we pursue mastery of our own biochemistry, we will increasingly integrate our advancing technologies into our selves.

We’ve entered a bizarre era where sculpting human brains and bodies — and the underlying genes — may soon be as commonplace as nose jobs and genetically modified tomatoes are today. The crucial decision to move from healing to enhancement is just over the horizon, and your tax dollars are laying the foundation.

Today, it’s selective abortions and smartphone-symbiosis. Tomorrow, it will be designer babies and wearable brain-computer interfaces. To their credit, both Renee Wegrzyn and John Ngai have said we need public debates about how far we go with these technologies. Up till now, all we’ve seen are trans children, cringy metaverse ads, and vaccine mandates.

Maybe you’re enthusiastic about our transhuman trajectory. Or maybe, like me, you’re appalled by the hubris behind it. My purpose here is not to convince you of which position to take.

What’s important is that you’re thinking about where we’re at, right now, and where these efforts to rewrite DNA and irradiate brains are going. To the extent our voices are heard, we have to insist on making our own plans for the future — because regardless of our opinions, reckless technocrats are busy making those plans for us.

Link To Read Full Article HERE

 


Image Source

Posted on

Attack on the Brain: Neurowars and Neurowarfare

September 9, 2022  |  Neuroweapons  |  SPACE & DEFENSE  |

Did America get hacked?

Radical changes in our society including dramatic shifts in attitudes and behaviors, unsound decision making by leaders, and media-induced confusion, may well be the desired outcomes of unrestricted warfare, through the use of neuroweapons.

The 2016 SPACE & DEFENSE article below by Armin Krishnan describes how the human brain is the ultimate target of neurowarfare, where enemies take control of entire societies and their leadership, by altering behavior and changing attitudes using sophisticated neuroweapons.

The article states, “offensive neurowarfare could also mean collapsing adversarial states by creating conditions of lawlessness, insurrection and revolution, for example, by inducing fear, confusion, or anger. Adversarial states could be destabilized using advanced techniques of subversion, sabotage, environmental modification, and ‘gray’ terrorism, followed by a direct military attack. As a result, the adversarial state would not have the capacity to resist the policies of a covert aggressor. Neurowarfare could take down a strategic competitor permanently without nuclear war and the risk of devastating nuclear retaliation.”

De facto weaponry concealed within the ‘smart’ / electrical grid (4G-5G-6G+satellites+smart meters) provides our enemies with the ability to target our entire population 24/7, with potential neuroweapons.

Winning this war requires spiritual strength, overcoming engineered divisions, and regaining local control over the wireless / electrical grid, through proper public oversight and strict safety regulations. -JD

 


 

Attack on the Brain: Neurowars and Neurowarfare

https://www.usafa.edu/app/uploads/Space_and_Defense_9_1.pdf

by Armin Krishnan

 

https://www.usafa.edu/app/uploads/Space_and_Defense_9_1.pdf

 

“While such methods of war seem intuitively objectionable from an ethical point of view, they increasingly represent the current reality of ‘hybrid warfare’, ‘political warfare’, and other forms of societal destabilization that are being employed with great effectiveness by several major nations. There is currently no legal protection against mind manipulation, although one can argue that covert mental coercion would violate human dignity and by extension human rights.”

-p.18

https://www.usafa.edu/app/uploads/Space_and_Defense_9_1.pdf

 

Link To Article_2016 Neurowarfare_Space_and_Defense

 

 


 

Dr. James Giordano, Professor of Neurology and Biochemistry at Georgetown University Medical Center, presents an overview of neuroweapons.

Link

 


 

Link To Learn More: Neuroweapons

 


 

 

MindWar: Weaponized Frequencies Triggering Genocide?

