November 30, 2023 | Zero5G.com | A cell tower proposal was withdrawn in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho after resistance by Shadduck Lane residents and others. After city staff requested professional RF radiation analysis, the land use application was rescinded. For now.
Communities everywhere are pushing back against ubiquitous cell tower deployment. Radiofrequency/Microwave (RF/MW) radiation, is a hazardous physical agent that is continuously transmitted by cell towers. RF/MW radiation is defined as pollution.
October 18, 2023 | Image source | The brain is the new battlefield of war. Goals of cognitive warfare include shaping and controlling the perception of individuals and entire societies.
For example, the CV19 war was hugely successful due to narrative engineering and controlling/blocking the flow of information on social media.
To successfully navigate the climate of deception and weaponized data it’s important to scrutinize information and verify facts and sources for ourselves.
According to a recent PLA article, controlling public perception includes “four social-media tactics, dubbed “confrontational actions”: Information Disturbance, Discourse Competition, Public Opinion Blackout, and Block Information. The goal is to achieve an “invisible manipulation” and “invisible embedding” of information production “to shape the target audience’s macro framework for recognizing, defining, and understanding events.”
“Chinese government and military writings say cognitive operations aim to “capture the mind” of one’s foes, shaping an adversary’s thoughts and perceptions and consequently their decisions and actions. Unlike U.S. defense documents and strategic thinkers, the People’s Liberation Army puts cognitive warfare on par with the other domains of warfare like air, sea, and space, and believes it key to victory—particularly victory without war.”
The phrase “cognitive warfare” doesn’t often appear in news stories, but it’s the crucial concept behind China’s latest efforts to use social media to target its foes.
Recent stories have ranged from Meta’s “Biggest Single Takedown” of thousands of false-front accounts on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, and Substack to an effort to spread disinformation about the Hawaii fires to a campaign that used AI-generated images to amplify divisive U.S. political topics. Researchers and officials expect similar efforts to target the 2024 U.S. election, as well as in any Taiwan conflict.
Chinese government and military writings say cognitive operations aim to “capture the mind” of one’s foes, shaping an adversary’s thoughts and perceptions and consequently their decisions and actions. Unlike U.S. defense documents and strategic thinkers, the People’s Liberation Army puts cognitive warfare on par with the other domains of warfare like air, sea, and space, and believes it key to victory—particularly victory without war.
Social media platforms are viewed as the main battlefield of this fight. China, through extensive research and development of their own platforms, understands the power of social media to shape narratives and cognition over events and actions. When a typical user spends 2.5 hours a day on social media—36 full days out of the year, 5.5 years in an average lifespan—it is perhaps no surprise that the Chinese Communist Party believes it can, over time, shape and even control the cognition of individuals and whole societies.
A recent PLA Daily article lays out four social-media tactics, dubbed “confrontational actions”: Information Disturbance, Discourse Competition, Public Opinion Blackout, and Block Information. The goal is to achieve an “invisible manipulation” and “invisible embedding” of information production “to shape the target audience’s macro framework for recognizing, defining, and understanding events,” write Duan Wenling and Liu Jiali, professors of the Military Propaganda Teaching and Research Department of the School of Political Science at China’s National Defense University.
Information Disturbance (信息扰动). The authors describe it as “publishing specific information on social media to influence the target audience’s understanding of the real combat situation, and then shape their positions and change their actions.” Information Disturbance uses official social media accounts (such as CGTN, Global Times, and Xinhua News) to push and shape a narrative in specific ways.
While these official channels have taken on a more strident “Wolf Warrior” tone, recently, Information Disturbance is not just about appearing strong, advise the analysts. Indeed, they cite how during 2014’s “Twitter War” between the Israeli Defense Force and the Palestinian Qassam Brigade, the Palestinians managed to “win international support by portraying an image of being weak and the victim.” The tactic, which predates social media, is reminiscent of Deng Xiaoping’s Tao Guang Yang Hui (韬光养晦)—literally translated as “Hide brightness, nourish obscurity.” China created a specific message to target the United States (and the West more broadly) under the official messaging of the CCP, that China was a humble nation focused on economic development and friendly relationships with other countries. This narrative was very powerful for decades; it shaped the U.S. and other nations’ policy towards China.
Discourse Competition (话语竞争)The second type is a much more subtle and gradual approach to shaping cognition. The authors describe a “trolling strategy” [拖钓], “spreading narratives through social media and online comments, gradually affecting public perception, and then helping achieve war or political goals.”
Here, the idea is to “fuel the flames” of existing biases and manipulate emotional psychology to influence and deepen a desired narrative. The authors cite the incredible influence that “invisible manipulation” and “invisible embedding” can have on social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter in international events, and recommend that algorithm recommendations be used to push more and more information to target audiences with desired biases. Over time, the emotion and bias will grow and the targeted users will reject information that does not align with their perspective.
Public Opinion Blackout (舆论遮蔽). This tactic aims to flood social media with a specific narrative to influence the direction of public opinion. The main tool to “blackout” public opinion are bots that drive the narrative viral, stamping out alternative views and news. Of note to the growing use of AI in Chinese influence operations, the authors reference studies that show that a common and effective method of exerting cognitive influence is to use machine learning to mine user emotions and prejudices to screen and target the most susceptible audiences, and then quickly and intensively “shoot” customized “spiritual ammunition” to the target group.
This aligned within another PLA article entitled, “How ChatGPT will Affect the Future of Warfare,” .” Here, the authors write that generative AI can “efficiently generate massive amounts of fake news, fake pictures, and even fake videos to confuse the public” at a n overall societal level of significance. Their The idea is to create, in their words, a “flooding of lies”” while by the dissemination and Internet trolls to create “altered facts” creates confusion about facts and . The goal is to create confusion in the target audience’s cognition regarding the truth of “facts” and play on emotions of fear, anxiety and suspicion. to create an atmosphere of insecurity, uncertainty, and mistrust. The end-state for the targeted society is an atmosphere of insecurity, uncertainty, and mistrust.
Block Information (信息封锁). The fourth type focuses on “carrying out technical attacks, blockades, and even physical destruction of the enemy’s information communication channels”. The goal is to monopolize and control information flow by preventing an adversary from disseminating information. In this tactic, and none of the others, the Chinese analysts believe the United States has a huge advantage. They cite that in 2009, for example, the U.S. government authorized Microsoft to cut off the Internet instant messaging ports of Syria, Iran, Cuba and other countries, paralyzing their networks and trying to “erase” them from the world Internet. The authors also mention in 2022, Facebook announced restrictions on some media in Russia, Iran, and other countries, but falsely claim that the company did so to delete posts negative toward the United States, for the US to gain an advantage in “cognitive confrontation.”
U.S. policy provides for funding and coordination of weather engineering activities.
According to The National Weather Modification Policy Act of 1976 (P.L. 94-490), the U.S. Secretary of Commerce and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and other government agencies are authorized to engage in atmospheric and weather modification research and in international atmospheric science activities.
There currently exists no regulatory oversight or public consent for weather engineering programs, though several USA States – Connecticut, Illinois, and Rhode Island, introduced legislation this year that would prohibit intentional atmospheric polluting activities, including solar radiation modification (SRM).
The Department of Energy (DoE) FY2024 Congressional Request includes appropriations for studies on atmospheric physics and chemistry involving clouds and aerosols.
Far more public scrutiny and regulatory oversight is essential, as scientific, military, and classified research is not yet subject to safety regulations or appropriate ethical constraints.
As President Eisenhower warned in his farewell address to Americans, “Public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”
After all, in addition to satellites providing constant “coverage” (exposure) of RADIATION, satellites provide constant surveillance. Satellite networks are also extremely vulnerable to hacking as well as having the capability of being used as weapons.