LINK

 


 

Posted on

FLASHBACK 2018: World Economic Forum ( WEF ) Focus on Mind Control Using Sound Waves

Image Source

FLASHBACK 2018: World Economic Forum ( WEF ) Focus on Mind Control Using Sound Waves

The fact that the WEF took an interest in the science behind mind control will not be much of a surprise to those who are aware of the ideology and goals of the World Economic Forum ( WEF ). What is interesting is that this article was removed from their website. Thanks to the  for shining a light on this hidden truth. -JD

 


 

https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.substack.com/p/wef-proposes-sound-waves-for-mind

 

Link To Full Article @ Source HERE

 


 

 

Mind control using sound waves? We ask a scientist how it works

07 November 2018 | By Antoine Jérusalem |  Source

At the moment, non-invasive neuromodulation – changing brain activity without the use of surgery – looks poised to usher in a new era of healthcare. Breakthroughs could include the better management of Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease, reducing the pain of migraines or even reversing cognitive disorders caused by brain injury

But what happens if this technique for altering our brain waves escapes regulation and falls into the wrong hands? Imagine a dictatorial regime with access to the tricks and tools to change the way its citizens think or behave.

That’s the ethical battleground that Antoine Jerusalem, a professor of engineering science at Oxford University, finds himself in as he researches the potential of ultrasound technology to tackle neurological diseases and disorders.

In this interview, conducted as part of the World Economic Forum’s annual gathering in the Middle East of scientists, government and business, he tells us more about this growing field of research.

Controlling the brain with sound waves: how does it work?

Well, to get straight to the science, the principle of non-invasive neuromodulation is to focus ultrasound waves into a region in the brain so that they all gather in a small spot. Then hopefully, given the right set of parameters, this can change the activity of the neurons.

If you want to get rid of neurons that have gone wild, for example in epilepsy, then you might want to crank up the energy to essentially kill them. But if you want to selectively promote or block the neuronal activity, you need to fine-tune your ultrasound waves carefully.

In other words, there’s a difference between ultrasound stimulation used for removing tissue, and ultrasound neuromodulation, which is aimed at controlling neuronal activity without damaging the tissue.

Ultrasound neuromodulation is something that definitely works, but that we still don’t understand.

Link To Read The Full Article HERE

 

LINK TO_PDF_NOV 7, 2018_WEF_Mind control using sound waves? Ultrasound_Neuroscience

 

 


 

 

The Weaponization Of Neuroscience

LINK

 


 

Posted on

The Weaponization Of Neuroscience

Image Source

The Weaponization Of Neuroscience

In this 2011 presentation, Dr. James Giordano, Professor of Neurology and Biochemistry at Georgetown University Medical Center, lectures on weapons of mass disruption, also known as neuroweapons. He describes NEUROWEAPONOLOGY, the ability to create a ripple effect of disrupting the process of cognition, emotion, and behavior, not only on individual scales but also on socioeconomic scales, geopolitical scales, and military scales. Dr. Giordano mentions cell phones, microwaves or electromagnetic pulse, and aerosolized particulate matter, at the nanoscale, in the context of neuroweapons. Graphene oxide is another element that might be included in this platform.

Many recognize that the deliberate destabilization of the USA and all nations of the world during the covid campaign was a skillful, calculated psychological warfare operation that not only induced mass fear of illness (hypochondria) but also included layered operations to intentionally disrupt the social fabric of society, [DIVIDE AND CONQUER] to orchestrate and incite race wars, gender wars, religious wars, generational wars and other engineered divisions.  Social media, cell phones, and wireless infrastructures (4G-5G-6G-AI+) including satellites, are tools ( neuroweapons ) to influence and change thoughts, attitudes and behaviors. Not only are the devices designed to be addictive, they are also designed to be interactive inside the Internet of Bodies. Great spiritual strength and self awareness, as well as bioethics and safety regulations are needed to escape the wireless technocratic prison and liberate ourselves, future generations, and all life on Earth from the permanent slavery of MindWar. -JD

Also see: 5G & The Realities of Neuroweapons LINK

 

Link To Video

Link To_Neurotechnologies as weapons in national intelligence and defense – An overview

 


 

 

Design of Wireless Nanosensor Networks for Intrabody Application

LINK