In a 1975 DARPA report on Soviet advances in climate and weather modification, the authors state that “the University of California is cited as engaged in research on the debilitating effect of weak vibrational fields on human behavior.”
As the United Nations International Telecommunications Union (ITU) continues pushing Sustainable Development Goals and Agenda 2030, including the use of satellites and overarching Artificial Intelligence, public awareness and strong regulatory oversight is needed in order to protect life on Earth and reign-in out-of-control satellite networks and their interoperable ground-based infrastructures.
It’s unlikely that most customers are aware of potential purposes of cell phones and other ‘smart’ devices, including weaponry.
See 2006 USAF report on the development of Microwave Weapons in the 1 GHz – 6 GHz frequency range,the same rangeadvertised by Nokia as “perfect for 5G”.
Biometric surveillance, track and trace, data harvesting, AI, ‘smart’ city installations, weaponry, digital ID, and central bank digital currency (CBDCs) are also not necessarily advertised as “5G” or “6G” “services”.
Fierce Opposition to Microwave Towers (“5G”) in New York City
Capabilities for a global control grid, including weather management, are built on a foundation of Radiofrequency/Microwave (RF/MW) irradiating antennas and microwave tower networks (“aka +4G-5G-6G” + AI), including interactive satellites.
Microwave radiation (MW) is the fourth largest source of pollution, and the brain is the most sensitive target organ according to military medical research.
According to the authors of the report, the research “is to lay the foundation for developing non-lethal stunning/immobilizing weaponry based on radiofrequency (RF)/ microwave(MW) radiation.”
The 2005 study examined bioeffects of RF/MW radiation exposures in the 1 GHz – 6 GHz frequency range focusing “specifically on identifying RF/MW parameters potentially capable of selectively altering exocytosis, the process underlying neurotransmitter release and hence nervous system functioning.”
Fast forward to now, when all life on Earth is being exposed to RF/MW Radiation constantly, 24/7/365.
According to an article by Nokia, (1 GHz – 6 GHz) “is considered perfect for 5G”
The March 2023 article, “An efficient antenna system with improved radiation for multi-standard/multi-mode 5G cellular communications,” states that “5G” spectrum provides “improved radiation coverage.”
“Interdisciplinary research project to explore the potential for developing non-lethal weapons based on radiofrequency/microwave bioeffects”
“Our research is to lay the foundation for developing non-lethal stunning/immobilizing weaponry based on radiofrequency (RF)/microwave(MW) radiation. We are focusing specifically on identifying RF/MW parameters potentially capable of selectively altering exocytosis, the process underlying neurotransmitter release and hence nervous system functioning.
The overall objective of the research funded by this grant was to begin laying the foundation upon which RF/MW technology can be developed that would have an application for non-lethal weaponry purposes, such as stunning/immobilizing the enemy. To accomplish this goal, this proposal had as one of its objectives to assemble, characterize and optimize an exposure system that would allow us to undertake a carefully designed and controlled investigation of the MW exposure parameters in the I to 6 GHz frequency range that can alter exocytosis, the process underlying neurotransmitter release.”
Parchin, N.O., Mohamed, H.G., Moussa, K.H. et al. An efficient antenna system with improved radiation for multi-standard/multi-mode 5G cellular communications. Sci Rep13, 4179 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31407-z
July 23, 2023 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | The purpose of this article is to examine the link between “5G” (satellite and ground-based microwave antenna systems), Geoengineering / Weather Modification (weather control), and UN-led globalist governance of these activities. Bottom line is that these systems are interactive and may be purposed as weapons. Regulatory measures at local, state, and national levels can be enacted and implemented to prohibit weather manipulation and the release of hazardous emissions in our skies and at ground level.
In a 1961 speech to the UN, JFK stated: “We shall propose further cooperative efforts between all nations in weather prediction and eventually in weather control. We shall propose, finally, a global system of communications satellites linking the whole world in telegraph and telephone and radio and television”.
Weather control involves the intentional release and interaction of two categories of hazardous polluting emissions:
“A hidden part of the information and communication (ICT) networks and devices we all use every day, ITU standards are rarely perceived by users but vital in enabling the interconnection and interoperability of ICT equipment and devices manufactured by hundreds of thousands of different companies around the world.”
The UN WMO and ITU collaborate to coordinate weather control and monitoring activities.
According to Petteri Taalas, WMO Secretary-General ITU “Radiofrequencies are really critical for meteorological services and climate monitoring applications.”
“It is also a growing area of collaboration for the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), as the shared used of radio spectrum is crucial for the study of climate change — and for the implementation of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).”
“Monitoring” may also be interpreted as SURVEILLANCE.
A June 2023 White House report “Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Management,” outlines the plan to deploy geoengineering programs, that are being framed as “research.” The report cites cooperative efforts with the WMO.
Origin of Meteorology see CIA 1960 Climate Control ReportHERE
International Telecommunication Union: The Most Important UN Agency You Have Never Heard OfHERE
Feasibility of Space-Based Monitoring for Governance of Solar Radiation ManagementHERE
Globally interactive systems of weather engineering and wireless communication networks (ALL the “G’s” + Artificial Intelligence) together comprise the foundation for a global, military weapons system.
What can be done to ban weather engineering and other hazardous emissions:
Regulatory measures at the state and national level can be enacted and implemented to prohibit weather manipulation and the release of hazardous emissions in our skies and at ground level.
Mexico banned Solar Geoengineering experimentation in January 2023.
Pennsylvania, Maryland, and West Virginia provide precedent from the 1960’s for prohibiting and preventing cloud seeding and weather modification activities. These kinds of policies could be reenacted at the state and national level today.
The Atmosphere Protection Act was introduced in Rhode Island in 2023 to prohibit deliberate polluting activities in the atmosphere and at ground level, including both aerosol injection and RF/MW Radiation.
Legislation to tackle geoengineering and weather modification pollution was also introduced in Connecticut and Illinois this year.
It’s possible and necessary to take control of wireless infrastructures at the local level.
Any county or locality can set the following WTF application requirement: the application will remain incomplete until the applicant submits substantial written evidence in the public record proving that the FCC has completed the U.S. Courts of Appeals-mandated work in Cases 18-1129, 18-1051 and 20-1025.
The court vacated the National Environmental Policy Act and National Historic Preservation Act exemptions and vacated the very definition of “Small Wireless Facilities” — a definition that was never subsequently re-established by the FCC. As a result, every single WTF of any size must undergo NEPA and NHPA review and must be considered one-at-a-time, on a case-by-case basis.
The court upheld the FCC’s decision to re-classify broadband Internet as an “information service,” and mobile broadband as a “private mobile service,” making neither subject to common carrier status or Title II regulation. The Court also concluded that the FCC did not show legal authority to issue its Preemption Directive, which would have barred states from imposing any rule or requirement to regulate broadband internet. The court vacated that portion of the order, freeing the states to regulate broadband as they wish.
Case No. 20-1025: Environmental Health Trust v FCC
The court vacated the extension of the FCC RF microwave radiation exposure guideline to frequencies above 6,000 MHz and mandated the FCC to evaluate the 27 volumes of scientific evidence in the court’s record (see links in Appendix B) and then explain how the FCC RF microwave radiation exposure guideline adequately protects against harmful effects of exposure to RF microwave radiation, focusing on impacts on children, biological harms of long-term exposures, and adverse impacts on the environment. The FCC has ignored this U.S. Courts of Appeals-mandate for two years — and counting.
Civilian leadership and local community engagement is essential to reigning in the military’s radiofrequency / microwave (“4G/5G/6G+AI”) weapon system and to responsibly guide scientific advancement based on ethics and the protection of biological life.